Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı
Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 153 - 157 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı
Öz: Amaç: Son yıllarda karın travmalarında nonoperatif tedavi ön plana çıkmıştır. Özellikle künt karın travmalarında nonoperatif tedavi yaygın kabul görmektedir. Bu yazıda tüm karın travmalarında (künt-penetran) nonoperatif tedavinin etkinliği tartışılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kliniğimizde Kasım 2008 ile Ocak 2013 tarihleri arasında karın travması nedeni ile takip ve tedavi edilen tüm hastalar retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, yaralanma tipi, yaralanan organ, tedavi şekli (operatif-nonoperatif) ve mortalite araştırılmıştır. Nonoperatif tedavinin etkinliğinin yüzde olarak verilmesi planlanmıştır. Bulgular: Kliniğimizde 115 hasta karın travması nedeni ile tedavi edilmiştir. Bu hastaların %60'ı (n=69) kesici delici alet yaralanması, %23,5'i (n=27) künt batın travması ve kalan %16,5'i (n=19) ise ateşli silah yaralanması idi. Hastaların %36,5'i (n=42) hastaneye kabullerinde hemodinamik instabilite ve/veya peritonit bulguları nedeni ile opere edildi. Kalan %63,5 hasta (n=73) nonoperatif olarak tedaviye alındı. Bu hastaların 10'una takipte laparotomi gerekti. Kalan 63 hasta nonoperatif tedavi ile takip edilmiştir. Nonoperatif tedavinin başarı oranı %86,3 olup yaralanma tipi ile tedavi başarısı arasında anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmemiştir. Toplam 5 hastada (%4,3) mortalite görüldü ancak nonoperatif tedaviye alınan hiçbir hastada mortalite gözlenmedi. Tüm hastalar değerlendirildiğinde hastaların %54,2'si (n=63) nonoperatif olarak tedavi edilmiştir. Sonuç: Karın travmalarında nonoperatif tedavi etkili ve güvenlidir. Klinik ve muayene bulguları stabil olan hastalar yakın klinik takip ile nonoperatif olarak tedavi edilebilir
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
The conservative management of abdominal injuries
Öz: Objective: Non-operative management of abdominal injuries has recently become more common. Especially nonoperative treatment of blunt abdominal trauma is gaining wide acceptance. In this study, the efficacy of non-operative treatment in abdominal trauma (blunt-penetrating) is discussed.Material and Methods: All patients who received treatment due to abdominal trauma from November 2008 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic characteristics, type of injury, injured organ, type of treatment (operative vs. nonoperative) and mortality data were evaluated. Results: The study includes 115 patients treated for abdominal trauma at our clinics. The mechanism of trauma was; 60% stab wounds, 23.5% blunt abdominal trauma and 16.5% gunshot wounds. Forty-two patients (36.5%) were operated for hemodynamic instability and / or peritonitis on admission. The remaining 63.5% of patients (n=73) were treated nonoperatively, 10 of whom required laparotomy during follow-up. The remaining 63 patients were treated with non-operative management. The success rate for non-operative treatment was 86.3% and there was no difference in terms of the types of injuries. The mortality rate was 4.3% (n= 5) in the whole series, but there were no deaths among the patients who had received non-operative treatment. In the whole patient group 54.2% (n=63) were treated nonoperatively. Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment in abdominal trauma is safe and effective. Patients with clinical stability and normal physical examination findings can be treated nonoperatively with close monitoring
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Wiewióra M, Sosada K, Piecuch J, Zurawiński W. The role of laparoscopy in abdominal trauma - review of the literature. Wideochir Inne Tech Malo Inwazyjne 2011; 6: 121-126.
- 2. Soreide K. Epidemiology of major trauma. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 697- 698 [CrossRef].
- 3. Hady HR, Łuba M, Myśliwiec P, Trochimowicz L, Łukaszewicz J, Zurawska J, et al. Surgical management in parenchymatous organ injuries due to blunt and penetrating abdominal traumas--the authors’ experience. Adv Clin Exp Med 2012; 21: 193-200.
- 4. Mnguni MN, Muckart DJ, Madiba TE. Abdominal trauma in durban, South Africa: factors influencing outcome. Int Surg 2012; 97: 161-168. [CrossRef]
- 5. Gad MA, Saber A, Farrag S, Shams ME, Ellabban GM. Incidence, patterns, and factors predicting mortality of abdominal injuries in trauma patients. N Am J Med Sci 2012; 4: 129-134. [CrossRef]
- 6. Farrath S, Parreira JG, Perlingeiro JA, Solda SC, Assef JC. Predictors of abdominal injuries in blunt trauma. Rev Col Bras Cir 2012; 39: 295-301. [CrossRef]
- 7. Stassen NA, Bhullar I, Cheng JD, Crandall M, Friese R, Guillamondegui O, et al. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73: 288- 293. [CrossRef]
- 8. van der Wilden GM, Velmahos GC, Emhoff T, Brancato S, Adams C, Georgakis G, et al. Successful nonoperative management of the most severe blunt liver injuries: a multicenter study of the research consortium of new England centers for trauma. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 423-428. [CrossRef]
- 9. Lone GN, Peer GQ, Warn AK, Bhat AM, Warn NA. An experience with abdominal trauma in adults in Kashmir. JK Pract 2001; 8: 156 225-230.
- 10. Parray FQ, Wani ML, Malik AA, Thakur N, Wani RA, Naqash SH, et al. Evaluating a conservative approach to managing liver injuries in Kashmir, India. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2011; 4: 483-487.
- 11. Swift C, Garner JP. Non-operative management of liver trauma. J R Army Med Corps 2012; 158: 85-95. [CrossRef]
- 12. Howes N, Walker T, Allorto NL, Oosthuizen GV, Clarke DL. Laparotomy for blunt abdominal trauma in a civilian trauma service. S Afr J Surg 2012; 50: 30-32.
- 13. Parks NA, Davis JW, Forman D, Lemaster D. Observation for nonoperative management of blunt liver injuries: how long is long enough? J Trauma 2011; 70: 626-629. [CrossRef]
- 14. Bhagvan S, Turai M, Holden A, Ng A, Civil I. Predicting hollow viscus injury in blunt abdominal trauma with computed tomography. World J Surg 2013; 37: 123-126. [CrossRef]
- 15. Fakhry SM, Brownstein M, Watts DD. Relatively short diagnostic delays (<8 hours) produce morbidity and mortality in blunt small bowel injury: analysis of time to operative intervention in 198 patients from a multicenter experience. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 2000; 48: 408-414. [CrossRef]
- 16. Ertugrul G, Coskun M, Sevinc M, Ertugrul F, Toydemir T. Delayed presentation of a sigmoid colon injury following blunt abdominal trauma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2012; 6: 247. [CrossRef]
- 17. Bruce PJ, Helmer SD, Harrison PB, Sirico T, Haan JM. Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: is it cost effective? Am J Surg 2011; 202: 810-815. [CrossRef]
- 18. Hashemzadeh SH, Hashemzadeh KH, Dehdilani M, Rezaei S. Nonoperative management of blunt trauma in abdominal solid organ injuries: a prospective study to evaluate the success rate and predictive factors of failure. Minerva Chir 2010; 65: 267-274.
- 19. Akinkuolie AA, Lawal OO, Arowolo OA, Agbakwuru EA, Adesunkanmi AR. Determinants of splenectomy in splenic injuries following blunt abdominal trauma. S Afr J Surg 2010; 48: 15-9.
- 20. Leppäniemi AK, Mentula PJ, Streng MH, Koivikko MP, Handolin LE. Severe hepatic trauma: nonoperative management, definitive repair, or damage control surgery? World J Surg 2011; 35: 2643- 2649. [CrossRef]
- 21. Arikan S, Kocakusak A, Yucel AF, Adas G. A prospective comparison of the selective observation and routine exploration methods for penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration. J Trauma 2005; 58: 526-532. [CrossRef]
- 22. Biffl WL, Kaups KL, Cothren CC, Brasel KJ, Dicker RA, Bullard MK, et al. Management of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds: a Western Trauma Association multicenter trial. J Trauma 2009; 66: 1294-1301. [CrossRef]
- 23. Ohene-Yeboah M, Dakubo JC, Boakye F, Naeeder SB. Penetrating abdominal injuries in adults seen at two teaching hospitals in ghana. Ghana Med J 2010; 44: 103-108.
- 24. Zafar SN, Rushing A, Haut ER, Kisat MT, Villegas CV, Chi A, et al. Outcome of selective non-operative management of penetrating abdominal injuries from the North American National Trauma Database. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 155-164. [CrossRef]
- 25. Hope WW, Smith ST, Medieros B, Hughes KM, Kotwall CA, Clancy TV. Non-operative management in penetrating abdominal trauma: is it feasible at a Level II trauma center? J Emerg Med 2012; 43: 190-195. [CrossRef]
- 26. Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Toutouzas KG, Sarkisyan G, Chan LS, Ishak R, et al. Selective nonoperative management in 1,856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: should routine laparotomy still be the standard of care? Ann Surg 2001; 234: 395- 402. [CrossRef]
- 27. Nicolau AE. Is laparoscopy still needed in blunt abdominal trauma? Chirurgia (Bucur) 2011; 106: 59-66.
- 28. O’Malley E, Boyle E, O’Callaghan A, Coffey JC, Walsh SR. Role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma: a systematic review. World J Surg 2013; 37: 113-122. [CrossRef]
APA | OKUŞ A, Sevinç B, AY A, ARSLAN K, Karahan Ö, Eryılmaz M (2013). Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı. , 153 - 157. |
Chicago | OKUŞ Ahmet,Sevinç Barış,AY ABDÜLHALİM SERDEN,ARSLAN Kemal,Karahan Ömer,Eryılmaz Mehmet Ali Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı. (2013): 153 - 157. |
MLA | OKUŞ Ahmet,Sevinç Barış,AY ABDÜLHALİM SERDEN,ARSLAN Kemal,Karahan Ömer,Eryılmaz Mehmet Ali Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı. , 2013, ss.153 - 157. |
AMA | OKUŞ A,Sevinç B,AY A,ARSLAN K,Karahan Ö,Eryılmaz M Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı. . 2013; 153 - 157. |
Vancouver | OKUŞ A,Sevinç B,AY A,ARSLAN K,Karahan Ö,Eryılmaz M Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı. . 2013; 153 - 157. |
IEEE | OKUŞ A,Sevinç B,AY A,ARSLAN K,Karahan Ö,Eryılmaz M "Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı." , ss.153 - 157, 2013. |
ISNAD | OKUŞ, Ahmet vd. "Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı". (2013), 153-157. |
APA | OKUŞ A, Sevinç B, AY A, ARSLAN K, Karahan Ö, Eryılmaz M (2013). Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, 29(4), 153 - 157. |
Chicago | OKUŞ Ahmet,Sevinç Barış,AY ABDÜLHALİM SERDEN,ARSLAN Kemal,Karahan Ömer,Eryılmaz Mehmet Ali Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 29, no.4 (2013): 153 - 157. |
MLA | OKUŞ Ahmet,Sevinç Barış,AY ABDÜLHALİM SERDEN,ARSLAN Kemal,Karahan Ömer,Eryılmaz Mehmet Ali Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.29, no.4, 2013, ss.153 - 157. |
AMA | OKUŞ A,Sevinç B,AY A,ARSLAN K,Karahan Ö,Eryılmaz M Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi. 2013; 29(4): 153 - 157. |
Vancouver | OKUŞ A,Sevinç B,AY A,ARSLAN K,Karahan Ö,Eryılmaz M Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı. Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi. 2013; 29(4): 153 - 157. |
IEEE | OKUŞ A,Sevinç B,AY A,ARSLAN K,Karahan Ö,Eryılmaz M "Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı." Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi, 29, ss.153 - 157, 2013. |
ISNAD | OKUŞ, Ahmet vd. "Abdominal yaralanmalarda konservatif tedavi yaklaşımı". Ulusal Cerrahi Dergisi 29/4 (2013), 153-157. |