Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 35 - 41 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service

Öz:
Service providers can adjust the entrance price to the state of the demand in real life service systems where the customers' decision to receive the service, is based on this price, state of demand and other system parameters. We analyzed service provider's short and long term pricing problems in unobservable M/M/1queues having the rational customers, where, for customers, the unit cost of waiting in the queue is higher than unit cost of waiting in the service. We showed that waiting in the queue has a clear negative effect on customers' utilities, hence the service provider's price values. We also showed that, in the short term, monopolistic pricing is optimal for congested systems with high server utilization levels, whereas in the long term, market capturing pricing is more profitable
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Matematik İstatistik ve Olasılık
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1]Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., Dube, L., Waiting time and decision making: Is time like Money? Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 110-119 (1995).
  • [2]Naor, P., The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica, 37(1), 15-24 (1969).
  • [3]Edelson, N. M., Hildebrand, D.K., Congestion tolls for queueing processes. Econometrica, 43, 81-92 (1975).
  • [4]Chen, H., Frank, M. Z., State dependent pricing with a queue. IIE Transactions, 33, 847-860 (2001).
  • [5]Chen, H., Frank, M. Z., Monopoly pricing when customers queue. IIE Transactions, 36, 569-581 (2004).
  • [6]Knudsen, N. C., Individual and social optimization in a multiserver queue with a general cost-benefit structure. Econometrica, 40, 515-528 (1972).
  • [7]Sariyer, G., Effective service design in strategic customer setting. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 12(12), 5109-5113 (2015).
  • [8]Mendelson, H., Whang, S., Optimal incentive-compatible priority pricing for the M/M/1queue. Operations Research, 38, 870-883 (1990).
  • [9]Bradford, R., Pricing, routing, and incentive compatibility in multi-server queues. European Journal of Operational Research, 89(2), 226-236 (1996).
  • [10]Rao, S., Peterson, E. R., Optimal pricing of priority services. Operations Research, 46, 46-56 (1998).
  • [11]Debo, L. G., Veeraraghavan, S. K., Equilibrium in queues under unknown service rates and service value. Chicago Booth Research Paper, 2011: 11-45.
  • [12]Anand, K. S., Pac, M. F., Veereraghavan, S. Quality-speed conundrum: tradeoffs in customer intensive services. Management Science, 57(1), 40-56 (2011).
  • [13]Alizamir, S., Vericourt, F., Sun, P., Diagnostic accuracy under congestion. Management Science, 59(1), 157-171 (2013).
  • [14]Wang, S., Debo, L. G., Scheller, W. A., Smith, S. F., Design and analysis of diagnostic service centers. Management Science, 56(11), 1873-1890 (2009).
  • [15]Oliveras, M., Lu, Y., Musalem, A., Schilkrut, A., Measuring the effect of queues on customer purchases. Management Science, 59(8), 1743-1763 (2013).
  • [16]Giebelhausen, M. D., Robinson, S. G., Cronin, J. J., Worth waiting for: increasing satisfaction by making consumers wait. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 889-905 (2011).
  • [17]Sariyer, G., Effect of in queue waiting on decision making. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(6), 13-18 (2014).
  • [18]Hassin, R., Haviv, M., To queue or not to queue. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 59, Kluwer Publishing (2002)
APA sariyer g (2017). Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service. , 35 - 41.
Chicago sariyer görkem Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service. (2017): 35 - 41.
MLA sariyer görkem Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service. , 2017, ss.35 - 41.
AMA sariyer g Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service. . 2017; 35 - 41.
Vancouver sariyer g Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service. . 2017; 35 - 41.
IEEE sariyer g "Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service." , ss.35 - 41, 2017.
ISNAD sariyer, görkem. "Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service". (2017), 35-41.
APA sariyer g (2017). Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA), 7(1), 35 - 41.
Chicago sariyer görkem Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA) 7, no.1 (2017): 35 - 41.
MLA sariyer görkem Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA), vol.7, no.1, 2017, ss.35 - 41.
AMA sariyer g Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA). 2017; 7(1): 35 - 41.
Vancouver sariyer g Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA). 2017; 7(1): 35 - 41.
IEEE sariyer g "Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service." An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA), 7, ss.35 - 41, 2017.
ISNAD sariyer, görkem. "Pricing in M/M/1 queues when cost of waiting in queue differs from cost of waiting in service". An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA) 7/1 (2017), 35-41.