Yıl: 2014 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 117 - 137 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city

Öz:
Risk perception on natural hazards in Turkey has been an emerging topic after of 1999 Kocaeli and Duzce earthquakes. The motivation lies behind the fact that it was the first time in the Turkish history, disaster mitigation had been considered as the responsibility of not only the government, but also all stake holders. Therefore, awareness campaigns, public participation, volunteering and increasing individual capacity against earthquakes have become hot topics to have a fresh start in building resilient communities. This paper aims to reveal earthquake risk perception and preparedness level of Istanbul residents. The results of two recent surveys on risk perception which were conducted in 2008 and 2013 are evaluated according to measures taken, willingness to pay for a safer house and trust to authorities. The findings of both surveys underline that there is an improvement in risk perception and measures taken to reduce risks related with earthquakes
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Mimarlık
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ambraseys, N.N., Finkel, C.F. (1991), Long-term seismicty of Istanbul and of the Marmara Sea region. Terra Nova, 3, 527-539.
  • Arvai, J.L., (2003), Using Risk Communication to Disclose the Outcome of a Participatory Decision-Making Process: Effects on the Perceived Acceptability of Risk-Policy Decisions. Risk Analysis 23:2, 281-289.
  • Asgary, A., Willis, K.G. (1997), “Household Behaviour in Response to Earthquake Risk: An Assessment of Alternative Theories”, Disasters, 21(4)354-365.
  • Barnett, J., Breakwell, G.M. (2001), Risk Perception and Experience: Hazard Personality Profiles and Individual Differences. Risk Analysis 21:1, 171-177.
  • Bontempo, R.N., Bottom, W.P., Weber, E.U. (1997), Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception: A Model-Based Approach. Risk Analysis 17:4, 479-488.
  • Carlino, S., Somma, R., Mayberry, G.C. (2008), Volcanic risk perception of young people in the urban areas of Vesuvius: Comparisons with other volcanic areas and implications for emergency management, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 172 (2008), 229-243.
  • Dooley, D., R. Catalano, S. Mishra and S. Serxner (1992), Earthquake Preparedness: Predictions in a Community Survey. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22(6): 451–470.
  • Eraybar, K., İlki, A., Okazaki, K. (2007), Avcılar İlçesinde Sismik Risk Algılaması, 6. Ulusal Deprem Mühendisliği Konferansı, 16-20 Ekim 2007, İstanbul (6th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering.
  • Eraybar, K., Okazaki, K., İlki, A. (2010), An exploratory study on risk perceptions of seismic risk and mitigation in two districts of Istanbul, Disasters, 34(1) 71-92.
  • Erdik, M., Durukal, E., Biro, Y. ve Birgören, G., (2000), İstanbul’da Binalar için Deprem Riski ve Risk Azaltımına Yönelik Somut bir Öneri, İkinci İstanbul ve Deprem Sempozyumu, TMMOB İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası İstanbul Şubesi, 27 Mayıs 2000, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Maçka Kampüsü, 131-149.
  • Fişek, G.O., Yeniceri, N., Muderrisoglu, S. (2002), Risk Perception and Attitudes Towards Mitigation, IIASA-DPRI Meeting, July 29-31 2002 Laxenburg Austria.
  • Green, A.R. (2008), Unauthorized development and seismic hazard vulnerability: a study of squatters and engineers in Istanbul, Turkey, Disasters, 32(3) 358-376.
  • Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., Gutteling, J.M. (2007), Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol:23 Issue: 4, pp: 1838-1852
  • Inal-Cekic, T., Oney Yazici, E. (2011), Spatial Distribution of Housing Investment and Perception of Earthquake Risk in Istanbul Metropolitan Area, 51st Congress of the European Regional Science Association, August 30 – September 4 2011, Barcelona, Spain. Inelmen, K ., A. Işeri-Say and H. Kabasakal (2004), Participation lethargy in disaster preparedness organizations within the framework of a Turkish CBO. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. 24(10/11). pp. 130–158.
  • Japon Uluslar arası İşbirliği Ajansı (JICA) ve İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi (İBB), (2002), Türkiye Cumhuriyeti, İstanbul İli Sismik MikroBölgeleme Dahil Afet Önleme/Azaltma Temel Planı Çalışması, İstanbul.
  • Karancı, N., Johnston, D. (2009), Overcomig Social and Economic Barrieres to Seismic Retrofitting of Residential Buildings in Turkey and New Zealand. Ansal, A., İlki, A., Karancı, N., Kundak, S. (Eds.) Book of Proceedings of Istanbul International Conference on Seismic Risk Mitigation. 215-222.
  • Kundak, S. (2011), Risk Perception as a Process of Mitigation, 20th SRAEurope Conference, 5-8 June 2011, Stuttgart, Germany. Kundak, S. (2013), Risk Perception Studies on Istanbul, 22nd SRA-Europe Conference, 17-19 June, Tronsheim, Norway.
  • Kundak, S., Türkoğlu, H., İlki, A., (2010), Earthquake Risk Perception of Istanbul Residents, International Disaster Risk Reduction Conference (IDRC), 30 May - 3 June 2010 Davos Switzerland Liu, S., Huang, J., Brown, G.L. (1998), Information and Risk Perception: A Dynamic Adjustment Process. Risk Analysis 18:6, 689-699. Mahalle Afet Gönüllüleri (MAG) www.mag.org.tr (accessed on November, 2013)
  • Palm, R.I., Hodgson, M. (1993), Natural Hazards in Puerto Rico. The Geographical Review 83(3): 280–89
  • Parsons, T. (2004), Recalculated probability of M>=7 earthquakes beneath the Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Journal of Geophysical Research. 109(B5). Art. No. B05304.
  • Paton, D., Johnston, D.M., Bebbington, M.S., Lai, C.D., Houghton, B.F. (2001), Direct and vicarious experience of volcanic hazards: implications for risk perception and adjustment adoption. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 15 (4), 58–63.
  • Perry, R.W., Lindell, M.K. (2008), Volcanic risk perception and adjustment in a multi-hazard environment, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 172 (2008), 170-178.
  • Renn, O and Rohrmann, B. (2000), Cross-Cultural Risk Perception: A survey of Emprical Studies, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
  • Rippl, S. (2002), Cultural theory and risk perception: a proposal for a better measurement, Journal of Risk Research, 5:2, 147-165.
  • Siegrist, M. And Cvetkovich, G. (2000), Perception of Hazards: The role of Social Trust and Knowledge. Risk Analysis, Vol:20 No:5 pp: 713- 719.
  • Sjöberg, L. (2000), Factors in Risk Perception. Risk Analysis Vol:20 No:1 pp:1-11.
  • Sjoberg, L. (2001), Limits of Knowledge and the Limited Importance of Trust. Risk Analysis 21:1, 189-198.
  • Slovic, P. (1993), Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy. Risk Analysis 13:6, 675-682.
  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. (1982), Why Study Risk Perception?. Risk Analysis 2:3, 83-93.
  • Slovic, P., Layman, M., Flynn, J.H. (1991), Risk Perception, Trust, and Nuclear Waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain. Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. Vol:33, Issue: 3, pp: 6-30.
  • Tekeli-Yesil, S., Dedeoglu, N., Braun-Fahrlaender, C., Tanner, M. (2010b), Factors Motivating Individuals to Take Precautionary Action for an Expected Earthquake in Istanbul, Risk Analysis, Vol:3, No:8, pp:1181-1195.
  • Tekeli-Yeşil, S., Dedeoğlu, N., Braun-Fahrlaender, C., Tanner, M. (2011), Earthquake awareness and perception of risk among the residents of Istanbul, Natural Hazards, 59, pp:427-446.
  • Tekeli-Yeşil, S., Dedeoğlu, N., Tanner, M., Braun-Fahrlaender, C., Obrist, B., (2010a), Individual preparedness and mitigation actions for a predicted earthquake in Istanbul, Disasters, 34(4), pp: 910-930.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2008), Address Based Population Registration System Database.
  • Turkish Statistical Institute (2013), Address Based Population Registration System Database.
  • Türkoğlu, H., Kundak, S., Korça Baran, P., Bölen, F., Marans, R.W., (2008), A Perceptional Approach to Environmental Problems in Istanbul, Turner, R.H., J.M. Nigg and D.H. Paz (1986), Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in California. University of California Press, London.
  • Viklund, M.J. (2003), Trust and Risk Perception in Western Europe: A CrossNational Study. Risk Analysis, Vol:23 No:4 pp: 727-738.
  • Weber, E.U., Hsee, C. (1998), Cross-Cultural Differences in Risk Perception, but Cross-Cultural Similarities in Attitudes Towards Perceived Risk. Management Science 44(9):1205-1217
APA KUNDAK S, Türkoğlu H, İLKİ A (2014). Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. , 117 - 137.
Chicago KUNDAK SEDA,Türkoğlu Handan,İLKİ ALPER Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. (2014): 117 - 137.
MLA KUNDAK SEDA,Türkoğlu Handan,İLKİ ALPER Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. , 2014, ss.117 - 137.
AMA KUNDAK S,Türkoğlu H,İLKİ A Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. . 2014; 117 - 137.
Vancouver KUNDAK S,Türkoğlu H,İLKİ A Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. . 2014; 117 - 137.
IEEE KUNDAK S,Türkoğlu H,İLKİ A "Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city." , ss.117 - 137, 2014.
ISNAD KUNDAK, SEDA vd. "Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city". (2014), 117-137.
APA KUNDAK S, Türkoğlu H, İLKİ A (2014). Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 117 - 137.
Chicago KUNDAK SEDA,Türkoğlu Handan,İLKİ ALPER Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 11, no.1 (2014): 117 - 137.
MLA KUNDAK SEDA,Türkoğlu Handan,İLKİ ALPER Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.11, no.1, 2014, ss.117 - 137.
AMA KUNDAK S,Türkoğlu H,İLKİ A Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014; 11(1): 117 - 137.
Vancouver KUNDAK S,Türkoğlu H,İLKİ A Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014; 11(1): 117 - 137.
IEEE KUNDAK S,Türkoğlu H,İLKİ A "Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city." A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, ss.117 - 137, 2014.
ISNAD KUNDAK, SEDA vd. "Risk perception in Istanbul: An earthquake-prone city". A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 11/1 (2014), 117-137.