COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING

GÜRBÜZ, ALİ; TEKİN, Muhammed; DEMİR, ALİ

COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING

Muhammed TEKİN, (Celal Bayar University)

Ali GÜRBÜZ, (Recep Tayyip Erdogan University)

Ali DEMİR (Celal Bayar University)

Mathematical and Computational Applications

2 1

Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 264 - 272 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING

Öz:

In recent years, nonlinear calculation methods can be easily carried out by means of developing computer technologies. In this way, comparisons of the nonlinear methods have started to increase rapidly and more studies are carried out on regular and irregular buildings. However, it is most important to compare consistency of the methods on buildings. In this study, most common nonlinear static (pushover) and nonlinear dynamic analysis (time history analysis) methods were compared on an asymmetric planned reinforced concrete (R/C) building. Building having horizontal and vertical irregularities was 5-story. Analyses were carried out by using SAP2000 program. The results are discussed in terms of base shear, lateral displacements and top displacement ratios.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Matematik

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. A. J. Kappos and P. Kyriakakis, A re-evaluation of scaling techniques for natural records, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 20, 111-123, 2000.
2. V. G. Bardakis and S. E. Dritsos, Evaluating assumptions for seismic assessment of existing buildings, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 27, 223-233, 2007.
3. D. Lee, W. Choi, C. Myung and Kim, D., Evaluation of seismic performance of multistory building structures based on the equivalent responses, Engineering Structures 28, 837-856, 2006.
4. M. Inel, H. B. Ozmen and H. Bilgin, Re-evaluation of building damage during recent earthquakes in Turkey, Engineering Structures 30, 412-427, 2008.
5. M. Saiidi and M. A. Sozen, Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE 107, 937-51, 1981.
6. ATC-40, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings vols. 1-2. California. Applied Technology Council, 1996.
7. Z. Dervişoğlu, Comparison Of Performance Evaluation Methods Of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Under Earthquake Effects Within Non Linear Theory Framework, Master Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, 2007.
8. FEMA-356, Prestandard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 2000.
9. FEMA-440, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Washington, 2004.
10. TSC-2007, Specifications for buildings to be built in seismic areas. Turkish Seismic Code 2007. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, (Turkey).
11. Bhatt, C., Bento, R., "Comparison of Nonlinear Static Methods for the Seismic Assessment of Plan Irregular Frame Buildings with Non Sesismic Details", Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16:15-39, 2012.

APA	TEKİN M, GÜRBÜZ A, DEMİR A (2013). COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING. , 264 - 272.
Chicago	TEKİN Muhammed,GÜRBÜZ ALİ,DEMİR ALİ COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING. (2013): 264 - 272.
MLA	TEKİN Muhammed,GÜRBÜZ ALİ,DEMİR ALİ COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING. , 2013, ss.264 - 272.
AMA	TEKİN M,GÜRBÜZ A,DEMİR A COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING. . 2013; 264 - 272.
Vancouver	TEKİN M,GÜRBÜZ A,DEMİR A COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING. . 2013; 264 - 272.
IEEE	TEKİN M,GÜRBÜZ A,DEMİR A "COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING." , ss.264 - 272, 2013.
ISNAD	TEKİN, Muhammed vd. "COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING". (2013), 264-272.

APA	TEKİN M, GÜRBÜZ A, DEMİR A (2013). COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 18(3), 264 - 272.
Chicago	TEKİN Muhammed,GÜRBÜZ ALİ,DEMİR ALİ COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING. Mathematical and Computational Applications 18, no.3 (2013): 264 - 272.
MLA	TEKİN Muhammed,GÜRBÜZ ALİ,DEMİR ALİ COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING. Mathematical and Computational Applications, vol.18, no.3, 2013, ss.264 - 272.
AMA	TEKİN M,GÜRBÜZ A,DEMİR A COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING. Mathematical and Computational Applications. 2013; 18(3): 264 - 272.
Vancouver	TEKİN M,GÜRBÜZ A,DEMİR A COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING. Mathematical and Computational Applications. 2013; 18(3): 264 - 272.
IEEE	TEKİN M,GÜRBÜZ A,DEMİR A "COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING." Mathematical and Computational Applications, 18, ss.264 - 272, 2013.
ISNAD	TEKİN, Muhammed vd. "COMPARISON OF NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES ON A R/C BUILDING". Mathematical and Computational Applications 18/3 (2013), 264-272.