Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 118 - 131 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program
Öz: Günümüzde toplumun her alanında gözlenen hızlı ve sürekli değişimlerin eğitim sistemlerine yansıması kaçınılmazdır. Yaşanan değişimlerle artan ve çeşitlenen sorumluluklara sahip olan yükseköğretim sistemlerinin, nitelikli eğitim sunma yöntemlerini bulması gerekmektedir. Nitelikli eğitimin en önemli değişkenlerinden biri, nitelikli eğitim programlarıdır. Yükseköğretim sistemlerinin amaçlarına uygun olan eğitim programı tasarımlarından biri çekirdek programdır. Çekirdek programın temel boyutlarıyla açıklanmasının ve yükseköğretim kademesindeki uygulamalarının incelenmesinin amaçlandığı bu çalışma, anlatıma dayalı derleme çalışmasıdır. Bu çalışma üç başlık altında yapılandırılmıştır: yükseköğretimde çekirdek program ve temel özellikleri, yükseköğretimde çekirdek program ve genel eğitim ilişkisi, yükseköğretimde çekirdek program uygulamaları
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Core Curriculum in Higher Education
Öz: It is inevitable that educational systems will be impacted by the rapid and ongoing changes observed in every part of the society. Considering all the increased and changing responsibilities due to these changes, higher education systems need to find new methods for qualified education. One of the most important aspects of qualified education is qualified curriculum design. The core curriculum is one of the most appropriate curriculum designs when the objectives of higher education systems are considered. This study which mainly aimed to explain the core curriculum and analyze its application in the higher education context is a narrative review article. The study is structured under three titles: core curriculum in higher education and its basic features, the relation between core curriculum in higher education and general education, and core curriculum applications in higher education
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Alberty, H. (1938). The development of the core curricula in the schools of the eight-year study. In Rugg, H. (Ed.), Democracy and the curriculum. New York, NY: D. Appleton-Century.
- Alberty, H. (1947). Reorganizing the high-school curriculum. New York: The Macmillan.
- Alberty, H. B., & Alberty, E. J. (1962). Reorganizing the high-school curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: The Macmillan.
- Altbach, P., G., & Salmi, J. (2011). The past, present, and future of the research university. In Altbach P. G. & Salmi J. (Eds.), The road to academic excellence the making of world-class research universities (pp.1-9). Washington: World Bank.
- Altınok, V. (2008). Yükseköğretimde ilke ve yönelimler neler olmalı? Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 41-52.
- Arimoto, A. (2001). Case study: Trends in higher education and academic reforms from 1994 onwards in Japan. Retrieved from http://chet.org.za/papers/case-study-trends-higher-educationand-academic-reforms-1994-onwards-japan.
- Arnold, F. (2016). İşi ustasından öğrenin, başarının püf noktaları (Itır Arda, Çev.) İstanbul: NTV.
- Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU). (2009). Trends and emerging practices in general education. Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/membership/documents/2009 MemberSurvey_Part2.pdf
- Association of American Colleges and Universities (AACU). (2015). Recent trends in general education design, learning outcomes, and teaching approaches. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.
- org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2015_Survey_Report2_GEtrends.pdf Aypay, A. (2003). Yükseköğretimin yeniden yapılandırılması: Sosyo-ekonomik ve politik çevrelerin üniversitelerde kurumsal adaptasyona etkileri. Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eğitim Yönetimi, 34,194-213.
- Bandaranyake, R. (2000). The concept and practicability of a core curriculum in basic medical education. Medical Teacher, 22(6), 560-563.
- Banta, T. W. (2007). Assessing student achievement in general education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Banta, T. W., & Mzumara, H. R. (2007). Assessing information literacy and technological competence. In T. W. Banta (Ed.), Assessing student achievement in general education (pp. 30–34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. The Society for Research in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University.
- Barnett, R. (2011). The idea of the university in the twenty-first century: Where’s the imagination? Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 1(2), 88-94.
- Bastedo, M., N. (2011). Curriculum in higher education: The historical roots of contemporary issues. In Altbach, P., Berdahl, R., & Gumport, P. (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political and economic challenges. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
- Bates, T. (1997). Restructuring the university for technological change. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, What Kind of University, London.
- Batovski, D., A. (2015). How to write a review article? Retrieved from www.atsu.edu/.../how_to_write_a_review_article.pdf
- Bell, D. (1966). The reforming of general education: The Columbia College experience in its national setting. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
- Biloslavo, R. (2011, March). Leading university by managing paradoxes. Proceedings of International Higher Education Congress, 1, 353-360. http://www.uyk2011.org/kitap/pages/ uyk2011_s_0353_0360.pdf
- Bok, D. (2005). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Bok, D. (2013). Higher education in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Boston University (2016). The core. Retrieved from https://www. bu.edu/core/.
- Boyer Commission. (2010). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Stony Brook, NY: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED424840. pdf.
- Brint, S., Proctor, K., Murphy, S.P., Turk-Bicakci, L., & Hanneman, R. A. (2009). General education models: continuity and change in the U.S. undergraduate curriculum, 1975–2000. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 605-642
- Buckler, J. A. (2004). Towards a new model of general education at Harvard College. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/ docs/icb.topic733185.files/Buckler.pdf.
- Burgaz, B., & Şentürk, İ. (2008). Küreselleşmenin eğitim fakültelerinin yönetim boyutundaki etkileri. Kırgızistan Türkiye Manasa Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19, 270-278.
- Burton, L. (2010). Subject centered curriculum. In Kridel C. (Ed.), Enclopedia of currciulum studies (pp. 824-825). Los Angeles, USA: Sage.
- Büyükkaragöz, S. (1997). Program geliştirme. Konya: Kuzucular Ofset.
- Capehart, B. E., Hodges, A., & RothSource, R. (1953). Evaluating the core curriculum: A further look. The School Review, 61(7), 406- 412. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1082256.
- Caskey, M., & Anfara, V. (2006). The evidence for the core curriculum-past and present. Middle School Journal, 3(37), 48-54.
- Charle, C., & Verger, J. (2005). Üniversitelerin tarihi. Ankara: Dost. Chicago University (2016). The core. Retrieved from https://collegeadmissions.uchicago.edu/academics/core
- Clark, B. R. (1996). Case studies of innovative universities. A progress report. Tertiary and Management, 2(1), 52-61.
- Daft, R. L. (2010). Understanding the theory and design of organizations (10th ed.). Mason, Ohio: Thomson South Western.
- Dayar, E. (2010). Üniversiteler dünyaya sahip oluyoruz derken ruhlarını kaybedebilirler mi? Retrieved from acikarsiv.atilim. edu.tr/browse/49/
- Delbanco, A. (2012). College: What it was, is, and should be. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
- DeMillo, R. A. (2011). Abelard to Apple: The fate of American colleges and universities. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Denholm, J., Giovannetti, M., Kummen, K., McLeod, K., & Snaydon, J. (2015). Report of the general education committee. Retrieved from https://www.capilanou.ca/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=48008.
- Doğramacı, İ. (2007). Türkiye’de ve dünyada yükseköğretim yönetimi. Ankara: Meteksan.
- Duncan, A. G. (2014). General education in the 21st century: Aspirational goals and institutional practice (Master’s Thesis). Available from ProQuest dissertations and theses database. (UMI No. 3644433).
- Eğitim Reformu Girişimi. (2013). Eğitim izleme raporu. Retrieved from http://erg.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/erg.sabanciuniv.edu/ Ensor, P. (2002). Curriculum. In Cloete, N, Fehnel, D, Gibbon, T, Maassen, P, Moja, T & Perold, H. (eds). Higher education policy, institutions and globalisation: New dynamics in South Africa after 1994. Cape Town: Juta.
- Erdem, A. R. (2002). Pamukkale Üniversitesi’nin bugünü ve geleceğine ilişkin önemli iç ve dış paydaşlarının (ilgi gruplarının) algıları. (Doktora tezi). Retrieved from https://tez. yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
- Erdem, A. R. (2005). Üniversitenin var oluş nedeni. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 104-116.
- Erdem, A. R. (2006). Dünyadaki yükseköğretimin değişimi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15, 299-314.
- Erdil, E., Pamukçu, M.T., Akçomak, İ., S., & Erden, Y. (2013). Değişen üniversite-sanayi işbirliğinde üniversite örgütlenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 68(2), 95-127.
- Ergüder, Ü., Şahin, M., Terzioğlu, T. & Vardar, Ö. (2009). Neden bir yükseköğretim vizyonu. İstanbul: İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi.
- Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The bi-evolution of the university in the triple helix era. Science Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.621.6900&r ep=rep1&type
- Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: Industry-university-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
- Etzkowitz, H., Gulbrandsen, M., & Levitt, J. (2000). Public venture capital: Government funding sources for technology entrepreneurs. New York: Harcourt.
- European Union. (2014). High level group on the modernisation of higher education: New modes of learning and teaching in higher education. Luxembourg: EU.
- European Universities Association. (2004). Annual report 2003. Retrieved from http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/ EUA_annual_report_2003.1099928273680.pdf.
- Fliegel, R., & Holland, J. (2013). Quantifying learning in critical thinking. Journal of General Education: A Curricular Commons of the Humanities and Sciences, 62(2–3), 160-203.
- Futhey, T., Luce, R., & Smith, J.M. (2010). Drivers of change in higher education. Educause Review, 45(1), 12-13.
- Gaff, J., G. (1991). New life for the college curriculum: Assessing achievements and furthering progress in the reform of general education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Glynn, S. M., Aultman, L. P., & Owens, A. M. (2005). Motivation to learn in general education programs. The Journal of General Education, 54, 150–170.
- Goldstein, P.J. (2006). The future of higher education: A view from CHEMA. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/ pdf/ECP0602.pdf.
- Günay, D. (2011). Türk yükseköğretiminin yeniden yapılandırılması bağlamında sorunlar, eğilimler, ilkeler ve öneriler. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 1(3), 113-121.
- Gür, T., M. (2003). Araştırma ve eğitimde disiplinlerarasılık. In Babüroğlu O.N. (Ed.), (Çev. Dicleli Z.), Eğitimin geleceği: Üniversitelerin ve eğitimin değişen paradigması. (pp. 185-195). İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi.
- Gürüz, K., Şuhubi, A. M., Şengör, C., Türker, K., & Yurtsever, E. (1994). Türkiye’de ve dünyada yükseköğretim, bilim ve teknoloji. İstanbul: Türk Sanayicileri ve İşadamları Derneği (TÜSİAD).
- Harden, R.M., & Davis, M.H. (1995). AMEE medical education guide no. 5. The core curriculum with options or special study modules. Medical Teacher, 17(2), 125-148.
- Hicks, O. (2007). Curriculum in higher education in Australia – Hello? Enhancing higher education, theory and scholarship. Proceedings of the 30th HERDSA Annual Conference. Retrieved from https://herdsa.org.au/system/files/p53.pdf.
- Higher Education Academy. (2013). We think that’s the future: curriculum reform initiatives in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/Research/ curriculum_reform_initiatives.
- Johnson, B. L. (1952). General education in action. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
- Johnstone, D. B. (1998). The financing and management of higher education: A status report on worldwide reforms. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/educ/postbasc. htm.
- Johnstone, D.B., & Marcucci, P.N. (2007). Worldwide trends in higher education finance: cost-sharing, student loans, and the support of academic research. UNECSO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge. Paris: UNESCO.
- Jones, E., A., & Ratcliff, J. L. (1991). Which general education curriculum is better: Core curriculum or the distributional requirement? The Journal of General Education, 40, 69-101.
- Jones, E. (1992). Is a core curriculum best for everybody? In Ratcliff J. L. (Ed.), Assessment and curriculum reform (pp. 37–46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Kalaycı, N. (2008). Yükseköğretim toplam kalite yönetimi uygulamalarında ihmal edilen unsurlardan “TKY Merkezi” ve “Eğitim Programları”. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 163- 188.
- Kalaycı, N., Atay, T., & İlhan, E. (2015, Ekim). Yükseköğretimde çekirdek program tasarımı ve uygulamaların karşılaştırılması. III. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Kongresi. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.
- Kavak, Y. (2011, Mayıs). Türkiye’de yükseköğretimde büyüme: Yakın geçmişe bakış ve uzun vadeli (2010-2050) büyüme projeksiyonları. Uluslararası Yükseköğretim Kongresi. Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya.
- Keeling, R. P., & Hersh, R. H. (2012). We’re losing our minds: rethinking American higher education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Keller, G. (1983). Academic strategy: the management revolution in American higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
- Keller, G. (2008). Higher education and the new society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
- Koç Üniversitesi (2016). Çekirdek program. Retrieved from https:// adaylar.ku.edu.tr/node/32 Kridel, C. (2010). Encyclopedia of curriculum studies. London: SAGE.
- Kuh, G. D. (2008). High impact educational practices: what they are, who has accessto them, and why they matter. Washington: American Association of Colleges and Universities.
- Latzer, B. (2004). The hollow core: failure of the general education curriculum. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535786.
- Le Compte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of relaibility and validity in etnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31-60.
- Levander, L. M., & Mikkola, M. (2009). Core curriculum analysis: a tool for educational design. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 15(3), 275-286.
- Light, R. J. (1992). The Harvard assessment seminars: second report. Cambridge: Harvard University Graduate School of Education and Kennedy School of Government.
- Lounsbury, J. H., & Vars, G. F. (1978). A curriculum for the middle schools. New York: Harper & Row.
- Lowenstein, M. (2015). General education, advising, and integrative learning. The Journal of General Education, 64(2), 117-130.
- MacDonald, W. B. (2003). Trends in general education and core curriculum: a survey. Retrieved from http://www.erin. utoronto.ca/~w3asc/trends.htm.
- Martin, J., C., & Verdaguer, A. (1995). Development and diversification of the social and economic functions of French universities. Higher Education in Europe, 20(3), 25-36.
- Mayer, P. (2009). Guidelines for writing a review article. Retrieved from http://www.plantscience.ethz.ch/education/Masters/ courses/Scientific_Writing
- McGregor, S., & Volckmann, R. (2010). Transdisciplinarity in higher education: The path of Arizona State University. Integral Leadership Review, 10(3), 1-25.
- Menand, L. (2010). The marketplace of ideas: reform and resistance in the American university. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- Middlehurst, R., & Woodfield, S. (2006). Quality review in distance learning: policy and practice in five countries. Tertiary Education and Management, 12(1), 37-58.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd Ed.). CA: Thousand Oaks, Sage. National Middle School Association. (2003). This we believe: successful schools for young adolescents. Westerville, OH: Author.
- National Leadership Council for Liberal Education and America’s Promise. (2007). College learning for the new global century.
- Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
- New Media Consortium. (2014). New horizon report 2014. Retrieved from https://www.nmc.org/pdf/2014-nmc-horizonreport-he-EN.pdf.
- New Media Consortium. (2015). New horizon report 2015. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2015-nmc-horizonreport-HE-EN.pdf.
- Newton, R., R. (2000). Tensions and models in general education planning. The Journal of General Education, 49(3), 165-181.
- O’Banion, T. (2016). A brief history of general education. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 40(4), 327-334.
- OECD. (2007). Four future scenarios for higher education. Paris: OECD.
- OECD. (2009). Higher education to 2030: Globalisation. Paris: OECD.
- Oliva, P. (2009). Developing the curriculum (7th ed.). USA: Pearson. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2004). Curriculum foundations, principles and issues (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Özdem, G., & Sarı, E. (2008). Yükseköğretimde yeni bakış açılarıyla birlikte yeni kurulan üniversitelerden beklenen işlevler (Giresun Üniversitesi örneği). Üniversite ve Toplum, Bilim, Eğitim ve Düşünce Dergisi, 8(1), 1-10.
- Pautasso, M., & Bourne, P. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC3715443/
- Pinar, W. (2003). What is curriculum theory? New York: Routledge. Posner, G. (1995). Analyzing the curriculum. USA: Library of Congress.
- Pushor, D, & Murphy, S. ( 2010). Problem centered curriculum. In Kridel C. (Ed.), Enclopedia of currciulum studies (pp. 685-686). Los Angeles: Sage.
- Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
- Roth, M. (2014). Beyond the university: Why liberal education matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
- Rudolph, F. (1977). Curriculum: A history of the American undergraduate course of study since 1636. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Rutgers University (2016). Core curriculum rubrics. Retrieved from http://sas.rutgers.edu/documents/core-requirements/636- crc-rubrics-for-core-goals/file.
- Sabancı Üniversitesi (2016). Üniversite dersleri. Retrieved from http://fdd.sabanciuniv.edu/tr Salmi, J. (2010). Dünya çapında üniversiteler kurmanın zorluğu (Çev. Yamaç K.) Ankara: Eflatun.
- Scott, J., C. (1993). The mission of the university: medieval to postmodern transformations. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1-39.
- Stauffer, T. M. (1990). A university model for the 1990s. New directions for higher education. Retrieved from http:/
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/he.36919907004/epdf.
- Şenses, F. (2007). Uluslararası gelişmeler ışığında Türkiye yükseköğretim sistemi: Temel eğilimler, sorunlar, çelişkiler ve öneriler. ERC (Economic Research Centre) Working Papers in Economics. Retrieved from www.erc.metu.edu.tr/menu/ series07/0705.pdf
- Şimşek, H. (1999). The Turkish higher education system in the 1990s. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 133-153.
- Şimşek, H., & Adıgüzel, T. (2012). Yükseköğretimde yeni bir üniversite paradigmasına doğru. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(166), 250- 261.
- Simsek, H., & Heydinger, R.,B. (1993). An analysis of the paradigmatic evolution of U.S. higher education and implications for the year 2000. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 9(1), 1-49.
- Taylor, J., & Miroiu, A. (2002). Policy-making, strategic planning, and management of higher education. Paris: UNESCO-CEPES. TEDMEM. (2015). Ulusal eğitim programı 2015-2022. Ankara: TEDMEM.
- TEDU. (2016). Academic catalog. Ankara: TED University. Tekeli, İ. (2003). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de üniversite üzerinde konuşmanın değişik yolları. Toplum ve Bilim Dergisi, 97, 123- 143.
- Times Higher Education. (2016). World university rankings 2015- 2016. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation. com/world-university-rankings/2016/world-ranking
- Timur, T. (2000). Toplumsal değişme ve üniversiteler. Ankara: İmge. Trow, M. A. (2005). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass
- to universal access: forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. Institute of Governmental Studies. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/ 96p3s213#page-1.
- Toylan, N., Vatansever, E., & Göktepe, A. (2010). Öğrenen organizasyon olarak üniversiteler: Türkiye’deki bir devlet üniversitesinde durum analizi. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 61-68.
- Tural, N. K. (2002). Küreselleşmenin üniversite üzerine etkisi. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 6, 99-120.
- TÜSİAD-EUA. (2008). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim: Eğilimler, sorunlar ve fırsatlar. Retrieved from http://eua.ieu.edu.tr/old/doc/ tusiad_eua_raporu.pdf
- Uvalić-Trumbić, S. (2010). New dynamics for higher education and research in the 21st century: What implications for small states? Paper prepared for the OECS Conference on Higher Education; St. Lucia: OECS Secretariat.
- Üçer-Saylan, D., Sayers, Z., & Alpar, M. A. (2016). Bir çekirdek program hikâyesi-temel geliştirme programı. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim, 6 (3), 304-316.
- Varış, F. (1977). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi. Vars, G. F. (1991). Integrated curriculum in historical perspective. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 14-15.
- Vars, G. F. (2001). Can curriculum integration survive in an era of high-stakes testing? Middle School Journal, 33(3), 7-17.
- Vidovich, L., O’Donoghue, T., & Tight, M. (2012). Transforming university curriculum policies in a global knowledge era: mapping a “global case study” research agenda. Educational Studies, 38(3), 283-295.
- Waldo, J. T. (2014). Application of the test of scientific literacy skills in the assessment of a general education natural science program. Journal of General Education: A Curricular Commons of the Humanities and Sciences, 63(1), 1–14.
- Waltzer, K. (2000). General education models: Pros & cons of general education strategies. Retrieved from https://www. york.cuny.edu/academic/academic-affairs/general-educationreform/Waltzer document.pdf.
- Wells, C. (2016). Special issue: Realizing general education: Reconsidering conceptions and renewing practice. ASHE Higher Education Report, 42 (2), 1-85. Retrieved from http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aehe.2016.42.issue-2/ issuetoc.
- White, C., R. (1994). A model for comprehensive reform in general education: Portland State University. The Journal of General Education, 43(3), 168-237.
- Williams, J. L., McCarley, N., & Kraft, J. (2013). History and systems of psychology: a course to unite a core curriculum. College Quarterly, 16(2), 1-13.
- Wissema, J.G. (2009). Towards the third generation university. Managing the university in transition.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Wolf, P., Cristensen, J.H., Svinicki, M.D., & Rice, R.E. (2007).
- Yüksek öğretimde eğitim programı geliştirme: Öğretim üyeleri tarafından yürütülen süreçler ve uygulamalar. (Çev. Kalaycı, N. & İlhan, E.; Çev. Ed. Atay, M.T.). Ankara: Elhan.
- Woodbury, S. (1998). Rhetoric, reality, and possibilities: Interdisciplinary teaching and secondary mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 303-311.
- Wraga, W. G. (1996). A century of interdisciplinary curricula in American schools. Jefferson City, MO: Scholastic.
- Wende, M. C. (2011). The emergence of liberal arts and sciences education in Europe: A comparative perspective. Higher Education Policy, 24(2), 233-253.
- Xing, J., Ng, P.S., & Cheng, C.Y. (2013). General education and the development of global citizenship in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. New York: Routledge.
- Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
- Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2007). Türkiye’nin yükseköğretim stratejisi. Retrieved from http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/ 10279/30217/yok_strateji_kitabi/27077070-cb13-4870-aba1- 6742db37696b
- Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK). (2014). Büyüme, kalite, uluslararası- laşma: Türkiye yükseköğretimi için bir yol haritası. Retrieved from https://yolharitasi.yok.gov.tr/docs/YolHaritasi.pdf
- Yüksel, İ. (2002). Yükseköğretimde eğitim-öğretim faaliyetleri ve örtük program. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 361-370.
| APA | KALAYCI ATAY N, ilhan e (2017). Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. , 118 - 131. |
| Chicago | KALAYCI ATAY NURDAN,ilhan elif Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. (2017): 118 - 131. |
| MLA | KALAYCI ATAY NURDAN,ilhan elif Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. , 2017, ss.118 - 131. |
| AMA | KALAYCI ATAY N,ilhan e Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. . 2017; 118 - 131. |
| Vancouver | KALAYCI ATAY N,ilhan e Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. . 2017; 118 - 131. |
| IEEE | KALAYCI ATAY N,ilhan e "Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program." , ss.118 - 131, 2017. |
| ISNAD | KALAYCI ATAY, NURDAN - ilhan, elif. "Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program". (2017), 118-131. |
| APA | KALAYCI ATAY N, ilhan e (2017). Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 7(1), 118 - 131. |
| Chicago | KALAYCI ATAY NURDAN,ilhan elif Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi 7, no.1 (2017): 118 - 131. |
| MLA | KALAYCI ATAY NURDAN,ilhan elif Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, vol.7, no.1, 2017, ss.118 - 131. |
| AMA | KALAYCI ATAY N,ilhan e Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi. 2017; 7(1): 118 - 131. |
| Vancouver | KALAYCI ATAY N,ilhan e Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi. 2017; 7(1): 118 - 131. |
| IEEE | KALAYCI ATAY N,ilhan e "Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program." Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 7, ss.118 - 131, 2017. |
| ISNAD | KALAYCI ATAY, NURDAN - ilhan, elif. "Yükseköğretimde Çekirdek Program". Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi 7/1 (2017), 118-131. |
