The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition

SEÇİL, Mustafa; Bozkurt, Ozan; Demir, Omer; ÇELİK, Serdar; ALTAY, Canan; KAYA, Fatih Gülbey

The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition

Serdar ÇELİK, (Gaziemir Nevvar Salih İşgören State Hospital, Clinic of Urology, İzmir, Turkiye)

Canan ALTAY, (Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine,)

Ozan BOZKURT, (Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine,)

Fatih Gülbey KAYA, (Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine,)

Ömer DEMİR, (Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine,)

Mustafa SEÇİL (Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine,)

Journal of Urological Surgery

0 0

Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 91 - 105 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition

Öz:

Hounsfield ünitesi (HU), üriner sistem taş dansitesinin kontrastsız bilgisayarlı tomografi (NCCT) değerlendirmesinde kantitatif veri ile tedavi başarı oranlarını gösterme yeteneğine sahiptir. Bu yazıda, iki hastanın NCCT'sinde HU değerleri arasındaki fark (HUdiff) ölçülmüştür. Bize göre, HUdiff değeri tedavi öncesi taş kompozisyonunu öngörebilmektedir

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Bulgularının Taş Kompozisyonunu Öngörmedeki Rolü

Öz:

Hounsfield units (HU) provides a quantitative assessment of stone density in the urogenital tract on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and has the ability to predict treatment success. The difference in HU (HUdiff) value was measured on NCCT in two patients. Our opinion is that HUdiff can predict stone composition before treatment

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Gleason DF. Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective. Hum Pathol 1992;23:273-279.
2. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982;6:655-663.
3. Delahunt B, Cheville JC, Martignoni G, Humphrey PA, Magi-Galluzzi C, McKenney J, Egevad L, Algaba F, Moch H, Grignon DJ, Montironi R, Srigley JR; Members of the ISUP Renal Tumor Panel. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for renal cell carcinoma and other prognostic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol 2013;37:1490-1504.
4. Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA; Grading Committee. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol 2016;40:244-252.
5. Gleason DF. Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966;50:125-128.
6. Gleason DF, Mellinger GT. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol 1974;111:58-64.
7. Gleason DF. The Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group. Histologic grading and clinical staging of prostatic carcinoma. In: Tannenbaum M. Urologic Pathology: The Prostate. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1977, pp. 171-197.
8. Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer 1993;71:3582- 3593.
9. Lilleby W, Torlakovic G, Torlakovic E, Skovlund E, Fosså SD. Prognostic significance of histologic grading in patients with prostate carcinoma who are assessed by the Gleason and World Health Organization grading systems in needle biopsies obtained prior to radiotherapy. Cancer 2001;92:311-319.
10. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL; ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1228-1242.
11. Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Egevad L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Vickers AJ, Parwani AV, Reuter VE, Fine SW, Eastham JA, Wiklund P, Han M, Reddy CA, Ciezki JP, Nyberg T, Klein EA. A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score. Eur Urol 2016;69:428-435.
12. Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1982;6:655-663.
13. Sika-Paotonu D, Bethwaite PB, McCredie MR, William Jordan T, Delahunt B. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:1091-1096.

APA	ÇELİK S, ALTAY C, Bozkurt O, KAYA F, Demir O, SEÇİL M (2017). The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition. , 91 - 105.
Chicago	ÇELİK Serdar,ALTAY Canan,Bozkurt Ozan,KAYA Fatih Gülbey,Demir Omer,SEÇİL Mustafa The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition. (2017): 91 - 105.
MLA	ÇELİK Serdar,ALTAY Canan,Bozkurt Ozan,KAYA Fatih Gülbey,Demir Omer,SEÇİL Mustafa The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition. , 2017, ss.91 - 105.
AMA	ÇELİK S,ALTAY C,Bozkurt O,KAYA F,Demir O,SEÇİL M The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition. . 2017; 91 - 105.
Vancouver	ÇELİK S,ALTAY C,Bozkurt O,KAYA F,Demir O,SEÇİL M The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition. . 2017; 91 - 105.
IEEE	ÇELİK S,ALTAY C,Bozkurt O,KAYA F,Demir O,SEÇİL M "The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition." , ss.91 - 105, 2017.
ISNAD	ÇELİK, Serdar vd. "The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition". (2017), 91-105.

APA	ÇELİK S, ALTAY C, Bozkurt O, KAYA F, Demir O, SEÇİL M (2017). The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition. Journal of Urological Surgery, 4(2), 91 - 105.
Chicago	ÇELİK Serdar,ALTAY Canan,Bozkurt Ozan,KAYA Fatih Gülbey,Demir Omer,SEÇİL Mustafa The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition. Journal of Urological Surgery 4, no.2 (2017): 91 - 105.
MLA	ÇELİK Serdar,ALTAY Canan,Bozkurt Ozan,KAYA Fatih Gülbey,Demir Omer,SEÇİL Mustafa The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition. Journal of Urological Surgery, vol.4, no.2, 2017, ss.91 - 105.
AMA	ÇELİK S,ALTAY C,Bozkurt O,KAYA F,Demir O,SEÇİL M The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition. Journal of Urological Surgery. 2017; 4(2): 91 - 105.
Vancouver	ÇELİK S,ALTAY C,Bozkurt O,KAYA F,Demir O,SEÇİL M The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition. Journal of Urological Surgery. 2017; 4(2): 91 - 105.
IEEE	ÇELİK S,ALTAY C,Bozkurt O,KAYA F,Demir O,SEÇİL M "The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition." Journal of Urological Surgery, 4, ss.91 - 105, 2017.
ISNAD	ÇELİK, Serdar vd. "The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition". Journal of Urological Surgery 4/2 (2017), 91-105.