Construction of a Turkish proposition bank

ESGEL, Volkan; TOPRAK, Cansu; ak, koray; YILDIZ, Olcay Taner

Construction of a Turkish proposition bank

Koray AK, (Işık Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Cansu TOPRAK, (Işık Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Volkan ESGEL, (Işık Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Olcay Taner YILDIZ (Işık Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences

1 0

Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 570 - 581 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Construction of a Turkish proposition bank

Öz:

This paper describes our approach to developing the Turkish PropBank by adopting the semantic role-labeling guidelines of the original PropBank and using the translation of the English Penn-TreeBank as a resource. We discuss the semantic annotation process of the PropBank and language-speci c cases for Turkish, the tools we have developed for annotation, and quality control for multiuser annotation. In the current phase of the project, more than 9500 sentences are semantically analyzed and predicate{argument information is extracted for 1330 verbs and 1914 verb senses. Our plan is to annotate 17,000 sentences by the end of 2017.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Mühendislik, Elektrik ve Elektronik

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

[1] Kingsbury P, Palmer M. From treebank to propbank. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation; 29{31 May 2002; Canary Islands, Spain. pp. 1989-1993.
[2] Kingsbury P, Palmer M. Propbank: the next level of treebank. In: Workshop of Treebanks and Lexical Theories; 2003; Vaxsjo, Sweden.
[3] Palmer M, Gildea D, Kingsbury P. The proposition bank: an annotated corpus of semantic roles. Comput Linguist 2005; 31: 71-106.
[4] Palmer M, Babko-Malaya O, Bies A, Diab M, Maamouri M, Mansouri A, Zaghouani W. A pilot Arabic propbank. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation; 26 May{1 June 2008; Marrakech, Morocco. pp. 3467-3472.
[5] Zaghouani W, Diab M, Mansouri A, Pradhan S, Palmer M. The revised Arabic propbank. In: Linguistic Anno- tation Workshop; 15{16 July 2010; Uppsala, Sweden. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: The Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 222-226.
[6] Duran MS, Alusio SM. Propbank-br: a Brazilian treebank annotated with semantic role labels. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation; 23{25 May 2012; _ Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 1862-1867.
[7] Xue N, Palmer M. Adding semantic roles to the Chinese treebank. Nat Lang Eng 2009; 15: 143-172.
[8] Van der Plas L, Samardzic T, Merlo P. Cross-lingual validity of Propbank in the manual annotation of French. In: Linguistic Annotation Workshop; 15{16 July 2010; Uppsala, Sweden. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: The Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 113-117.
[9] Vaidya A, Choi JD, Palmer M, Narasimhan B. Analysis of the Hindi proposition bank using dependency structure. In: Linguistic Annotation Workshop; 23{24 June 2011; Portland, OR, USA. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: The Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 21-29.
[10] Kawahara D, Kurohashi S, Hasida K. Construction of a Japanese relevance-tagged corpus. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation; 29{31 May 2002; Canary Islands, Spain. pp. 2008-2013.
[11] Marquez L, Villarejo L, Mart MA, Taule M. Semeval-2007 task 09: Multilevel semantic annotation of Catalan and Spanish. In: International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations; 23{24 June 2007; Prague, Czech Republic. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: The Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 42-47.
[12] Taule M, Mart MA, Recasens M. Ancora: multilevel annotated corpora for Catalan and Spanish. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation; 26 May{1 June 2008; Marrakech, Morocco. pp. 96-101.
[13] Mukund S, Ghosh D, Srihari RK. Using cross-lingual projections to generate semantic role labeled corpus for Urdu: a resource poor language. In: International Conference on Computational Linguistics; 23{27 August 2010; Beijing, China. pp. 797-805.
[14] Haverinen K, Kanerva J, Kohonen, S Missila A, Ojala S, Viljanen T, Laippala V, Ginter F. The Finnish Proposition Bank. Lang Resour Eval 2015; 4: 907-926.
[15] Sahin GG. Framing of verbs for Turkish propbank. In: Turkish Computational Linguistics; 3{9 April 2016; Konya, Turkey.
[16] Sahin GG. Verb sense annotation for Turkish propbank via crowdsourcing. In: International Conference on Intelli- gent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics; 3{9 April 2016; Konya, Turkey.
[17] Yldz OT, Solak E, Gorgun O, Ehsani R. Constructing a Turkish-English parallel treebank. In: International Conference on Computational Linguistics; 22{27 June 2014; Baltimore, MD, USA. pp. 112-117.
[18] Yldz OT, Solak E, Candr S, Ehsani R, Gorgun O. Constructing a Turkish constituency parse treebank. In: International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences; 21{24 December 2015; London, UK. pp. 339-347.
[19] Marcus MP, Marcinkiewicz MA, Santorini B. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Comput Linguist 1993; 19: 313-330.
[20] Choi JD, Bonial C, Palmer M. Propbank instance annotation guidelines using a dedicated editor, Jubilee. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation; 17{23 May 2010; Valletta, Malta. pp. 1871-1875.
[21] Choi JD, Bonial C, Palmer M. Propbank frameset annotation guidelines using a dedicated editor, Cornerstone. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation; 17{23 May 2010; Valletta, Malta. pp. 3650-3653.
[22] Burchardt A, Erk K, Frank A, Kowalski A, Pado S, Pinkal M. Salto { a versatile multi-level annotation tool. In: International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation; 24{26 May 2006; Genoa, Italy. pp. 517-520.

APA	ak k, TOPRAK C, ESGEL V, YILDIZ O (2018). Construction of a Turkish proposition bank. , 570 - 581.
Chicago	ak koray,TOPRAK Cansu,ESGEL Volkan,YILDIZ Olcay Taner Construction of a Turkish proposition bank. (2018): 570 - 581.
MLA	ak koray,TOPRAK Cansu,ESGEL Volkan,YILDIZ Olcay Taner Construction of a Turkish proposition bank. , 2018, ss.570 - 581.
AMA	ak k,TOPRAK C,ESGEL V,YILDIZ O Construction of a Turkish proposition bank. . 2018; 570 - 581.
Vancouver	ak k,TOPRAK C,ESGEL V,YILDIZ O Construction of a Turkish proposition bank. . 2018; 570 - 581.
IEEE	ak k,TOPRAK C,ESGEL V,YILDIZ O "Construction of a Turkish proposition bank." , ss.570 - 581, 2018.
ISNAD	ak, koray vd. "Construction of a Turkish proposition bank". (2018), 570-581.

APA	ak k, TOPRAK C, ESGEL V, YILDIZ O (2018). Construction of a Turkish proposition bank. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 26(1), 570 - 581.
Chicago	ak koray,TOPRAK Cansu,ESGEL Volkan,YILDIZ Olcay Taner Construction of a Turkish proposition bank. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 26, no.1 (2018): 570 - 581.
MLA	ak koray,TOPRAK Cansu,ESGEL Volkan,YILDIZ Olcay Taner Construction of a Turkish proposition bank. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, vol.26, no.1, 2018, ss.570 - 581.
AMA	ak k,TOPRAK C,ESGEL V,YILDIZ O Construction of a Turkish proposition bank. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2018; 26(1): 570 - 581.
Vancouver	ak k,TOPRAK C,ESGEL V,YILDIZ O Construction of a Turkish proposition bank. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2018; 26(1): 570 - 581.
IEEE	ak k,TOPRAK C,ESGEL V,YILDIZ O "Construction of a Turkish proposition bank." Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 26, ss.570 - 581, 2018.
ISNAD	ak, koray vd. "Construction of a Turkish proposition bank". Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences 26/1 (2018), 570-581.