EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS

Şahin ÇADIRCI, (Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Hayvan Bilimleri Bölümü, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)
Seyrani KONCAGÜL (Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Hayvan Bilimleri Bölümü, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)
Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
1 0
Yıl: 2013 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 15 - 23 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, aynı yemle beslenen yumurta tavuklarının haftalık bireysel yumurtaverim eğrilerini tanımlayabi lmek bakımından sekiz matematiksel modeli karşılaştırmak veyumurta verim eğrisi parametreleri ile çevresel farklılıklar (başlangıç vücut ağırlığı - VA ve yemtüketimi - YT) arasında olası ilişkileri incelemektir. Veriler aynı çevre şartlarında yetiştirilen 11 4yumurtacı tavuktan elde edilmiştir. En iyi model belirlendikten sonra, belirlenen model yumurtaverim aralığının artırılmasına karşı (haftalık - 1H, iki haftalık - 2H ya da dört haftalık - 4H yumurtaverimi) hassas olup olmadığının anlaşılması için de test edi lmiştir. Modeller, kalıntı ortalaması(KO), determinasyon katsayısı (R 2 ), gözlenen ve tahmin edilen yumurta verim eğrileri arasındakikorelasyon (r), AIC ve BIC istatistikleri kullanılarak karşılaştırılmıştır.Karşılaştırma ölçütleri değerlendirildiğinde, haftalık bireysel yumurta verim eğrisinitanımlamak bakımından sekiz model arasından 3 parametreli GK2001in en iyi performansıgösteren model olduğu tespit edilmiştir. GK2001 modelinin KO, R 2 , r, AIC ve BICdeğerleri 0.00, 0.99, 0.59,- 183.83 ve- 175.37olarak bulunmuş, bunu sırasıyla 6 parametreliPOL5 modeli (0.00, 0.99, 0.59,- 194.38 ve- 177.45) ve 5 parametreli POL4 modeli (0.70,0.99, 0.56,- 188.09 ve- 173.99) izlemiştir. GK2001 modelinin parametreleri vücut ağırlığıya da yem tüketimindeki farklılık lardan etkilenmemiştir. Bu modelinin haftalık bireyselyumurta verim eğrilerinin tanımlanmasında kullanılmasının uygun olduğu, ancak yumurtaüretim aralığının artırılması durumunda yıllık gerçek yumurta veriminin olduğundan düşükolarak tahmin edilmesine y ol açacağı sonucuna varılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği

BAŞLANGIÇ YEM TÜKETİMİ VE CANLI AĞIRLIĞININ YUMURTA TAVUKLARININ HAFTALIK BİREYSEL YUMURTA VERİM EĞRİSİNE ETKİSİ

Öz:
The main objectives of this study were to compare eight mathematical models for abilit y todescribe weekly egg production curve of individual hens, and to examine any relation of eggproduction curve parameters with initial body weight (BW) and feed intake (FI)when they are feda single diet . After determining the best model , the modelwas also investigated to assess whetherit was sensitive to increase in egg production intervals; from weekly (1W) to 2 weekly (2W) tofour weekly (4W) productions . Data were obtained from 114 Nick Brown laying hens raised in thesameenvironmentalconditions .Themodelswerecomparedusingresidualmean(RM),coefficients of determination (R 2 ), correlation between the observed and the estimated eggproduction curves (r), AIC and BIC statistics. With respect to the goodness - of - fit criteria, among the eight mod els, GK2001 model with 3parameters performed best to describe the curve of individual weekly egg production. RM, R 2 , r,AIC and BIC values were 0.00, 0.99, 0.59,- 183.83 and- 175.37 for GK2001 followed by POL5with 6 parameters (0.00, 0.99, 0.59,- 194.38and- 177.45) and POL4 with 5 parameters (0.70, 0.99,0.56,- 188.09 and- 173.99). The parameters of GK2001 model were not affected by variation inbody weight or feed intake. It was concluded that GK2001 model could conveniently be used todescribe individu al weekly egg production of hens fed the same diet, but increasing egg productioninterval for summarizing data was resulted in underestimating the actual annual egg production.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ziraat Mühendisliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adams, C.J., Bell D.D., 1980. Predicting poultry egg production. Poultry Science, 59: 937–938.
  • Bell, D.D., 1968. Eighteen-week body weight and performance in caged layers. Poultry Science(Abs.), 47: 1655.
  • Bell, D.D., Adams, C.J., 1992. First and second cycle egg production characteristics in commercial table egg flocks. Poultry Science, 71:448–459.
  • Bindya, L.A., Murthy, H.N.N., Jayashankar, M.R., Govindaiah, M.G., 2010. Mathematical Models for Egg Production in an Indian Colored Broiler Dam Line. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(9): 916-919.
  • Cadirci, S., 2011. Effect of body weight on feed intake of pullets at the onset of lay. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Harran University, 15(3): 55-59.
  • Cason, J.A., Britton, W.M., 1988. Comparison of compartmental and Adams-Bell models of poultry egg production. Poultry Science, 67: 213–218.
  • Cason, J.A., 1990. Comparison of linear and curvilinear decreasing terms in logistic flock egg production models. Poultry Science, 69:1467–1470.
  • Cason, J.A., Ware, G.O., 1990. Analysis of flock egg production curves using generalized growth functions. Poultry Science, 69: 1064–1069.
  • Cason, J.A., 2003. Egg production models for molted flocks. Poultry Science, 70: 2232-2236.
  • Fialho, F.B., Ledur, M.C., 1997. Segmented polynomial model for estimation of egg production curves in laying hens. British Poultry Science, 38: 66–73.
  • Flock, D.K., 1977. Genetic analysis of part-period egg production in a population of White Leghorns under long-term RRS. Z. Tierz. Zuchtungsbiol, 94: 89–103.
  • Foster, W.H., Robertson, D.V., Belyavin, C.G., 1987. Forecasting egg production in commercial flocks. British Poultry Science, 28: 623–630.
  • Gavora, J.S., Parker, R.J., McMillan, I., 1971. Mathematical model of egg production. Poultry Science, 50: 1306–1315.
  • Gavora, J.S., Liljedahl, L.E., McMillan, I., Ahlen, K., 1982. Comparison of three mathematical models of egg production. British Poultry Science, 23: 339–348.
  • Grossman, M., Koops, W.J., 2001.A Model for Individual Egg Production in Chickens. Production.Poultry Science, 80: 859–867.
  • Grossman, M., Gossman, T.N., Koops, W.J., 2000. A model for persistency of egg production. Poultry Science, 79: 1715–1724.
  • Harms, R.H., Douglas, C.R., Christmas, R.B., Damron, B.L., Miles, R.D., 1978. Feeding commercial layers for maximum performance. Feedstuffs, 50(8): 23-24.
  • Harms, R.H., Douglas, C.R., 1981. Amino acid specifications for replacement pullet feeds. Feedstuffs, 53(9): 36-39.
  • Harms, R.H., Costa, P.T., Miles, R.D., 1982. Daily feed intake and performance of laying hens grouped according to their body weight. Poultry Science, 61: 1021-1024.
  • Koops, W.J., Grossman, M., 1992. Characterization of poultry egg production using a multiphasic approach. Poultry Science, 71: 399–405.
  • Lal, K., Singh, R., Prasad, S., 2003. Non-linear models for poultry products in India. International Veterinary Journal, 80: 135-137.
  • Leeson, S., Summers, J.D., 1987. Effect of immature body weight on laying performance. Poultry Science, 66: 1924-1928.
  • Lokhorst, C., 1996. Mathematical curves for the description of input and output variables of the daily production process in aviary housing systems for laying hens. Poultry Science, 75: 838–848.
  • Muir, W.M., 1990. Association between persistency of lay and partial record egg production in White Leghorn hens and implications to selection programs for annual egg production. Poultry Science, 69: 1447–1454.
  • McMillan, I., 1981. Compartmental model analysis of poultry egg production curves. Poultry Science, 60: 1549–1551.
  • McMillan, I., Gowe, R.S., Gavora, J.S., Fairfull, R.W., 1986. Prediction of annual production from part record egg production in chickens by three mathematical models. Poultry Science, 65: 817–822.
  • McNally, D.H., 1971. Mathematical model for poultry egg production. Biometrics, 27: 737–738.
  • North, M.O., Bell, D.D., 1990. Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 4th ed. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
  • NRC (National Research Council)., 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th Ed., The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
  • Quisenberry, J.H., Bradley, J.W., Cathey, J.R., Thornberry, F.D., Nagi, S.A., 1967. Body weight and laying performance. In: Proc. 1968 Assn. S. Agric. Workers (Abs.), Pg: 302-303.
  • SAS: SAS/STAT. SAS Inst Inc, Cary, NC, USA, 2000.
  • Savegnago, R.P., Nunes, B.N., Caetano, S.L., Ferraudo, A.S., Schmidt, G.S., Ledur, M.C., Munari, D.P., 2011. Comparison of logistic and neural network models to fit to the egg production curve of White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science, 90:705-711.
  • Thornberry, F.D., Quisenberry, J.H., 1968. The effects of pullet body weight at housing on laying hen performance. Poultry Science(Abs.), 47: 1727.
  • Thomas, J.M., George, K.C., Jacob, M., Nair, G.R., 1994. Prediction of egg production in Japanese quails. International Journal of Poultry Science, 29: 9-19.
  • Yang, N., Wu, C., McMillan, I., 1989. New mathematical model of poultry egg production. Poultry Science, 68: 476–481.
APA ÇADIRCI Ş, KONCAGÜL S (2013). EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS. , 15 - 23.
Chicago ÇADIRCI ŞAHİN,KONCAGÜL Seyrani EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS. (2013): 15 - 23.
MLA ÇADIRCI ŞAHİN,KONCAGÜL Seyrani EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS. , 2013, ss.15 - 23.
AMA ÇADIRCI Ş,KONCAGÜL S EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS. . 2013; 15 - 23.
Vancouver ÇADIRCI Ş,KONCAGÜL S EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS. . 2013; 15 - 23.
IEEE ÇADIRCI Ş,KONCAGÜL S "EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS." , ss.15 - 23, 2013.
ISNAD ÇADIRCI, ŞAHİN - KONCAGÜL, Seyrani. "EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS". (2013), 15-23.
APA ÇADIRCI Ş, KONCAGÜL S (2013). EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 15 - 23.
Chicago ÇADIRCI ŞAHİN,KONCAGÜL Seyrani EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 17, no.1 (2013): 15 - 23.
MLA ÇADIRCI ŞAHİN,KONCAGÜL Seyrani EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.17, no.1, 2013, ss.15 - 23.
AMA ÇADIRCI Ş,KONCAGÜL S EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013; 17(1): 15 - 23.
Vancouver ÇADIRCI Ş,KONCAGÜL S EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2013; 17(1): 15 - 23.
IEEE ÇADIRCI Ş,KONCAGÜL S "EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS." Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, ss.15 - 23, 2013.
ISNAD ÇADIRCI, ŞAHİN - KONCAGÜL, Seyrani. "EFFECTS OF INITIAL BODY WEIGHT AND FEED INTAKE ON INDIVIDUAL WEEKLY EGG PRODUCTION CURVE OF LAYING HENS". Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 17/1 (2013), 15-23.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 4:21

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları