PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ

Tarhan OKAN, (Yrd. Doç. Dr., Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, İİBF, İşletme Bölümü,)
Halis DEMİR, (Doç. Dr., Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Üniversitesi, İİBF, İşletme Böl.)
Sedat BOSTAN (Doç. Dr., Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi,)
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi
1 0
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 18 Sayfa Aralığı: 237 - 262 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ

Öz:
Araştırmanın amacı, sağlık çalışanlarının prosedür adaleti algıları ve birey yönelimli örgütsel vatandaşlık (diğergamlık) davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin, çalışanların psikolojik sermayelerinin düşük ve yüksek düzeylerine göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmayacağını ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma, Trabzon ve Gümüşhane illerinde görev yapan 249 sağlık çalışanından meydana gelen bir örneklem üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Elde edilen bulgular, prosedür adaleti ile diğergamlık arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişkinin varlığına kanıt sağlamaktadır. Psikolojik sermaye boyutlarının tamamı ile diğergamlık arasında pozitif yönlü ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları ayrıca, prosedür adaleti ile diğergamlık arasındaki ilişkide psikolojik sermayenin öz yeterlilik ve dayanıklılık boyutlarının moderatör etkilerine kanıt sağlamaktadır
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İş İşletme

A CONTINGENT VIEW OF THE PERCEPTION OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE AND THE CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOUR-INDIVIDUAL RELATION: THE IMPACT OF HIGH AND LOW PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL

Öz:
The aim of this research is to reveal whether the relationship between perception of procedural justice and individual oriented organizational citizenship (altruism) behaviours of health professionals differ according to their low and high levels of psychological capital. The study was carried out on a sample of 249 health professionals serve in Trabzon and Gumushane. The findings provide evidence for existence of a positive relationship between altruism and procedural justice. A positive relationship between all dimensions of psychological capital and altruism is determined. The results also reveal that the self-efficacy and resiliency dimensions of psychological capital have a moderator effect on the relationship between altruism and justice capital
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İş İşletme
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akgül, A. (2005). Tıbbi Araştırmalarda İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri: SPSS Uygulamaları. 3. Baskı, Ankara: Emek Ofset, ISBN: 975-96359-2-5.
  • Aiken, L. S. and West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Albayrak, A. S. (2006). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Ambrose, M. L. (2002). Contemporary Justice Research: A New Look at Familiar Questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89 (1), 803-812.
  • Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S. and Luthans, F. (2008). Can Positive Employees Help Positive Organizational Change? Impact of Psychological Capital and Emotions on Relevant Attitudes and Behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44 (1), 48-70.
  • Avey, J. B., Luthans, F. and Youssef, C. M. (2010). The Additive Value of Positive Psychological Capital in Predicting Work Attitudes and Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36 (2), 430-452.
  • Blakely, G. L., Andrews, M. C. and Moorman, R. H. (2005). The Moderating Effects of Equity Sensitivity on The Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20 (2), 259-273.
  • Bryman, A. and Cramer, D. (1997). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. 10. Baskı, Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Bynum, L. A., Bentley J. P., Holmes, E. R. and Bouldin, A. S. (2012). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors of Pharmacy Faculty: Modeling Influences of Equity Sensitivity, Psychological Contract Breach, and Professional Identity. Journal of Leadership Accountability and Ethics, 9 (5), 99-111.
  • Choi, B., Poon, S. K. and Davis, J. G. (2008). Effects of Knowledge Management Strategy on Organizational Performance: A Complementarity Theory-Based Approach. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 36 (2), 235-251.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y. and Spector, P. E. (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86 (2), 278-321.
  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge T. A. and Shaw, J. C. (2006). Justice and Personality: Using Integrative Theories to Derive Moderators of Justice Effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100 (1), 110-127.
  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E. and Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the Millennium, a Decade Later: a Meta-Analytic Test of Social Exchange and Affect-Based Perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98 (2), 199-236.
  • Cropanzano, R. and Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31 (6), 874-900.
  • Demir, E. ve Parlak, B. (2012). Türkiye’de Eğitim Araştırmalarında Kayıp Veri Sorunu. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 3 (1), 230-241.
  • Dyne, L. V. and LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1), 108-119.
  • Efanga, S. I. and Akpan, G. M. (2015). The Relationship between Organizational Justice and Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Secondary Schools in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 4 (3), 70-79.
  • Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and Procedural Justice Climate as Antecedents of Unit-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57 (1), 61-94.
  • Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335- 362.
  • Farh, J-L., Earley, P. C. and Lin, S-C. (1997). Impetus for Action: A Cultural Analysis of Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Chinese Society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (3), 421-444.
  • Fassina, N. E., Jones, D. A. and Uggerslev, K. L. (2008). Relationship Clean-Up Time: Using Meta-Analysis and Path Analysis to Clarify Relationships among Job Satisfaction, Perceived Fairness, and Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Management, 34 (2), 161-188.
  • Fiske, A. P. (2000). Complementarity Theory: Why Human Social Capacities Evolved to Require Cultural Complements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, (4) 1, 76-94.
  • Fletcher D. E. (1998). Effects of Organizational Commitment, Job Involvement, and Organizational Culture on the Employee Voluntary Turnover Process. Texas Tech University, Doctoral Dissertation.
  • Gilaninia, S. and Abdesonboli, R. (2011). Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Case Study: Rasht Public Hospitals. International Journal of Business Administration, 2 (4), 42-49.
  • Grant, A. M., Gino, F. and Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Reversing the Extraverted Leadership Advantage: The Role of Employee Proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 54 (3), 528-550.
  • Greenberg, J. (1987). A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories. Academy of Management Review, 12 (1), 9-22.
  • Greenberg, J. (1990a). Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16 (2), 399-432.
  • Greenberg, J. (1990b). Looking Fair vs. Being Fair: Managing Impressions of Organizational Justice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 111-158. http://www.sjsu.edu/people/richard.webb/courses/c6/s3/14-Greenberg-article.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 25.01.2016).
  • Guangling, W. (2011). The Study on Relationship between Employees’ Sense of Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Private Enterprises. Energy Procedia, 5, 2030-2034.
  • İlhan, M. ve Çetin, B. (2014). LISREL ve AMOS Programları Kullanılarak Gerçekleştirilen Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (YEM) Analizlerine İlişkin Sonuçların Karşılaştırılması. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5 (2), 26-42.
  • Jafari, P. and Bidarian, S. (2012). The Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1815-1820.
  • Jaggwe, J. M. (2014). Teacher Competence, Psychological Capital, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Work-Life Balance, and Teacher Engagement. Makekere University Business School, Master Dissertation.
  • Konovsky, M. A. and Organ, D. W. (1996). Dispositional and Contextual Determinants of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17 (3), 253-266.
  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M. and Avolio, B. J. (2007a). Psychological Capital: Developing the Human Competitive Edge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Luthans, F., Avolio B. J., Avey, J. B. and Norman S. M. (2007b). Positive Psychological Capital: Measurement and Relationship with Performance and Satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60 (3), 541-572.
  • Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Patera J. L. (2008). Experimental Analysis of a Web-Based Training Intervention to Develop Positive Psychological Capital. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7 (2), 209-221.
  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (6), 845-855.
  • Moorman R. H., Niehoff B. P. and Organ D.W. (1993). Treating Employees Fairly and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Sorting the Effects of Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and Procedural Justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6 (3), 209-225.
  • Moorman R. H., Blakely, G. L. and Niehoff B. P. (1998). Does Perceived Organizational Support Mediate the Relationship Between Procedural Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior?. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (3), 351- 357.
  • Morrison, E. W. and Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking Charge at Work: Extrarole Efforts to Initiate Workplace Change. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4), 403- 419.
  • Mowday R. T., Porter L. W. and Steers R. M. (1982). Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. New York: Academic Press.
  • Norman, S. M., Avey, J. B., Nimnicht, J.L. and Pigeon, N. G. (2010). The Interactive Effects of Psychological Capital and Organizational Identity on Employee Organizational Citizenship and Deviance Behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17 (4), 380-391.
  • Noruzy, A., Shatery, K., Rezazadeh, A. and Hatami-Shirkouhi, L. (2011). Investigation the Relationship between Organizational Justice, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 4 (7), 842-847.
  • Organ, D.W. (1990). The Motivational Basis of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43-72.
  • Organ, D. W. and Moorman, R. H. (1993). Fairness and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: What Are the Connections?. Social Justice Research, 6 (1), 5-18.
  • Parker, S.K. (1998). Enhancing Role Breadth Self-Efficacy: The Roles of Job Enrichment and Other Organizational Interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (6), 835 – 852.
  • Parker, S. K. and Axtell, C. M. (2001). Seeing another Viewpoint: Antecedents and Outcomes of Employee Perspective Taking. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6), 1085-1100.
  • Penner, L. A., Midili, A. R. and Kegelmeyer, J. (1997). Beyond Job Attitudes: A Personality and Social Psychology Perspective on the Causes of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Human Performance, 10 (2), 111-131.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Moorman, R.H. and Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers’ Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1 (2), 107 – 142.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J. B. and Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Journal of Management, 26 (3), 513-563.
  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M. and Blume, B. D. (2009). Individualand Organizational-Level Consequences of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (1), 122–141.
  • Pohl, S., Dal Santo, L. and Battistelli, A. (2012). Perceived Organizational Support, Job Characteristics and Intrinsic Motivation as Antecedents of Organizational Citizenship Behaviours of Nurses. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 25 (3/4), 31-44.
  • Pohl, S., Battistelli A. and Librecht, J. (2013). The Impact of Perceived Organizational Support and Job Characteristics on Nurses’ Organizational Citizenship Behaviours. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 16 (2), 193- 207.
  • Rauf, F. H. A. (2014). Perception of Organizational Justice as a Predictor of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: an Empirical Study at Schools in Sri Lanka. European Journal of Business and Management, 6 (12), 124-130.
  • Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., Tang, R. L. and Krebs, S. A. (2010). Investigating the Moderating Effects of Leader–Member Exchange in the Psychological Contract Breach–Employee Performance Relationship: A Test of Two Competing Perspectives. British Journal of Management, 21 (2), 422–437.
  • Rifai, H. A. (2005). A Test of the Relationships among Perceptions of Justice, Job Satisfaction, Affective Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 7 (2), 131-154.
  • Rioux, S. M. and Penner, L. A. (2001). The Causes of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Motivational Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (6). 1306- 1314.
  • Roberts, S. J., Scherer, L.L. and Bowyer, C. J. (2011). Job Stress and Incivility: What role Does Psychological Capital Play?. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18 (4), 449-458.
  • Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V. and Williams C. A. (2006). Employee Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Organizational Justice Framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (4), 537-543.
  • Scheier, M.F. and Carver, C.S. (1985). Optimism, Coping, and Health: Assessment and Implications of Generalized Outcome Expectancies. Health Psychology, 4 (3), 219 – 247.
  • Shahnawaz, M. G. and Jafri, Md. H. (2009). Psychological Capital as Predictors of Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35 (Special Issue), 78-84.
  • Snyder, C.R., Sympson, S.C., Ybasco, F.C., Borders, T.F., Babyak, M.A. and Higgins, R.L. (1996). Development and Validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (2), 321 – 335.
  • Söyük, S. (2007). Örgütsel Adaletin İş Tatmini Üzerine Etkisi ve İstanbul İlindeki Özel Hastanelerde Çalışan Hemşirelere Yönelik Bir Çalışma. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü: İstanbul.
  • Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik. Seçkin: Ankara.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks.
  • Wagnild, G.M. and Young, H.M. (1993). Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Resilience Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 1 (2), 165 – 178.
  • Walumbwa, F. O. and Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader Personality Traits and Employee Voice Behavior: Mediating Roles of Ethical Leadership and Work Group Psychological Safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (5), 1275–1286.
  • Wang H., Sui, Y., Luthans, F., Wang, D. and Wu, Y. (2014). Impact of Authentic Leadership on Performance: Role of Followers’ Positive Psychological Capital and Relational Processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35 (1), 5-21.
  • Williams, L. J. and Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and in-Role Behaviors. Journal of Management, 17 (3), 601-617.
  • Zhong, L. (2007). Effects of Psychological Capital on Employees’ Job Performance, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39 (2), 328 – 334
APA OKAN T, Demir H, Bostan S (2017). PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ. , 237 - 262.
Chicago OKAN TARHAN,Demir Halis,Bostan Sedat PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ. (2017): 237 - 262.
MLA OKAN TARHAN,Demir Halis,Bostan Sedat PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ. , 2017, ss.237 - 262.
AMA OKAN T,Demir H,Bostan S PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ. . 2017; 237 - 262.
Vancouver OKAN T,Demir H,Bostan S PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ. . 2017; 237 - 262.
IEEE OKAN T,Demir H,Bostan S "PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ." , ss.237 - 262, 2017.
ISNAD OKAN, TARHAN vd. "PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ". (2017), 237-262.
APA OKAN T, Demir H, Bostan S (2017). PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 1(18), 237 - 262.
Chicago OKAN TARHAN,Demir Halis,Bostan Sedat PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi 1, no.18 (2017): 237 - 262.
MLA OKAN TARHAN,Demir Halis,Bostan Sedat PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, vol.1, no.18, 2017, ss.237 - 262.
AMA OKAN T,Demir H,Bostan S PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi. 2017; 1(18): 237 - 262.
Vancouver OKAN T,Demir H,Bostan S PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi. 2017; 1(18): 237 - 262.
IEEE OKAN T,Demir H,Bostan S "PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ." Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 1, ss.237 - 262, 2017.
ISNAD OKAN, TARHAN vd. "PROSEDÜR ADALETİ ALGISI VE ÖRGÜTSEL VATANDAŞLIK DAVRANIŞI-BİREY İLİŞKİSİNE DURUMSAL BİR BAKIŞ: YÜKSEK VE DÜŞÜK PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYE ETKİSİ". Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi 1/18 (2017), 237-262.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 4:25

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları