Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 61 - 65 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz:
Amaç: Travmatik anterior omuz instabilitesi cerrahi tedavisinde açık ve artroskopik Bankart tamirinin klinik sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması amaçlandı.Materyal ve Metod: Ocak 2005 ile Ocak 2013 yılları arasında tekrarlayan anterior omuz instabilitesi nedeniyle cerrahi tedavi uygulanan 23 hastadan son kontrolleri yapılan 20 hasta (17 erkek, 3 kadın) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların 10'una açık Bankart tamiri, 10'una artroskopik Bankart tamiri uygulandı. Ağrı değerlendirmesi vizüel analog skalasına (VAS) göre yapılırken klinik sonuçlar Rowe skalası kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Ameliyat sonrası ortalama takip süresi açık tamir grubunda 37.4±27.1 ay iken, artroskopik tamir grubunda 23±6.9 ay idi. İstatistiksel değerlendirmede Shapiro-Wilk testi ile Mann-Whitney U testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: VAS skoru açık tamir grubunda 5.7±2.5, artroskopik tamir grubunda 4.1±1.9, Rowe skoru açık tamir grubunda 97.5 , artroskopik tamir grubunda 95 olarak bulundu. Klinik sonuçlar açık tamir grubunda 9 hastada (%90) mükemmel, bir hastada (10%) iyi iken, artroskopik tamir grubunda 8 hastada (80%) mükemmel, bir hastada (10%) iyi, bir hastada (10%) kötü olarak bulundu. Açık grupta 2 hastada, artroskopik grupta ise 5 hastada dış rotasyon kısıtlılığı gözlendi. İki grup arasında VAS skoru, Rowe skoru ve eklem hareket açıklığı bakımından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark görülmedi (p>0.05). Sonuç: Çalışmamızda artroskopik tamir ile açık tamir sonuçları, son yıllardaki çalışmalarla paralel olarak eşdeğer bulundu. Ancak artroskopik tamirin cerrahi tecrübe ve tamir yöntemlerinin gelişmesiyle, postoperatif hasta konforu ve rehabilitasyon kolaylığı nedeniyle avantajlı olduğu kanısındayız.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ortopedi

Comparison of Open and Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Results in Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability

Öz:
Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical results of open and arthroscopic bankart repair in the surgical treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Material and Methods: Out of 23 patients who had surgical treatment due to recurrent anterior shoulder instability between January 2005 and January 2013, 20 patients (17 men, 3 women) whose last controls were made were included in the study. Open Bankart repair was applied on 10 (average age 30, ranging between 17 and 43) patients and arthroscopic Bankart repair was applied on 10 (average age 21, ranging between 18 and 49) patients. While pain was assessed according to visual analog scale (VAS), clinical results were assessed by using Rowe scale. Average postoperation follow-up time was 37.4±27.1 months in the open repair group, while it was 23±6.9 months in the arthroscopic repair group. ShapiroWilk test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis. Results: VAS score was 5.7±2.5 in the open surgery group, while it was 4.1±1.9 in the arthroscopic group and Rowe score was 97.5 (ranging between 80 and 100), while it was 95 (ranging between 50 and 100) in the arthroscopic repair group. Clinical results were perfect in 9 (90%) patients in the open surgery group, while they were good in 1 (10%) patient. In the arthroscopic repair group, clinical results were perfect in 8 (80%) patients, good in 1 (10%) patient and bad in 1 (10%) patient. Limitation of external rotation was seen in 2 patients in the open group and in 5 patients in the arthroscopic group. No statistical difference was found between the two groups in terms of VAS score, Rowe score and range of motion (p>0.05).Conclusion: The results of arthroscopic repair and open repair in our study were found to be in parallel with the results of recent studies. However, with the developments in repair methods and surgical experiences, we are of the opinion that arthroscopic repair is more advantageous due to postoperative patient comfort and ease of rehabilitation.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Ortopedi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Ee GW, Mohamed S, Tan AH. Long term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;14(6):28.
  • 2. Shah AS, Karadsheh MS, Sekiya JK. Failure of operative treatment for glenohumeral instability: etiology and management. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(5):681-94.
  • 3. Hintermann B, Gächter A. Arthroscopic findings after shoulder dislocation. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(5):545-51.
  • 4. Tuncay İ, Tosun N, Akpınar F. Preliminary results of Bankart repair of anterior shoulder instabilities with suture anchors. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2000;34:368-73.
  • 5. Kim SH, Ha KI, Kim SH. Bankart repair in traumatic anterior shoulder instability: open versus arthroscopic technique. Arthroscopy. 2002;18(7):755-63.
  • 6. Geiger DF, Hurley JA, Tovey JA, Rao JP. Results of arthroscopic versus open Bankart suture repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;(337):111-7.
  • 7. Cole BJ, L'Insalata J, Irrgang J, Warner JPJ. Comparison of arthroscopic and open anterior shoulder stabilization. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82-A(8):1108-14.
  • 8. Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg. 2000;82-A(7):991-1003.
  • 9. Levine WN, Arroyo JS, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. Open revision stabilization surgery for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(2):156-60.
  • 10. Cole BJ, Romeo AA. Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization with suture anchors: technique, technology, and pitfalls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(390):17-30.
  • 11. Garofalo R, Mocci A, Moretti B, Callari E, Di Giacomo G, Theumann N, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability using knotless suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(11):1283-9.
  • 12. Yan H, Cui GQ, Wang JQ, Yin Y, Tian DX, Ao YF. Arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors: results and risk factors of recurrence of instability. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011;49(7):597-602.
  • 13. Iwaso H, Uchiyama E, Sakakibara S, Fukui N. Modified double row technique for arthroscopic Bankart repair: surgical technique and preliminary results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77(2):252-7.
  • 14. Mahiroğulları M, Ozkan H, Akyüz M, Uğraş AA, Güney A, Kuşkucu M. Comparison betweenthe results of open and arthroscopic repair of isolated traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(3):180-5.
  • 15. Arciero RA, Wheeler JH, Ryan JB, McBride JT. Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus nonoperative treatment for acute, initial anterior shoulder dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(5):589-94.
  • 16. Balg F, Boileau P. The instability severity index score. A simple pre-operative score to select patients for arthroscopic or open shoulder stabilisation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(11):1470-7.
  • 17. Gartsman GM, Taverna E, Hammerman SM. Arthroscopic rotator interval repair in glenohumeral instability: description of an operative technique. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(3):330-2.
  • 18. Karlsson J, Magnusson L, Ejerhed L, Hultenheim I, Lundin O, Kartus J. Comparison of open and arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent shoulder dislocation in patients with a Bankart lesion. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):538-42.
  • 19. Kim SH, Ha KI, Cho YB, Ryu BD, Oh I. Arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the shoulder: two to six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(8):1511-8.
  • 20. O'Neill DB. Arthroscopic Bankart repair of anterior detachments of the glenoid labrum. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(10):1357-66.
  • 21. Levine WN, Richmond JC, Donaldson WR. Use of the suture anchor in open Bankart reconstruction. A follow-up report. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(5):723-6.
  • 22. Spindler KP, Dunn WR. Arthroscopic Repair is as effective as open repair for isolated Bankart lesions of the shoulder and may improve range of motion. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(11):2574.
  • 23. Özbaydar M, Elhassan B, Warner JJ. The use of anchors in shoulder surgery: a shift from metallic to bioabsorbable anchors. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(10):1124-6.
  • 24. Elkousy H, Hammerman SM, Edwards TB, Warnock KM, O'Connor DP, Ambrose C, et al. The arthroscopic square knot: a biomechanical comparison with open and arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(7):736-41.
APA sezgin h, ÇIRAKLI A, ZENGİN E, PİŞKİN A, uzun e (2017). TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. , 61 - 65.
Chicago sezgin hicabi,ÇIRAKLI Alper,ZENGİN EYUP ÇAĞATAY,PİŞKİN Ahmet,uzun erdal TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. (2017): 61 - 65.
MLA sezgin hicabi,ÇIRAKLI Alper,ZENGİN EYUP ÇAĞATAY,PİŞKİN Ahmet,uzun erdal TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. , 2017, ss.61 - 65.
AMA sezgin h,ÇIRAKLI A,ZENGİN E,PİŞKİN A,uzun e TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. . 2017; 61 - 65.
Vancouver sezgin h,ÇIRAKLI A,ZENGİN E,PİŞKİN A,uzun e TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. . 2017; 61 - 65.
IEEE sezgin h,ÇIRAKLI A,ZENGİN E,PİŞKİN A,uzun e "TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI." , ss.61 - 65, 2017.
ISNAD sezgin, hicabi vd. "TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI". (2017), 61-65.
APA sezgin h, ÇIRAKLI A, ZENGİN E, PİŞKİN A, uzun e (2017). TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, 7(4), 61 - 65.
Chicago sezgin hicabi,ÇIRAKLI Alper,ZENGİN EYUP ÇAĞATAY,PİŞKİN Ahmet,uzun erdal TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Bozok Tıp Dergisi 7, no.4 (2017): 61 - 65.
MLA sezgin hicabi,ÇIRAKLI Alper,ZENGİN EYUP ÇAĞATAY,PİŞKİN Ahmet,uzun erdal TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Bozok Tıp Dergisi, vol.7, no.4, 2017, ss.61 - 65.
AMA sezgin h,ÇIRAKLI A,ZENGİN E,PİŞKİN A,uzun e TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. 2017; 7(4): 61 - 65.
Vancouver sezgin h,ÇIRAKLI A,ZENGİN E,PİŞKİN A,uzun e TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Bozok Tıp Dergisi. 2017; 7(4): 61 - 65.
IEEE sezgin h,ÇIRAKLI A,ZENGİN E,PİŞKİN A,uzun e "TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI." Bozok Tıp Dergisi, 7, ss.61 - 65, 2017.
ISNAD sezgin, hicabi vd. "TRAVMATİK ANTERİOR OMUZ İNSTABİLİTESİNDE AÇIK VE ARTROSKOPİK BANKART TAMİRİ SONUÇLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI". Bozok Tıp Dergisi 7/4 (2017), 61-65.