Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 59 - 65 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Kaybedilen doğal dişlerin yerine dental implantlar başarıyla uygulanmaktadır. Ancak, aşırı kemik kaybı standart implant uygulamaları öncesinde ileri cerrahi işlemler gerektirebilmektedir. Son dönemde ileri cerrahi işlemlerin dezavantajlarından kaçınmak için kısa implantların kullanımı değerlendirilmektedir. Etkili ve pratik bir çözüm olan kısa implantların klinik başarıları araştırılmaktadır. Çalışmalarda implantların yüzey özelliği, kemik yapısı, marjinal kemik kaybı, kron/implant oranı, implant üstü restorasyonların tasarımı ve periodontal yapıların sağlığı gibi başlıca faktörler değerlendirilmektedir. Klinik çalışmaların dikkate alındığı bu derlemede, kısa implantlar ve söz konusu faktörlerin kısa implantların başarısına olan etkileri tartışılacaktır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

An Assessment of Short Dental Implants on the Basis of Clinical Studies

Öz:
Dental implants can be applied successfully when the natural teeth are lost. However, excessive bone loss can require advanced surgical treatments prior to standard applications of dental implants. Recently, use of short dental implants has been considered for avoiding disadvantages of such advanced surgical operations. Clinical success of short implants as an effective and practical solution is being investigated. Research has been conducted to evaluate main factors such as surface properties of implants, bone characteristics, marginal bone loss, crown/implant ratio, design of implant restorations, and health of the periodontal structures. This review based on these clinical studies will discuss short dental implants and the effects of the mentioned factors on their success.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Busenlechner D, Fürhauser R, Haas R, Watzek G, Mailath G, Pommer B. Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014;44(3):102-8.
  • 2. Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22(2):109-17.
  • 3. Kılıç E, Kılıç K, Er N, Aral CA, Yağan AE, Alkan A. Kısa dental implantların klinik ve radyolojik takibi: retrospektif çalışma. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2011;14(3):211-8.
  • 4. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(2):35-51.
  • 5. Andersson B, Odman P, Carlsson GE. A study of 184 consecutive patients referred for single tooth replacement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6(4):232-7.
  • 6. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants--an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(1):86-93.
  • 7. Malmstorm H, Gupta B, Ghanem A, Cacciato R, Ren Y, Romanos GE. Success rate of short dental implants supporting single crowns and fixed bridges. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(9):1093-98.
  • 8. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquinis M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(4):254-62.
  • 9. Block MS, Delgado A, Fontenot MG. The effect of diameter and length of hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants on ultimate pullout force in dog alveolar bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.1990;48(2):174-8.
  • 10. Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(2):139-44.
  • 11. Grant BT, Pancko FX, Kraut RA. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(4):713-7.
  • 12. Schincaglia GP, Thoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, Garcia A, Taylor TD, Hämmerle CH. Randomized controlled multicentre study comparing short dental implants (6mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 1: demographics and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year of loading. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(11):72-80.
  • 13. Esposito M, Pistilli R, Barausse C, Felice P. Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(4):383-95.
  • 14. Tan WC, Krishnaswamy G, Ong MM, Lang NP. Patientreported outcome measures after routine periodontal and implant surgical procedures. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(6):618-24.
  • 15. Atieh MA, Zadeh H, Stanford CM, Cooper LF. Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(6):1323-31.
  • 16. Hof M, Tepper G, Semo B, Arnhart C, Watzek G, Pommer B. Patients' perspectives on dental implant and bone graft surgery: questionnaire-based interview survey. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(1):42-5.
  • 17. Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Husler J, Hammerle CH, Jung RE. EAO Supplement Working Group 4--EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(11):154-69.
  • 18. Tutak M, Smektala T, Schneider K, Golebiewska E, Sporniak-Tutak K. Short dental implants in reduced alveolar bone height: a review of the literature. Med Sci Monit. 2013;21(19):1037-42.
  • 19. Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, Hürzeler MB, Faehn O, Sanavi F ve ark. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(3):417-23.
  • 20. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (_____10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(7): 667-76.
  • 21. Lee SA, Lee CT, Fu MM, Elmisalati W, Chuang SK. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the management of limited vertical height in the posterior region: short implants (5 to 8 mm) vs longer implants (>8 mm) in vertically augmented sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(5):1085-97.
  • 22. Hagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (_____ or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol. 2004;75(6):798-804.
  • 23. Anitua E, Alkhraist MH, Pinas L, Begona L, Orive G. Implant survival and crestal bone loss around extrashort implants supporting a fixed denture: the effect of crown height space, crown-to-implant ratio, and offset placement of the prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(3):682-9.
  • 24. Monje A, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Garcia-Nogales A, Fu JH, Wang HL. A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (_____10 mm) for implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(10):1119-24.
  • 25. Queiroz TP, Aguiar SC, Margonar R, de Souza Faloni AP, Gruber R, Luvizuto ER. Clinical study on survival rate of short implants placed in the posterior mandibular region: resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(9):1036-42.
  • 26. Pommer B, Frantal S,Willer J, Posch M,Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(9):856-63.
  • 27. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(2):151-61.
  • 28. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short (_____=10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(4):816-25.
  • 29. Elias N, Yoshiki O, Lima J, Muller CA. Relationship between surface properties of titanium and dental implant removal torque. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2008;1(3):234-42.
  • 30. Deporter D. Short dental implants: what works and what doesn't? A literature interpretation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(4):457-64.
  • 31. Annibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell'Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2012;91(1):25-32.
  • 32. Malo P, Nobre M, Lopes A. Short implants in posterior jaws. A prospective 1-year study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011;4(1):47-53.
  • 33. Anitua E, Orive G. Short implants in maxilla and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of followup. J Periodontol. 2010;81(6):819-26.
  • 34. Pilliar RM, Sagals G, Meguid SA, Oyonoarte R, Deporter DA. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: Three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(6):879- 89.
  • 35. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP ve ark. Long-term evaluation of nonsubmerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8(3):161-72.
  • 36. Gotfredsen K, Karlsson U. A prospective 5-year study of fixed partial prostheses supported by implants with machined and TiO2-blasted surface. J Prosthodont. 2001;10(1):2-7.
  • 37. Goiato MC, dos Santos DM, Santiago JF Jr, Moreno A, Pellizzer EP. Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43(9):1108-16.
  • 38. Al-Emran S. Prevalence of tooth loss in Saudi Arabian school children: an epidemiological study of Saudi male children. Saudi Dental J. 1990;2(4):137-40.
  • 39. Deporter D, Ogiso B, Sohn DS, Ruljancich K, Pharoah M. Ultrashort sintered porous-surfaced dental implants used to replace posterior teeth. J Periodontol. 2008;79(7):1280-6.
  • 40. French D, Larjava H, Ofec R. Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow- up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(11):1345- 54.
  • 41. Esposito M, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, Felice P. Rehabilitation of posterior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomised clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011;4(1):21-30.
  • 42. Mendonca JA, Francischone CE, Senna PM, Matos de Oliveira AE, Sotto-Maior BS. A retrospective evaluation of the survival rates of splinted and non-splinted short dental implants in posterior partially edentulous jaws. J Periodontol. 2014;85(6):787-94.
  • 43. Randow K, Ercisson I, Nilner K, Petersson A, Glantz PO. Immediate functional loading of Branemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 1999;10(1):8-15.
  • 44. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;7(4):1-5.
  • 45. Galindo-Moreno P, Fauri M, Avila-Ortiz G, FernándezBarbero JE, Cabrera-León A, Sánchez-Fernández E. Influence of alcohol and tobacco habits on peri-implant marginal bone loss: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(5):579-86.
  • 46. Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(4):67-72.
  • 47. Hasan I, Heinemann F, Aitlahrach M, Bourauel C. Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implant. Biomed Tech. 2010;55(69):341-50.
  • 48. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res.1996;7(2):143-52.
  • 49. Glantz PO, Nilner K. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic implant-borne reconstructions. Periodontol 2000. 1998;17(6):119-24.
  • 50. Quaranta A, Piemontese M, Rappelli G, Sammartino G, Procaccini M. Technical and biological complications related to crown to implant ratio: a systematic review. Implant Dent. 2014;23(2):180-7.
  • 51. Birdi H, Schulte J, Kovacs A, Weed M, Chuang SK. Crown-to-implant ratios of short-length implants. J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(6):425-33.
  • 52. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol. 1992;18(3):264-74.
  • 53. Nunes M, Almeida RF, Felino AC, Malo P, de Araújo Nobre M. The influence of crown-to-implant ratio on short implant marginal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(5):1156-63.
  • 54. Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Gross M, Chaushu G. Analysis of load transfer and stress distribution by splinted and unsplinted implant-supported fixed cemented restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37(9):658-62.
  • 55. Misch CE. Short dental implants: a literature review and rationale for use. Dent Today. 2005;24(8):64-8.
  • 56. Anitua E, Alkhraisat MH, Orive G. Novel technique for the treatment of the severely atrophied posterior mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(5):1338- 46.
  • 57. Bechara S, Kubilius R, Veronesi G, Pires JT, Shibli JA, Mangano FG. Short (6mm) dental implants versus sinus floor elevation and placement of longer (>=10 mm) dental implants: a randomized controlled trial with a 3-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;12(7)1-11.
APA ATALA M, DEĞİRMENCİ K (2018). Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. , 59 - 65.
Chicago ATALA Mustafa Hayati,DEĞİRMENCİ Kübra Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. (2018): 59 - 65.
MLA ATALA Mustafa Hayati,DEĞİRMENCİ Kübra Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. , 2018, ss.59 - 65.
AMA ATALA M,DEĞİRMENCİ K Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. . 2018; 59 - 65.
Vancouver ATALA M,DEĞİRMENCİ K Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. . 2018; 59 - 65.
IEEE ATALA M,DEĞİRMENCİ K "Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi." , ss.59 - 65, 2018.
ISNAD ATALA, Mustafa Hayati - DEĞİRMENCİ, Kübra. "Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi". (2018), 59-65.
APA ATALA M, DEĞİRMENCİ K (2018). Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. ANADOLU KLİNİĞİ TIP BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ, 23(1), 59 - 65.
Chicago ATALA Mustafa Hayati,DEĞİRMENCİ Kübra Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. ANADOLU KLİNİĞİ TIP BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ 23, no.1 (2018): 59 - 65.
MLA ATALA Mustafa Hayati,DEĞİRMENCİ Kübra Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. ANADOLU KLİNİĞİ TIP BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ, vol.23, no.1, 2018, ss.59 - 65.
AMA ATALA M,DEĞİRMENCİ K Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. ANADOLU KLİNİĞİ TIP BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ. 2018; 23(1): 59 - 65.
Vancouver ATALA M,DEĞİRMENCİ K Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. ANADOLU KLİNİĞİ TIP BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ. 2018; 23(1): 59 - 65.
IEEE ATALA M,DEĞİRMENCİ K "Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi." ANADOLU KLİNİĞİ TIP BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ, 23, ss.59 - 65, 2018.
ISNAD ATALA, Mustafa Hayati - DEĞİRMENCİ, Kübra. "Kısa Dental İmplantların Klinik Çalışmalar Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi". ANADOLU KLİNİĞİ TIP BİLİMLERİ DERGİSİ 23/1 (2018), 59-65.