Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 311 - 316 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes

Öz:
BACKGROUND: Despite surgical and technical advances in microsurgery, it is still difficult to obtain satisfactory results after replantation of finger amputation. The aim of the present study was to discuss some of the many factors that can affect the success rate of replantation.METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients with 85 finger replantations was performed. Revascularizations and replantations proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joint were excluded. Demographic characteristics of the patients, place of injury, mechanism of injury, level of amputation, and success rate were examined.RESULTS: A total of 53 male and 7 female patients with mean age of 31 years were included in the study. Index finger (27%) was the most commonly replanted digit. Left side was the more affected, with 62%. Mechanism of injury was crush in 56%, guillotine in 23%, and avulsion in 21% of replanted digits. Success rate was 81%, 53%, and 36% in guillotine, crush, and avulsion injuries, respectively.CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the injury type and personal variables are very important in the rate of replantation success. Knowledge about the effects of different factors on the results of replantation surgery will provide guidance to hand surgeons in order to inform patients and their relatives properly
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Cerrahi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Neinstein RM, Dvali LT, Le S, Anastakis DJ. Complete digital amputations undergoing replantation surgery: a 10-year retrospective study. Hand (N Y) 2012;7:263–6.
  • 2. Beris AE, Lykissas MG, Korompilias AV, Mitsionis GI, Vekris MD, Kostas-Agnantis IP. Digit and hand replantation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010;130:1141–7.
  • 3. Dec W. A meta-analysis of success rates for digit replantation. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2006;10:124–9.
  • 4. Janezic TF, Arnez ZM, Solinc M, Zaletel-Kragelj L. One hundred sixtyseven thumb replantations and revascularisations: early microvascular results. Microsurgery 1996;17:259–63.
  • 5. Soucacos PN. Indications and selection for digital amputation and replantation. J Hand Surg Br 2001;26:572–81.
  • 6. Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, Un-nanuntana A. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury 2000;31:33–40.
  • 7. McCabe SJ. Patient participation in the decision for replantation. Hand Clin 2001;17:351–5.
  • 8. Morrison WA, McCombe D. Digital replantation. Hand Clin 2007;23:1–12.
  • 9. Yoshimura M. Indications and limits of digital replantation. JMAJ 2003;46:460–7.
  • 10. Fufa D, Calfee R, Wall L, Zeng W, Goldfarb C. Digit replantation: experience of two U.S. academic level-I trauma centers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:2127–34.
  • 11. Coban YK. Finger replantation without anticoagulant therapy. Edorium J Plast Cosmet Surg 2014;1:1–4.
  • 12. Fukui A, Tamai S. Present status of replantation in Japan. Microsurgery 1994;15:842–7.
  • 13. Li J, Guo Z, Zhu Q, Lei W, Han Y, Li M, et al. Fingertip replantation: determinants of survival. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:833–9.
  • 14. Hamilton RB, O’Brien BM, Morrison A, MacLeod AM. Survival factors in replantation and revascularization of the amputated thumb--10 years experience. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;18:163–73.
  • 15. Kim JY, Brown RJ, Jones NF. Pediatric upper extremity replantation. Clin Plast Surg 2005;32:1–10.
  • 16. Michalko KB, Bentz ML. Digital replantation in children. Crit Care Med 2002;30(11 Suppl):S444–7.
  • 17. Dahlbäck B. Advances in understanding pathogenic mechanisms of thrombophilic disorders. Blood 2008;112:19–27.
  • 18. Largo TW, Rosenman KD. Michigan work-related amputations, 2008. J Occup Environ Med 2013;55:280–5.
  • 19. Kim WK, Lim JH, Han SK. Fingertip replantations: clinical evaluation of 135 digits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;98:470–6.
  • 20. Yu H, Wei L, Liang B, Hou S, Wang J, Yang Y. Nonsurgical factors of digital replantation and survival rate: A metaanalysis. Indian J Orthop 2015;49:265–71.
  • 21. Wei FC, Chang YL, Chen HC, Chuang CC. Three successful digital replantations in a patient after 84, 86, and 94 hours of cold ischemia time. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;82:346–50.
  • 22. Lin CH, Aydyn N, Lin YT, Hsu CT, Lin CH, Yeh JT. Hand and finger replantation after protracted ischemia (more than 24 hours). Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:286–90.
  • 23. Choi MS, Lee JH, Ki SH, Ahn HC. Trends in digital replantation. Curr Orthop Pract 2012;23:284–8.
APA ORUÇ M, GÜRSOY K, ÖZER K, Çolak Ö, KANKAYA Y, SUNGUR N, ULUSOY G, KOÇER U (2017). Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes. , 311 - 316.
Chicago ORUÇ Melike,GÜRSOY KORAY,ÖZER Kadri,Çolak Özlem,KANKAYA Yüksel,SUNGUR Nezih,ULUSOY Gürhan Mustafa,KOÇER Uğur Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes. (2017): 311 - 316.
MLA ORUÇ Melike,GÜRSOY KORAY,ÖZER Kadri,Çolak Özlem,KANKAYA Yüksel,SUNGUR Nezih,ULUSOY Gürhan Mustafa,KOÇER Uğur Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes. , 2017, ss.311 - 316.
AMA ORUÇ M,GÜRSOY K,ÖZER K,Çolak Ö,KANKAYA Y,SUNGUR N,ULUSOY G,KOÇER U Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes. . 2017; 311 - 316.
Vancouver ORUÇ M,GÜRSOY K,ÖZER K,Çolak Ö,KANKAYA Y,SUNGUR N,ULUSOY G,KOÇER U Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes. . 2017; 311 - 316.
IEEE ORUÇ M,GÜRSOY K,ÖZER K,Çolak Ö,KANKAYA Y,SUNGUR N,ULUSOY G,KOÇER U "Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes." , ss.311 - 316, 2017.
ISNAD ORUÇ, Melike vd. "Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes". (2017), 311-316.
APA ORUÇ M, GÜRSOY K, ÖZER K, Çolak Ö, KANKAYA Y, SUNGUR N, ULUSOY G, KOÇER U (2017). Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 23(4), 311 - 316.
Chicago ORUÇ Melike,GÜRSOY KORAY,ÖZER Kadri,Çolak Özlem,KANKAYA Yüksel,SUNGUR Nezih,ULUSOY Gürhan Mustafa,KOÇER Uğur Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 23, no.4 (2017): 311 - 316.
MLA ORUÇ Melike,GÜRSOY KORAY,ÖZER Kadri,Çolak Özlem,KANKAYA Yüksel,SUNGUR Nezih,ULUSOY Gürhan Mustafa,KOÇER Uğur Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.23, no.4, 2017, ss.311 - 316.
AMA ORUÇ M,GÜRSOY K,ÖZER K,Çolak Ö,KANKAYA Y,SUNGUR N,ULUSOY G,KOÇER U Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2017; 23(4): 311 - 316.
Vancouver ORUÇ M,GÜRSOY K,ÖZER K,Çolak Ö,KANKAYA Y,SUNGUR N,ULUSOY G,KOÇER U Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2017; 23(4): 311 - 316.
IEEE ORUÇ M,GÜRSOY K,ÖZER K,Çolak Ö,KANKAYA Y,SUNGUR N,ULUSOY G,KOÇER U "Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 23, ss.311 - 316, 2017.
ISNAD ORUÇ, Melike vd. "Eight years of clinical experience with digit replantation: Demographic characteristics and outcomes". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 23/4 (2017), 311-316.