Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 32 - 49 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback

Öz:
During instruction, providing feedbacks improves students’ academic achievements as well as motivates them to actively engage in lesson activities. Feedback is very important for teaching. Feedback is not only a functional tool to provide active involvement of the students to the learning process but also affects the academic success of the student. In this study, it is important to analyze in-service mathematics teachers' opinions on feedback. This study is conceptualized as a qualitative study. The data of this study included in-service teachers’ responses to a semi-structured questionnaire, which created by the researchers. In-service teachers’ responses to the interview questions were audio taped and later transcribed verbatim to conduct a content analysis. Twelve mathematics teachers working in 12 different schools in a central district of Kırşehir voluntarily participated in the study during the 2015-2016 academic year. The data of the study were obtained conducting face-to-face interviews with the mathematics teachers. Teachers’ responses to the questionnaire items were analyzed thematically and classified under the following seven headings: style of the feedback, scope of the feedback, principles of providing the feedback, difficulties experienced when providing the feedback, reasons for providing insufficient feedback, the benefits of the feedback, and the significance of the feedback in learning. The results are presented in relation to the literature in the area.Teachers agree that it is not possible to complete students’ gaps in Mathematics with the courses offered in the collective education system. Based on the findings some suggestions about the usage of feedback were provided
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akyol, H. (2007). Vygotsky, Piaget ve Yapılandırmacı Okuma Eğitimi. VI. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, Eskişehir.
  • Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment Education, 5 (1), pp.7-74.
  • Brookhart, S.M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(1), pp. 3-12.
  • Clark, K., & Dwyer, F. M. (1998). Effect of different types of computer-assisted feedbacks strategies on achievement and response confidence. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(1), pp.55-63.
  • Carvalhoa, C., Santosa J., Conboya, J. & Martinsa D. (2014). Teachers´ feedback: Exploring differences in students´ perceptions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, pp. 169-173.
  • Crooks, T.J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation on students. Review of Educational Research, 5, pp.438-481.
  • Dempsey J.V., Litchfield B.C., & Driscoll M.P., (1993). Feedback, Retention, Discrimination Error, and Feedback Study Time, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25: 3, pp. 303-326.
  • Duhon, G., House, S., Hastings, K., Poncy, B., & Solomon, B. (2015). Adding immediate feedback to explicit timing: An option for enhancing treatment ıntensity to ımprove mathematics fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(1), pp. 74-87.
  • Eraz, G., & Öksüz, C. (2015). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğrencilerin ders dışı matematik etkinliklerine ilişkin uyguladıkları geribildirimlerin etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, ss.105-119.
  • Erişen, Y. (1997). Öğretim elemanlarının dönüt ve düzeltme davranışlarını yerine getirme dereceleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 3(1), ss. 45-62.
  • Foote, C.J. (1999). Attribution feedback in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13(2), 155-166.
  • Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback, Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), pp. 81-112.
  • Kluger, A.N. & Denisi, A. (1996). The Effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 2(2), pp. 254-284.
  • Köğce, D. & Baki, A. (2012). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin geribildirim kavramına ilişkin inanışları, X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, 27-30 Haziran, Niğde.
  • Labuhn, A.S., Zimmerman, B.J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), pp. 173-194.
  • Mory, E.H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Education Communications and Technology (pp. 745-783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Manouchehri, A. (2007). Inquiry-discourse mathematics instruction. Mathematics Teacher, 101 (4), pp.290–300.
  • Manouchehri, A. & St. John, D. (2006). From classroom discussions to group discourse. Mathematics Teacher, 99 (8), pp. 544–551.
  • Naroth, C. (2010). Constructive teacher feedback for enhancing learner performance in mathematics.[serial online]. n.d.; Available from: Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations, Ipswich, MA. 21 Ağustos 2016 da ulaşılmıştır.
  • Nordstrom, C.R., Wendland, D. & Williams, K.B. (1998). “To err is human”: An examination of the effectiveness of error management training, Journal of Business and Pschology, 12, 3, pp. 269-282.
  • Kahl, S. (2005). Where in the world are formative tests? Right under your nose! Education Week, 25 (4), 38.
  • Looney, J. (Ed.). (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms.
  • Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • Peker, R. (1992). Geri bildirimin üniversite öğrencilerinin ölçme ve değerlendirme dersindeki başarısına etkisi. UludağÜniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), ss. 31-39.
  • Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Bürgermeister, A. & Harks, B. (2008). The interplay between student evaluation and instruction. grading and feedback in mathematics classrooms. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, pp. 110-123.
  • Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W. & Hochweber, J. (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students´ perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction, 27, pp. 63-73.
  • Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., Estrella, G., Penuel, B., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S.
  • (2010). Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: Impact on students' mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, (4), pp.399-404.
  • Sadler, D.R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), pp. 77-84.
  • Saracaloğlu, A.S., Gencel, İ.E. & Çengel, M. (2011). Öğrenci ve öğretmen görüşleri açısından lise öğretmenlerinin öğretme sürecindeki yeterlikleri, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Aralık, 2 (2), ss.77-99.
  • Stevenson, C.E., Heiser, W. J. & Resing, W. C. M. (2013). Working memory as a moderator of training and transfer of analogical reasoning in children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), pp.159-169.
  • Stone, N.J. (2000). Exploring the relationship between calibration and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 12, pp. 437-475.
  • Şahin, M. (2015). Öğrenme ve öğretme sürecinde uygulanan dönüt etkinliği ile ilgili öğretmen adaylarının görüşlerinin incelenmesi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), ss.247-264.
  • Santagata, R. (2002). When student make mistake: Socialization practices in Italy and the United States, Doctoral Dissertation, Los Angeles: University of California, Philosophy in Psychology.
  • Turkdoğan, A. Baki, A. (2012). İlköğretim ikinci kademe matematik öğretmenlerinin yanlışlara dönüt vermede kullandıkları dönüt teknikleri, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 45, (2), ss.157-182.
  • Warden, C.A. (2000). EFL business writing behaviors in differing feedback environments. Language Learning, 50 (4), pp .573–616.
  • Wigfield, A., Klauda, S.L., & Cambria, J. (2008). Influences on the development of academic self-regulatory processes. In B.J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of selfregulation of learning and performance (pp.33-48). New York: Routledge.
  • Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In D. H. Schuck & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
APA Beydoğan H (2018). Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. , 32 - 49.
Chicago Beydoğan H.Ömer Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. (2018): 32 - 49.
MLA Beydoğan H.Ömer Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. , 2018, ss.32 - 49.
AMA Beydoğan H Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. . 2018; 32 - 49.
Vancouver Beydoğan H Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. . 2018; 32 - 49.
IEEE Beydoğan H "Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback." , ss.32 - 49, 2018.
ISNAD Beydoğan, H.Ömer. "Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback". (2018), 32-49.
APA Beydoğan H (2018). Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(1), 32 - 49.
Chicago Beydoğan H.Ömer Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 5, no.1 (2018): 32 - 49.
MLA Beydoğan H.Ömer Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, vol.5, no.1, 2018, ss.32 - 49.
AMA Beydoğan H Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2018; 5(1): 32 - 49.
Vancouver Beydoğan H Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2018; 5(1): 32 - 49.
IEEE Beydoğan H "Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback." International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5, ss.32 - 49, 2018.
ISNAD Beydoğan, H.Ömer. "Middle School Mathematics Teachers' Opinions on Feedback". International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 5/1 (2018), 32-49.