Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study
Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 132 - 144 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022
Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study
Öz: Bu araştırmanın amacı Liu, Hallinger ve Feng (2016) tarafından geliştirilen Öğrenme Merkezli Liderlik Ölçeğinin - ÖMLÖ (Learning-Centered Leadership Scale - LCLS) Türk kültürüne uyarlanmasıdır. Araştırmaya Konya ve Adıyaman illerinde bulunan ilk ve ortaokullarda görev yapan toplam 232 öğretmen katılmıştır. Ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini tespit etmek amacıyla Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) yapılmıştır. Yapılan AFA sonucu ölçeğin üç boyuttan oluştuğu ortaya konmuştur. Bu alt boyutlar ölçeğin orijinal formuyla ve ilgili alan yazınla uyumlu biçimde ''öğrenmeye dönük bir vizyon oluşturma'', ''öğrenme desteği sağlama'' ve ''öğrenme programını yönetme ve model olma'' olarak yeniden isimlendirilmiştir. Nihai formu 19 maddeden oluşan ölçeğin alt boyutlarından elde edilen puanların iç tutarlılık değerleri .88 ile .91 arasında değişmektedir. Araştırma sonuçları Türkçeye uyarlanan Öğrenme Merkezli Liderlik Ölçeği'nin (ÖMLÖ) ilk ve ortaokullarda görev yapan okul müdürlerinin öğrenme merkezli liderlik düzeylerini belirlemede kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Öğrenme Merkezli Liderlik Ölçeğinin (ÖMLÖ) Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması
Öz: The purpose of this study was to adapt Learning-Centered Leadership Scale into Turkish culture. The participants of the study included a total of 232 teachers employed in primary and secondary schools located in Konya and Adıyaman. This study conducted Explanatory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to test the construct validity of the Turkish-adapted form of the scale. EFA results yielded a three-factor structure of the scale. These factors were labelled as Building a Learning Vision, Providing Learning Support and Managing the Learning Program and Modelling. The results of the study revealed that the scale consisted of 19 items and internal consistency values of the three factors ranged between .88 and .91. The results of the study demonstrated that The Turkish Form of LearningCentered Leadership Scale is reliable and valid instrument to measure the level of school principals’ learning-centered leadership behaviours
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Bayram, N. (2016). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş ve AMOS uygulamaları (3. Baskı). Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
- Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2015). Principals’ and teachers’ perceptions of efforts by principals to improve teaching and learning in Turkish middle schools. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(6), 1471-1485.
- Bush, T. (2003). Theories of educational leadership and management. London, UK. Sage Publication.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (11. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Cravens, X.C. (2008).The cross-cultural fit of the learning-centered leadership framework and assessment for Chinese principals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
- Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
- Doll, W.J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461.
- DuFour, R. (2002). The learning-centered principal. Educational leadership, 59(8), 12-15.
- Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: and sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll (third edition). London: Sage.
- Goldring, E., Porter, A., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 1-36.
- Gumus, S., & Akcaoglu, M. (2013). Instructional leadership in Turkish primary schools: An analysis of teachers’ perceptions and current policy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(3), 289- 302.
- Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2016). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership.
- Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221-239.
- Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1-30.
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit ındexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
- Kiltz, G., Danzig, A., & Szecsy, E. (2004). Learner-centered leadership: a mentoring model for the professional development of school administrators. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 12(2), 135- 153.
- Knapp, M.S., Copland, M.A., Honig, M.I., Plecki, M.L. and Portin, B.S. (2010), Learning-Focused Leadership and Leadership Support: Meaning and Practice in Urban Systems, The Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
- Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79-91.
- Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.
- Murphy, J. F., Goldring, E. B., Cravens, X. C., Elliott, S. N., & Porter, A. C. (2011). The Vanderbilt assessment of leadership in education: Measuring learning-centered leadership. Journal of East China Normal University, 29(1), 1-10.
- Reardon, R. M. (2011). Elementary school principals' learning-centered leadership and educational outcomes: Implications for principals' Professional development. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(1), 63-83.
- Saphier, J., King, M. and D'Auria, J. (2006). Three strands form strong school leadership, Journal of Staff Development, 27(2), 51-57.
- Sun, M., Youngs, P., Yang, H., Chu, H., & Zhao, Q. (2012). Association of district principal evaluation with learning-centered leadership practice: Evidence from Michigan and Beijing. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(3), 189-213.
- Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-73.
- Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinox
- Tan, C. Y. (2014). Influence of contextual challenges and constraints on learning-centered leadership. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(3), 451-468.
| APA | Kılınç A, Bellibaş M, Gümüş S (2017). Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. , 132 - 144. |
| Chicago | Kılınç Ali Çağatay,Bellibaş Mehmet Şükrü,Gümüş Sedat Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. (2017): 132 - 144. |
| MLA | Kılınç Ali Çağatay,Bellibaş Mehmet Şükrü,Gümüş Sedat Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. , 2017, ss.132 - 144. |
| AMA | Kılınç A,Bellibaş M,Gümüş S Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. . 2017; 132 - 144. |
| Vancouver | Kılınç A,Bellibaş M,Gümüş S Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. . 2017; 132 - 144. |
| IEEE | Kılınç A,Bellibaş M,Gümüş S "Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study." , ss.132 - 144, 2017. |
| ISNAD | Kılınç, Ali Çağatay vd. "Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study". (2017), 132-144. |
| APA | Kılınç A, Bellibaş M, Gümüş S (2017). Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 132 - 144. |
| Chicago | Kılınç Ali Çağatay,Bellibaş Mehmet Şükrü,Gümüş Sedat Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 18, no.3 (2017): 132 - 144. |
| MLA | Kılınç Ali Çağatay,Bellibaş Mehmet Şükrü,Gümüş Sedat Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.18, no.3, 2017, ss.132 - 144. |
| AMA | Kılınç A,Bellibaş M,Gümüş S Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017; 18(3): 132 - 144. |
| Vancouver | Kılınç A,Bellibaş M,Gümüş S Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017; 18(3): 132 - 144. |
| IEEE | Kılınç A,Bellibaş M,Gümüş S "Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study." İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, ss.132 - 144, 2017. |
| ISNAD | Kılınç, Ali Çağatay vd. "Adaptation of Learning-Centered Leadership Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study". İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 18/3 (2017), 132-144. |
