Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 6 - 9 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery

Öz:
Konvansiyonel ve diyot lazer ile yapılan gingivektomi prosedürlerinin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması Amaç: Gingivektomi cerrahisinde konvansiyonel cerrahi veya 940 nm diyot lazer kullanımının hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu kontrollü klinik çalışma, anterior maksilla bölgesinde sadece estetik nedenlerle gingivektomi cerrahisi isteyen 20 sağlıklı hasta üzerinde yürütüldü. Hastalar her grupta 10 hasta olacak şekilde rastgele dağıtıldı. Test grubunda diyot lazer ile cerrahi uygulanırken, kontrol grubunda cerrahi işlem bisturi ile uygulandı. Ameliyat sonrası kanama oranı, Dünya Sağlık Örgütü tarafından belirlenen kanama kriterleri kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Ameliyat sonrası rahatsızlık düzeyi görsel analog skala (VAS) kullanılarak kaydedildi, ameliyat süresi her operasyon için değerlendirildi ve postoperatif analjezik gereklilikler değerlendirilip karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Kontrol grubunda cerrahi sırasında anestezi gereksinimi istatistiksel olarak daha yüksek bulundu (p<0.001). Ortalama kanama oranları, konvansiyonel ve lazer gruplarında sırasıyla 1.32 ve 0.24 idi (p<0.001). Test grubundaki hastalarda cerrahi sonrası ağrı yoktu, ancak kontrol grubunda VAS ağrı düzeyi yüksek bulundu ve değerler arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı (p<0.001). Gruplar arası ameliyat süreleri açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmadı. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları doğrultusunda, diyot lazer ile yapılan gingivektomi prosedürlerinin konvansiyonel tekniklere göre bariz avantajları bulunduğu gözlenmiştir
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tıbbi Araştırmalar Deneysel Anestezi Ortopedi

Konvansiyonel ve diyot lazer ile yapılan gingivektomi prosedürlerinin hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması

Öz:
Background: To compare the use of the 940 nm diode laser with conventional surgery in the management of soft tissue in gingivectomy procedures in terms of patient satisfaction. Methods: This controlled clinical trial was conducted on 20 healthy patients who needing esthetic-only gingivectomy in the anterior maxilla. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 10 each: experimental (diode laser-assisted surgery) and control (traditional surgery using scalpels). The bleeding rate following the surgery was assessed using the bleeding criteria established by the World Health Organization. The postsurgical discomfort level was recorded using visual analog scales (VAS), surgery time was evaluated for each operation and postoperative analgesic requirements were evaluated and compared. Results: In control groups, anesthesia requirements were found statistically higher during surgery (p<0.001). The average bleeding rates were 1.32 and 0.24 in the conventional and laser groups, respectively (p<0.001). Experimental patients had no postsurgical pain but in the control group, VAS pain level was found higher. The difference between VAS values in each groups were significant (p<0.001). There was no significant difference for surgery time between the treatment type. Conclusion: This study shows that the diode laser has a great advantage over conventional surgery in the gingivectomy procedures.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tıbbi Araştırmalar Deneysel Anestezi Ortopedi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Carranza FA, Hogan EL. Gingival enlargement. Newman MG, Takei HH and Carranza FA, editors. Carranza's clinical periodontology. Saunders; 2002. p. 279-96.
  • 2. Seki K, Sato S, Asano Y, Akutagawa H, Ito K. Improved pathologic teeth migration following gingivectomy in a case of idiopathic gingival fibromatosis. Quintessence Int 2010;41:543-5.
  • 3. Foley TF, Sandhu HS, Athanasopoulos C. Esthetic periodontal considerations in orthodontic treatment--the management of excessive gingival display. J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69: 368-72.
  • 4. Parker S. Low-level laser use in dentistry. Br Dent J 2007;202:131-8.
  • 5. de Santana-Santos T, de Souza-Santos a A, Martins-Filho PR, da Silva LC, de Oliveira ESED, Gomes AC. Prediction of postoperative facial swelling, pain and trismus following third molar surgery based on preoperative variables. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:e65-70.
  • 6. Ozcelik O, Cenk Haytac M, Kunin A, Seyd aoglu G. Improved wound healing by low-level laser irradiation after gingivectomy operations: a controlled clinical pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:250-4.
  • 7. Sarver DM. Use of the 810 nm diode laser: soft tissue management and orthodontic applications of innovative technology. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2006; 18: suppl 7-13.
  • 8. Vescovi P, Corcione L, Meleti M, Merigo E, Fornaini C, Manfredi M, et al. Nd:YAG laser versus traditional scalpel. A preliminary histological analysis of specimens from the human oral mucosa. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25:685-91.
  • 9. Fornaini C, Rocca JP, Bertrand MF, Merigo E, Nammour S, Vescovi P. Nd:YAG and diode laser in the surgical management of soft tissues related to orthodontic treatment. Photomed Laser Surg 2007; 25:381-92.
  • 10.Gontijo I, Navarro RS, Haypek P, Ciamponi AL, Haddad AE. The applications of diode and Er:YAG lasers in labial frenectomy in infant patients. J Dent Child (Chic) 2005;72:10-5.
  • 11.Coluzzi DJ. Fundamentals of dental lasers: science and instruments. Dent Clin North Am 2004 48:751- 70.
  • 12.Genovese MD, Olivi G. Use of laser technology in orthodontics: hard and soft tissue laser treatments. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2010;11:44-8.
  • 13.Luomanen M. Experience with a carbon dioxide laser for removal of benign oral soft-tissue lesions. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88:49-55.
  • 14.Pirnat S. Versatility of an 810 nm diode laser in dentistry: An overview. J Laser Health Acad 2007; 4:1-9.
  • 15.Shankar BS, T R, S NM, Reddy PS, Saritha G, Reddy JM. Chronic inflammatory gingival overgrowths: laser gingivectomy & gingivoplasty. J Int Oral Health 2013;5:83-7.
  • 16.Sobouti F, Rakhshan V, Chiniforush N, Khatami M. Effects of laser-assisted cosmetic smile lift gingivectomy on postoperative bleeding and pain in fixed orthodontic patients: a controlled clinical trial. Prog Orthod 2014;15:66.
  • 17.Ize-Iyamu IN, Saheeb BD, Edetanlen BE. Comparing the 810nm diode laser with conventional surgery in orthodontic soft tissue procedures. Ghana Med J 2013;47:107-11.
  • 18.Webert K, Cook RJ, Sigouin CS, Rebulla P, Heddle NM. The risk of bleeding in thrombocytopenic patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2006;91:1530-7.
  • 19.Kersten P, White PJ, Tennant A. Is the pain visual analogue scale linear and responsive to change? An exploration using Rasch analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e99485.
  • 20.Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Soft-tissue lasers in orthodontics: an overview. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:S110-4.
  • 21.Kafas P, Stavrianos C, Jerjes W, Upile T, Vourvachis M, Theodoridis M, et al. Upper-lip laser frenectomy without infiltrated anaesthesia in a paediatric patient: a case report. Cases J 2009;2: 7138.
  • 22.Grossi GB, Maiorana C, Garramone RA, Borgonovo A, Creminelli L, Santoro F. Assessing postoperative discomfort after third molar surgery: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65:901-17.
APA ÖNCÜ E, ERBEYOĞLU A, ALAN R (2017). Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery. , 6 - 9.
Chicago ÖNCÜ Elif,ERBEYOĞLU Ahmet Afşin,ALAN RAİF Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery. (2017): 6 - 9.
MLA ÖNCÜ Elif,ERBEYOĞLU Ahmet Afşin,ALAN RAİF Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery. , 2017, ss.6 - 9.
AMA ÖNCÜ E,ERBEYOĞLU A,ALAN R Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery. . 2017; 6 - 9.
Vancouver ÖNCÜ E,ERBEYOĞLU A,ALAN R Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery. . 2017; 6 - 9.
IEEE ÖNCÜ E,ERBEYOĞLU A,ALAN R "Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery." , ss.6 - 9, 2017.
ISNAD ÖNCÜ, Elif vd. "Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery". (2017), 6-9.
APA ÖNCÜ E, ERBEYOĞLU A, ALAN R (2017). Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery. Selcuk Dental Journal, 4(1), 6 - 9.
Chicago ÖNCÜ Elif,ERBEYOĞLU Ahmet Afşin,ALAN RAİF Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery. Selcuk Dental Journal 4, no.1 (2017): 6 - 9.
MLA ÖNCÜ Elif,ERBEYOĞLU Ahmet Afşin,ALAN RAİF Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery. Selcuk Dental Journal, vol.4, no.1, 2017, ss.6 - 9.
AMA ÖNCÜ E,ERBEYOĞLU A,ALAN R Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2017; 4(1): 6 - 9.
Vancouver ÖNCÜ E,ERBEYOĞLU A,ALAN R Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2017; 4(1): 6 - 9.
IEEE ÖNCÜ E,ERBEYOĞLU A,ALAN R "Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery." Selcuk Dental Journal, 4, ss.6 - 9, 2017.
ISNAD ÖNCÜ, Elif vd. "Comparison of gingivectomy procedures for patient satisfaction: Conventional and diode laser surgery". Selcuk Dental Journal 4/1 (2017), 6-9.