Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 40 Sayfa Aralığı: 42 - 57 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior

Öz:
Bu çalışma, erken yetişkinlik dönemindeki üniversite öğrencilerinin ebeveynlerinin davranışlarının onların öz-yeterlik algıları ve benlik (özerk, ilişkisel, özerk--ilişkisel) ile olan ilişkisini araştırmayı amaçlamıştır. Ebeveynlik davranışları olarak, otoriter--itaat bekleme, sıcaklık/yakınlık ve psikolojik kontrol alt başlıklarından sevgiyi esirgeme ve suçluluk yaratma incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, benlik modeli olarak, Kağıtçıbaşı'nın (l996a) "özerk-ilişkisel benlik' modeli temel alınmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini yaşları 18--23 arasında değişen, uygunluk yöntemi ile seçilmiş, 332 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın verileri, üniversite öğrencilerinin kendi benlik stillerini, öz--yeterlik algılarını ve ebeveynlerinin (hem anne hem de baba) davranışlarını ölçekler aracılığıyla değerlendirdikleri niceliksel yöntemlerle elde edilmiştir. Çalışma bulgularına göre (i) cinsiyetin ilişkisel ve özerk--ilişkisel benlik düzeyleri ile ilişkili olduğu; (ii) öz-yeterlik algısının, özerk benlik ve özerk--ilişkisel benlik ile pozitif yönde ilişkili olduğu; (iii) sıcak ve yakın anne--baba davranışlarının, bireyin ilişkisel benlik düzeyi ile pozitif yönde ilişkili olduğu; (iv) anne--babaların sevgilerini esirgeme yoluyla uyguladıkları psikolojik kontrolün bireyin özerk- ilişkisel benlik düzeyi ile negatif yönde ilişkili olduğu; (v) öz--yeterlik algısı düşük olan bireylerde, babalarının sıcak ve yakın davranışlarının, bireylerin özerk-ilişkisel benlik düzeyi ile pozitif yönde ilişkili bulunmuştur. Bu çalışmanın en önemli katkısı, Türk kültüründeki ebeveyn davranışlarını, bu davranışların bireylerin farklı benlik tipleri ile ilişkisini ve bu ilişkiyi, hem anne hem de baba davranışlarına odaklanarak araştırmasıdır. Özellikle, babaların genç yetişkin çocukları ile olan ilişkilerine yönelik yapılan ender çalışmalardan olması, bu çalışmanın literatüre katkıları bakımından önem taşımaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Psikoloji

Benlik Gelişiminin Öz-Yeterlik Algısı ve Ebeveyn Davranışlarıyla İlişkisi

Öz:
This study aims to examine the relationship between parenting behaviors and the self-efficacy and self (autonomous, related, and autonomous—related) in university students. Obedience demanding, warmth and responsiveness, and psychological control with love withdrawal and guilt induction dimensions were investigated as the parenting behaviors. The conceptual framework of the study was based on Kagitcibasi’s (l996a) autonomous—related self—development model. The sample of the study is composed of 332 university students aged 18-23 that were selected by convenience sampling. The university students reported on the levels of their own parents’ behaviors (both mother and father), their self—efficacy and their self with questionnaires. The results of the study showed that (i) the gender of the students was associated with the related self and autonomous—related self (ii) the self—efficacy of the students was positively linked to their autonomous self and autonomous—related self scores; (iii) warmth and responsive mother and father behaviors were positively linked with students’ related self; (iv) the parental use of psychological control by using love withdrawal was negatively linked to students’ autonomous-related self; (v) the fathers’ warmth and responsive behaviors had protective role on the development of autonomous—related self in students with lower levels of self—eüîcacy. The importance of this study is the investigation of both maternal and paternal parenting behaviors used as different discipline techniques in Turkish culture and their associations with the development of self during the early adulthood period. The paternal behaviors and their associations with development were rarely studied in the literature. This aspect of the current study is also critically important for possible contributions to the literature.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Psikoloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akcinar, B. ve Baydar, N. (2014). Parental control is not unconditionally detrimental for externalizing beha— viors in early childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38, 2, 118 127.
  • Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting neglected construct. Child Develop— ment, 67, 3296-3319.
  • Barber, B. K. ve Harmon, E. L. (2002). Violating the self: Parental psychological control of children and adolescents. B. K. Barber (Der.), Intrusive Paren— ting: How Psychological Control Aflects Children and Adolescents içinde (s. 15). Washington, DC American Psychological Association Press.
  • Barber, B. K., Olsen, J. E. ve Shagle, S. C. (1994). Asso— ciations between parental psychological and beha— vioral control and youth internalized and extemali— zed behaviors. Child Development, 65, 1120—1136.
  • Barber, B. K. ve Xia, M. (2013). The centrality of control to parenting and its effects. Morris, Amanda Shef— field ve Harrist, Amanda W. (Der.). Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development içinde (s. 61—87).
  • Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. Baumeister, R. F. (Der.) (1999). The self in social psy— chology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  • Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M. ve Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: an interpersonal approach. Psycho— logical bulletin, II5, 243—267.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122.
  • Bean, R. A., Bush, K. R., McKenry, P. C. ve Wilson, S. M. (2003). The impact of parental support, beha— vioral control, and psychological control on the academic achievement and self—esteem of African American and European American adolescents. Journal ofAdolescent Research, 18, 523—541.
  • Bowen, M. (1966). The use of family theory in clinical practice. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 7, 345—374.
  • Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S. ve Larivee, S. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self—regulation and performance among junior and senior high-school age students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 4, 153—164.
  • Bowlby, ., (1969). Attachment and loss: Cilt Attach— ment. New York: Basic Books.
  • Bradley, R. H., Whiteside, L., Caldwell, B., Casey, P. H.,Kelleher, K., Pope, S.ve ark. (1993). Maternal IQ, the home environment and child IQ in lowbirthweight, premature children. International Journal ofBehavioural Development, 6, 61—74.
  • Bradley, R. H., Corwyn, R. F., Burchinal, P., McAdoo, H. P. ve Garcia-Coll, C. (2001). The home environ— ments of children in the United States Part II: Re— lations with behavioral development through age thirteen. Child Development, 72, 1868—1886.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human de— velopment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Brooks—Gunn, J. ve Duncan, G.J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. Futures of Children, 7, 55-71.
  • Budak, S. (2000). Psikoloji Sözlüğü. Ankara: Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları.
  • Chen, X.; Liu, M. ve Li, D. (2000). Parental warmth, control, and indulgence and their relations to ad— justment in Chinese children: longitudinal study. Journal ofFamily Psychology, 14, 401—419.
  • Cox, M. J. ve Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. An— nual Review ofPsychology, 48, 243-267.
  • Deater—Deckard K. ve Dodge, K. A. (1997). Externali— zing behavior problems and discipline revisited: nonlinear effects of culture, context, and gender. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 161—175.
  • Doğruyol, B. (2008). The Impact ofParental Control and Support on The Development of Chronic Self-Re— gulatory ocus. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., van de Vijver, F. J., Kağitçibasi, Ç. ve Poortinga, Y. H. (2006). Families across cul— tures: 30-nation psychological study. Cambridge University Press.
  • Grolnick, W.S. (2003). The psychology ofparental cont— rol: How well-meant parenting backfires. Hillsda— le, NJ: Lawrence E. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Harma, M. (2008). The Impact ofParental Control and Marital Conflict on Adolescents’ Self-Regulation andAdjustment. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Jones, W. H. ve Kugler, K. (1993). Interpersonal correlates of the guilt inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 246-258.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996a). Family and human develop— ment across cultures: view from the other side. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996b). Özerk-ilişkisel benlik: Yeni bir sentez. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, II, 36-43.
  • Kagitcibasi, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cul— tural context implications for self and family. Jour— nal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403—422.
  • Kagitcibasi, C. (2007). Family, self, and human deve— lopment across cultures: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2010). Benlik, aile ve insan gelişimi: Kültürel psikoloji. Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Kağıtçıbaşı, C. ve Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children and family change: three decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology: International Review, 54, 317—337.
  • Kesebir, S., Kavzoğlu, S. Ö. ve Üstündağ, M. F. (2011). Bağlanma ve psikopatoloji. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 3, 321—342.
  • Kındap, Y., Sayıl, M. ve Kumru, A. (2008). Anneden algı— lanan kontrolün niteliği ile ergenin psikososyal uyu— mu ve arkadaşlıkları arasındaki ilişkiler: Benlik de— gerinin aracı rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 23, 92—107.
  • Kowal, J. ve Fortier, M. (1999). Motivational determinants of flow: Contrıbutions from self— determination theory. Journal ofSocial Psychology, 139, 355—369.
  • Kurt, D., Sayil, M. ve Tepe, Y. K. (2013). Ana babanın psikolojik kontrolü ile gencin yalnızlığı arasındaki ilişkide kişilerarası güven inancı ve bağlanmanın Rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 28, 105—116.
  • Kwak, K. (2003). Adolescents and their parents: review of intergenerational family relations for immigrant and non-immigrant families. Human De— velopment, 46, 115—136.
  • Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L. ve Dom— busch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049—1065.
  • Leondari, A. ve Kiosseoglou, G. (2002). Parental, psychological control and attachment in late adoles— cents and young adults. Psychological Reports, 90, 1015-1030.
  • Meeus, W. I. M., Oosterwegel, A. ve Vollebergh, W. (2002). Parental and peer attachment and identity development in adolescence. Journal of Adoles— cence, 25, 93—106.
  • Morsünbül, Ü. (2012). Özerklik ve Ruh Sağlığına Etkisi. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 4, 260—278.
  • Neff, K. D. ve McGehee, P. (2010). Self—compassion and psychological resilience among adolescents and young adults. Selfand Identity, 9, 225—240.
  • Niemiec, C. P. ve Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, com— petence, and relatedness in the classroom Applying self—determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133-144.
  • Olsen, S. F., Yang, C., Hart, C. H., Robinson, C. C., Wu, P., Nelson, D. A., Nelson, L. J., Jin, S., ve Wo, J. (2002). Maternal psychological control and pres— chool children’s behavioral outcomes in China, Russia, and the United States. B. K. Barber (Der.), Intrusive parenting: How psychological control af— fects children and adolescents, içinde (s. 235—262). Washington, DC American Psychological Association Press.
  • Radke-Yarrow, M., Richters, J. ve Wilson, W. E. (1988). Child development in network of relationships.
  • R. Hinde ve J. Stevenson—Hinde (Der.), Relations— hips withinfamilies içinde (s. 48-67). Oxford, Eng— land: Clarendon.
  • Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2000). Self—determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well—being. American Ps— ychologist, 55, 68.
  • Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. ve Grolnick, W. S. (1995). Au— tonomy, relatedness, and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. Ariel, 128, 155.
  • Rohner, R. P. (1986). The Warmth Dimension: Foun— dations of Parental Acceptance-Rejection Theory. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  • Rohner, R. P., Khaleque, A. ve Cournoyer, D. E. (2005). Parental acceptance rejection theory, methods, eVidence, and implications. Ethos, 33, 299—334.
  • Sherer, M. ve Adams, C. H. (1983). Construct validation of the self-efficacy scale. Psychological Reports, 53, 899—902.
  • Tepe, Y. K. ve Sayıl, M. (2012). Ebeveyn kontrolü ve ergenin sosyal işlevselliği arasındaki bağlantıda ilişkisel saldırganlığın aracı rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 27, 133—137.
  • Turner, E. A., Chandler, M. ve Heffer, R. W. (2009). The influence of parenting styles, achievement motivation, and self—efficacy on academic performance in college students. Journal of College Student Deve— lopment, 50, 337—346.
  • Van Petegem, S., Beyers, W., Vansteenkiste, M. ve Soenens, B. (2012). On the association between adolescent autonomy and psychosocial functioning: examining decisional independence from self—de— termination theory perspective. Developmental Ps— ychology, 48, 76.
  • Vannoy, D. (1991). Social differentiation, contemporary marriage, and human development. Journal ofFa— mily Issues, 12, 251—267.
  • Vansteenkiste, M., Zhou, M., Lens, W. ve Soenens, B. (2005). Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese leamers: Vitalizing or immobili— zing? Journal ofEducational Psychology, 97, 468.
  • Varan, A. (2005). Relation between perceived paren— tal acceptance and intimate partner acceptance in Turkey: Does history repeat itself? Ethos, 33, 414- 426.
  • Yaban, E. H., Sayıl, M. ve Tepe, Y. K. (2014). Are discrepancies in perceptions of psychological control related to maladjustment? study of adolescents and their parents in Turkey. International Journal ofBehavioral Development, 38, 550—562
  • Yıldırım, F. ve İlhan, İ. Ö. (2010). Genel öz yeterlilik ölçeği türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 21, 301—308.
  • Yılmaz, A. (2000). Anne—baba tutum ölçeğinin güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 7, 160—172.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psy— chology, 25, 82—91.
APA AKÇİNAR B, ÖZBEK E (2017). Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior. , 42 - 57.
Chicago AKÇİNAR Berna,ÖZBEK Ebru Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior. (2017): 42 - 57.
MLA AKÇİNAR Berna,ÖZBEK Ebru Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior. , 2017, ss.42 - 57.
AMA AKÇİNAR B,ÖZBEK E Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior. . 2017; 42 - 57.
Vancouver AKÇİNAR B,ÖZBEK E Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior. . 2017; 42 - 57.
IEEE AKÇİNAR B,ÖZBEK E "Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior." , ss.42 - 57, 2017.
ISNAD AKÇİNAR, Berna - ÖZBEK, Ebru. "Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior". (2017), 42-57.
APA AKÇİNAR B, ÖZBEK E (2017). Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20(40), 42 - 57.
Chicago AKÇİNAR Berna,ÖZBEK Ebru Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 20, no.40 (2017): 42 - 57.
MLA AKÇİNAR Berna,ÖZBEK Ebru Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, vol.20, no.40, 2017, ss.42 - 57.
AMA AKÇİNAR B,ÖZBEK E Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2017; 20(40): 42 - 57.
Vancouver AKÇİNAR B,ÖZBEK E Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları. 2017; 20(40): 42 - 57.
IEEE AKÇİNAR B,ÖZBEK E "Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior." Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20, ss.42 - 57, 2017.
ISNAD AKÇİNAR, Berna - ÖZBEK, Ebru. "Self-Efficacy Perception of Self-Development and Parental Behavior". Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 20/40 (2017), 42-57.