Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 477 - 480 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119 İndeks Tarihi: 10-09-2018

The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience

Öz:
Aim: Kidney biopsy is the golden standard method for both diagnosis and determining the therapeutic options in renal parenchymal diseases. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the results of kidney biopsies that have been performed in the last 6 years.Material and Methods: The results of 202 patients who underwent renal biopsy in our hospital between 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively evaluated.Results: The mean age of the patients were found as 50.7 ± 15.1 years. The male and female numbers of the patients were 114 (56.4%) and 88 (44.6%) respectively. Proteinuria in 96 patients (47.5%) was the most common indication for kidney biopsy. When we evaluated the biopsy results; 123 (60.9%) of the patients were diagnosed for primary glomerulonephritis, 43 (21.3%) of the patientswere diagnosed for secondary glomerulonephritis while 36 (17.8%) of the patients were diagnosed for tubulointerstitial involvement. The most common pathological diagnosis were Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in 40 patients (19.8%) and Immune Globulin A Nephropathy in 38 patients (18.8%) in our patient group who had primary glomerulonephritis.Conclusion: The most common pathology of the patients who had native kidney biopsy was primary glomerulonephritis. 61.3% of the patients who had diagnosis for Diabetes Mellitus had pathologies other than Diabetic Nephropathy shows the importance of screening any other co-existing pathologies in this group of patients. Uncontrolled use of the drugs accelerates the rate of Tubulointerstitial Nephritis as the primary and co-existing pathological diagnosis.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Genel ve Dahili Tıp
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ulinski T, Sellier-Leclerc AL, Tudorache E, Bensman A, Aoun B. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 2012;27(7):1051-7.
  • Breedveld FC, Markusse HM, MacFarlane JD. Subcutaneous fat biopsy in the diagnosis of amyloidosis secondary to chronic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1989;7(4):407-10.
  • Haruhara K, Tsuboi N, Kanzaki G, Koike K, Suyama M, Shimizu A, et al.Glomerular Density in Biopsy-Proven Hypertensive Nephrosclerosis. Am J Hypertens 2015;28(9):1164-71.
  • Obialo CI, Hewan-Lowe K, Fulong B. Nephrotic proteinuria as a result of essential hypertension. Kidney Blood Press Res 2002;25(4):250-4.
  • Chong YB, Keng TC, Tan LP, Ng KP, Kong WY, Wong CM, et al. Clinical predictors of non-diabetic renal disease and role of renal biopsy in diabetic patients with renal involvement: a single centre review. Ren Fail 2012;34(3):323-8.
  • Qian Y, Zuo K, Li S, Zeng C, Liu Z, Wu Y. Membranous nephropathy occurring with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Clin Nephrol 2017;87 (2017)(3):140-6.
  • Bergesio F, Ciciani AM, Santostefano M, Brugnano R, Manganaro M, Palladini G, et al. Immunopathology Group, Italian Society of Nephrology. Renal involvement in systemic amyloidosis-an Italian retrospective study on epidemiological and clinical data at diagnosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22(6):1608-18.
  • Gesualdo L, Di Palma AM, Morrone LF, Strippoli GF, Schena FP; Italian Immunopathology Group, Italian Society of Nephrology. The Italian experience of the national registry of renal biopsies. Kidney Int 2004;66(3)890-4.
  • Rivera F, Lopez-Gomez JM, Perez-Garcia R. Clinicopathologic correlation of renal pathology in Spain. Kidney Int 2004;66(3):898-904.
  • Pişkinpaşa S, Dede F, Akoğlu H, ve ark. Böbrek Biyopsilerinin Klinikopatolojik Değerlendirmesi: Tek Merkez Deneyimi. Turk Neph Dial Transpl 2012;21:167-72.
  • Sen S, Sarsik B. A proposed histopathologic classification, scoring, and grading system for renal amyloidosis: standardization of renal amyloid biopsy report. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2010;134(4):532-44.
  • Fuiano G, Mazza G, Comi N, Caglioti A, De Nicola L, Iodice C, et al. Current indications for renal biopsy: a questionnaire- based survey. Am J Kidney Dis 2000;35:448-57.
  • McQuarrie EP, Mackinnon B, Young B, Yeoman L, Stewart G, Fleming S, et al. Scottish renal biopsy registry. Centre variation in incidence, indication and diagnosis of adult native renal biopsy in Scotland. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;24(5):1524-8.
  • Pirani CL. Evaluation of kidney biopsy specimens, In Tisher CG, Brenner BM (eds): Renal Pathology: With Clinical and Functional Correlations (2nd ed). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott 1994;85-115.
APA SAYİN B (2017). The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience. , 477 - 480. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
Chicago SAYİN Burak The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience. (2017): 477 - 480. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
MLA SAYİN Burak The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience. , 2017, ss.477 - 480. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
AMA SAYİN B The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience. . 2017; 477 - 480. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
Vancouver SAYİN B The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience. . 2017; 477 - 480. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
IEEE SAYİN B "The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience." , ss.477 - 480, 2017. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
ISNAD SAYİN, Burak. "The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience". (2017), 477-480. https://doi.org/10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
APA SAYİN B (2017). The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience. İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi, 24(4), 477 - 480. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
Chicago SAYİN Burak The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience. İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi 24, no.4 (2017): 477 - 480. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
MLA SAYİN Burak The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience. İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi, vol.24, no.4, 2017, ss.477 - 480. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
AMA SAYİN B The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience. İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi. 2017; 24(4): 477 - 480. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
Vancouver SAYİN B The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience. İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi. 2017; 24(4): 477 - 480. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
IEEE SAYİN B "The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience." İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi, 24, ss.477 - 480, 2017. 10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119
ISNAD SAYİN, Burak. "The evaluation of kidney biopsy results in the 6 years period: single center experience". İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi 24/4 (2017), 477-480. https://doi.org/10.5455/jtomc.2017.09.119