Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis

ŞENER, Sevgi Özcan; BÜYÜKERKMEN, Emine Begüm; MAĞAT, GÜLDANE

doi:10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293

Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis

GÜLDANE MAĞAT, (Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız ve Çene Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye)

Emine Begüm BÜYÜKERKMEN, (Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye)

Sevgi Özcan ŞENER (Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız ve Çene Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye)

Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi

0 0

Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 77 - 83 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293 İndeks Tarihi: 07-01-2019

Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis

Öz:

Objective: The point of this research was to assess impact of the fixed prosthesis on the trabecular structure of condyle using fractal analysis (FA). Material and Methods: In this retrospective research, 100 dental panoramic radiographs of males and females taken for routine dental examination of patients between 30-44 years who are utilizing unilateral fixed prosthesis were chosen. Regions of interest (50×50 pixels) were selected within the cortical boundary of the mandibular condyle, and the fractal dimension (FD) was calculated using the box-counting method with ImageJ version 1.48. Results: The mean age was 37.78±0.44 years. The mean FD was 1.26±0.12. There was no statistically significant difference between the right and left condyles on both genders for FD values (p>0.05). It was found that a significant difference in FD values between males and females (p<0.01). Males had greater FD values than females. Whereas the mean FD value was 1.21±0.19 in females, the mean FD value of males was 1.32±0.08. A positive significant correlation was found between age and FD values for both condyles (p<0.05). Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that the use of fixed prosthesis had no effect on the trabecular structure of the condyle. The FD value decreased with age, especially in females. Radiographic findings should be supported electromyographic results to clarify the relationship between masticatory activity and mandibular remodeling in this region.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Sabit Protezin Kondilin Trabeküler Yapısına Etkisinin Değerlendirilmesi: Radyografik Doku Analizi

Öz:

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı sabit protezin kondilin trabeküler yapısına olan etkisini fraktal analiz (FA) kullanarak değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif araştırmada, rutin diş muayenesi için alınmış dental panoramik radyografisi olan hastalar arasından 30-44 yaş arasında olan ve tek taraflı sabit protez kullanan 50 kadın ve 50 erkek birey, toplam 100 kişi seçildi. İlgilenilen bölgeler (50 x 50 piksel), mandibular kondilin kortikal sınırları içinde seçilmiştir ve fraktal boyut (FB), ImageJ versiyon 1.48 olan kutu sayma yöntemi kullanılarak hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması 37,78±0,44 yıl idi. Ortalama FB değeri 1,26±0,12 idi. FB değerleri için her iki cinsiyette sağ ve sol kondiller arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık yoktu (p>0,05). Erkekler ve kadınların FB değerleri arasında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu tespit edildi (p<0,01). Erkeklerin FB değerleri kadınlara göre daha fazlaydı. Kadınlarda ortalama FB değeri 1,21±0,19 iken erkeklerin ortalama FB değeri 1,32±0,08 idi. Her iki kondil için de yaş ve FD değerleri arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki bulundu (p<0.05). Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın bulguları sabit protez kullanımının kondilin trabeküler yapısına bir etkisi olmadığını göstermiştir. Özellikle kadınlarda FD değeri yaşla birlikte azalmaktadır. Bu bölgedeki çiğneme aktivitesi ile mandibular remodeling arasındaki ilişkiyi netleştirmek için radyografik bulgular, elektromiyografik sonuçlarla desteklenmelidir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Diş Hekimliği

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

41. Pirttiniemi P, Kantomaa T. Relation of glenoid fossa morphology to mandibulofacial asym-metry, studied in dry human Lapp skulls. Acta Odontol Scand 1992;50(4):235-43.
40. Lin YT, Lin WH, Lin YT. Immediate and six-month space changes after premature loss of a primary maxillary first molar. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138(3):362-8.
39. Yasar F, Akgunlu F. Evaluating mandibular cortical index quantitatively. Eur J Dent 2008;2(4):283-90.
38. Parkinson IH, Fazzalari NL. Methodological principles for fractal analysis of trabecular bone. J Microsc 2000;198(Pt 2):134-42.
37. Arsan B, Köse TE, Çene E, Özcan İ. Assess-ment of the trabecular structure of mandibular condyles in patients with temporomandibular dis-orders using fractal analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017;123(3):382-91.
36. Aranha Watanabe PC, Moreira Lopes De Faria L, Mardegan Issa JP, Caldeira Monteiro SA, Tiossi R. Morphodigital evaluation of the trabecular bone pattern in the mandible using digitized panoramic and periapical radi-ographs. Minerva Stomatol 2009;58(3):73-80.
35. Kavitha MS, Park SY, Heo MS, Chien SI. Dis-tributional variations in the quantitative corti-cal and trabecular bone radiographic measurements of mandible, between Male and female populations of Korea, and its uti-lization. PLoS One 2016;11(12):e0167992.
34. Sindeaux R, Figueiredo PT, de Melo NS, Guimarães AT, Lazarte L, Pereira FB, et al. Fractal dimension and mandibular cortical width in normal and osteoporotic men and women. Maturitas 2014;77(2):142-8.
33. Geraets WG, van der Stelt PF. Fractal prop-erties of bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29(3):144-53.
32. Wilding RJ, Slabbert JC, Kathree H, Owen CP, Crombie K, Delport P. The use of fractal analysis to reveal remodelling in human alve-olar bone following the placement of dental im-plants. Arch Oral Biol 1995;40(1):61-72.
31. Southard TE, Southard KA, Jakobsen JR, Hillis SL, Najim CA. Fractal dimension in radi-ographic analysis of alveolar process bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82(5):569-76.
30. Alman AC, Johnson LR, Calverley DC, Grunwald GK, Lezotte DC, Hokanson JE. Diagnostic capabilities of fractal dimension and mandibular cortical width to identify men and women with decreased bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 2012;23(5):1631-6.
29. Sánchez I, Uzcátegui G. Fractals in dentistry. J Dent 2011;39(4):273-92.
28. Umemori S, Tonami K, Nitta H, Mataki S, Araki K. The possibility of digital imaging in the diagnosis of occlusal caries. Int J Dent 2010;2010:860515.
27. Uchiyama T, Tanizawa T, Muramatsu H, Endo N, Takahashi HE, Hara T. Three-dimensional microstructural analysis of human trabecular bone in relation to its mechanical properties. Bone 1999;25(4):487-91.
26. White SC, Cohen JM, Mourshed FA. Digital analysis of trabecular pattern in jaws of pa-tients with sickle cell anemia. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29(2):119-24.
25. Yasar F, Akgünlü F. Fractal dimension and la-cunarity analysis of dental radiographs. Den-tomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34(5):261-7.
24. Melsen B, Lang NP. Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral im-plants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12(2):144-52.
23. Law AN, Bollen AM, Chen SK. Detecting os-teoporosis using dental radiographs: a com-parison of four methods. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127(12):1734-42.
22. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Pa-tient risk related to common dental radi-ographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139(9): 1237-43.
21. Lee DH, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, Hong JU, Lee CW, Heo MS, et al. A clinical study of alveolar bone quality using the fractal dimension and the im-plant stability quotient. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40(1):19-24.
20. Liu J, Liu SY, Zhao YJ, Gu X, Li Q, Jin ZL, et al. Effects of occlusion on mandibular mor-phology and architecture in rats. J Surg Res 2016;200(2):533-43.
19. Termsuknirandorn S, Hosomichi J, Soma K. Occlusal stimuli influence on the expression of IGF-1 and the IGF-1 receptor in the rat periodontal ligament. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(4):610-6.
18. Shimomoto Y, Chung CJ, Iwasaki-Hayashi Y, Muramoto T, Soma K. Effects of occlusal stim-uli on alveolar/jaw bone formation. J Dent Res 2007;86(1):47-51.
17. Steigman S, Michaeli Y, Yitzhaki M, Weinreb M. A three-dimensional evaluation of the ef-fects of functional occlusal forces on the mor-phology of dental and periodontal tissues of the rat incisor. J Dent Res 1989;68(8):1269-74.
16. Maeda H, Suzuki H. [An experimental study of the orthodontic force effect on internal re-modeling of mandibular bone]. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi 1990;49(2):100-17.
15. Sato H, Kawamura A, Yamaguchi M, Kasai K. Relationship between masticatory function and internal structure of the mandible based on computed tomography findings. Am J Or-thod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128(6):766-73.
14. von Wowern N, Hjørting-Hansen E, Stoltze K. Changes in bone mass in rat mandibles after tooth extraction. Int J Oral Surg 1979;8(3):229-33.
13. Chilibeck PD, Sale DG, Webber CE. Exercise and bone mineral density. Sports Med 1995;19(2):103-22.
12. Kunii R, Yamaguchi M, Aoki Y, Watanabe A, Kasai K. Effects of experimental occlusal hy-pofunction, and its recovery, on mandibular bone mineral density in rats. Eur J Orthod 2008;30(1):52-6.
11. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Kappa Delta Award paper. Osteoregulatory nature of mechanical stimuli: function as a determinant for adaptive remodeling in bone. J Orthop Res 1987;5(2):300-10.
10. Rot I, Mardesic-Brakus S, Costain WJ, Saraga-Babic M, Kablar B. Role of skeletal muscle in mandible development. Histol Histopathol 2014;29(11):1377-94.
9. Jolley L, Majumdar S, Kapila S. Technical fac-tors in fractal analysis of periapical radi-ographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35(6): 393-7.
8. González‐Martín O, Lee EA, Veltri M. CBCT fractal dimension changes at the apex of imme-diate implants placed using undersized drilling. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(8):954-7.
7. Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC, Huh KH, Lee SP. Direct measurement of trabecular bone anisotropy using directional fractal di-mension and principal axes of inertia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104(1):110-6.
6. Huang CC, Chen JC, Chang YC, Jeng JH, Chen CM. A fractal dimensional approach to successful evaluation of apical healing. Int Endod J 2013;46(6):523-9.
5. Baksi BG, Fidler A. Fractal analysis of peri-apical bone from lossy compressed radi-ographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods. J Digit Imaging 2011;24(6):993-8.
4. Huh KH, Yi WJ, Jeon IS, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC, et al. Relationship between two-di-mensional and three-dimensional bone archi-tecture in predicting the mechanical strength of the pig mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101(3):363-73.
3. Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC, Huh KH. Comparison of trabecular bone anisotropies based on fractal dimensions and mean inter-cept length determined by principal axes of in-ertia. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007;45(4):357-64.
2. Bianchi AE, Dolci Jr G, Sberna MT, Sanfilippo S. Factors affecting bone response around loaded titanium dental implants: a literature re-view. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2004;3:135-40.
1. Huh KH, Baik JS, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, Choi SC, et al. Fractal analysis of mandibular trabecular bone: optimal tile sizes for the tile counting method. Imaging Sci Dent 2011;41(2):71-8.

APA	MAĞAT G, BÜYÜKERKMEN E, ŞENER S (2018). Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis. , 77 - 83. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
Chicago	MAĞAT GÜLDANE,BÜYÜKERKMEN Emine Begüm,ŞENER Sevgi Özcan Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis. (2018): 77 - 83. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
MLA	MAĞAT GÜLDANE,BÜYÜKERKMEN Emine Begüm,ŞENER Sevgi Özcan Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis. , 2018, ss.77 - 83. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
AMA	MAĞAT G,BÜYÜKERKMEN E,ŞENER S Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis. . 2018; 77 - 83. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
Vancouver	MAĞAT G,BÜYÜKERKMEN E,ŞENER S Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis. . 2018; 77 - 83. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
IEEE	MAĞAT G,BÜYÜKERKMEN E,ŞENER S "Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis." , ss.77 - 83, 2018. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
ISNAD	MAĞAT, GÜLDANE vd. "Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis". (2018), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293

APA	MAĞAT G, BÜYÜKERKMEN E, ŞENER S (2018). Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, 24(2), 77 - 83. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
Chicago	MAĞAT GÜLDANE,BÜYÜKERKMEN Emine Begüm,ŞENER Sevgi Özcan Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi 24, no.2 (2018): 77 - 83. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
MLA	MAĞAT GÜLDANE,BÜYÜKERKMEN Emine Begüm,ŞENER Sevgi Özcan Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.24, no.2, 2018, ss.77 - 83. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
AMA	MAĞAT G,BÜYÜKERKMEN E,ŞENER S Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018; 24(2): 77 - 83. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
Vancouver	MAĞAT G,BÜYÜKERKMEN E,ŞENER S Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis. Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018; 24(2): 77 - 83. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
IEEE	MAĞAT G,BÜYÜKERKMEN E,ŞENER S "Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis." Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi, 24, ss.77 - 83, 2018. 10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293
ISNAD	MAĞAT, GÜLDANE vd. "Evaluation of the Effect of Fixed Prosthesis on Trabecular Structure of Condyle: Radiographic Texture Analysis". Türkiye Klinikleri Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi 24/2 (2018), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.5336/dentalsci.2018-60293