Newspapers try to illuminate readers with a wide variety of news from politics to economy, from sports to magazine. It is observed that Turkish press offers a rich content of the aforementioned areas. However, to say that the news of culture, art and literature, dams and coverages are sufficient, satisfying and informative, is not possible. The area of newspapers spared to news, dams and coverages about culture, art and literature is so limited and inefficient contextually; this case is clarified by comparison with economy, politics, sports. Morever, newspapers has no “culture-art” pages or that pages are canceled in excess of the news about other areas are also known. This situation is a serious problem for a average newspaper reader whose relevance is “superficial” with culture, art and literature; and those who follow the news, information and debate relating to these areas, devoid of this opportunity. This case has become more apparent especially after the year of 1950. Newspapers, in case of a full agenda, firstly sacrifice their culture and art pages. Unfortunately, the first pages they shorten will be the culture and art pages. In addition, the journalists who regulate the culture and art pages are not considered as active members of a profession by the newspaper management. In this study, the news/pages about culture, art and literature of newspapers representing the Turkish press, will be analyzed by content analysis and discourse analysis and the accuracy will be checked of abovementioned assumption