AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN

TUTULMAZ, Onur

AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN

Onur TUTULMAZ (Hitit Üniversitesi)

IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal

4 2

Yıl: 2012 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 603 - 643 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN

Öz:

Sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve Sürdürülebilirlik konusu günümüzde gerek teorik alanda, gerekse de politik uygulama alanında gündemdeki önemli konulardan birini oluşturmaktadır. Sürdürülebilir kalkmmanm kavramlaştırılması aşamasıyla kendi interdisipliner yapısı içerisinde bulunan kavram-- sal ilişkileri önem kazanır. Bu ilişkilerin tanımlandığı çerçeve ise kavramm modellenmesine temel oluşturacaktır. Konu üzerine yapılan teorik ve uygulama çalışmaları genellikle bu modeller kullanı-- larak yapıldığı için modellenme aşaması önemli bir aşamayı oluşturur. Bu çalışmada sürdürülebilir kalkmmanm geniş kavramsal incelemesi gerçekleştirilmiş, modellemede kullanılacak teknik araçlar ve Sürdürülebilirlik ölçümleri incelenmiştir. Teknik incelemelerde öne çıkan çevresel Kuznets eğrisi ve çevresel içsel büyüme modelleri karşılaştırılarak; uygulamalarda öne çıkan çevresel Kuznets eğ-- risi modelleri özellikle eleştirilmiştir. Çalışma sonunda çevresel içsel büyüme modellerinin önemli bir boşluğu doldurma kapasitesine sahip olduğu saptanmış, buna karşın bu konuda hala önemli bir boşluğun olduğu sonuç olarak elde edilmiştir. Bu sebeple çevresel değerlendirmeyi gelişmeye içsel olarak dahil etme potansiyeline vurgu yapılarak çevresel içsel büyüme modelleri öne çıkartılırken, modelin uygulamasına yönelik çalışmalara yol açılması amaçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelime:

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMANIN MODELLENMESİ UZERINE BIR DEGERLENDİRME

Öz:

Sustainable development and sustainability subject is an important issue both in the aca— demical areas and in pragmatical and political applications. Conseptualization ofthe subject and the conseptual relations in this interdisciplinary area constitute, at the same time, the tools of the modellization of sustainable development. Being implemented an exclusive study on concepts related with sustainable development, technical tools to modelize sustainable development are determined and analyzed. The environmental Kuznets curve and environmental endogenous grth models come forward through the analysis. These two models are compared and critisized. EKC models critisized in terms of the depth of representation ability. Environmental endogenous growth models has potential in this respect, nevertheless, there are just few studies exist to fill the gap in this area. Therefore, underlining the potential that environmental valuation can be added to growth models endogenously, this study aims to propagate applications of the environmental endogenous model.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

AGHİON, P. VE HOWİTT, P. (1992). Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. Econometrica. 60 (2), 323-51.
AGHİON, P. VE HOWİTT, (2009). The Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
AGRAS, J. VE CHAPMAN, D. (1999). dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 28 (2), 267— 277.
ARROW, K. J. (1962). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29 (3), 155—173.
ARROW, K., DASGUPTA, P., GOULDER, L., DAİLIÇ G., EHRLİCH, P, HEAL VE DİĞERLERİ (2004). Are we consunıing too much? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18 (3) 147-172.
ATKINSON, G., DUBORG, R., HAMİLTON, K., MUNASİNGHE, M., PEARCE VE D., YOUNG, C. (1997).
Measuring Sustainable Development. Cheltenham. UK ve Lyme, USA: Edward Elgar Pub.
BAKER, S. (2006). Sustainable Development. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
BARBİER, E. (1987). The concept of environmental sustainable development. Environmental Conservation. 14, 0.
BARBİER, E.B., BURGESS, J.C. VE FOLKE, C. (1994). Paradise Lost? The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity. London:Earthscan.
BARBİER, E.B., PEARCE, D. VE MARKANDYA, A. (1992). Environmental Sustainability and Cost-Benefit Analysis. Environment and Flaming A, 22 (9), 1259-1266.
BARNE I; J., ELLEMOR, H. VE D0- VERS, S. (2003). Sustainability and Interdisciplinarity. Stephen Dovers, David I. Stern and Micheal D. Young (eds.). New Dimensions in Ecological Economics, Integrated approaches to People and Nature (s. 88-101). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA.: Edward Elgar.
BARRO, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Ecomy, 98 (5), 103-26
BARRO, R.]. VE SALA-İ-MARTİN, X. (1992). Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 59 (4), 645-61.
BARRO, R.]. VE SALA-İ-MARTİN, X. (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw Hill.
BECİC, E., VE SVARC, J. (2009). Sustainable development: what are the measurement challenges? The 3rd OECD World Forum “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy“. Busan.
BECKER, E., JAHN, T. VE STİESS, 1. (1999). Exploring uncommon ground: sustainability and the social sciences. Becker and T. Jahn (eds.). Sustainability and the social sciences: crossdisciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientatio (s. 1-22). London and New York: Zed Books.
BO WERS, J. (199 7). Sustainability and Environmental Economics: An Alternative Text. Harlow, England: Longman Publishers Ltd.
CAMPAGNA, (2006). GIS for Sustainable Development. Boca Raton, US: Taylor and Fracis Group.
CARLEY, M. VE CHRISTIE, 1. (2000). Managing Sustainable Development. London, UK; Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
CARSON, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Boston, MAzHoughton Mifflin.
CASS, D. (1965). Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. Review of Economic Studies, 32, 233—240.
CONRAD, N. 0. (1992). Sustainable Deveopment: in the Constitution? Calgary: University of Calgary.
COSTANTİNİ, V. VE MONNİ, S. (2008). Environment, human development and economic growth. Ecological Economics, 64, 867—880. COSTANZA, R. (1989). What is Ecological Economics? Ecological Economics, 1, 1-7.
COSTANZA, R., CUMBERLAND, J., DALY, H., GOODLAND, R. VE NORGARD, R. (199 7). An Introduction to Ecological Economics. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: St. Lucie Press.
DALY, H.E. (1991D). Towards an Environmental Macroeconomics. Land Economics, 67 (2), 255-259.
DALY, H.E. (1992). Steady-state economics. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
DALY, H.E. (1996). Beyond Growth. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
DALY, H.E. (2005). Economics in full world. Scientific American, 293 (3), 100-107.
DALY, H.E. VE COSTANZA, R. (1992). Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Conservation Biology, (1), 37-46.
DASGUPTA, P. (2001). Human well-being and the natural environment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
DASGUPTA, (2009). The Welfare Economic Theory of Green National Accounts. Environmental and Resource Economics, 42 (1), 3-38.
DE BRUYN, S. VE HEİNTZ, R. (1999). The environmental Kuznets curve Hypothesis. J.C.J.M. van den Bergh (eds.). Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.
DİETZ, s., ADGER, W.N. (2003). Economic growth, biodiversity loss and conservation effort. Journal of Environmental Management, 68, 23—35.
DOMAR, E.D. (1946). Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment. Econometrica, 14, 137—47.
Dovers, S. (1997). Sustainability: demands on policy. Journal of Public Policy, 16, 303-318.
EHRLİCH, RR. (1989). The Limits to Substitution: Meta-Resource Depletion and new Economic-Ecological Paradigm. Ecological Economics, (1), 9-16.
EL SERAFY; S. (1991). The Environment as Capital. Robert Costanza (ed.). Ecological Economics: The science and management of sustainability (s. 168-175). New York: Columbia University Press.
EL SERAFIÇ S. (1997). Green Accounting andEconomic Policy. Ecological Economics, 21 (3), 217-229.
EKİNS, (2003). Identifying critical natural capital: Conclusions about critical natural capital. Ecological Economics, 44 (2-3), 277-292.
EKİNS, R, FOLKE, C., VE DE GROOT, R. (2003). Identifying critical natural capital. Ecological Economics, 44(2- 3), 159-163.
FABER, M, MANST EN, R. VE PROOPS, J. (1992). Humankind and the Environment: An Anatomy of Surprise and Ignorance. Environmental Values. (3), 217-241.
FA UCHEUX, S. VE FROGER, G. (1995). Decision-making under Environmental Uncertainty. Ecological Economics, 15 (1), 29-42.
FRİCKER, A. (2001). Measuring up tp sustainability Sustainable Futures Trust. Erişim: 25, 2, 2010, http://www/metafuture.org/ articlesbycolleagues/ AlanFricker/ Measuring%20up%20 to%2OSustainability.htm.
GLOMM, G. VE RAVİKUMAR, B. (1994). Growth-Inequalitv Trade-Offs in Model with Public Sector R&D. nadian Journal of Economics, 27 (2), 4234-93.
GLOMM, G. VE RAVİKUMAR, B. (19943). Public investment in infrastructure in simple growth model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 18 (6), 1173-1187.
GOODLAND, R. (1995). The Concept of Environmental Sustainability. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 26 (1), 1-24.
GOODLAND, R. VE DALI’; H.E. (1992). Ten Reasons Why Northern Income Growth Is Not the Solution to Southern Poverty. Robert Goodland, Herman Daly and Salah El Serafy (eds.). Population, Technology and Lifestyle (s. 128-145). Washington DC: Island Press.
GREİNER, A., SEMMLER, W. VE GONG, G. (2005). The Forces of Economic Growth: time series perspective. Princeton, NJ, Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.
GRAİNGER, A. (2004). Introduction. M. Purvis and A. Grainger (eds.). Exploring Sustainable Development: geographical perspectives (2nd ed.) (s. 1-32). London, UK, Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
GROSSMAN, G. (1995). Pollution and growthzwhat do we know? I. Goldin and A. Winters (eds.). The Economics of Sustainable Development (s. 19- 46). Cambridge, UK, New York, US: Cambridge University Press.
GROSSMAN, G. VE HELPMAN, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
GROSSMAN, G. VE KRUEGER, A. (1993). Environmental Impacts of North American Free Trade Agreement. P. Garber (ed.). The U. S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
HAMİLTON, K. (1994). Green Adjustments to GDP. Resources Policy, 20 (3), 155-168.
HAMİLTON, K. (2000). Genuine Savings as Sustainability Indicator. Washington: World Bank.
HARROD, R. (1939). An Essay on Dynamic Theory. Economic Journal, 49, 14 —33.
HARTWİCK, J.M. (1977). Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from exhaustable Resources. The American Economic Review, 67 (5), 972-74.
HARTWİCK, .].M (1978). Investing Returns from Depleting Renewable Resource Stocks and Intergenerational Equity. Economics Letters, (l), 85- 88.
HARTWİCK, J.M. (1978B). Substitution among Exhaustable Resources and Intergenerational Equity. Review of Economic Studies, 45 (2), 347-354.
HARTWİCK, .LM (1990). Natural Resources, National Accounting and Economic Depreciation. Journal of Public Economics, 43 (3), 291-304.
HARTWİCK, .LM (1993). Notes of Economic Depreciation of Natural Resource Stocks and National Accounting. Alfred Franz and Carsten Stahmer (eds.). Approaches to Environmental Accounting: Proceeding of the IARIW Conference on the Environmental Accounting 1991 (s. 167-198). Heidelberg: Springer.
HOHMEYER, 0. (1992). Renewables and the Full Costs of Energy. Energy Policy, 20 (4), 365-375.
HOLMBERG, J. VE SANDBROOK, R. (1992). Sustainable development: what is to be done? J. Holmberg (ed.) Making Development Sustainable: Redefining Institutions, Policies and Economics (s. 19-38). Wahington, DC: Island Press.
HOWARTH, R.B. AND NORGAARD, R.B. (1992). Environmental Valuation under Sustainable Development. The American Economic Review, 82 (2), 473-477.
HUETİNG, R. VE REİJNDERS, L. (1998). Sustainability is an Objective Concept. Ecological Economics, 27 (2), 139-147.
KOOPMANS, 11 C. (1965). On the concept of optimal economic growth. (Study Week on the) Econometric Approach to Development Planning (S. 225- 287). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
KUZNETS, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review, 45 (1), 1-28.
LUCAS, R.E. (1988). On The Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (1), 3-42.
MANAGİ, S. (2007). Technological Change and Environmental Policy. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
MCPHERSON, M.A. VE NİESWİADOMIÇ ML. (2005). Environmental Kuznets curve: threatened species and spatial effects. Ecological Economics, 55, 395—407.
MEADOWS, D.H., MEADOWS, D.L., RANDERS, J. VE BEHRENS, W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books.
MORSE, S. (2010). Sustainability: biological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
MUNASİNGHE, M. (1993). Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development. Washington. DC: World Bank.
MUNİER, N. (2005). Introduction to Sustainability. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
NEUMAYER, E. (1999). The ISEW: not an index of sustainable economic welfare. Social indicators research, 48 (1). 77-101.
NEUMAYER, E. (2000). On the methodology of ISEW, GPI and related measures: some constructive comments and some doubt on the “threshold” hypothesis. Ecological economics, 34 (3). 347-361.
NEUMAYER, E. (2003). Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
NEUMAYER, E. (2004). Sustainability and well-being indicators. United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) Research Paper 23/2004. Erişim: 22, 9, 2010, www.lse.ac.uk/ collections/ geograpthndEnvironment/ whosWho/ profiles/ neumayer/ p_df/ Sustainabilitywellbeingarticle.pdf.
NEUMAYER, E., (2010). Weak versus Strong Sustainability (3rd. ed.). Cheltenhem, UK, Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Inc.
NORDHA US, W.D. (1991). To Slow or not to Slow: The economics of the Greenhouse Effects. The Economic Journal, 101 (407), 920-37.
NORDHAUS, W.D. (1994). Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of the Climate Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
NORDHAUS, W.D. (2008). Question of Balance- Weighting the oppositions on Global Warming Policies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
NORGAARD, R.B. (1994). Development Betrayed: The end of Progress and Coevoulutionary Revisioning of the Future. London, New York: Routledge.
NORTON, B. G. (1986). Conservation and Preservation: Conceptual Rehabilitation. Environmental Ethics, 8, 195- 220.
NORTON, B. G. (1995). Evaluating ecosystem states: two competing paradigms. Ecological Economics, 14, 113-127.
PEARCE, D.W. (1998). Economics and Environment: Essays on Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, US: Edward Elgar.
PEARCE, D. W., BARBİER, E. VE MARKANDAYA, A. (1990). Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World. London: Edward Elgar.
PEZZEY, J. (1992A). Sustainability: An Interdisciplinary Guide. Environmental Values, (4), 321-362.
PEZZEY, J. (19923). Sustainable Development Concepts: An Economic Analysis. World Bank Environmental Paper (No. 2). Washington DC, USA: World Bank.
PEZZEY, J. (1997). Sustainability Constraints versus “Optimalityl versus Intertemporal Concern, and Axioms versus Data. Land Economics, 73, 448-66.
PEZZEY, J. VE TOMAN, M.A. (2002). Progress and Problems in the Economics of Sustainability. Tom Tietenberg and Henk Folmer (eds.). International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2002/2003 (s. 165-232). Chelhentam, UK and Northampton,MA: Edward Elgar.
PİTTEL, K. (2002). Sustainability and Endogenous Growth. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
PURVİS, M. VE GRAİNGER, A. (2004). Exploring sustainable development: geographical perspectives. London Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
RAMSEY, (1928). mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal, 152 (38), 543—559.
RANDALL, A. (1991). The Value of Biodiversity. Ambio, 20 (2), 64-68.
RAO, P. K. (2000). Sustainable Development: Economics and Policies, Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
REDCLİFT; M. (1987). Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. London: Methuen.
REES, WJI (1990). Atmospheric change: human ecology in disequilibrium. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 36, 103-124.
REES, W.Iİ (1991). The Ecology of Sustainable Development. Daysh, 2., Carley, M., Ekehorn, E., Philliphs-Howard, K. and R. Waller (eds.). Human Ecology, Environmental Education and Sustainable Development. CHEC and Centre for Human Ecology, University of Edinburgh.
REPETTO, R. VE CRUZ, W. (1991). Accounts Overdue:Natural resources depreciation in Costa Rica. Washington: World Resources Institute. RİCCİ, (2007). Channels of transmission of environmental policy to economic growth: survey of the theory. Ecological Economics, 60, 688-699.
ROGERS, P. R, JALAL, K. E, VE BOYD, J. A. (2006). An Introduction to Sustainable Development. Canada: Harvard University Press.
ROMER, P. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth. Journal of P0- litical Economy, 94, 1002—37.
ROMER, P. M. (1987). Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization. American Economic Review,. 77 (2), 56-62.
ROMER, P. M. (1990). Endogenous Technolo ical Chan e. Economy. 98 (5), 71-102.
SACHS, W. (ED.) (1993). Global ecology:a new arena of political conflict. London New York: Zed Books.
SEPPALA, T., HA UKİOJA, T. VE KAİVOOJA, J. (2001). The EKC hypothesis does not hold for Direct Material Flows: Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis tests for Direct material Flows in five industrial countries. Population and Environment, 23 (2), 217-237
SHAFİK, N. VE BANDYOPADHYAY, S. (1992). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross-Country Evidence. Background Paper for the World Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
SHAW, G.K. (2001). Review: Growth Theory and Sustainable Development by Lucas Bretschger. The Economic Journal, 472, 511-514.
SMULDERS, S. (19953). Entropy, Environment and Endogenous Economic Growth, International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 319-340.
SMULDERS, S. VE BRETSCHGER, L. (2000). Explaining Environmental Kuznets Curves: How Pollution Induces Policy and New Technology, Tilburg University CenteR Working Paper, No. 2000-95.
SNEDDON, C. (2000). Sustainability in ecological economics, ecology and livelihoods: review. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 521-549.
SOLOW, R. M. (1956). Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65—94.
SOLOW, R. (1974). Is the End of the World at Hand? A. Weintraub, E. Schwartz and J. Richard Aronson (eds.). The Economic Growth Controversy (s. 39-61). London2Macmillan.
SOLOW, R. M. (19743). lntergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources. Review of Economic Studies, Symposium, 29-46.
SOLOW, R. (1986). On the lntergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 88 (1), 141-149.
SOLOW, R. M. (1993). Sustainability: An Economist‘s Perspective. R. Dorfman and N. Dorfman (eds.), Selected Readings in Environmentaf Economics (s. 179-187). New York: Norton.
SOLOW, R. M. (19933). An Almost Practical Step Toward Sustainability. Resources Policy, 19 (3), 162-172.
SOLOW, R. (1997). Learning from‘ Learning by doingl: Lessons for economic growth, The Kenneth J. Arrow Lecture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
SPANGENBERG, J., HİNTERBERGER, F., MOLL, S. VE SCHÜTZ, H. (1999). Material Flow Analysis, TMR and the MIPS Concept: Contribution to the Development of the lndicators for Measuring Changes in Consumption and Production Patterns. lntemational Journal of Sustainable Development, (1), 491-505.
SPASH, CL. (1993). Economics, Ethics and Long-term Environmental Damages. Environmental Ethics, 10(1), 117-132.
STRANGE, T., VE BAYLEIÇ A. (2008). Susatainable Development: linking economy, society and environment. Paris, France: OECD Publications.
SWAN, W. (1956). Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation. Economic Record, 32 (63), 334 361.
TİETENBERG, J. VE HUETİNG, R. (1991). GNP and market prices: Wrong signals dor sustainable economic development that disguise environmental destruction. R. Goodland, H. Daly and S. El Serafy (eds.). Population, technology and lifestyle: The transition to sustainability (s. 52-62). Washington, DC: Island Press.
TIETENBERG, T. VE LEWIS, L. (2010). Environmental Economics and Policy (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. TURNER, R.K. VE PEARCE, D. (1992). Sustainable Development: Ethics and Economics. Working Paper PA 92-09, Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, Norwich; London,UK.
UTULMAZ, 0. (2005). Ulaştırma sektörü ve Türk havayolu ulaştırmasında stokastik smır yöntemiyle etkinlik analizi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi, Ankara.
UZAWA, H. (1965). Optimum Technical Change in an Aggregative Model of Economic Growth. International Economic Review. 6, 18-31.
VAZQUEZ-BARQUERO, A. (2002). Endogenous Development. London, UK; New York, US: Routledge. VİCTOR, RA. (2008). Managing without growth: slower by design, not disaster. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Pub.
WORLD COMİSSİON ON ENVİRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT WCED (198 7). Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press. WWF (2008). Living Planet Report 2008. Gland: World Wide Fund for Nature.
YANDLE, B., VİJAYARAGHAVAN, M. VE BHATTARAİ, M. (2002). Environmental Kuznets Curve: primer. Research Study No 1. Montana, USA: Political Economy Research Center (PERC). Erişim: 22, 01, 2011, http://www.macalester.edu/~wests/ econ23 1/yandleeta1.pdf.

APA	TUTULMAZ O (2012). AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN. , 603 - 643.
Chicago	TUTULMAZ Onur AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN. (2012): 603 - 643.
MLA	TUTULMAZ Onur AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN. , 2012, ss.603 - 643.
AMA	TUTULMAZ O AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN. . 2012; 603 - 643.
Vancouver	TUTULMAZ O AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN. . 2012; 603 - 643.
IEEE	TUTULMAZ O "AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN." , ss.603 - 643, 2012.
ISNAD	TUTULMAZ, Onur. "AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN". (2012), 603-643.

APA	TUTULMAZ O (2012). AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN. IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal, 2(3), 603 - 643.
Chicago	TUTULMAZ Onur AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN. IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal 2, no.3 (2012): 603 - 643.
MLA	TUTULMAZ Onur AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN. IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal, vol.2, no.3, 2012, ss.603 - 643.
AMA	TUTULMAZ O AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN. IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal. 2012; 2(3): 603 - 643.
Vancouver	TUTULMAZ O AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN. IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal. 2012; 2(3): 603 - 643.
IEEE	TUTULMAZ O "AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN." IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal, 2, ss.603 - 643, 2012.
ISNAD	TUTULMAZ, Onur. "AN EVALUATİON ON MODELIZATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMEN". IIB International Refereed Academic Social Sciences Journal 2/3 (2012), 603-643.