Yıl: 2017 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 8 Sayfa Aralığı: 553 - 570 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES

Öz:
This article attempts to understand the fate of conventional notions of photographic indexicality and referentiality in the digital era where digital images have replaced analog images almost completely. Following a critical overview of relevant literature on digital photography, the author makes a conceptual distinction between referentiality and indexicality with respect to their implications for the notion of photographic realism. With a particular focus on the concept of indexicality, defined herein as an element that radically determines the definition of photography, the author argues that the image becomes a “thing” in digital images in the absence of indexicality by using Jean-Paul Sartre’s notion of “illusion of immanence”, a claim that would strongly challenge the view that digital images can still be regarded as photographs that themselves presuppose a particular relationship between an image and its object
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Amelunxen, Hubertus v. 1996. “Photography after Photography: The Terror of the Body in Digital Space.” In Photography after Photography: Memory and the Representation in the Digital Age, ed. Hubertus v. Amelunxen et al., trans. Pauline Cumbers, 115-123. Munich: G+B Arts.
  • Archambault, Michael. “Film vs. Digital: A Comparison of the Advantages and Disadvantages.” http://petapixel.com/2015/05/26/film-vs-digital-a-comparison-of-theadvantages-and-disadvantages/.
  • Armstrong, Carol. 1998. Scenes in a Library: Reading the Photograph in the Book, 1843– 1975. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Arnheim, Rudolf. 1974. “On the Nature of Photography.” Critical Inquiry 1 no.1: 149- 161.
  • Barthes, Roland. 1981. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.
  • Batchen, Geoffrey. 1994. “Phantasm: Digital Imaging and the Death of Photography.” Aperture 136: 46-51.
  • Batchen, Geoffrey. 1997. Burning with Desire: The Conception of Photography. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
  • Batchen, Geoffrey. 2000. Each Wild Idea: Writing Photography History. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation, trans. Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1996. The Perfect Crime, trans. Chris Turner. London and New York: Verso.
  • Baudrillard, Jean. 2007. Fatal Strategies. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
  • Bazin, André. 1967. “The Ontology of the Photographic Image.” In What is Cinema?, Vol. 1, trans. Hugh Gray, 9-16. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Orig. pub. 1958.)
  • Binkley, Timothy. 1993. “Reconfiguring Culture.” In Future in Visions: New Technologies of the Screen, ed. Philip Hayward and Tana Wollen, 92-122. London: BFI.
  • Bolter, Jay David and Grusin, Richard. 2000. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Crary, Jonathan. 1992. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Cubitt, Sean et al. 2015. “Introduction: Materiality and Invisibility.” Digital Light, ed. Sean Cubitt et al., 7-20. London: Open Humanities Press.
  • Derrida, Jacques. 2010. Copy, Archive, Signature: A Conversation on Photography, trans. Jeff Fort. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Doane, Mary A. 2007. “The Indexical and the Concept of Medium Specificity.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 18, no. 1: 128-152.
  • Flusser, Vilém. 1986. “The Photograph as Post-Industrial Object: An Essay on the Ontological Standing of Photographs.” Leonardo 19, no. 4: 329-332.
  • Frosch, Paul. 2003. The Image Factory: Consumer Culture, Photography and the Visual Content Industry. Oxford and New York: Berg.
  • Geuens, Jean-Pierre. 2002. “The Digital World Picture.” Film Quarterly 55, no. 4: 16-27.
  • Gooskens, Geert. 2011. “The Digital Challenge: Photographic Realism Revisited.” Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics 3: 115-125.
  • Jäger, Gottfried. 1996. “Analogue and Digital Photography: The Technical Picture.” In Photography after Photography: Memory and the Representation in the Digital Age, ed.
  • Hubertus v. Amelunxen et al., trans. Libby Fink, 107-119. Munich: G+B Arts.
  • Jäger, Gottfried. 2003. “Abstract Photography.” In Rethinking Photography I+II: Narration and New Reduction in Photography, ed. Ruth Horak, 162-195. Salzburg: Fotohof Edition.
  • Kember, Sarah. 1998. Virtual Anxiety: Photography, New Technologies and Subjectivity. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
  • Krauss, Rosalind E. 1986. The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Lister, Martin. 2007. “A Sack in the Sand: Photography in the Age of Information.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 13, no. 3: 251-274.
  • Lister, Martin. 2009. “Photography in the Age of Electronic Imaging.” In Photography: A Critical Introduction, ed. Liz Wells, 311-344. London: Routledge.
  • Manovich, Lev. 2006. “The Paradoxes of Digital Photography.” In The Photography Reader, ed. Liz Wells, 240-249. London: Routledge.
  • Maynard, Patrick. 1983. “The Secular Icon: Photography and the Functions of Images.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42, no. 2: 155-169.
  • Mitchell, William J. 1992. The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Nöth, Winfried. 2007. “The Death of Photography in Self-Reference.” In Self-Reference in the Media, ed. Winfried Nöth and Nina Bishara, 95-106. New York and Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Palmer, Daniel. 2015. “Lights, Camera, Algorithm: Digital Photography’s Algorithmic Conditions.” In Digital Light, ed. Sean Cubitt et al., 144-162. London: Open Humanities Press.
  • Punt, Michael. 1995. “‘Well, Who You Gonna Believe Me or Your own Eyes?’: A Problem of Digital Photography.” The Velvet Light Trap – A Critical Journal of Film and Television 36: 2- 20.
  • Ritchin, Fred. 1990. In Our Own Image: The Coming Revolution in Photography. New York: Aperture.
  • Ritchin, Fred. 1991. “The End of Photography as We Have Known It.” In Photo-Video: Photography in the Age of the Computer, ed. Paul Wombell, 8-15. London: Rivers Oram Press.
  • Roberts, John. “Photography after the Photograph: Event, Archive, and the Non-Symbolic.” Oxford Art Journal 32, no. 2: 281-298.
  • Robins, Kevin. 1995. “Will Image Move us Still?” In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, ed. Martin Lister, 29-50. New York: Routledge. Robins, Kevin. 1996. Into the Image: Culture and Politics in the Field of Vision. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Rodowick, David. 2001. Reading the Figural, or, Philosophy after the New Media. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  • Røssaak, Elvind. 2011. “Algorithmic Culture: Beyond the Photo/Film-Divide.” In Between Stillness and Motion: Film, Photography, Algorithms, ed. Elvind Røssaak, 187-203. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Rubinstein, Daniel and Sluis, Katrin. 2013. “The Digital Image in Photographic Culture: Algorithmic Photography and the Crisis of Representation.” In The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, ed. Martin Lister, 22-40. New York: Routledge, 2013.
  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2004. The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination, trans. Jonathan Webber. New York, NY: Routledge (Orig. pub. 1940.)
  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2012. Imagination, trans. Kenneth Williford and David Rudrauf. New York, NY: Routledge. (Orig. pub. 1936.)
  • Sontag, Susan. 1975. On Photography. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
  • Vasselau, Cathryn. 2015. “Simulated Translucency.” In Digital Light, ed. Sean Cubitt et al., 163-178. London: Open Humanities Press.
  • Walton, Kendall. 1984. “Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism.” Critical Inquiry 11, no. 2: 246-277.
  • Willemen, Paul. 2002. “Reflections on Digital Imagery: Of Mice and Men.” In New Screen Media: Cinema/Art/Narrative, ed. Martin Rieser and Andrea Zapp, 14-26. London: British Film Institute.
  • Willis, Anne-Marie. 1990. “Digitisation and the Living Death of Photography.” In Culture, Technology and Creativity in the Late Twentieth Century, ed. Philip Hayward, 197-208. London: John Libbey.
APA DEĞİRMENCİ K (2017). THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES. , 553 - 570.
Chicago DEĞİRMENCİ KORAY THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES. (2017): 553 - 570.
MLA DEĞİRMENCİ KORAY THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES. , 2017, ss.553 - 570.
AMA DEĞİRMENCİ K THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES. . 2017; 553 - 570.
Vancouver DEĞİRMENCİ K THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES. . 2017; 553 - 570.
IEEE DEĞİRMENCİ K "THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES." , ss.553 - 570, 2017.
ISNAD DEĞİRMENCİ, KORAY. "THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES". (2017), 553-570.
APA DEĞİRMENCİ K (2017). THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES. Art-Sanat Dergisi, 0(8), 553 - 570.
Chicago DEĞİRMENCİ KORAY THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES. Art-Sanat Dergisi 0, no.8 (2017): 553 - 570.
MLA DEĞİRMENCİ KORAY THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES. Art-Sanat Dergisi, vol.0, no.8, 2017, ss.553 - 570.
AMA DEĞİRMENCİ K THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES. Art-Sanat Dergisi. 2017; 0(8): 553 - 570.
Vancouver DEĞİRMENCİ K THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES. Art-Sanat Dergisi. 2017; 0(8): 553 - 570.
IEEE DEĞİRMENCİ K "THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES." Art-Sanat Dergisi, 0, ss.553 - 570, 2017.
ISNAD DEĞİRMENCİ, KORAY. "THE ONTOLOGY OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGES". Art-Sanat Dergisi 8 (2017), 553-570.