BAHATTİN TUNCALI
(Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Baskent University Zubeyde Hanim Practice and Research Center, Izmir, Turkey)
HAKAN BOYA
(Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Baskent University Zubeyde Hanim Practice and Research Center, Izmir, Turkey)
Zeynep KAYHAN
(Department of Anesthesiology, Baskent University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey)
Şükrü ARAÇ
(Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Baskent University Zubeyde Hanim Practice and Research Center, Izmir, Turkey)
Yıl: 2018Cilt: 52Sayı: 4ISSN: 1017-995XSayfa Aralığı: 256 - 260İngilizce

132 1
Tourniquet pressure settings based on limb occlusion pressure determination or arterial occlusion pressure estimation in total knee arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized, double blind trial
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the limb occlusion pressure (LOP) determination and arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) estimation methods for tourniquet pressure setting in adult patients undergoing knee arthroplasty under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Methods: Ninety-three patients were randomized into two groups. Pneumatic tourniquet inflation pressures were adjusted based either on LOP determination or AOP estimation in Group 1 (46 patients, 38 female and 8 male; mean age: 67.71 ± 9.17) and Group 2 (47 patients, 40 female and 7 male; mean age: 70.31 ± 8.27), respectively. Initial and maximal systolic blood pressures, LOP/AOP levels, required time to estimate AOP/determinate LOP and set the cuff pressure, initial and maximal tourniquet pressures and tourniquet time were recorded. The effectiveness of the tourniquet was assessed by the orthopedic surgeons using a Likert scale. Results: Initial and maximal systolic blood pressures, determined LOP, estimated AOP, duration of tourniquet and the performance of the tourniquet were not different between groups. However, the initial (182.44 ± 14.59 mm Hg vs. 200.69 ± 15.55 mm Hg) and maximal tourniquet pressures (186.91 ± 12.91 mm Hg vs. 200.69 ± 15.55 mm Hg) were significantly lower, the time required to estimate AOP and set the tourniquet cuff pressure was significantly less (23.91 ± 4.77 s vs. 178.81 ± 25.46 s) in Group II (p ¼ 0.000). No complications that could be related to the tourniquet were observed during or after surgery. Conclusion: Tourniquet inflation pressure setting based on AOP estimation method provides a bloodless surgical field that is comparable to that of LOP determination method with lower pneumatic inflation pressure and less required time for cuff pressure adjustment in adult patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under combined spinal epidural anesthesia.
Fen > Tıp > Ortopedi
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Kapalı
  • Noordin S, McEwen JA, Kragh Jr JF, Eisen A, Masri BA. Surgical tourniquets in orthopaedics. J Bone Jointt Surg Am. 2009;91:2958e2967.
  • Odinsson A, Finsen V. Tourniquet use and its complications in Norway. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1090e1092.
  • Olivecrona C, Ponzer S, Hamberg P, Blomfeldt R. Lower tourniquet cuff pressure reduces postoperative wound complications after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study of 164 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94: 2216e2221.
  • Olivecrona C, Blomfeldt R, Ponzer S, Stanford BR, Nilsson BY. Tourniquet cuff pressure and nerve injury in knee arthroplasty in a bloodless field: a neurophysiological study. Acta Orthop. 2013;84:159e164.
  • Brin YS, Feldman V, Ron Gal I, Markushevitch M, Regev A, Stern A. The sterile elastic exsanguination tourniquet vs. the pneumatic tourniquet for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:595e599.
  • Drolet BC, Okhah Z, Phillips BZ, et al. Evidence for safe tourniquet use in 500 consecutive upper extremity procedures. Hand (N Y). 2014;9:494e498.
  • Tejwani NC, Immerman I, Achan P, Egol KA, McLaurin T. Tourniquet cuff pressure: the gulf between science and practice. J Trauma. 2006;61:1415e1418.
  • Pauers RS, Carocci MA. Low pressure pneumatic tourniquets: effectiveness at minimum recommended inflation pressures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1994;33: 605e609.
  • Shaw JA, Murray DG. The relationship between tourniquet pressure and underlying soft-tissue pressure in the thigh. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64: 1148e1152.
  • McLaren AC, Rorabeck CH. The pressure distribution under tourniquets. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:433e438.
  • Hargens AR, McClure AG, Skyhar MJ, Lieber RL, Gershuni DH, Akeson WH. Local compression patterns beneath pneumatic tourniquets applied to arms and thighs of human cadavera. J Orthop Res. 1987;5:247e252.
  • Graham B, Breault MJ, McEwen JA, McGraw RW. Perineural pressures under the pneumatic tourniquet in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Br. 1992;17: 262e266.
  • Estebe JP, Davies JM, Richebe P. The pneumatic tourniquet: mechanical, ischaemia-reperfusion and systemic effects. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28: 404e411.
  • Estersohn HS, Sourifman HA. The minimum effective midthigh tourniquet pressure. J Foot Surg. 1982;21:281e284.
  • Newman RJ, Muirhead A. A safe and effective low pressure tourniquet. A prospective evaluation. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1986;68:625e628.
  • Sadri A, Braithwaite IJ, Abdul-Jabar HB, Sarraf KM. Understanding of intraoperative tourniquets amongst orthopedic surgeons and theatre staff- a questionnaire study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:243e245
  • Yalçınkaya M, Sokücü S, Erdo € gan S, Kabukçuo glu YS. Tourniquet use in or- thopedic surgery: a descriptive survey study among Turkish orthopedic surgeons and residents in Istanbul. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48:483e490.
  • Boya H, Tuncalı B, Ozcan O, Araç S € ¸ , Tuncay C. Practice of tourniquets use in Turkey: a pilot study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50:162e170.
  • Sharma JP, Salhotra R. Tourniquets in orthopedic surgery. Indian J Orthop. 2012;46:377e383.
  • Reid HS, Camp RA, Jacob WH. Tourniquet hemostasis. A clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;177:230e234.
  • McEwen JA, Inkpen KB, Younger A. Thigh tourniquet safety: limb occlusion pressure measurement and a wide contoured cuff allow lower cuff pressures. Surg Technol. 2002;34:8e18.
  • AORN Recommended Practices Committee. Recommended practices for the use of the pneumatic tourniquet in the perioperative practice setting. AORN J. 2007;86:640e655.
  • Younger AS, Manzary M, Wing KJ, Stothers K. Automated cuff occlusion pressure effect on quality of operative fields in foot and ankle surgery: a randomized prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:239e243.
  • Masri BA, Day B, Younger ASE, Jeyasurya J. Technique for measuring limb occlusion pressure that facilitates personalized tourniquet systems: a randomized trial. J Med Biol Eng. 2016;36:644e650.
  • Tuncali B, Karci A, Tuncali BE, et al. A new method for estimating arterial occlusion pressure in optimizing pneumatic tourniquet inflation pressure. Anesth Analg. 2006;102:1752e1757.
  • Unver B, Karatosun V, Tuncali B. Effects of tourniquet pressure on rehabilitation outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs. 2013;32:217e222.
  • Tuncali B, Boya H, Kayhan Z, Arac S, Camurdan MA. Clinical utilization of arterial occlusion pressure estimation method in lower limb surgery: effectiveness of tourniquet pressures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50: 171e177.
  • Tuncali B, Karci A, Bacakoglu AK, Tuncali BE, Ekin A. Controlled hypotension and minimal inflation pressure: a new approach for pneumatic tourniquet application in upper limb surgery. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1529e1532.
  • Crenshaw AG, Hargens AR, Gershuni DH, Rydevik B. Wide tourniquet cuffs more effective at lower inflation pressures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1988;59: 447e451.
  • Mittal P, Shenoy S, Sandhu JS. Effect of different cuff widths on the motor nerve conduction of the median nerve: an experimental study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:1.
  • Kovar FM, Jaindl M, Oberleitner G, et al. Nerve compression and pain in human volunteers with narrow vs wide tourniquets. World J Orthop. 2015;6:394e399.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.