Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 614 - 620 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846 İndeks Tarihi: 08-05-2019

Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules

Öz:
Background: This study aims to identify the prognostic factorsfor stage I lung adenocarcinoma and to evaluate the surgicalmanagement of subsolid nodules.Methods: The study included 133 patients (90 males, 43 females;mean age 64.9 years; range, 29 to 82 years) who had undergoneoperation in our clinic for stage I lung adenocarcinoma betweenJanuary 2007 and December 2015. Clinical, radiological andpathological data were retrospectively evaluated and their effectson recurrence and survival were examined by Kaplan-Meier andCox regression analyses.Results: Comparing the histopathological tumor types accordingto the pathological tumors size, we determined that the prevalenceof invasive adenocarcinoma significantly increased with increasingtumor size (p<0.001). For all nodules, a tumor disappearance ratelower than 25% negatively influenced disease-free survival and amaximum standardized uptake value higher than 5.6 negativelyinfluenced overall survival (p=0.027 for both). The grouping,which was performed considering the maximum standardizeduptake value 5.6 as the cut-off value, was an independent prognosticfactor for overall survival (hazard ratio: 5.973, 95% confidenceinterval: 1.186-30.073, p=0.03). Five-year overall survival rate wasstatistically significantly higher in patients who underwent wedgeresection or segmentectomy for subsolid nodules compared tothose who underwent lobectomy (100% vs. 79.3%, p=0.044).Conclusion: Sublobar resections can be safely performed in subsolidnodules smaller than 2 cm in diameter with tumor disappearance rate≥25% and maximum standardized uptake value ≤5.6.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Kalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemi

Evre I akciğer adenokarsinomu için prognostik faktörler ve subsolid nodüllerin cerrahi yönetimi

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmada evre I akciğer adenokarsinomu için prognostik faktörler tespit edildi ve subsolid nodüllerin cerrahi yönetimi değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Çalışmaya kliniğimizde Ocak 2007 - Aralık 2015 tarihleri arasında evre I akciğer adenokarsinomu nedeniyle ameliyat edilen 133 hasta (90 erkek, 43 kadın; ort. yaş 64.9 yıl; dağılım, 29-82 yıl) dahil edildi. Klinik, radyolojik ve patolojik veriler geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi ve bunların nüks ve sağkalım üzerindeki etkileri Kaplan-Meier ve Cox regresyon analizleri ile incelendi. Bulgular: Histopatolojik tümör tipleri patolojik tümör boyutlarına göre karşılaştırıldığında, invaziv adenokarsinom görülme sıklığının artan tümör boyutu ile anlamlı şekilde arttığı tespit edildi (p<0.001). Tüm nodüller için %25’den daha düşük tümör kaybolma oranı hastalıksız sağkalımı olumsuz etkiledi ve 5.6’dan yüksek maksimum standartlaştırılmış tutulum değeri genel sağkalımı olumsuz etkiledi (her ikisi için de p=0.027). Maksimum standartlaştırılmış tutulum değeri 5.6 eşik değer kabul edilerek yapılan gruplama genel sağkalım açısından bağımsız prognostik faktör (risk oranı: 5.973, %95 güven aralığı: 1.186-30.073, p=0.03) idi. Beş yıllık genel sağkalım oranı subsolid nodüller için kama rezeksiyon veya segmentektomi geçiren hastalarda lobektomi geçirenlere kıyasla istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde daha yüksek idi (%100’e karşın %79.3, p=0.044). Sonuç: Sublobar rezeksiyonlar çapı 2 cm’den küçük, tümör kaybolma oranı ≥%25 ve maksimum standartlaştırılmış tutulum değeri ≤5.6 olan subsolid nodüllerde güvenle uygulanabilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Kalp ve Kalp Damar Sistemi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, Nicholson AG, Geisinger KR, Yatabe Y, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/ european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:244-85.
  • Xu CH, Wang W, Wei Y, Hu HD, Zou J, Yan J, et al. Prognostic value of the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/ European Respiratory Society classification in stage IB lung adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015;41:1430-6.
  • Takahashi M, Shigematsu Y, Ohta M, Tokumasu H, Matsukura T, Hirai T. Tumor invasiveness as defined by the newly proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification has prognostic significance for pathologic stage IA lung adenocarcinoma and can be predicted by radiologic parameters. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:54-9.
  • Urer HN, Kocaturk CI, Gunluoglu MZ, Arda N, Bedirhan MA, Fener N, et al. Relationship between lung adenocarcinoma histological subtype and patient prognosis. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;20:12-8.
  • Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:39-51.
  • Van Schil PE, Sihoe AD, Travis WD. Pathologic classification of adenocarcinoma of lung. J Surg Oncol 2013;108:320-6.
  • Lee SH, Jo EJ, Eom JS, Mok JH, Kim MH, Lee K, et al. Predictors of recurrence after curative resection in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul) 2015;78:341-8.
  • Lee HY, Lee SW, Lee KS, Jeong JY, Choi JY, Kwon OJ, et al. Role of CT and PET Imaging in Predicting Tumor Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison with the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:1785-94.
  • Wang Y, Wang R, Zheng D, Han B, Zhang J, Zhao H, et al. Predicting the recurrence risk factors and clinical outcomes of peripheral pulmonary adenocarcinoma≤3 cm with wedge resection. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2017;143:1043-51.
  • Okada M, Mimae T, Tsutani Y, Nakayama H, Okumura S, Yoshimura M, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy for clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2014;3:153-9.
  • Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Nakayama H, Okumura S, Adachi S, Yoshimura M, et al. Appropriate sublobar resection choice for ground glass opacity-dominant clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: wedge resection or segmentectomy. Chest 2014;145:66-71.
  • Yoshida J, Nagai K, Yokose T, Nishimura M, Kakinuma R, Ohmatsu H, et al. Limited resection trial for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules: fifty-case experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:991-6.
  • Yamato Y, Tsuchida M, Watanabe T, Aoki T, Koizumi N, Umezu H, et al. Early results of a prospective study of limited resection for bronchioloalveolar adenocarcinoma of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:971-4.
  • Nakata M, Sawada S, Saeki H, Takashima S, Mogami H, Teramoto N, et al. Prospective study of thoracoscopic limited resection for ground-glass opacity selected by computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1601-5.
  • Koike T, Togashi K, Shirato T, Sato S, Hirahara H, Sugawara M, et al. Limited resection for noninvasive bronchioloalveolar carcinoma diagnosed by intraoperative pathologic examination. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1106-11.
  • Watanabe T, Okada A, Imakiire T, Koike T, Hirono T. Intentional limited resection for small peripheral lung cancer based on intraoperative pathologic exploration. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;53:29-35.
  • Mun M, Kohno T. Efficacy of thoracoscopic resection for multifocal bronchioloalveolar carcinoma showing pure ground-glass opacities of 20 mm or less in diameter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:877-82.
  • Ichiki Y, Hanagiri T, Baba T, So T, Ono K, Uramoto H, et al. Limited pulmonary resection for peripheral small-sized adenocarcinoma of the lung. Int J Surg 2011;9:155-9.
  • Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H, Takami K, Kuriyama K, Mano M, et al. Prognostic value of groundglass opacity found in small lung adenocarcinoma on highresolution CT scanning. Lung Cancer 2001;33:17-25.
  • Ikeda N, Maeda J, Yashima K, Tsuboi M, Kato H, Akada S, et al. A clinicopathological study of resected adenocarcinoma 2 cm or less in diameter. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1011-6.
APA Kocaman G, YENIGÜN B, ELHAN A, DİZBAY SAK S, HAMZAYEV E, ENÖN S, KAYI CANGIR A, YÜKSEL C (2018). Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules. , 614 - 620. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
Chicago Kocaman Gökhan,YENIGÜN BÜLENT MUSTAFA,ELHAN Atilla Halil,DİZBAY SAK Serpil,HAMZAYEV Elvin,ENÖN Serkan,KAYI CANGIR Ayten,YÜKSEL Cabir Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules. (2018): 614 - 620. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
MLA Kocaman Gökhan,YENIGÜN BÜLENT MUSTAFA,ELHAN Atilla Halil,DİZBAY SAK Serpil,HAMZAYEV Elvin,ENÖN Serkan,KAYI CANGIR Ayten,YÜKSEL Cabir Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules. , 2018, ss.614 - 620. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
AMA Kocaman G,YENIGÜN B,ELHAN A,DİZBAY SAK S,HAMZAYEV E,ENÖN S,KAYI CANGIR A,YÜKSEL C Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules. . 2018; 614 - 620. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
Vancouver Kocaman G,YENIGÜN B,ELHAN A,DİZBAY SAK S,HAMZAYEV E,ENÖN S,KAYI CANGIR A,YÜKSEL C Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules. . 2018; 614 - 620. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
IEEE Kocaman G,YENIGÜN B,ELHAN A,DİZBAY SAK S,HAMZAYEV E,ENÖN S,KAYI CANGIR A,YÜKSEL C "Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules." , ss.614 - 620, 2018. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
ISNAD Kocaman, Gökhan vd. "Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules". (2018), 614-620. https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
APA Kocaman G, YENIGÜN B, ELHAN A, DİZBAY SAK S, HAMZAYEV E, ENÖN S, KAYI CANGIR A, YÜKSEL C (2018). Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, 26(4), 614 - 620. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
Chicago Kocaman Gökhan,YENIGÜN BÜLENT MUSTAFA,ELHAN Atilla Halil,DİZBAY SAK Serpil,HAMZAYEV Elvin,ENÖN Serkan,KAYI CANGIR Ayten,YÜKSEL Cabir Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi 26, no.4 (2018): 614 - 620. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
MLA Kocaman Gökhan,YENIGÜN BÜLENT MUSTAFA,ELHAN Atilla Halil,DİZBAY SAK Serpil,HAMZAYEV Elvin,ENÖN Serkan,KAYI CANGIR Ayten,YÜKSEL Cabir Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, vol.26, no.4, 2018, ss.614 - 620. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
AMA Kocaman G,YENIGÜN B,ELHAN A,DİZBAY SAK S,HAMZAYEV E,ENÖN S,KAYI CANGIR A,YÜKSEL C Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi. 2018; 26(4): 614 - 620. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
Vancouver Kocaman G,YENIGÜN B,ELHAN A,DİZBAY SAK S,HAMZAYEV E,ENÖN S,KAYI CANGIR A,YÜKSEL C Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi. 2018; 26(4): 614 - 620. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
IEEE Kocaman G,YENIGÜN B,ELHAN A,DİZBAY SAK S,HAMZAYEV E,ENÖN S,KAYI CANGIR A,YÜKSEL C "Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules." Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi, 26, ss.614 - 620, 2018. 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846
ISNAD Kocaman, Gökhan vd. "Prognostic factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma and surgical management of subsolid nodules". Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi 26/4 (2018), 614-620. https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15846