Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”

Niyazi ÖZER, (İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya, Türkiye)
Servet ATİK, (İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya, Türkiye)
Süleyman Nihat ŞAD, (İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya, Türkiye)
Ali KIŞ (İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya, Türkiye)
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi
4 0
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 553 - 578 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014. İndeks Tarihi: 28-05-2019

Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”

Öz:
The purpose of this study is threefold: 1) to determine the levels of university students’ engagement and trust inprofessors, 2) to investigate if there is a significant difference between students’ engagement and trust scores interms of some variables, and 3) to explore the relationship between student engagement and trust in professors.The participants comprised 1840 university students studying at seven different faculties of Inonu Universityduring the 2013-2014 academic year. A test battery containing demographic information, student trust scale andstudent engagement scale was administered to the participating students. Results showed that female studentsand students from earlier grades trust in professors and engage into classroom activities more. Regression analysisresults, also, indicated that students’ scores on trust in professors explained approximately 16% of the totalvariance in student engagement. This implies that when students trust in their professors they tend to engage inlessons more, which, in turn, brings about better learning.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Türk Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Öğretim Elemanlarına Güvenleri ve Derse Katılımları: “Güveniyorum, öyleyse katılırım!”

Öz:
Bu araştırma ile üniversite öğrencilerinin derse katılım ve öğretim elemanlarına güven düzeyleri, derse katılım ile öğretim elemanlarına güven güven arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmaya 2013-2014 eğitim öğretim yılında İnönü Üniversitesi bünyesinde bulunan yedi fakültede öğrenim gören 1840 öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırmaya katılan öğrencilere Üniversite Öğrencileri İçin Derse Katılım Ölçeği ve Öğretim Elemanlarına Güven Ölçeği uygulanmıştır. Bağımsız değişkenler açısından yapılan analizler sonucunda öğrencilerin derse katılım düzeyleri ve öğretim elemanlarına güven düzeyleri cinsiyet ve sınıf düzeyi değişkenlerine göre anlamlı şekilde farklılaştığı belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin öğretim elemanlarına güveninin derse katılımlarını anlamlı şekilde yordayıp yordamadığını belirlemek amacıyla regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Öğrencilerin öğretim elemanlarına duydukları güven onların derse katılımının anlamlı yordayıcısı olduğu ve derse katılım düzeyine ait toplam varyansın yaklaşık %16’sını açıkladığı belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuç öğrencilerin öğretim elemanlarına güvendiklerinde derse daha fazla katıldıklarını ve bu sayede daha iyi öğrendikleri anlamına gelmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adams, C. M. (2013). Collective student trust a social resource for urban elementary students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(10), 1-25.
  • Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Kabbani, N. S. (2001). The dropout process in life course perspective: Early risk factors at home and school. Teachers College Record, 103, 760 – 822
  • Appleton, J. A., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.
  • Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445.
  • Astin A. (1984) Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297–308.
  • Bryk, A.S., & Schneider, B. L. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, NY.
  • Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349-362.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. (14. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Daly, A. J. & Chrispeels, J. (2008). A question of trust: Predictive conditions for adaptive vetechnical leadership in educational contexts. Leadership vePolicy in Schools, 7(1), 30-63.
  • Evans, D. E. (2012). A Study of african american student trust and engagement in high school (Doctoral dissertation), University of Illinois, Chicago.
  • Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 116(3), 429.
  • Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117 142.
  • Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and student at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Forsyth, P. B., Adams, C. M. & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust: why schools can’t ımprove without ıt. New York :Teachers College Press.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E.ve Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
  • Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments. Issues & Answers. REL 2011-No. 098. Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.
  • Furlong, M. J. ve Christenson, S. L. (2008). Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for all students. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 365-368.
  • Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 148.
  • Harris, L. (2011). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of student engagement: Engagement in learning or in schooling?. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 376-386.
  • Harris, L. R. (2008). A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 57-79.
  • Hoy, W. K. & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184-208.
  • Hoy, W. K.,Gage, C. Q. ve Tarter, C. J. (2006). School mindfulnessandfacultytrust: Necessaryconditionsforeachother?. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 236-255.
  • Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of computer assisted learning, 27(2), 119-132.
  • Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773.
  • Karakaya, İ. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Tanrıöğen, A. (Editör). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. İkinci baskı. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Karasar, N., (2009). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (13.bs.). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kong, Q. P., Wong, N. Y., & Lam, C. C. (2003). Student engagement in mathematics: Development of instrument and validation of construct. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 4-21.
  • Krause, K. L., & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493-505.
  • Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5-20. doi:10.1002/ir.283
  • Kuh, G. D., Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., Ouimet, J. A., Gonyea, R. M., and Kennedy, J. (2001). NSSE technical and norms report, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Bloomington, IN.
  • Lam, S.-f., Jimerson, S., Wong, B. P. H., Kikas, E., Shin, H., Veiga, F. H., Hatzichristou, C., Polychroni, F., Cefai, C., Negovan, V., Stanculescu, E., Yang, H., Liu, Y., Basnett, J., Duck, R., Farrell, P., Nelson, B., & Zollneritsch, J. (2014). Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 countries. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(2), 213-232.
  • Maddux, W. W., ve Brewer, M. B. (2005). Gender differences in the relational and collective bases for trust. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 159-171.
  • Mahatmya, D., Lohman, B. J., Matjasko, J. L., & Farb, A. F. (2012). Engagement across developmental periods. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 45-63). New York: Springer. Springer US.
  • Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, vehigh school years. American educational research journal, 37(1), 153-184.
  • Murray, C. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. The Journal of Early Adolescence. 1-29.
  • National Research Council. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G. & Lamborn, S. D. (1992) The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann, (Ed.), Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Özer, N. & Atik, S. (2014). Üniversite öğrencilerinin öğretim üyelerine güveni ve derse katılım düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki [On the relationship between trust in instructors and student engagement], Unpublished Manuscript, Malatya: İnönü Üniversitesi.
  • Özer, N., Dönmez, B. ve Atik, S. (2016). Ortaokul ve lise öğrencilerinin okul müdürüne ve öğretmenlere güven düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 40(1), 259-280.
  • Öztürk, B. (2000). Sınıf içi etkileşim. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 6(4), 621-640.
  • Reschly, A.L., & Christenson, S.L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.
  • Robbins, S. P. ve Judge, T. A. (2013). Örgütsel davranış.(Çev. Edt. İnci Erdem). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 465-479.
  • Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460.
  • Sever, M., Ulubey, Ö., Toraman, Ç., & Türe, E. (2014). An analysis of high school students’ classroom engagement in relation to various variables. Education and Science, 39(176), 183-198.
  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571.
  • Solomon, R. C. ve Flores, F. (2001). Güven yaratmak. Ankara: MESS Yayınları.
  • Spector, M. D. & Jones, G. E. (2004). Trust in the workplace: factors affecting trust formation between team members. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(3), 311-321.
  • Şad, S. N., & Özer, N. (2014). Silent scream: I do not want to participate professor!. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2532-2536.
  • Tison, E. B., Bateman, T., & Culver, S. M. (2011). Examination of the gender–student engagement relationship at one university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 27-49.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Trust in schools: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 334 – 352.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547-593.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matters: leadership for successful schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Weaver, R.R. & Qi, J. (2005). Classroom organization and participation: College students’ perceptions. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 570-601.
  • Yazzie-Mintz, E., & McCormick, K. (2012). Finding the humanity in the data: Understanding, measuring, and strengthening student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 743-761). Springer: US.
APA Ozer N, Atik S, Şad S, KIS A (2018). Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”. , 553 - 578. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
Chicago Ozer Niyazi,Atik Servet,Şad Süleyman Nihat,KIS Ali Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”. (2018): 553 - 578. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
MLA Ozer Niyazi,Atik Servet,Şad Süleyman Nihat,KIS Ali Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”. , 2018, ss.553 - 578. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
AMA Ozer N,Atik S,Şad S,KIS A Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”. . 2018; 553 - 578. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
Vancouver Ozer N,Atik S,Şad S,KIS A Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”. . 2018; 553 - 578. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
IEEE Ozer N,Atik S,Şad S,KIS A "Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”." , ss.553 - 578, 2018. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
ISNAD Ozer, Niyazi vd. "Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”". (2018), 553-578. https://doi.org/10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
APA Ozer N, Atik S, Şad S, KIS A (2018). Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 24(3), 553 - 578. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
Chicago Ozer Niyazi,Atik Servet,Şad Süleyman Nihat,KIS Ali Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 24, no.3 (2018): 553 - 578. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
MLA Ozer Niyazi,Atik Servet,Şad Süleyman Nihat,KIS Ali Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, vol.24, no.3, 2018, ss.553 - 578. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
AMA Ozer N,Atik S,Şad S,KIS A Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 2018; 24(3): 553 - 578. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
Vancouver Ozer N,Atik S,Şad S,KIS A Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi. 2018; 24(3): 553 - 578. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
IEEE Ozer N,Atik S,Şad S,KIS A "Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 24, ss.553 - 578, 2018. 10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
ISNAD Ozer, Niyazi vd. "Turkish College Students’ Trust in Professors and Engagement: “I trust therefore I engage!”". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi 24/3 (2018), 553-578. https://doi.org/10.14527/ kuey.2018.014.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 11:21

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları