Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework

Ilgım EROĞLU (Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü, İstanbul, TÜRKİYE)
YEDİ: SANAT, TASARIM VE BİLİM DERGİSİ
1 0
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 20 Sayfa Aralığı: 53 - 61 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 25-06-2019

Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework

Öz:
Until recently, there had been two diversified student admission methods for industrial product design departments in Turkey.These models can be shortly defined as aptitude tests and central examinations conducted by Measuring, Selection and Place-ment Center (Ölçme Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi – ÖSYM). The nature of these admission methods provided universities withstudents who had both different abilities and backgrounds. In this study, a conceptual framework is provided to discuss if thesedifferences can enable design students’ with different approaches to design-driven innovation. Innovation capabilities for diffe-rent types of design-driven innovation are identified through related studies in literature to be evaluated together with require-ments for success in the two different admission methods.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Sanat

-

Öz:
Yakın zamana kadar, Türkiye’de endüstri ürünleri tasarımı departmanları için iki çeşit öğrenci kabul yöntemi geçerli olmuştur. Bu modeller kısaca, Ölçme, Seçme ve Yerleştirme Merkezi (ÖSYM) tarafından yapılan merkezi sınavlar ve üniversiteler tarafından yapılan özel yetenek sınavları olarak tanımlanabilir. Bu kabul yöntemlerinin doğası, farklı yetenekleri ve geçmişleri olan öğrencilerin üniversitelerde eğitim gör- mesini sağlamıştır. Bu çalışmada, bu farklılıkların tasarım öğrencilerinin tasarım odaklı yenileşim yaklaşımlarında farklılaşma yaratıp yarat- mayacağının tartışılması için kavramsal bir çerçeve sunulmuştur. Farklı tipte tasarım odaklı yenileşimler için inovasyon kabiliyetleri, iki farklı kabul yöntemindeki başarı şartlarıyla birlikte değerlendirilmek üzere, literatürdeki ilgili çalışmalarla belirlenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Sanat
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Alloway, T. P., and Passolunghi, M. C. (2011). “The relationship between working memory, IQ, and mathematical skills in children”. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 133- 137.
  • Amabile, T. M., and Pratt, M. G. (2016). “The Dynamic Componential Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations: Making Progress, Making Meaning”. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183.
  • Asatekin, M. (2006). “ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü “BAŞLANGIÇ NOTLARI””. Tasarım+ Kuram, 3(5), 28-33.
  • Basadur, M. (2004). “Leading Others to Think Innovatively Together: Creative Leadership.” The Leadership Quarterly 15.1, 103--21.
  • Bayazıt, N. (2006). “İTÜ’de Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü “DENEYİ’mim”. Tasarım+ Kuram, 3(5), 41-53.
  • Caves, R. E. (2000). Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce (No. 20). Harvard University Press.
  • Celbiş, Ü. (2006). “Marmara Üniversitesi, Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi, Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü”. Tasarım+Kuram, 3(5), 34-40.
  • Cheng, P., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. (2014). “A new strategy to reduce design fixation: Presenting partial photographs to designers”. Design Studies, 35(4), 374-391.
  • Crilly, N. (2015). “Fixation and Creativity in Concept Development: The Attitudes and Practices of Expert Designers”. Design Studies, 38, 54-91.
  • Dahl, D. W., and Moreau, P. (2002). “The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation”. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 47-60.
  • Dell’Era, C., Marchesi, A., and Verganti, R. (2008). “Linguistic Network Configurations: Management of Innovation in Design-Intensive Firms”. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(01), 1-19.
  • Dell’Era, C., and Verganti, R. (2009 – a). “The Impact of International Designers on Firm Innovation Capability and Consumer Interest”. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(9), 870-893.
  • Dell’Era, C., and Verganti, R. (2010). “Collaborative Strategies in Design-Intensive Industries: Knowledge Diversity and Innovation”. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 123-141.
  • D’zurilla, T. J., and Goldfried, M. R. (1971). “Problem solving and behavior modification”. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78(1), 107.
  • Edens, K., and Potter, E. (2007). “The relationship of drawing and mathematical problem solving: Draw for math tasks.” Studies in Art Education, 48(3), 282-298.
  • Ekmekçioğlu, D. (2012). Bir Meslek İki Farklı Profil: Türkiye’de Endsütriyel Tasarımı Eğitimindeki Farklı Öğrenci Kabul Sistemleri ve Yansımaları. ITU Graduate School of Science Engineering and Technology, Unpublished Master Thesis.
  • Forés, B., and Camisón, C. (2016). “Does Incremental and Radical Innovation Performance Depend on Different Types of Knowledge Accumulation Capabilities and Organizational Size?”. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 831-848.
  • Frith, C., and Law, J. (1995). “Cognitive And Physiological Processes Underlying Drawing Skills”. Leonardo, 203-205.
  • Franke, N., Von Hippel, E., and Schreier, M. (2006). “Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301-315.
  • Gibbons, H. 2007. Teaching Dance: The Spectrum of Styles. AuthorHouse, Indiana.
  • Grossman, M. (1970). “Perceptual style, creativity, and various drawing abilities.” Studies in Art Education, 11(2), 51-54.
  • Ho, C. H., Eastman, C., & Catrambone, R. (2006). “An investigation of 2D and 3D spatial and mathematical abilities”. Design Studies, 27(4), 505-524.
  • Holmes, J., & Adams, J. W. (2006). “Working Memory and Children’s Mathematical Skills: Implications for Mathematical Development and Mathematics Curricula”. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 339-366.
  • Jansson, D. G., and Smith, S. M. (1991). “Design Fixation”. Design Studies, 12(1), 3-11.
  • Küçükerman, Ö. (2006). “1971 Yılında Türkiye’de ilk Kez Güzel Sanatlar Akademisi ile Başlatılan Endüstri Tasarımı Eğitiminin 37 Yıllık ‘SEYiR DEFTERi’”. Tasarım + Kuram, 3 (5), 1-27.
  • Linsey, J. S., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K. L., and Schunn, C. (2010). “A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty”. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(4), 041003.
  • Lesh, R. (2000). What Mathematical Abilities Are Most Needed for Success Beyond School in a Technology Based Age of Information?. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Education (Auckland, NZ, December 11-14, 2000).
  • Nelson, P. L., Martin, S. S., and Baldwin, V. G. (1998). “Drawing Skills and Science Concepts in Young Children: A Study of Relationships”. Studies İn Art Education, 39(3), 262-269.
  • Norman, D. A., and Verganti, R. (2014). “Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change”. Design Issues, 30(1), 78-96.
  • Obal, M., Kannan Narasimhan, R., and Ko, G. (2016). “Whom Should We Talk To? Investigating the Varying Roles of Internal and External Relationship Quality on Radical and Incremental Innovation Performance”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(S1), 136-147.
  • Perks, H., Cooper, R., & Jones, C. (2005). “Characterizing the role of design in new product development: An empirically derived taxonomy”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(2), 111-127.
  • Purcell, A. T., Williams, P., Gero, J. S., and Colbron, B. (1993). “Fixation effects: Do they exist in design problem solving?”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(3), 333-345.
  • Resnick, L. (2001). Making America Smarter: The Real Goal of School Reform. In Costa, (Ed) Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  • Reuhkala, M. (2001). “Mathematical Skills in Ninth-Graders: Relationship With Visuo-Spatial Abilities and Working Memory”. Educational Psychology, 21(4), 387-399.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition and Sense Making in Mathemetics, In: D. Grouws (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, New York : Macmillan.
  • Smith, S. M., Linsey, J. S., and Kerne, A. (2011). “Using Evolved Analogies to Overcome Creative Design Fixation”. In Design Creativity 2010 (pp. 35-39). London: Springer.
  • Urban, G. L., and Von Hippel, E. (1988). “Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products”. Management Science, 34(5), 569-582.
  • Verganti, R. (2008). Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation: “A Metamodel and a Research Agenda”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 436-456.
  • Verganti, R. (2009). Design-Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition By Radically Innovating What Things Mean. Harvard Business Press.
  • Verganti, R. (2011). “Designing Breakthrough Products”. Harvard Business Review, 89(10), 114-120.
  • Verganti, R., and Öberg, Å. (2013). “Interpreting and Envisioning—A Hermeneutic Framework to Look at Radical Innovation of Meanings”. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(1), 86-95.
  • Viswanathan, V., and Linsey, J. (2012). “A Study on the Role of Expertise in Design Fixation and Its Mitigation”. ASME Paper No. DETC2012-71155.
  • Won, P. H. (2001). “The comparison between visual thinking using computer and conventional media in the concept generation stages of design”. Automation in Construction, 10(3), 319-325.
  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., and Griffin, R. W. (1993). “Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity”. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
  • ITU. (2018). End. Ürünleri Tasarımı (%100 İngilizce) Ders Planı. http://www.sis.itu.edu.tr/tr/dersplan/plan/EUTE/201110 .html
  • METU. (2017). Department of Industrial Design. https://catalog. metu.edu.tr/program.php?fac_prog=125
  • MU. (2012). ENDÜSTRİ ÜRÜNLERİ TASARIMI BÖLÜMÜ ENDÜSTRİ ÜRÜNLERİ TASARIMI ANASANAT DALI 2012-2013 EĞİTİM ÖĞRETİM YILI BAHAR DÖNEMİ. http://dosya.marmara.edu.tr/ gsf/eut/Ders_Pro.2012-13_bahar.pdf
  • MU. (2017). Marmara Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi 2017- 2018 Özel Yetenek Giriş Sınavları Kılavuzu. http://dosya. marmara.edu.tr/gsf/YIL_2017/duyurular/2017-2018_OZEL_ YETENEK_GIRIS_SINAVLARI_KILAVUZU.pdf
  • MSFAU. (2017-a). Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi 2017/2018 Eğitim-Öğretim Yılı Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Yetenek Sınavları Kılavuzu. http://yeteneksinavi.msgsu.edu. tr/Files/GYS_kilavuz.pdf
  • MSFAU. (2017-b). 2017-2018 Ders Planı. http://www.msgsu.edu. tr/tr-TR/lisans/887/Page.aspx
  • ÖSYM. (2017-a). LYS Soru Kitapçıkları ve Cevap Anahtarları. http://www.osym.gov.tr/TR,13193/2017---lys-soru- kitapciklari-ve-cevap-anahtarlari.html
  • ÖSYM. (2017-b). 2017 Öğrenci Seçme ve Yerleştirme Sistemi (ÖSYS) Kılavuzu. https://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2017/ OSYS/LYS/KILAVUZ_18042017.pdf
  • ÖSYM. (2018). TABLO-4 Merkezi Yerleştirme İle Öğrenci Alan Yükseköğretim Lisans Programları. https://dokuman.osym. gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2017/OSYS/YER/Tablo-4_12082017. pdf
APA EROĞLU I (2018). Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. , 53 - 61.
Chicago EROĞLU ILGIM Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. (2018): 53 - 61.
MLA EROĞLU ILGIM Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. , 2018, ss.53 - 61.
AMA EROĞLU I Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. . 2018; 53 - 61.
Vancouver EROĞLU I Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. . 2018; 53 - 61.
IEEE EROĞLU I "Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework." , ss.53 - 61, 2018.
ISNAD EROĞLU, ILGIM. "Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework". (2018), 53-61.
APA EROĞLU I (2018). Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. YEDİ: SANAT, TASARIM VE BİLİM DERGİSİ, 1(20), 53 - 61.
Chicago EROĞLU ILGIM Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. YEDİ: SANAT, TASARIM VE BİLİM DERGİSİ 1, no.20 (2018): 53 - 61.
MLA EROĞLU ILGIM Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. YEDİ: SANAT, TASARIM VE BİLİM DERGİSİ, vol.1, no.20, 2018, ss.53 - 61.
AMA EROĞLU I Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. YEDİ: SANAT, TASARIM VE BİLİM DERGİSİ. 2018; 1(20): 53 - 61.
Vancouver EROĞLU I Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework. YEDİ: SANAT, TASARIM VE BİLİM DERGİSİ. 2018; 1(20): 53 - 61.
IEEE EROĞLU I "Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework." YEDİ: SANAT, TASARIM VE BİLİM DERGİSİ, 1, ss.53 - 61, 2018.
ISNAD EROĞLU, ILGIM. "Analysis of Student Admission Methods of Two Industrial Product Design Departments in Turkey and Innovation Capabilities: A Conceptual Framework". YEDİ: SANAT, TASARIM VE BİLİM DERGİSİ 1/20 (2018), 53-61.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 8:4

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları