Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis

Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 176 - 190 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14686/buefad.363159 İndeks Tarihi: 15-01-2019

Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis

Öz:
Considering the research methods of the studies in the field of educational sciences, it can be stated that studies follow similar research steps or phases though using different terminology to refer to these steps. While such differentiated use of terminology is significantly fewer in research designs such as experimental or descriptive, there has been an increase in such misuse in the studies utilizing content analysis design and the literature in the field reveals interchangeable use of terms like technique, design, and method. Reviewing the literature reveals mistakes in the use of content analysis since it is not only a method of research but a method of data analysis as well. In this respect, the present study aims to define and group the approaches on content analysis as one of the frequently discussed and confused concept. Following an extensive literature review, the study attempts to define content analysis and to categorize various approaches related. The categories include meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, and descriptive content analysis. Lastly, the issues that researchers need to pay special attention are highlighted.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Eğitim, Özel

Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmalarında İçerik Analizi: Meta-Analiz, Meta-Sentez, Betimsel İçerik Analizi

Öz:
Eğitim bilimlerine ilişkin çalışmaların araştırma yöntemleri incelendiğinde, aynı işlem basamaklarına ve tanımlara sahip birçok yöntemin farklı isimlendirmelerle kullanıldığı görülmektedir. Deneysel, tarama modeli gibi araştırma yöntemlerinde bu farklılıklar görülmemesine rağmen içerik analizi ile ilgili tanım farklılıklarının oldukça fazlalaştığı; teknik, desen ve yöntemlerin birbirlerinin yerine sıklıkla kullanıldığı literatürde görülmektedir. İçerik analizinin hem araştırma yöntemi hem de veri analizi olması nedeniyle bu kullanımlarda hatalar yapıldığı literatürde görülmektedir. Literatürde tanım ve süreç olarak tartışmalı olan içerik analizinin tanımlanarak, yaklaşımlarının sınıflanması bu çalışmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Bu amaç çerçevesinde literatür taraması yapılarak içerik analizinin tanımı, yaklaşımları gruplanmıştır. Bu yaklaşımlar meta-analiz, meta-sentez ve betimsel içerik analizi olarak gruplanmıştır. Son olarak çalışma sonunda bu yaklaşımlar ile ilgili dikkat edilmesi gereken noktalar belirtilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Eğitim, Özel
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of advanced nursing, 53(3), 311-318.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods on social science]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Walsh, D. & Downe, S. (2005). Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211.
  • Strobel, J. & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 3(1), 4458.
  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Sikes, P. (2009). Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft and collusion in academic research writing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 13-24.
  • Riffe, D., Lacy, S. & Fico, F. G. (2005). Analyzing media messages. Using quantitative content analysis in research (2nd Ed.). Mahwah : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Paterson, B., Thorne, S., Canam, C. & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-study of qualitative health research. London: Sage.
  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488.
  • Noblit, G. & Hare, R. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guide book. California: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Miller, G., & Whicker, M. (1999, Eds.). Introduction. In Handbook of research methods in public administration (pp. 1- 2). NewYork: Marcel Dekker Inc.
  • Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Jensen, L. & Allen, M. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research, 6(4), 553– 560.
  • Higgins, J. & Green, S. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. London: Willey.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E. & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (7. ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Dinçer, S. (2014). Eğitim bilimlerinde uygulamalı meta-analiz. [Applying meta-analysis on educational science]. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
  • Çalık, M. & Sözbilir, M. (2014). İçerik analizinin parametreleri [Parameters of content analysis]. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science]., 39(174), 33-38.
  • Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and metaanalysis (2nd ed.). Newyork: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (5th Ed.). London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
  • Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M. & Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating metaethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science and Medicine, 56(4), 671–684.
  • Cartwright, R., Khoo, A. K., & Cardozo, L. (2007). Publish or be damned? The fate of abstracts presented at the International Continence Society Meeting 2003. Neurourology and urodynamics, 26(2), 154-157.
  • Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York: Guilford Publications.
  • Bowen, W. M. & Bowen, C. C. (2002). Typologies, indexing, content analysis, meta-analysis, and scaling as measurement techniques. In G. J. Miller & M. L. Whicker (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration (pp. 51-86). NewYork: Marcel Dekker Inc.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. & Rothstein, H. R. (2013). Meta-analize giriş [Introduction to metaanalysis]. (Serkan Dinçer, trans.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York: Free Press.
  • Bair, C. R. (1999). Meta-synthesis: A new research methodology. The Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. San Antonio, Texas, (ERIC document no. ED 473 866).
  • Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258-267.
APA Dinçer S (2018). Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. , 176 - 190. 10.14686/buefad.363159
Chicago Dinçer Serkan Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. (2018): 176 - 190. 10.14686/buefad.363159
MLA Dinçer Serkan Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. , 2018, ss.176 - 190. 10.14686/buefad.363159
AMA Dinçer S Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. . 2018; 176 - 190. 10.14686/buefad.363159
Vancouver Dinçer S Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. . 2018; 176 - 190. 10.14686/buefad.363159
IEEE Dinçer S "Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis." , ss.176 - 190, 2018. 10.14686/buefad.363159
ISNAD Dinçer, Serkan. "Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis". (2018), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.363159
APA Dinçer S (2018). Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 176 - 190. 10.14686/buefad.363159
Chicago Dinçer Serkan Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 7, no.1 (2018): 176 - 190. 10.14686/buefad.363159
MLA Dinçer Serkan Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.7, no.1, 2018, ss.176 - 190. 10.14686/buefad.363159
AMA Dinçer S Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; 7(1): 176 - 190. 10.14686/buefad.363159
Vancouver Dinçer S Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; 7(1): 176 - 190. 10.14686/buefad.363159
IEEE Dinçer S "Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis." Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7, ss.176 - 190, 2018. 10.14686/buefad.363159
ISNAD Dinçer, Serkan. "Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, Meta-Synthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis". Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 7/1 (2018), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.363159