Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 75 - 95 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 23-01-2019

Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans

Öz:
The Justice and Development Party governments in Turkey have placed public diplomacy into theservice of foreign policy as a multi-dimensional tool-kit to be utilized in extending the overseascommunication beyond governments towards their publics. And this may be the first time in theRepublican history that by the Justice and Development Party era, people abroad have found Turkey’smission bodies more accessible and reachable in terms of both institutional presence and of institutionalwillingness to involve in their affairs/problems. The Justice and Development Party governments haveaccordingly adopted a comprehensive ‘state-to-society’ public diplomacy agenda, targeting for instancethe so-called ‘kin communities’, by which shared civilizational memories, values and histories areoften recalled and promoted in building relations. The target communities have thus been encouragedto embrace such identity frames and hence to re-negotiate and when possible redefine their senseof belonging in a civilizational sense. This is a development which brings the constitutive appeal ofthe country’s new foreign policy into a brighter light. Based on this, this paper initially questions theconstitutive influences Turkey has possibly posed to the targeted communities abroad. Moreover,in the implementation of such state-to-society public diplomacy, certain political figures in Turkeyhave functioned as intermediaries between the public diplomacy bureaucracy and the communitiesabroad, as facilitators of Turkey’s access to the targeted communities, and vice versa. These politicalelites have mostly been the members of the ruling party in the Parliament, acted as the chairman ofinter-parliamentary friendship groups, accompanied prime ministers and presidents in their visits totarget communities, and used their personal ties and networks to bring the targeted communities closerto Turkey, and vice versa. They therefore have direct involvement in the conduct of overseas stateto-society policy and have personally contributed to the country’s public diplomacy campaigns. Thispaper, at this juncture, secondly aims to unfold this intermediary role of the political elites, whichwould help garner a better understanding of the sources and causes of Turkey’s societal influencesabroad. The paper uses Turkey’s relations with the Bosniak and Albanian communities in the Balkansas case studies to trace the state-to-society diplomacy and the intermediaries’ roles within it. To betterobserve both the influence and the intermediaries’ facilitative role, interviews are conducted with someof the political intermediaries who took part in Turkey’s reach to the kin communities in the Balkans.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Uluslararası İlişkiler

Siyasi aracılar ve Türkiye’nin Balkanlarda Devletten-Topluma Yönlü Diplomasisi

Öz:
Türkiye’de Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi hükümetleri kamu diplomasisini, yurtdışı iletişimi ülke yönetimlerinin ötesinde halklara doğru taşımak için kullanılacak stratejik bir dil ve çok-boyutlu bir enstrüman olarak, dış politikanın hizmetine sundu. Ve belki de Cumhuriyet tarihinde ilk kez yurtdışındaki insanlar, Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi dönemiyle birlikte, Türkiye’nin misyon kurumlarını hem kurumsal mevcudiyet hem de onların ilişkilerine/sorunlarına müdahil olma istekliliği anlamında daha erişilebilir ve ulaşılabilir buldular. İletişime geçilen halkların ilişkilerine/sorunlarına müdahil olma istekliliği kapsamında Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi hükümetleri kapsamlı bir devletten-topluma yönlü, örneğin akraba toplulukları hedef alan, bir kamu diplomasisi gündemi benimsedi ve bu kapsamda ilgili topluluklarla ilişki geliştirilirken ortak medeniyet hafızası, değerleri ve tarihi sıklıkla hatırlatıldı ve desteklendi. Hedef topluluklar da bu minvalde kimlikleri üzerine düşünürken ilgili medeniyetsel zihni çerçeveleri benimsemeleri ve aidiyetlerini medeniyete referansla yeniden müzakere etmeleri ve mümkünse yeniden tanımlamaları yönünde teşvik edildi. Bu durum ülkenin yeni dış politikasında mevcut kurucu (şekillendirici ve etki doğurucu) istekliliği daha da görünür kılan bir gelişmedir. Bu zeminde, bu çalışma da öncelikli olarak Türkiye’nin hedef topluluklar üzerinde oluşturdukları muhtemel kurucu etkileri sorgulamaktadır. Dahası, ilgili devletten-topluma yönlü kamu diplomasisinin yürütülmesinde, Türkiye’de belirli siyasi figürler kamu diplomasisi bürokrasisi ile yurt dışındaki topluluklar arasında, Türkiye’nin o topluluklara o toplulukların da Türkiye’ye erişimini kolaylaştıran, aracılar olarak görev aldılar. Bu siyasi elitler ekseriyetle parlamentoda iktidar partisi üyelerindendir, parlamentolar arası dostluk grubu başkanlıkları yapmışlardır, hedef toplulukları da içeren yurtdışı gezilerinde başbakanlara ve cumhurbaşkanlarına eşlik etmişlerdir ve kişisel bağlantılarını kullanarak hedef toplulukları Türkiye’ye Türkiye’yi de hedef topluluklara yakınlaştırmışlardır. Onlar ayrıca, ülke dışındaki devletten-topluma yönlü siyasetin uygulanmasında doğrudan rol almışlar ve ülkenin kamu diplomasisi uğraşlarına doğrudan kişisel katkı sunmuşlardır. Bu makale, tam da bu noktada, ikinci olarak ilgili siyasi elitlerin aracılık rolünü açığa çıkartmayı hedeflemektedir; bu Türkiye’nin yurtdışındaki etkilerinin kaynaklarının ve nedenlerinin daha iyi anlaşılmasına yardımcı olacaktır. Çalışma, devletten-topluma yönlü diplomasinin ve aracıların bundaki rollerinin izini sürmek için Türkiye’nin Balkanlar’da yaşayan Boşnak ve Arnavut topluluklarla ilişkilerini vaka incelemesi olarak seçmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında, bahsi geçen etkiyi ve aracıların bu etkinin oluşumundaki kolaylaştırıcı rollerini daha iyi gözlemleyebilmek için Türkiye’nin Balkanlarda yaşayan topluluklarla ilişki geliştirmesi sürecinde yer almış bazı siyasi aracılarla röportajlar yapılmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Siyasi Bilimler Uluslararası İlişkiler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • YTB (2017b) “Türkiye Yeniden: Mezun Buluşması – İstanbul”, 25 November, https://www.ytb.gov.tr/ haberler/turkiye-yeniden-mezun-bulusmasi-istanbul
  • YTB (2017a) “Türkiye Mezunları Dernekleri Eğitim Programı”, YTB official website, 23 November, https:// www.ytb.gov.tr/haberler/turkiye-mezunlari-dernekleri-egitim-programi
  • YTB (2015) “Saraybosna’da evlad-ı fatihan zirvesi gerçekleştirildi”, 14 December, https://www.ytb.gov.tr/ haberler/saraybosnada-evlad-i-fatihan-zirvesi-gerceklestirildi
  • Yenişafak (2016) “Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’ın Aliya İzzetbegoviç yazısı”, 19 October, www.yenisafak.com/ hayat/cumhurbaskani-erdoganin-aliya-izzetbegovic-yazisi-2550178
  • World Bulletin (2013) “Turkey to restore home where Aliya Izetbegovic was born”, 20 April, www. worldbulletin.net/haber/107082/turkey-to-restore-home-where-aliya-izetbegovic-was-born
  • UNESCO (2013), “Restoration of Ottoman cultural heritage in South-East Europe”, 10 December, www. unesco.org/new/en/member-states/single-view/news/restoration_of_ottoman_cultural_heritage_ in_south_east_europ/
  • Time Balkan (2017) “Sırbistan’da Erdoğan’a destek mitingi”, 06 April, timebalkan.com/sirbistanda-erdoganadestek- mitingi
  • Time Balkan (2016) “Üsküp’te Türkiye’ye destek mitingi düzenlenecek”, 27 July, timebalkan.com/ makedonyadan-turkiyeye-destek-devam-ediyor/
  • TIKA (2016) “Balkan Müslümanları “Anavatan” Türkiye İçin Nöbette”, www.tika.gov.tr/tr/haber/balkan_ muslumanlari_anavatan_turkiye_icin_nobette-24298
  • TIKA (2015b) “ANALYSIS: Turkey’s Balkan policy not interest-oriented”, www.tika.gov.tr/en/news/analysis_ turkeys_balkan_policy_not_interest_oriented-21145
  • TIKA (2015a) “TİKA Çalışanları Bulundukları Ülkelerde Çağdaş Alperenlerdir”, www.tika.gov.tr/tr/haber/ tika_calisanlari_bulunduklari_ulkelerde_cagdas_alperenlerdir-21645
  • TIKA (2013b) “Bosna-Hersek Proje & Faaliyetleri” www.tika.gov.tr/upload/oldpublication/bosnahersek.pdf
  • TIKA (2013a), “TİKA’s Mosque Restoration Projects,” www.tika.gov.tr/en/news/tikas_mosque_restoration_ projects-8601
  • TCCB, 2015, “600 Yıldır Arnavut Kardeşlerimizle Beraber Bugünlere Geldik, Beraber Geleceğe Yürüyoruz”, 13 May, https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/32290/600-yildir-arnavut-kardeslerimizle-beraberbugunlere- geldik-beraber-gelecege-yuruyoruz.html
  • Star (2016) “‘15 Temmuz Darbe Girişimi’ Saraybosna’da anlatıldı”, 10 October, www.star.com.tr/guncel/15- temmuz-darbe-girisimi-saraybosnada-anlatildi-haber-1148402/
  • Sabah (2016) “Balkan Müslümanları ‘anavatan’ Türkiye için nöbette,” 09 August, https://www.sabah.com.tr/ dunya/2016/08/09/balkan-muslumanlari-anavatan-turkiye-icin-nobette
  • Reuters (2017) “Turkey’s Erdogan gets warm welcome in mainly Muslim Serbian town”, 11 October, https:// www.reuters.com/article/us-serbia-turkey/turkeys-erdogan-gets-warm-welcome-in-mainlymuslim- serbian-town-idUSKBN1CG24F
  • Milliyet (2012) “Bulgaristan parlemento heyeti TBMM’de” 26 June, www.milliyet.com.tr/bulgaristanparlemento- heyeti-tbmm-de-siyaset-1559106
  • MoS (2013) “Memorandum of Support to Turkish Government, by the Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia (ABIM)”, 14 June, https://tr.scribd.com/document/147800814/Memorandum-Support- Turkey-ABIM
  • Meclis Haber (2011) “Balkan heyetinin TBMM’deki temasları”, 12 December, www.meclishaber.gov.tr/ develop/owa/haber_portal.aciklama?p1=118446
  • Kenan Surkovic (2017) “The Art of Carpet Weaving in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, Islamic Arts Magazine, 17 July, islamicartsmagazine.com/magazine/view/the_art_of_carpet_weaving_in_bosnia_and_herzegovina
  • Hürriyet (2017) “Turkey’s TİKA changes strategy in favor of development projects”, May 20. Report by Sevil Erkuş, www.hurriyetdailynews.com/turkeys-tika-changes-strategy-in-favor-of-developmentprojects- 113304
  • Hürriyet (2013) “Yedi ülkede Erdoğan’a destek mitingi”, 15 June, www.hurriyet.com.tr/yedi-ulkede-erdogana- destek-mitingi-23506365
  • Haberturk (2010), “‘Bilge Kral’ın Erdoğan’a vasiyeti” 19 October, www.haberturk.com/dunya/haber/562955- bilge-kralin-erdogana-vasiyeti
  • Haberler (2014) “Arnavutluk İslam Birliği Başkanı Bruçay’dan Diyanet İşleri Başkanı Mehmet Görmez’e Ziyaret,” 22 May, https://www.haberler.com/arnavutluk-islam-birligi-baskani-brucay-dan-6058275-haberi/
  • DHA (2012) “Davutoğlu: Arnavut Halkı ile ortak bir kültür ve tarihe sahibiz”, 05 September, arsiv.dha.com. tr/davutoglu-arnavut-halki-ile-ortak-bir-kultur-ve-tarihe-sahibiz_359416.html.
  • Balkan Insight (2014) “New Macedonia Albanian Party Denies Erdogan Link”, 24 November, www. balkaninsight.com/en/article/new-albanian-party-in-macedonia-denies-erdogan-connection
  • Balkan Insight (2013) “Kosovo Textbooks Soften Line on Ottoman Rule”, 22 January, www.balkaninsight. com/en/article/kosovo-textbooks-soften-line-on-ottoman
  • Anadolu Agency (2017c) “TDV Karadağ’da Boşnakça Kur’an-ı Kerim meali dağıttı”, 03 June, aa.com.tr/tr/ dunya/tdv-karadagda-bosnakca-kuran-i-kerim-meali-dagitti/833885
  • Anadolu Agency (2017b) “Turkey helps restore 16th-century Bosnian mosque”, 12 May, aa.com.tr/en/ turkey/turkey-helps-restore-16th-century-bosnian-mosque/817097
  • Anadolu Agency (2017a) “Erdoğan’dan, Aliya İzzetbegoviç mesajı”, 19 October, aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/ erdogandan-aliya-izzetbegovic-mesaji/942570
  • Anadolu Agency (2016) “Bosniaks in Serbia hold rally in support of Turkey”, 08 August, aa.com.tr/en/ europe/bosniaks-in-serbia-hold-rally-in-support-of-turkey/623505
  • Anadolu Agency (2013b) “Balkanlar ve Malezya’da Erdoğan’a destek mitingi”, aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/balkanlarve- malezyada-erdogana-destek-mitingi/238486
  • Anadolu Agency (2013a) “Balkan Türklerinden Erdoğan’a destek mitingi”, 14 June, aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/ balkan-turklerinden-erdogana-destek-mitingi/238550
  • Akşam (2014) “Bilge Kral anılıyor”, 19 October, www.aksam.com.tr/dunya/bilge-kral-aniliyor/haber-346791
  • Interview with Rıfat Sait, 15 April 2017
  • Interview with Hüseyin Kansu, 01 November 2017
  • Interview with Davut Nuriler, 08 December 2017
  • Zöllner, O. (2009) “German Public Diplomacy: The Dialogue of Cultures”, in Snow N. and P. M. Taylor (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, London: Routledge, 262-269
  • Üngör, Ç. (2015) “Expanding Perspective: Reaching Out to China and the East,” in Çevik S. B. and P. Seib (eds.) Turkey’s Public Diplomacy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 213-232.
  • Ulusoy, K. (2015) “Turkish Foreign Policy in a Transatlantic Context: A Case for Soft Power and Public Diplomacy,” in Çevik S. B. and P. Seib (eds.) Turkey’s Public Diplomacy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 153-172.
  • Tufekci, O. (2014) “Ahmet Davutoğlu’s Foreign Policy Understanding: A Blend of Westernist and Multiculturalist Eurasianism”, The Arab World Geographer, 17 (3): 275-289.
  • Tufekci, O. (2013) “Another ‘the Last Eurasianist’: Davutoğlu’s Eurasianist Rhetoric”, Caucasus International, 2 (3): 101-109.
  • Tuch, H. (1990) Communicating with the World: US Public Diplomacy Overseas, New York: St Martin’s Press.
  • Tabak, H. (2017) “Manifestations of Islam in Turkey’s Foreign Policy”, in Tabak H., Ö. Tüfekçi and A. Chiriatti (eds) Domestic and Regional Uncertainties in the New Turkey, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 85-104
  • Tabak, H. (2016) The Kosovar Turks and Post-Kemalist Turkey: Foreign Policy, Socialisation and Resistance, London: I.B.Tauris.
  • Sharp, P. (2005) “Revolutionary States, Outlaw Regimes and the Techniques of Public Diplomacy”, in Melissen J. (ed), The new public diplomacy, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 106-123
  • Seo H., S. Thorson (2016) “Empathy in Public Diplomacy: Strategic Academic Engagement with North Korea”, in Pamment J. (ed.), Intersections between Public Diplomacy & International Development: Case Studies in Converging Fields, CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy, Los Angeles: Figueroa Press.
  • Schneider, C. P. (2005) “Culture communicates: US diplomacy that Works,” in Melissen J. (ed.), The new public diplomacy, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 147-168.
  • Sancar, G. A. (2015) “Turkey’s Public Diplomacy: Its Actors, Stakeholders, and Tools”, in Çevik S. B. and P. Seib (eds.) Turkey’s Public Diplomacy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 13-42.
  • Şahin, M., S. Çevik (eds) (2015) Türk Dış Politikası ve Kamu Diplomasisi, Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık
  • Pratkanis, A. (2009) “Public Diplomacy in International Conflicts: A Social Influence Analysis,” in Snow N. and P. M. Taylor (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, London: Routledge, 11-153.
  • Öktem, K. (2014) “Turkey’s New Diaspora Policy: The Challenge of Inclusivity, Outreach and Capacity”, Report prepared for Istanbul Policy Center, Sabanci University, Stiftung Mercator Initiative.
  • Oktay, A. S. (2015) “Diaspora-making as a State-led Project: Turkey’s Expansive Diaspora Strategy and its Implications for Emigrant and Kin Populations”, Unpublished PhD Thesis, European University Institute
  • Ogawa, T. (2009) “Origin and Development of Japan’s Public Diplomacy”, in Snow N. and P. M. Taylor (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, London: Routledge, 270-281.
  • Nye, J. S. (2008) “Public diplomacy and soft power,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616 (1): 94-109.
  • Mor, B. D. (2007) “The rhetoric of public diplomacy and propaganda wars: A view from self-presentation theory,” European Journal of Political Research, 46 (5): 661-683.
  • Mogensen K. (2015) “International trust and public diplomacy”, International Communication Gazette, 77 (4): 315-336.
  • Mitchell, J. (1986) International Cultural Relations, London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Melissen, J. (2005) “The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice,” in Jan Melissen (ed), The new public diplomacy, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 3-27.
  • Malone, G. D. (1988) Political advocacy and cultural communication: Organizing the nation’s public diplomacy, Lanham: University Press of America.
  • Kirişçi, K. (2004) “The Kurdish question and Turkish foreign policy,” in L. Martin (ed.), The future of Turkish foreign policy, MA: MIT press, 277-314.
  • Karadeniz, R. F. (2011) “Türk Dış Politikası’nda ‘Dış Türkler’: Karşılaştırmalı Teorik Bir Çalışma”, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Istanbul: Marmara University
  • Karadağ, H. (2016) Uluslararası İlişkilerde Yeni Bir Boyut – Kamu Diplomasisi, Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Kamusella, T. (2016) “Albania: a denial of the Ottoman past – School textbooks and politics of memory”, Revista de etnologie şi culturologie, 20, 96-105.
  • Kalın, İ. (2011) “Soft Power and Public Diplomacy in Turkey”, Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, 16 (3): 5-24.
  • Gregory, B. (2008) “Public Diplomacy: Sunrise of an Academic Field”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616 (1): 274-290.
  • Dinnie, K. (2015) Nation branding: concepts, issues, practice, London: Routledge.
  • Delaney, R. F. (1968) “Introduction”, in Hoffman A. S. (ed.), International Communication and the New Diplomacy, Bloomington: Indiana University Press
  • Deibel, T. L. and W. R. Roberts (1976) Culture and Information: Two Foreign Policy Functions, Newbury Park: Sage.
  • Cull, N. J. (2009) “Public Diplomacy before Gullion: The evolution of a phrase,” in Snow N. and P. M. Taylor (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy, London: Routledge, 19-23.
  • Cull, N. J. (2008) “Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616 (1): 31-54.
  • Cowan, G., A. Arsenault (2008) “Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy”, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616 (1): 10-30.
  • Colel, R. E. (2011) “Foreign Public Diplomacy Policy: The rhetorical turn”, Grove City College journal of Law & Public Policy, 2 (2): 149-164.
  • Clinton, H. R. (2010) “Leading through Civilian Power”, Foreign Affairs, 89: 13-24.
  • Chigas, D. (2003) “Track II (Citizen) Diplomacy,” in. Burgess G. and H. Burgess (eds.) Beyond Intractability, Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder, (August). http://www. beyondintractability.org/essay/track2-diplomacy
  • Boyar, E., K. Fleet (2008), “A Dangerous Axis: The ‘Bulgarian Müftü’, the Turkish Opposition and the Ankara Government, 1928–36”, Middle Eastern Studies, 44 (5): 775-789
  • Boskovic, M. M., D. Reljic, A. Vracic (2015), “Elsewhere in the Neighborhood: Reaching Out to the Western Balkans”, in Cevik S. and P. Seib (eds.), Turkey’s Public Dipnylomacy, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 99-120.
  • Bjola C., S. Murray (2016) (eds.) Secret Diplomacy: Concepts, contexts and cases, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Bilmez, B. (2003) “Sami Frashëri or Şemseddin Sami? Mythologization of an Ottoman intellectual in the modern Turkish and socialist Albanian historiographies – based on ‘selective perception’”, Balkanologie, 7 (2): 19-46.
  • Baklacıoğlu, N.Ö. (2015) “Between neo-Ottomanist kin policy in the Balkans and Transnational Kin Economics in the EU”, Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 14 (3): 47-72.
  • Aras, B., P. Akpınar (2015) “The Role of Humanitarian NGOs in Turkey’s Peacebuilding”, International Peacebuilding, 22 (3): 230-247.
  • Aras B. (2012) “Turkey’s Mediation and Friends of Mediation Initiative”, SAM Papers, 4.
  • Al-Ghazzi O., M. M. Kraidy (2013) “Neo-Ottoman Cool 2: Turkish Nation Branding and Arabic-Language Transnational Broadcasting”, International Journal of Communication, 7, 2341-2360.
APA Tabak H (2018). Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans. , 75 - 95.
Chicago Tabak Hüsrev Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans. (2018): 75 - 95.
MLA Tabak Hüsrev Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans. , 2018, ss.75 - 95.
AMA Tabak H Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans. . 2018; 75 - 95.
Vancouver Tabak H Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans. . 2018; 75 - 95.
IEEE Tabak H "Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans." , ss.75 - 95, 2018.
ISNAD Tabak, Hüsrev. "Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans". (2018), 75-95.
APA Tabak H (2018). Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 75 - 95.
Chicago Tabak Hüsrev Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 6, no.1 (2018): 75 - 95.
MLA Tabak Hüsrev Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.6, no.1, 2018, ss.75 - 95.
AMA Tabak H Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. 2018; 6(1): 75 - 95.
Vancouver Tabak H Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi. 2018; 6(1): 75 - 95.
IEEE Tabak H "Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans." Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 6, ss.75 - 95, 2018.
ISNAD Tabak, Hüsrev. "Political Intermediaries and Turkey’s State-to-Society Diplomacy in the Balkans". Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi 6/1 (2018), 75-95.