COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 217 - 223 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 İndeks Tarihi: 24-09-2019
COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS
Öz: The increasing number of vehicles triggers traffic jam which is one of the most important problems that occursin crowded cities. Signalization timing has a crucial role in controlling traffic flow and decreasing loss of time incity traffic. In order to reduce queue length and vehicle delays in traffic, the estimation of traffic concentration atdifferent signalization timings plays an important role. Traffic simulation tools such as RODEL, SIDRA, andVISSIM are used to understand the behavior of vehicles in traffic. In this study, VISSIM program was used todemonstrate queue lengths, vehicle delays and vehicular emission formations in a roundabout at differentsignalization timings. The study has been evaluated on a real case study to verify the differences between currentand proposed states. A roundabout in Adana (Turkey) was selected which is located at the city center with oversaturated traffic density for a case study. The model indicated that increment of the green time period of thesouth road from 22 seconds to 28 seconds resulted in improved queue lengths, vehicle delays and emissionformations of the vehicles which were around the roundabout.
Anahtar Kelime: DÖNER KAVŞAKLARDA FARKLI SİNYALİZASYON ZAMANLAMASINDAKİ TRAFİK YOĞUNLUĞUNUN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
Öz: Artan araç sayısı kalabalık şehirlerde oluşan en önemli problemlerden biri olan trafik sıkışıklığını tetiklemektedir. Sinyalizasyon zamanlaması trafik akış kontrolünde ve şehir trafiğinde kaybedilen zamanın azalmasında çok önemli bir rol üstlenmektedir. Kuyruk uzunluğunu ve trafikteki araç gecikmelerini azaltmak için farklı sinyalizasyon zamanlamalarındaki trafik yoğunluğunun tahmini önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. RODEL, SIDRA ve VISSIM gibi trafik simülasyon programları araçların trafikteki davranışlarını anlamak için kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, VISSIM programı değişik sinyalizasyon zamanlamalarında döner kavşak etrafında oluşan kuyruk uzunluğu, araç gecikmesi ve araç emisyon oluşumunu göstermek için kullanılmıştır. Çalışma, mevcut ve önerilen durum arasındaki farkları doğrulamak için gerçek bir durum çalışması üzerinde değerlendirildi. Durum çalışması için Adana (Türkiye) şehir merkezinde yer alan, aşırı trafik yoğunluğu bulunan bir döner kavşak seçilmiştir. Model, güney yolunun yeşil ışık periyodunun 22 saniyeden 28 saniyeye yükselmesinin, kavşak etrafında yer alan araçların kuyruk uzunluğunu, araçların gecikmesini ve araç emisyon oluşumlarını iyileştirdiğini gösterdi.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- CUADRA, L., “Technological Forecasting & Social Change Soft-Computing: An Innovative Technological Solution for Urban Traffic-Related Problems in Modern Cities”, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 89, 236–244, 2014.
- YUSUPBEKOV, N.R., MARAKHIMOV, A.R., IGAMBERDIEV, H.Z., UMAROV, S.X., “Application of Soft-Computing Technologies to the Traffic Control System Design Problems”, Procedia - Procedia Comput. Sci., 102, 540–546, 2016.
- GALLELLI, V., VAIANA, R., IUELE, T., “Comparison Between Simulated and Experimental Crossing Speed Profiles on Roundabout with Different Geometric Features”, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 111, 117– 126, 2014.
- NIELSEN, O.A., FREDERIKSEN, R.D., SIMONSEN, N., “Using Expert System Rules to Establish Data for Intersections and Turns in Road Networks”, 5, 569–581, 1998.
- YUN, M., JI, J., “Delay Analysis of Stop Sign Intersection and Yield Sign Intersection Based on VISSIM”, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 96, 2024–2031, 2013.
- SINGH, M., PONNU, B., ARKATKAR, S.S., “Modeling of Traffic Flow on Indian Expressways Using Simulation Technique”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 43, 475–493, 2012.
- QUAASSDORFF, C., BORGE, R., PÉREZ, J., LUMBRERAS, J., DE PAZ, D., DE ANDRÉS, J.M., “Science of the Total Environment Microscale Traffic Simulation and Emission Estimation in a Heavily Trafficked Roundabout in Madrid ( Spain )”, Sci. Total Environ., 567, 416–427, 2016.
- LIN, D., YANG, X., GAO, C., “VISSIM-based Simulation Analysis on Road Network of CBD in”, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 96, 461–472, 2013.
- MARSDEN, G., BELL, M., REYNOLDS, S., “Towards a Real-Time Microscopic Emissions Model”, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 6, 37–60, 2001.
- RAKHA, H., DING, Y., “Impact of Stops on Vehicle Fuel Consumption and Emissions”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129, 23-32, 2013.
- http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.481.7349&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accession date 24.02.2016)
- NIKOLIC, G., ENG, P., PRINGLE, R., RANKIN, M., BRAGG, C.K., “Evaluation of Analytical Tools used for the Operational Analysis of Roundabouts”, Proceedings of Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada. Halifax Nova Scotia, Canada, 2010.
- FERNANDES, P., COELHO, M.C., ROUPHAIL, N.M., “Assessing the Impact of Closely-Spaced Intersections on Traffic Operations and Pollutant Emissions on a Corridor Level”, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 54, 304–320, 2017.
- LAKOUARI, N., EZ-ZAHRAOUY, H., BENYOUSSEF, A., “Traffic Flow Behavior at a Single Lane Roundabout as Compared to Traffic Circle”, Phys. Lett. Sect. A Gen. At. Solid State Phys., 378, 3169– 3176, 2014.
- MENEGUZZER, C., GASTALDI, M., ROSSI, R., GECCHELE, G., PRATI, M.V., “Comparison of Exhaust Emissions at Intersections under Traffic Signal Versus Roundabout Control Using an Instrumented Vehicle”, Transp. Res. Procedia, 25, 1597–1612, 2017.
- https://tr.scribd.com/document/349536639/Manual-VISSIM-540-e-pdf (accession date 29.09.2017).
- HUANG, F., LIU, P., YU, H., WANG, W., “Identifying If VISSIM Simulation Model and SSAM Provide Reasonable Estimates for Field Measured Traffic Conflicts at Signalized Intersections”, Accid. Anal. Prev., 50, 1014–1024, 2013.
- SIDDHARTH, S.M.P., RAMADURAI, G., “Calibration of VISSIM for Indian Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions”, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 104, 380–389, 2013.
| APA | ULUDAMAR E, Tüccar G (2018). COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS. , 217 - 223. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| Chicago | ULUDAMAR ERİNÇ,Tüccar Gökhan COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS. (2018): 217 - 223. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| MLA | ULUDAMAR ERİNÇ,Tüccar Gökhan COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS. , 2018, ss.217 - 223. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| AMA | ULUDAMAR E,Tüccar G COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS. . 2018; 217 - 223. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| Vancouver | ULUDAMAR E,Tüccar G COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS. . 2018; 217 - 223. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| IEEE | ULUDAMAR E,Tüccar G "COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS." , ss.217 - 223, 2018. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| ISNAD | ULUDAMAR, ERİNÇ - Tüccar, Gökhan. "COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS". (2018), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| APA | ULUDAMAR E, Tüccar G (2018). COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 217 - 223. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| Chicago | ULUDAMAR ERİNÇ,Tüccar Gökhan COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 7, no.1 (2018): 217 - 223. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| MLA | ULUDAMAR ERİNÇ,Tüccar Gökhan COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.7, no.1, 2018, ss.217 - 223. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| AMA | ULUDAMAR E,Tüccar G COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018; 7(1): 217 - 223. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| Vancouver | ULUDAMAR E,Tüccar G COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018; 7(1): 217 - 223. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| IEEE | ULUDAMAR E,Tüccar G "COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS." Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 7, ss.217 - 223, 2018. 10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
| ISNAD | ULUDAMAR, ERİNÇ - Tüccar, Gökhan. "COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC DENSITIES AT DIFFERENT SIGNALIZATION TIMINGS IN ROUNDABOUTS". Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 7/1 (2018), 217-223. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.386593 |
