(Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Meram Tıp Fakültesi, Acil Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye)
(Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Meram Tıp Fakültesi, Üroloji Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye)
Mustafa Kürşat AYRANCI
(Konya Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya)
(Ufuk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Acil Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)
(Ufuk Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Acil Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, Türkiye)
(Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Acil Tıp Anabilim Dalı, Konya, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2018Cilt: 17Sayı: 4ISSN: 2149-5807 / 2149-6048Sayfa Aralığı: 193 - 198İngilizce

155 0
Is There a Difference Between the Readabilities of Informed Consent Forms Used for Procedures in the Emergency Services of State and University Hospitals in Turkey?
Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the readability levels of informed consent forms (ICFs) used for procedures in the emergency services of state and university hospitals by comparing through readability formulas.Materials and Methods: ICFs used in emergency medicine clinics in different university and state hospitals in Turkey were collected, and forms that were the same were included in the evaluation only once. A total of 32 ICFs, with 15 from university hospitals and 17 from state hospitals, were evaluated. Average word number, syllable number, and words with syllable number of four and above were calculated. Different formulas were used to determine readability levels.Results: Although the readability of ICFs used in university hospitals was found to be better than those in state hospitals, the readability levels of the ICFs for both groups were detected to have medium difficulty according to the Atesman formula, very difficult according to the Flesch-Kincaid formula, difficult according to the Gunning-Fog formula, and at high school level according to the Bezirci-Yilmaz formula.Conclusion: In conclusion, the readability rates of emergency procedure ICFs in both state hospitals and university hospitals were detected to be rather low according to the present study. The education level of our country and the local environment should be considered while preparing these ICFs.
Fen > Tıp > Acil Tıp
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Meneguin S, Aparecido Ayres J. Perception of the informed consent form by participants in clinical trials. Invest Educ Enferm. 2014; 32: 97-102.
  • Boztas N, Ozbilgin S, Ocmen E, Altuntas G, Ozkardesler S, Hancı V, et al. Evaluating the Readibility of Informed Consent Forms Available Before Anaesthesia: A Comparative Study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014; 42: 140-4. [CrossRef]
  • Sonmez MG, Kozanhan B, Ozkent MS, Ecer G, Boğa MS, Demirelli E, et al. The evaluation of the readability of informed consent forms used for urology: Is there a difference between open, endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery? Turk J Surg. 2018, 28: 1-5.
  • Hadden KB, Prince LY, Moore TD, James LP, Holland JR, Trudeau CR. Improving readability of informed consents for research at an academic medical institution. J Clin Transl Sci. 2017; 1: 361-5. [CrossRef]
  • Atesman E. Measuring readability in Turkish. A.U. Tomer Language Journal. 1997; 58: 171-4.
  • Bezirci B, Yilmaz AE. A software library for measurement of readability of texts and a new readability metric for turkish. DEU FMD. 2010; 12: 49-62.
  • Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Phycol. 1948; 32: 221-33.[CrossRef]
  • Gunning R, editor. The Technique of Clear Writing. New York: McGraw-Hill International Book Co; 1952.
  • Hadden KB, Prince LY, Moore TD, James LP, Holland JR, Trudeau CR, et al. Improving readability of informed consents for research at an academic medical institution. J Clin Transl Sci. 2017; 1: 361-5. [CrossRef]
  • Office of Human Research Protections. Informed consent. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2016 (cited 2017 June 1). Available from: URL: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/consent/index.html
  • Manta CJ, Ortiz J, Moulton BW, Sonnad SS. From the patient perspective, consent forms fall short of providing information to guide decision making. J Patient Saf. 2016 Aug 3. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000310. [Epub ahead of print] [CrossRef]
  • Hochhauser M. Consent forms: not easy to read. Applied Clinical Trials. 2007; 16: 74.
  • Sherlock A, Brownie S. Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2014; 84: 207-10. [CrossRef]
  • Eltorai AE, Sharma P, Wang J, Daniels AH. Most American academy of orthopaedic surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473: 1181-86. [CrossRef]
  • Eltorai AE, Ghanian S, Adams CA Jr, Born CT, Daniels AH. Readability of patient education materials on the American association for surgery of trauma website. Arch Trauma Res. 2014; 3: e18161. [CrossRef]
  • Larson E, Foe G, Lally R. Reading level and length of written research consent forms. Clin Trans Sci. 2015; 8: 355-6. [CrossRef]
  • Tanriover MD, Yildirim HH, Ready FND, Cakir B, Akalin HE. Turkey Health Literacy Survey. December 2014. Available from: URL: http://www.sagliksen. org.tr/cdn/uploads/gallery/pdf/8dcec50aa18c21cdaf86a2b33001a409.pdf.
  • Barro R, Lee JW. Educational Attainment Dataset. 2011. Available from: URL: http://www.barrolee.com/ 2011.
  • Mariscal-Crespo MI, Coronado-Vázquez MV, Ramirez-Durán MV. Global analysis of the readability of the informed consent forms used in public hospitals of Spain. Rev Calid Asist. 2017; 32: 200-8. [CrossRef] Gargoum FS, O'Keeffe ST. Readability and content of patient information leaflets for endoscopic procedures. Ir J Med Sci. 2014; 183: 429-32. [CrossRef]
  • Norberto EMS, Go´mez-Alonso D, Trigueros JM, Quiroga J, Gualis J, Vaquero C. Legibilidad del consentimiento informado quirurgico en Espana. Cir Esp. 2014; 92: 201-7. [CrossRef]
  • Vučemilo L, Borovečki A. Readability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Medical Procedures in Croatia. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138017. [Epub ahead of print] [CrossRef]
  • Shukla AN, Daly MK, Legutko P. Informed consent for cataract surgery: patient understanding of verbal, written, and videotaped information. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38: 80-4. [CrossRef]

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.