The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 364 - 368 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 İndeks Tarihi: 30-09-2019
The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial
Öz: In this study; we aimed to compare the effects of endotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscope and McGRATH videolaryngoscope (VL) on intraocular pressure. Total of 50 ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) Grade 1-2, Mallampati score 1 or 2, age between 18 to 65 patients planned to undergo nonophthalmic surgery were included to study. Patients were divided randomly into 2 groups as direct laryngoscopic (Macintosh)(n=25) and videolaryngoscopic (McGRATH)(n=25) intubation group. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) recorded by anesthesiologist and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by ophthalmologist with tonopen device were recorded pre-induction (basal), pre-intubation, 1th,3rd,5th minutes of intubation, respectively. Study terminated after 5th minute values taken. There were no statistically significant differences in distirubiton of sex, weight, age, height, and ASA between groups. Duration of intubation in McGRATH group was 32 ± 2 s and statistically significantly longer than Macintosh group (23.8 ± 2.9 s)(p<0.05). Statistically significant increase was found in IOP after 1st minute of intubation in Macintosh group (16.1 ± 2.4 mmHg) compared with McGRATH group (12.1 ± 2.5 mmHg) (p<0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in terms of MAP and HR values (p>0.05). We concluded that endotracheal intubation via McGRATH VL provide a lower IOP level compared with Macintosh laryngoscope in patients when performed by experienced anesthesiologists. There is a need for further studies related to the effects of patients with high intraocular pressures.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Bhardwaj N, Yaddanapudi S, Singh S, Pandav SS. Insertion of laryngeal mask airway does not increase the intraocular pressure in children with glaucoma. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011;21(10):1036-40.
- Ismail SA, Bisher NA, Kandil HW, et al. Intraocular pressure and hemodynamic responses to insertion of the I-gel, laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(6):443-8.
- Griesdale DEG, Liu D, McKinney J, et al. Glidescopre videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracehal intubation: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:41-52.
- Glidescope. Operator and service manual. Saturn Biomedical Systems Inc, 2003.
- Noppens RR, Möbus S, Heid F, et al. Evaluation of the McGrath series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:716-20.
- Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, Czyzewski L, et al. A comparison of intubation through the McGrath MAC, Glidescope, Airtraq and Miller laryngoscope by paramedics during child CPR: a randomized corssover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;33(7):946-50.
- Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Dmestiha T, et al. Video-laryngoscope in the adult airwat management: A topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:1050-61.
- Watcha MF, Chu FC, Stevens JL, et al. Intraocular pressure and hemadynamic changes following tracheal intubation in children. J Clin Anesth. 1991;3:3103.
- Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, et al. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiol. 2011;114(1):34-41.
- Agrawal G, Agarwal1 M, Taneja S. A randomized comparative study of intraocular pressure and hemodynamic changes on insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and conventional tracheal intubation in pediatric patients. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28(3):326-9.
- Ahmad N, Zahoor A, Riad W, et al. Influence of Glidescope assisted endotracheal intubation on intraocular pressure in opthalmic patients. Saudi J Anesth. 2015;2:195-8.
- Tuzcu K, Tuzcu EA, Karcioglu M, et al. The Effects of Remifentanil and Esmolol on Increase in Intraocular Pressure Due to Laryngoscopy And Tracheal Intubation: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(5):372-6.
- Robinson R, White M, McCann P, et al. Effect of anaesthesia on intraocular blood flow. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75: 92-3.
- Hassan HG, el-Sharkawy TY, Renck H, et al. Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with vs. without endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991;35(5):442-7.
- Peker G, Takmaz SA, Baltacı B, et al. Comparison of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Terms of Efficacy, Intra-ocular Pressure and Hemodynamic Parameters in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery. Turk J Anaesth Reanim. 2015;43: 304-12.
- Ng I, Hill AL, Williams DL Lee, K, Segal R. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath videolaryngoscope with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope in intubating adult patients with potential difficult airways. Br J Anaesthesia. 2012;109(3):439–43.
- Gómez-Ríos MÁ, Pinegger S, Mantilla MDC, et al. A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq® NT, McGrath® MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiol. 2016;66(3):289-97.
- Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, et al. Comparision of Truview EVO2, Glidescope and Airwayscope laryngoscope used in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:723-30.
- Nishikawa K, Matsuoka H, Saito S. Tracheal intubation with the PentaxAws reduces the changes of hemodynamic responses and bispectral index scores compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009;21:292-6.
- Ozturk NK, Kavakli AS. Use of McGrath Videolaryngoscope to asist transesophageal echocardiography probe insertion in intubated patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017;31:191-6.
- Jakusenko N, Kopeika U, Mihelsons M, et al. Comparison of stress response performing endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy, fibreoptic intubation and intubation by the glidescope laryngoscope. Proc Latvian Acad Sci. 2008;62(4-5):176–81.
- Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, et al. The clinical assessment of Glidescope in orotracheal intubation under general anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2007;73(9):451-7.
- Liu ZJ, Yi J, Guo WJ, et al. Comparison of McGrath series 3 and macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway by inexperienced anesthetists: A randomized study. Medicine. 2016;95(2):e2514.
- Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23(6):522-6.
- Wallace CD, Foulds LT, McLeod GA, et al. A comparison of the ease of tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC laryngoscope and a standard Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2015;70:1281-85.
- Jeon WJ1, Kim KH, Yeom JH, et al. A comparison of the Glidescope® to the McGrath® videolaryngoscope in patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011;61(1):19-23.
- Madan R, Tamilselvan P, Sadhasivam S, et al. Intra-ocular pressure and hemodynamic changes after tracheal intubation and extubation: a comparative study in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous children. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(4):380-4.
- Karaman T, Dogru S, Karaman S, et al. Intraocular pressure changes: the McGrath videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope; a randomized trial. J Clin Anesth 2016;34:358-64.
- Taylor AM, Peck M, Launcelott S, et al. TheMcGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlledtrial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(2):142-7.
- Walker L, Brampton W, Halai M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(3):440-5.
- Jones PM, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, et al. A comparison of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(1):144-8.
- Lili X, Zhiyong H, Jianjun S. A comparison of the glidescope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014;26(1):27-31.
| APA | ÖZKAN A, Akbas S, POLAT N, YALIN M (2018). The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial. , 364 - 368. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| Chicago | ÖZKAN Ahmet Selim,Akbas Sedat,POLAT Nihat,YALIN Mehmet Rıdvan The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial. (2018): 364 - 368. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| MLA | ÖZKAN Ahmet Selim,Akbas Sedat,POLAT Nihat,YALIN Mehmet Rıdvan The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial. , 2018, ss.364 - 368. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| AMA | ÖZKAN A,Akbas S,POLAT N,YALIN M The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial. . 2018; 364 - 368. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| Vancouver | ÖZKAN A,Akbas S,POLAT N,YALIN M The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial. . 2018; 364 - 368. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| IEEE | ÖZKAN A,Akbas S,POLAT N,YALIN M "The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial." , ss.364 - 368, 2018. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| ISNAD | ÖZKAN, Ahmet Selim vd. "The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial". (2018), 364-368. https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| APA | ÖZKAN A, Akbas S, POLAT N, YALIN M (2018). The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial. Medicine Science, 7(2), 364 - 368. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| Chicago | ÖZKAN Ahmet Selim,Akbas Sedat,POLAT Nihat,YALIN Mehmet Rıdvan The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial. Medicine Science 7, no.2 (2018): 364 - 368. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| MLA | ÖZKAN Ahmet Selim,Akbas Sedat,POLAT Nihat,YALIN Mehmet Rıdvan The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial. Medicine Science, vol.7, no.2, 2018, ss.364 - 368. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| AMA | ÖZKAN A,Akbas S,POLAT N,YALIN M The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial. Medicine Science. 2018; 7(2): 364 - 368. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| Vancouver | ÖZKAN A,Akbas S,POLAT N,YALIN M The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial. Medicine Science. 2018; 7(2): 364 - 368. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| IEEE | ÖZKAN A,Akbas S,POLAT N,YALIN M "The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial." Medicine Science, 7, ss.364 - 368, 2018. 10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
| ISNAD | ÖZKAN, Ahmet Selim vd. "The effects of endotracheal intubation via McGRATH Videolaryngoscope on intraocular pressure: A randomized clinical trial". Medicine Science 7/2 (2018), 364-368. https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2017.07.8797 |
