Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 19 Sayfa Aralığı: 606 - 621 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 08-10-2019

KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?

Öz:
İktisat teorisi, A. Smith’in yaşadığı dönemden bu yana ekonomide konjonktür dalgalanmalarının kaynakları ileilgili görüş birliğine varabilmiş değildir. Konjonktür dalgalanmalarının nedenleri, ekonominin herhangi birmüdahale olmaksızın dengeye gelip-gelmemesine göre açıklanmaktadır. Ana akım iktisat düşüncesinin öncülükettiği yaklaşıma göre, genişleme ve daralma dönemlerinin ortaya çıkmasında dışsal şoklar (teknoloji ve arzşokları gibi) etkilidir. Keynesyen çizgideki iktisat düşüncesine göre ekonomide görülen dalgalanmaların içsel(toplam talep, yatırım, kâr, bölüşüm vb.) nedenleri vardır. Bu çalışmada, OECD ekonomilerinde, 1995-2016dönemi için, kâr oranlarının konjonktür yönü panel veri yöntemleri kullanılarak araştırılmaktadır. Bulgular;OECD bölgesinde kâr oranlarının konjonktür yönlü olduğunu göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İş Tarih Siyasi Bilimler İşletme Kamu Yönetimi Çevre Çalışmaları İktisat İşletme Finans Kentsel Çalışmalar Uluslararası İlişkiler

ARE PROFIT RATES PROCYCLICAL?

Öz:
Since the time when Adam Smith lived, economy theory has not come to an agreement on the sources of cyclical fluctuations in economy. The reasons for cyclical fluctuations are accounted for on the basis of whether economy comes to the equilibrium without the intervention. According to the approach lead by the mainstream economic thought, external shocks, such as technology and supply shocks, are in effect on creating the periods of economic expansion and contraction. In the economic thought held by Keynesians, there are internal reasons for the flactuations seen in economy, like such as total demand, investment, profit, distribution etc. By using the panel data methods for the period between 1995 and 2016 in OECD economies, In this study, in the OECD economies, the cyclical direction of profit rates is being investigated. Findings show that profit rates are procyclical in OECD area.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İş Tarih Siyasi Bilimler İşletme Kamu Yönetimi Çevre Çalışmaları İktisat İşletme Finans Kentsel Çalışmalar Uluslararası İlişkiler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • AMADEO, E., J. (1986). Notes On Capacity Utilisation, Distribution and Accumulation, Contributions to Political Economy, 5: 83-94.
  • BAGWELL, K., ve STAIGER, R. (1995). Collusion Over the Business Cycle. New York: NBER.
  • BAKIR, E. (2015). Capital Accumulation, Profitability, and Crisis Neoliberalism in the United States. Review of Radical Political Economics, 47(3), 389-411.
  • BHADURI, A., ve MARGLIN, S. (1990). Unemployment and The Real Wage: The Economic Basis for Contesting Political Ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), 375-393.
  • BILBIIE, F., GHIRONI, F., ve MELITS, M. J. (2005). Business Cycles and Firm Dynamics. http://repec.org/sed2005/up.677.1107213716.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 07.07.2015).
  • BOGLIACINO, F., ve PIANTA, M., (2012). Profits, R&D, and Innovation-A Model and a Test. Seville: IRI-IPTS.
  • COAD, A. (2007). Testing the Principle of „Growth of the Fitter‟: The Relationship Between Profits And Firm Growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 18(3), 370-386.
  • CALDENTEY, E., P., ve VERNENGO, M. (2013). Wage and Profit-Led Growth: The Limits to NeoKaleckian Models and a Kaldorian Proposal (No. 775). Working Paper, Levy Economics Institute.
  • CHRISTODOULOPOULOU, S. (2007). The Determinants of Business Cycle Correlations: A Comparison Between OECD and non-OECD Economies. https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/263193/ christodoulopoulou-paper.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.03.2015).
  • DUTT, A., K. (1984). Stagnation, Income Distribution And Monopoly Power. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8: 25-40.
  • DUTT, A., K. (1987). Alternative Closures Again: A Comment On Growth, Distribution and Inflation, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 11: 75-82.
  • DUTT, A., K., (1990). Growth, Distribution and Uneven Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • FELIPE, J., ve KUMAR, U. (2010). Technical Change in India‟s Organized Manufacturing Sector. http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/56953/1/637220897.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 07.03.2015).
  • GOODWIN, R. M. (1967). A Growth Cycle. C. H. Feinstein (Ed.), Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth içinde (ss. 54-58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • GOTTFRIES, N. (1991). Customer Markets, Credit Market Imperfections And Real Price Rigidity. Economica, 58(231), 317-323.
  • GREEN, E., ve PORTER, R. (1984). Noncooperative Collusion Under Imperfect Price Information. Econometrica. 52(1), 87-100.
  • HAHNEL, R., ve SHERMAN, H. (1982). The Rate of Profit Over The Business Cycle. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6(2), 185-194.
  • HEIN, E., ve TARASSOW, A. (2008). Distribution, Aggregate Demand And Productivity Growth: Theory And Empirical Results For Six OECD Countries Based On A Post-Kaleckian Model. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(4), 724-757.
  • HEINRICH, M. (2013). Crisis Theory, the Law of the Tendency of the Profit Rate to Fall, and Marx's Studies in the 1870s. Monthly Review, 64(11), 15-31.
  • HSIAO, C., PESARAN, M., ve PICK, A. (2007). Diagnostic Tests of Cross Section Independence for Nonlinear Panel Data Models. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics. http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/26029/1/538177373.PDF (Erişim Tarihi: 08.03.2015).
  • INKLAAR, R., JONG-A-PIN, R., ve DE HAAN, J. (2008). Trade and Business Cycle Synchronization in OECD Countries-A Re-examination. European Economic Review, 52(4), 646-666.
  • JUMP, R. (2016). An Empirical Analysis of the Profit Squeeze Theory for the USA and UK. https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/v_2016_10_21_jump.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 25.10.2018).
  • KALECKI, M. (1942). A Theory of Profits. The Economic Journal, 52 (206/207), 258-267.
  • KIYOTA, K., NAKAJIMA, T., ve NISHIMURA, K. (2009). Measurement of the Market Power of Firms: The Japanese Case in the 1990s. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(3), 381-414.
  • KIYOTA, K. (2011). Productivity, Markup, Scale Economies, and the Business Cycle: Estimates from Firm-Level Panel Data in Japan. http://manageweb.ict.uniba.it/ricerca/dipartimenti/dse/seminari/ seminari2011/Kiyota2011.pdf (Erişim Tarihi:16.11.2015).
  • LAWRENCE, D., DIEWERT, E., ve FOX, K. (2006). The Contributions of Productivity, Price Changes And Firm Size To Profitability. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 26(1), 1-13.
  • LEÃO, P., (2016), A Post-Keynesian Model of The Business Cycle, https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/v_2016_10_21_leao.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2018).
  • LEGRAND, M., D., ve HAGEMANN, H., (2007), Business Cycles in Juglar and Schumpeter, The History of Economic Thought,Vol.49 , No.1.
  • LEVY, D., FARNHAM, M., ve RAJAN, S. (2008). Where Profits Come From: Answering The Critical Question That Fewer Ever Ask. http://www.levyforecast.com/assets/Profits.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 21.02.2015).
  • LIMA, M. A., ve RESENDE, M. (2004). Profit Margins And Business Cycles in The Brazilian Industry: A Panel Data Study. Applied Economics, 36(9), 923-930.
  • MACALLAN, C., MILLARD, S., ve PARKER, M. (2008). The Cyclicality of Mark-Ups And Profit Margins For The United Kingdom: Some New Evidence. Bank of England Working Paper, No: 351.
  • MACHIN, S., ve VAN REENEN, J. (1993). Profit Margins And The Business Cycle: Evidence From UK Manufacturing Firms. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 41(1), 29-50.
  • MARGLIN, S., ve A., BHADURI, (1987). Profit Squeeze and Keynesian Theory, https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/WP39.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 25.10.2018).
  • MITCHELL, W., C., (1927). The Processes Involved in Business Cycles. Mitchell, W., C., (Ed.), Business Cycles: The Problem and Its Setting içinde (ss. 1051-1135). Elsevier.
  • MOUHAMMED, A. (2006). Instability of Capitalism Inflation, Unemployment, And Business Cycles. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta U Rijeci, 24(2), 165-184.
  • NAUTZ, D., ve RONDORF, U. (2010), The (In)stability of Money Demand in the Euro Area: Lessons from a Cross-Country Analysis, SFB 649 "Economic Risk".
  • ONARAN, Ö., ve GALANIS, G. (2013). Is Aggregate Demand Wage-Led or Profit-Led? A Global Model. Conditions of Work and Employment Series No: 40, 71-99
  • ONGAN, T. H. (2011). Profit Rate of Turkish Manufacturing Sector in a Marxian Perspective. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 1-10.
  • PESARAN, M. H. ve YAMAGATA, T. (2008) Testing Slope Homogeneity in Large Panels, Journal of Econometrics, 142(1): 50–93.
  • PIANTA, M., ve TANCIONI, M. (2008). Innovations, Wages, and Profits. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 31(1), 101-123.
  • PRZYBYLA, M., ve ROMA, M. (2005). Does Product Market Competition Reduce Inflation? Evidence From EU Countries and Sectors. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, No:453.
  • ROTEMBERG, J., ve WOODFORD, M. (1999). The Cyclical Behavior of Prices And Costs. J. Taylor ve M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics içinde (ss. 1051-1135). Elsevier.
  • ROWTHORN, R. (1981). Demand, Real Wages and Economic Growth. Thames Papers in Political Economy, 1-39.
  • SALVATI, L. (2015). Investment and Profits in Neo-Kaleckian Models: A Critical Appraisal. http://dipeco.uniroma3.it/db/docs/Presentazione%20Luigi%20Salvati%20REV3.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2015).
  • SCREPANTI, E., ve ZAMAGNI, S. (2005). An Outline of The History of Economic Though. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • SHERMAN, H., J. (1991), The Business Cycle: Growth and Crisis under Capitalism, New Jersey: Princeton.
  • SMALL, I. (1997). The Cyclicality of Mark-Ups and Profit Margins: Some Evidence for Manufacturing and Services. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.199. 9074&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 11.02.2015).
  • SPIEGEL, Y., ve STAHL, K. (2014). Industry Structure and Pricing Over The Business Cycle: World Scientific.
  • STOCK, J., ve WATSON, M. (1999). Business Cycle Fluctuations in US Macroeconomic Time Series. In J. Taylor ve M. Woodford (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics içinde (ss. 3-64). Elsevier.
  • STOCKHAMMER, E., ve MICHELL, J. (2014). Pseudo-Goodwin Cycles in a Minsky Model. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/23043/1/PKWP1405.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 11.05.2015).
  • SU, L., ve ZHANG, Y. (2010). Testing Cross-sectional Dependence in Nonparametric Panel Data Models. http://www.mysmu.edu/faculty/ljsu/Publications/testing%20crosssectional%20dependence%20i n%20nonparametric%20panel%20data%20models20100912.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.07.2015).
  • TAPIA, J. (2015). Profits Encourage Investment, Investment Dampens Profits, Government Spending Does Not Prime The Pump-A Dag Investigation of Business-Cycle Dynamics. Germany: University Library of Munich.
  • TSOULFIDIS, L. (2005). Falling Rate of Profit and Overaccumulation in Marx and Keynes. Japan Sciety of Political Economy, 6(18), 65-77.
  • VALLE E AZEVEDO, J., KOOPMAN, S. J., ve RUA, A. (2006). Tracking the Business Cycle of The Euro Area: A Multivariate Model-Based Bandpass Filter. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24(3), 278-290.
  • WARNER, E., ve BARSKY, R. (1995). The Timing And Magnitude of Retail Store Markdowns: Evidence From Weekends And Holidays. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 321- 352.
  • OECDstat, http://stats.oecd.org/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.06.2018).
  • TÜİK, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do (Erişim Tarihi: 10.06.2018).
  • http://www.progressive-economics.ca/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/bschaufele.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 25.02.2016).
APA kılınç e, BERBEROĞLU C (2018). KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?. , 606 - 621.
Chicago kılınç efe can,BERBEROĞLU Cafer Necat KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?. (2018): 606 - 621.
MLA kılınç efe can,BERBEROĞLU Cafer Necat KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?. , 2018, ss.606 - 621.
AMA kılınç e,BERBEROĞLU C KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?. . 2018; 606 - 621.
Vancouver kılınç e,BERBEROĞLU C KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?. . 2018; 606 - 621.
IEEE kılınç e,BERBEROĞLU C "KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?." , ss.606 - 621, 2018.
ISNAD kılınç, efe can - BERBEROĞLU, Cafer Necat. "KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?". (2018), 606-621.
APA kılınç e, BERBEROĞLU C (2018). KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 10(19), 606 - 621.
Chicago kılınç efe can,BERBEROĞLU Cafer Necat KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi 10, no.19 (2018): 606 - 621.
MLA kılınç efe can,BERBEROĞLU Cafer Necat KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, vol.10, no.19, 2018, ss.606 - 621.
AMA kılınç e,BERBEROĞLU C KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi. 2018; 10(19): 606 - 621.
Vancouver kılınç e,BERBEROĞLU C KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi. 2018; 10(19): 606 - 621.
IEEE kılınç e,BERBEROĞLU C "KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?." Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 10, ss.606 - 621, 2018.
ISNAD kılınç, efe can - BERBEROĞLU, Cafer Necat. "KÂR ORANLARI KONJONKTÜR YÖNLÜ MÜDÜR?". Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi 10/19 (2018), 606-621.