DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ

Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 15 Sayfa Aralığı: 345 - 372 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 02-07-2019

DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ

Öz:
Din, dinî inanç ve dindarlık ahlaki duygu, düşünce ve davranışınneresindedir? Dini inanç ahlak üzerinde etkili midir? Dindar olmak aynızamanda ahlaklı olmak anlamına gelir mi? Ya da tersinden bakacakolursak, dindar olmamak ya da Tanrı inancı taşımamak ahlaksız olmakanlamına gelir mi?Din ve ahlak ilişkisiyle ilgili klasik teorilere bakıldığında, dininahlakı pekiştiren ve bireyin olumsuz duygularını bastırmasını sağlayanbir olduğu ifade edilebilir. Fakat deneysel çalışmalar bu teorilerden farklıya da zıt sonuçlar doğurabilmektedir. Hem din hem de ahlak karmaşıkbileşenlere sahiptir ve bu bileşenlerin birbiriyle farklı kombinasyonlarısonucu farklı din-ahlak ilişkileri ortaya çıkmaktadır. Din ve ahlak ilişkisiüzerine yapılan araştırmaların detaylı olarak incelenmesi bundansonraki çalışmalara ışık tutacak olması bakımından önemlidir.Çalışmamızda, İngilizce literatürde yer alan çeşitli din-ahlak ilişkileriniele alan çalışmalar incelenmiş olup herhangi bir deneysel çalışmayürütülmemiştir.Çalışmamızda; önce ahlakın tanımını ve kapsamını açıkladıktansonra dört farklı din-ahlak ilişkisi tespit ederek incelediğimiz literatürütoplamda beş kategoriye ayırdık. Tespit edilen bu dört din-ahlak ilişkisinegöre; din ahlakı olumlu etkiler, din ahlakı olumsuz etkiler, din ile ahlakbirbirinden bağımsızdır ve din ile ahlak arasındaki bağlantı karmaşıktır.Bu çalışmanın tezi; hem dinin, hem de ahlakın çok boyutlu(multidimensional) bir yapılarının olmasından dolayı, dinin ahlaküzerinde olumlu, olumsuz ve karmaşık etkilere sahip olmasıdır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Etik Felsefe

HOW RELIGION AND MORALITY ARE RELATED? A CONCISE LITERATURE REVIEW

Öz:
Where do religion, religious belief and religiosity placed on moral emotion, thought and behavior? Is religious belief effective on morality? Does being religious also mean being moral? Or inversely, does being not religious or not having a God belief mean being immoral? Classical theories on the relationship between religion and morality claim that religion strengthen morality and suppress the negative emotions of the individual. However, empirical studies can have different or contrary results with these classical theories. Both religion and morality have complex elements and the different combinations of these elements pave the way for different religion-morality relationships. A detailed examination of the studies on religion-morality relationship is, it would seem, essential to highlight the future studies conducted in this vein. In our study, various relationships between religion and morality in the English literature were examined; nonetheless, due to the nature of the study no experimental work was conducted. In this study, first, the description of morality and its content were explained; second, the study seperates the literature into five categories in appropriate with the categories which are set four different religion- morality relationship in the study. According to these four religion- morality relationships, religion positively influences morality; religion negatively influences morality, religion and morality are not related and the relationship between religion and morality is complex. The most important finding obtained from this study is that most of the current research indicate both religion and morality are multi-dimensional structures, and the relation betweenreligion on morality is rather complicated.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Etik Felsefe
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ahmed b. Hanbel, Muvatta, Hüsnü’l-Hulk 8, 2-381
  • Baumard, N. & Boyer, P. (2013). “Explaining moral religions” . Trends in cognitive sciences, 17(6), 272-280. Baumard, N. & Boyer, P. (2013). Explaining moral religions. Trends in cognitive sciences, 17 (6), 272-280.
  • Berniūnas, R. (2014). “Delineating the Moral Domain in Moral Psychology” . Problemos, (Supplement), 90-101.
  • Bloom, P. (2012). “Religion, morality, evolution” . Annual review of psychology, 63, 179199.
  • Bulbulia, J.; Osborne, D. & Sibley, C. G. (2013). “Moral foundations predict religious orientations in New Zealand” . PloS one, 8 (12), e80224.
  • Bushman, B.; Ridge, R.; Das, E.; Key, C. & Busath, G. (2007). “When God Sanctions Killing: Effect of Scriptural Violence on Aggression” . Psychological Science, 18 (3), 204-207
  • Carpenter, T. P. & Marshall, M. A. (2009). “An examination of religious priming and intrinsic religious motivation in the moral hypocrisy paradigm” . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48 (2), 386-393.
  • Cohen, A. B. & Rankin, A. (2004). “Religion and the morality of positive mentality”. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26 (1), 45-57.
  • Cushman, F.; Young, L. & Hauser, M. (2006). “The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm” . Psychological science, 17 (12), 1082- 1089.
  • Decety, J.; Cowell, J. M.; Lee, K.; Mahasneh, R.; Malcolm-Smith, S.; Selcuk, B. & Zhou, X. (2015). “The negative association between religiousness and children’s altruism across the world” . Current Biology, 25 (22), 2951-2955.
  • Dingemans, E. & Ingen, E. (2015). “Does Religion Breed Trust? A Cross-National Study of the Effects of Religious Involvement, Religious Faith, and Religious Context on Social Trust” . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.00(0), 1-17
  • Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, Kur’an-ı Kerim Meali, Ankebut Suresi 45. Ayet. Ankara 2011
  • Galen, L. W. (2012). “Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination.” Psychological Bulletin, 138 (5), 876-906
  • Gervais, W. M. (2014). “Good for God? Religious motivation reduces perceived responsibility for and morality of good deeds.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 (4), 1616- 1626
  • Graham, J. & Haidt, J. (2010). “Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities.” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14 (1), 140-150.
  • Gray, K.; Young, L. & Waytz, A. (2012). “Mind Perception is the Essence of Morality.” Psychological Inquiry. 23, 101-124
  • Hackney, C.H. & Sanders, G.S. (2003). “Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies” . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43-55.
  • Haidt, J. (2001). “The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment” . Psychological review, 108 (4), 814.
  • Haidt, J. (2007). “The new synthesis in moral psychology”. Science, 316 (5827), 998-1002.
  • Holdcroft, B. (2006). “What is Religiosity” . Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 10 (1), s.89-103
  • Hoffman, J.P. (2015). “Religion: Morality and Social Control” . International Encyclopedia of the Social& Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition, 20, 333-337
  • Hunsberger, B.& Jackson, L.M. (2005). “Religion, Meaning and Prejudice” . Journal of Social Issues. 61 (4), 807-826
  • Inozu, M.; Karanci, A. N. & Clark, D. A. (2012). “Why are religious individuals more obsessional? The role of mental control beliefs and guilt in Muslims and Christians”. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 43 (3), 959966.
  • Jaume, L.; Simkin H. & Etchezahar, E. (2013). “Religious as Quest and its Relationship with intrinsic and extrinsic orientation” . International Journal of Psychological Research. 6 (2), s.71-78
  • Keljo, K. & Christenson, T. (2003). “On the Relation of Morality and Religion: two lessons from James's Varieties of Religious Experience” . Journal of moral education, 32 (4), 385-396.
  • Lejon, K. & Agnafors, M. (2011). “Less Religion, Better Society? On Religion, Secularity, and Prosperity in Scandinavia” . Dialog, 50 (3), 297-307.
  • Malhotra, D. (2010). “(When) are Religious People Nicer? Religious Salience and the 'Sunday Effect' on Pro-Social Behavior” . Judgement and Decision Making, 5 (2), 138-143
  • McCullough, M. E. & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2009). “Religion, Self-Regulation, and SelfControl: Associations, Explanations, and Implications” . Psychological Bulletin, 135 (1), 69-93.
  • McKay, R. & Whitehouse, H. (2015). “Religion and morality” . Psychological Bulletin, 141 (2), 447.
  • Mustea, A.; Negru, O. & Opre, A. (2010). “Morality and religion: a psychological perspective” . Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 9 (26), 18-35
  • Norenzayan, A. (2008). “The Origin and Evaluation of Religious Prosociality”. Science. 322 (58), 57-62
  • Ok, Ü. (2006). “Türkiye’de Din Psikolojisi: Neredeyiz ve nereye gidebiliriz” . İslami Araştırmalar, 19(3), 441-456.
  • Pagliaro, S. (2012). “On the relevance of morality in social psychology: An introduction to a virtual special issue” . European Journal of Social Psychology, 42 (4), 400-405.
  • Parker, M. T. & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2013). “Lessons from morality-based social identity: The power of outgroup ‘hate’, not just ingroup ‘love’ ” . Social Justice Research, 26 (1), 81-96
  • Pew Research Center (2014), “Worldwide, Many See Belief in God as Essential to Morality”
  • Piazza, J. (2012). “ ‘If you love me keep my commandments’ ”: Religiosity increases preference for rule-based moral arguments.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 22 (4), 285-302.
  • Preston, J. L. & Ritter, R. S. (2013). “Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup” . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39 (11), 1471-1483
  • Preston, J.L,; Ritter, R.S. & Hernandez, J.I. (2010).” Principles of Religious Prosociality: A Review and Reformulation” . Social and Personality Psychological Compass, 4 (8), 574-590
  • Prinz, J. (2008). “Is morality innate? ”. Moral psychology, 1, 367-406
  • Roes, F. L. & Raymond, M. (2003). “Belief in moralizing gods” . Evolution and human behavior, 24 (2), 126-135.
  • Rusu, P. P. & Turliuc, M. N. (2011). “Ways of Approaching Religiosity in Psychological Research” . The Journal of International Social Research. 4 (18), 352-362
  • Saroglou, V. (2012). “Is religion not prosocial at all? Comment on Galen (2012)” . Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 907-912
  • Saroglou, V., Corneille, O. & Van Cappellen, P. (2009). “ ‘Speak, Lord, your servant is listening’: Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19 (3), 143-154.
  • Saroglou, V. (2006). “Religion’s role in prosocial behavior: Myth or reality?” Religion, 31(2), 1-66.
  • Shariff, A. F. & Norenzayan, A. (2007). “God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game.” Psychological science, 18 (9), 803- 809.
  • Sosis, R. H. & Ruffle, B.J. (2003). “Religious Ritual and Cooperation: Testing for a Relationship on Israeli Religious and Secular Kibbutzim" . Current Anthropology, 44 (5), 713-722.
  • Stavrova, O. & Siegers, P. (2014). “Religious prosociality and morality across cultures: How social enforcement of religion shapes the effects of personal religiosity on prosocial and moral attitudes and behaviors.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40 (3), 315-333.
  • Szekely, R. D.; Opre, A. & Miu, A. C. (2015). “Religiosity enhances emotion and deontological choice in moral dilemmas.” Personality and individual differences, 79, 104-109.
  • Thomson, N. D. (2015). “Priming social affiliation promotes morality–Regardless of religion” . Personality and individual differences, 75, 195-200.
  • Van Pachterbeke, M.; Freyer, C. & Saroglou, V. (2011). “When authoritarianism meets religion: Sacrificing others in the name of abstract deontology” . European Journal of Social Psychology, 41 (7), 898-903.
  • Voert, M. T.; Felling, A. & Peters, J. (1994). “The effect of religion on self-interest morality” . Review of Religious Research, 302-323.
APA ÖZEL H, KAPLAN H (2018). DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ. , 345 - 372.
Chicago ÖZEL Hilal,KAPLAN HASAN DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ. (2018): 345 - 372.
MLA ÖZEL Hilal,KAPLAN HASAN DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ. , 2018, ss.345 - 372.
AMA ÖZEL H,KAPLAN H DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ. . 2018; 345 - 372.
Vancouver ÖZEL H,KAPLAN H DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ. . 2018; 345 - 372.
IEEE ÖZEL H,KAPLAN H "DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ." , ss.345 - 372, 2018.
ISNAD ÖZEL, Hilal - KAPLAN, HASAN. "DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ". (2018), 345-372.
APA ÖZEL H, KAPLAN H (2018). DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ. Turkish Studies (Elektronik), 13(15), 345 - 372.
Chicago ÖZEL Hilal,KAPLAN HASAN DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ. Turkish Studies (Elektronik) 13, no.15 (2018): 345 - 372.
MLA ÖZEL Hilal,KAPLAN HASAN DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ. Turkish Studies (Elektronik), vol.13, no.15, 2018, ss.345 - 372.
AMA ÖZEL H,KAPLAN H DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ. Turkish Studies (Elektronik). 2018; 13(15): 345 - 372.
Vancouver ÖZEL H,KAPLAN H DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ. Turkish Studies (Elektronik). 2018; 13(15): 345 - 372.
IEEE ÖZEL H,KAPLAN H "DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ." Turkish Studies (Elektronik), 13, ss.345 - 372, 2018.
ISNAD ÖZEL, Hilal - KAPLAN, HASAN. "DİN VE AHLAK BİRBİRİYLE NASIL İLİŞKİLİDİR? KISA BİR LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ". Turkish Studies (Elektronik) 13/15 (2018), 345-372.