When literary terms are translated and transferred from what language they belong to into Turkish, a second challenging task to be done will come to exist. This hard task is to make the Turkish equivalents of literary terms Turkish. Of course, it is an undeniable problem that those who deal with literary translations are lacking in their mastery of Turkish and the field of the text which they translate. However, it is another problem and a more distressing situation to find Turkish equivalents to current literary approaches and theoretic concepts and also to wait for translators to do this task. Because some literary terms have been translated either in multiple and various expressions, which could be different from each other, or in expressions, which have not been transformed completely into Turkish and are too long to comprehend. At the same time, it shows the shortcomings of the people in our own literature who are expected to follow the literary agenda globally and to make their conceptual equivalents Turkish. A negative picture emerges in the form of the fact that these problems have not been too much emphasized, a cooperative study for literary terms troublesome to make Turkish has not been carried out, so some concepts leading to differences in understanding within the language have come into existence, and consequently there has sometimes been confusion in terms. As a result, translation texts (Turkish) which will provide resources for the field of literature are brought to our language by those who do not have literature field knowledge. Also those who research in (Turkish) literature field cannot internalize current literary trends. These two things sterilize the texts which have been introduced or will be introduced into our language by means of translation. The basis of these troubles lies in looking for Turkish equivalents without forming a thought substructure and in attempting to make these terms Turkish in this way.