Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 29 Sayı: 107 Sayfa Aralığı: 3 - 19 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 17-07-2019

Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması

Öz:
Döviz kurundaki değişim ile döviz rezervlerindeki değişimin toplamı olarak tanımlanan “DövizPiyasası Baskısı” (DPB) ülkelerin küresel veya bölgesel krizlere olan hassasiyetini göstermektedir.Kriz dönemlerinde döviz kuru ve rezervlerinde meydana gelen değişimlere karşı otoritenin vermişolduğu politik tepkiler DPB’nin üzerinde oluşan baskıyı azaltmak amaçlıdır. Finansal kriz döneminde,politikacılar DPB’yi ortadan kaldıracak politikaları doğru seçmezse, bu durum döviz piyasası baskısınınşartlarını daha da kötüleştirerek ülkenin daha derin ekonomik krize girmesine yol açabilir. ÇalışmadaWeymark’ın DPB modeli kullanılarak Türkiye’nin 1997:M01-2018:M03 dönemi DPB’ye karşıTürkiye’nin verdiği politik tepkilerin Yapısal Vektör Otoregresif (SVAR) yöntemi ile belirlenmesiamaçlanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat İşletme Finans Uluslararası İlişkiler

Exchange Market Pressure And Monetary Policy: Application For Turkey In 1997: M01-2018: M03 Period

Öz:
The Exchange Market Pressure (EMP), defined as the sum of the change in the exchange rate and the change in the foreign exchange reserves, shows the sensitivity of countries to global or regional crises. The political response of the authorities to the changes in exchange rates and reserves during crisis periods aims to reduce the pressure on the EMP. During the financial crisis period, if politicians do not choose right policies to remove the EMP, it may lead to a deeper economic crisis in the country by worsening the conditions of the foreign exchange market pressure. In this study, policy responses in Turkey against the increase in EMP at 1997: M01-2018: M03 period is determined by using Weymark's EMP model and Structural Vectoral Autoregressive (SVAR) method.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İşletme İktisat İşletme Finans Uluslararası İlişkiler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Bahmani Oskooee M., Shiva, R. (1998). A Method of Detecting Whether A Central Bank Engages İn The Black Market For Foreign Exchange: Evidence From Iran, Economics Letters, Vol. 60, issue 1, 97-103.
  • Bautista, G., Bautista, C. (2005). Monetary Policy and Exchange Market Pressure: The Case of Philippines. Journal of Macroeconomics, 27:1, 153–68.
  • Bieleck S. (2005). Exchange Market Pressure and Domestic Credit Evidence from Poland. The Poznan University of Economic Review, 5 (1), 20-36.
  • Burdekin, R., and Burkett, P (1990). Re-examination of the Monetary Model of Exchange Market Pressure: Canada 1963-1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72,677-681.
  • Dornbusch R., (1976). The Theory of Flexible Exchange Rate Regimes and Macro-Economic Policy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 78, 255-75.
  • Connolly, M., and Silveira, J.D. (1979). Exchange Market Pressure in Postwar Brazil: An Application of Girton-Roper Monetary Model. American Economic Review, June, 448–54.
  • Eichengreen, B., Rose, A. K. and Wyplosz, C. (1995). Exchange Market Mayhem: The Antecedents and After Math of Speculative Attacks, Economic Policy, 10, 249–31.
  • Ertem, O., (2011). Küresel Finansal Dalgalanmaların Gelişmekte Olan Ülke Döviz Rezervleri ve Kurları Üzerine Etkisi, Uzmanlık Yeterlilik Tezi, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası Piyasalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
  • Feridun, M. (2009). Determinants of Exchange Market Pressure in Turkey: An Econometric Investigation, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 45, 65 –81.
  • Frenkel, J. A. (1976). A Monetary Approach to Exchange Rate: Doctrinal Aspects and Empirical Evidence. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 78, 200–224.
  • Girton, L., Roper, D. (1977). A Monetary Model of Exchange Market Pressure Applied to The Postwar Canadian Experience. American Economic Review, 67:4, 537–48.
  • García, C. and Malet, N. (2007) Exchange Market Pressure, Monetary Policy, and Economic Growth: Argentina, 1993–2004. The Developing Economies, 45, 253–82.
  • Hall S., Kenjegaliev S., Swamy P.A. ve Taylas G.S. (2013). Measuring Currency Pressure the Cases of Japanese Yen the Chinese Yuan and The U.K Pound. University of Leicester Department of Economics Working Paper, No 13/10 Leicester.
  • International Financial Data 12 Mart 2018 tarihinde http://data.imf.org. adresinden erişildi. International Monetary Fund (2007). Annual Report On Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions. Washington D.C. IMF, 19-21.
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009). World Economic Outlook. Washington D.C. IMF 139-172.
  • Kamaly, A. and N. Erbil (2000). A VAR Analysis of Exchange Market Pressure: A Case Study for the MENA Region. Economic Research Forum, Cairo, Egypt. (Working Paper, 2025.)
  • Kaminsky ve Reinhart (1999). The Twin Crisis the Causes of Banking and Balance of Payment Problem. American Economic Review, 89 (3) ss. 473-500.
  • Kaminsky, G., S. Lizondo and C. Reinhart. (1998). Leading Indicators of Currency Crisis. IMF Staff Papers, 45: 1-45.
  • Khan, I. N. (2010). Exchange Market Pressure Index in Pakistan. SBP Working Paper Series, No. 35, State Bank of Pakistan, Karachi.
  • Khawaja, M.I. (2007). Exchange Market Pressure and Monetary Policy: Evidence from Pakistan. Lahore Journal of Economics, 12(2), 83-114.
  • Kim, Inchul (1985) Exchange Market Pressure in Korea: An Application of Girton-Roper Monetary Model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, May, 285–63.
  • Kim, S. (1999). Do Monetary Shocks Matter in The G-7 Countries? Using Common Identifying Assumptions About Monetary Policy Across Countries. Journal of International Economics, 48(2), 387-412.
  • Kim, S. (2001). International Transmission of Us Monetary Policy Shocks: Evidence from VAR’s, Journal of Monetary Economics, 48, 339372.
  • Klaassen, F. (2012). Identifying The Weights İn Exchange Market Pressure. In European Economic Association & Econometric Society Parallel Meetings, 27-31 August, Malaga Spain S. 1-29.
  • Kurihara, Y., Fukushima, A., Minegishi, S. (2011). Exchange Market Pressure On Floating Exchange Rate System in Asia: Revisited. International Review of Business and Social Sciences, 1(2), 22- 38.
  • Kumah F.Y. (2007). A Markow- Switching Approach to Measuring Exchange Market Pressure. IMF Working Paper, WP/07/242.
  • Kyin T.S.ve Chin L. (2017). Exchange Market Pressure and Monetary Policies. Governance and Sustainability of Global Business Economics, GCBER, 273-280.
  • Mah, J.S. (1998). Exchange Market Pressure in Korea: Dynamic Specification. Applied Economics Letter, 5, 765-768.
  • Mah J.S. (1995). An Analysis of the Structural Change in The Exchange Market Pressures: Korea 1980-1989. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 2 80-82.
  • Mah J.S. (1991). A Note on The Exchange Market Pressure: The Korean Experience 1980-1987. Applied Economics Vol. 23 No 4, 587-590.
  • Modeste, Nelson C. (1981). Exchange Market Pressure During the 1970s in Argentina: An Application of Girton-Roper Monetary Model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking May, 234–40.
  • Roper, D. ve Turnovsky, S. (1980). Optimal Exchange Market Intervention in A Simple Stochastic Macro Model, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 13 (2) ss 296-309.
  • OECD verilerine 14 Mart 2018 tarihinde https://stats.oecd.org. adresinden erişildi.
  • Parlaktuna, I. (2005). Exchange Market Pressure in Turkey 1993-2004: An Application of the Girton- Roper Monetary Model. International Economic Journal, 19(1), 51-62.
  • Pentecost E., Van Hooydonk C. ve Van Poeck A, (2001) Measuring and Estimating Exchange Market Pressure in the EU. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 401-418.
  • Poeck, A., Vanneste, J. and Veiner, M. (2007). Exchange Rate Regime and Exchange Market Pressure in the New EU Member States. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), ss.459 485.
  • Stavarek D.ve Dohnal M. (2009). Exchange Market Pressure in Central Europe: An Application of the Girton Roper Model: Published in Economies of Central and Eastern Europe Convergence Opportunities and Challenges. Conference Proceeding Tallinn, 14-16. (3 Mart 2018 tarihinde http: // mpra.ub.uni-maenchen.de/15744/ adresinden erişildi).
  • Stavarek D. (2007) Exchange Market Pressure in the EU4 Countries a Model-Depended Approach. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 4(3) 80:94.
  • Tanner, E. (2001). Exchange Market Pressure and Monetary Policy: Asia and Latin America in The 1990s. IMF Staff Papers, 47, 311-33.
  • Tanner, E. (2002). Exchange Market Pressure, Currency Crises, and Monetary Policy: Additional Evidence from Emerging Markets. IMF Working Paper, wp/02/14
  • Thornton, J. (1995). Exchange Market Pressure in Costa Rica, 1986-92: An Application of the Girton- Roper Model. International Economic Journal 9:1.
  • Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası (TCMB), Elektronik Veri Dağıtım Sistemine (EVDS) 01/Mart/ 2018 tarihinde https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr. adresinden erişildi.
  • Vanneste, J., Van Poeck, A. ve Veiner, M. (2005). Exchange Rate Regimes and Exchange Market Pressure in Accession Countries. Working Paper, 2004/012. University of Antwerp, Department of Economics.
  • Velasco: A. (1987). Financial Crises and Balance of Payments Crises: A Simple Model of the Southern Cone Experience. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 27, issue 1-2, 263-283
  • Weymark, D.N. (1995). Estimating Exchange Market Pressure and The Degree of Exchange Market Intervention for Canada. Journal of International Economics, 39, 273-295.
  • Weymark, D.N. (1997), Measuring Exchange Market Pressure and Intervention in Interdependent Economies: A Two-Country Model. Review of International Economics, 39 (3-4) 273-295.
  • Weymark, D.N. (1998). A General Approach to Measuring Exchange Market Pressure, Oxford Economics Papers, 50, 106-121.
  • Yorgancı F.ve Soydal, H. (2016). Analysis of Exchange Market Pressure Index with The Selected Data: Case of Turkey. Journal of Social Science, 3(6), ss. 409-423.
  • Ziramba, E. (2007). Measuring Exchange Market Pressure in South Africa: An Application of the Girton-Roper Monetary Model. SAJEMS, 10(1), 89-98.
APA parlaktuna i, KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ G (2018). Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması. , 3 - 19.
Chicago parlaktuna inci,KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ GAYE Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması. (2018): 3 - 19.
MLA parlaktuna inci,KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ GAYE Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması. , 2018, ss.3 - 19.
AMA parlaktuna i,KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ G Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması. . 2018; 3 - 19.
Vancouver parlaktuna i,KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ G Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması. . 2018; 3 - 19.
IEEE parlaktuna i,KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ G "Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması." , ss.3 - 19, 2018.
ISNAD parlaktuna, inci - KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ, GAYE. "Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması". (2018), 3-19.
APA parlaktuna i, KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ G (2018). Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması. Bankacılar, 29(107), 3 - 19.
Chicago parlaktuna inci,KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ GAYE Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması. Bankacılar 29, no.107 (2018): 3 - 19.
MLA parlaktuna inci,KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ GAYE Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması. Bankacılar, vol.29, no.107, 2018, ss.3 - 19.
AMA parlaktuna i,KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ G Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması. Bankacılar. 2018; 29(107): 3 - 19.
Vancouver parlaktuna i,KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ G Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması. Bankacılar. 2018; 29(107): 3 - 19.
IEEE parlaktuna i,KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ G "Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması." Bankacılar, 29, ss.3 - 19, 2018.
ISNAD parlaktuna, inci - KARPAT ÇATALBAŞ, GAYE. "Döviz Piyasası Baskısı ve Para Politikası: Türkiye 1997:M01-2018:M03 Dönemi Uygulaması". Bankacılar 29/107 (2018), 3-19.