A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study

Pınar AKYILDIZ, (Bartın Üniversitesi)
Yüksel DEDE (Gazi Üniversitesi)
Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
1 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 69 - 98 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 18-12-2019

A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study

Öz:
The purpose of this study is to develop a highly valid and reliable scalewhich determines pre-service mathematics teachers’ beliefs towards thenature of mathematics. The study was carried out using the exploratorymixed methods. The qualitative research design of the study was conductedwith a single case study and the quantitative research design was carriedout with a descriptive survey study. The participants of the qualitative part ofthe study are 53 senior pre-service mathematics teachers, selected byconvenient sampling method. The quantitative part of the study comprises499 participants, who are pre-service mathematics teachers, selected byconvenient sampling method. The data in the qualitative part of the studywere collected through a feedback form which has two open-endedquestions. The analysis of qualitative data was conducted by means ofsemantic content analysis. The results of the qualitative analysis of the studyrevealed that the mathematical beliefs of pre-service teachers are dividedinto four categories: tool-oriented, aim-oriented, progress-oriented, andfunction-oriented mathematical beliefs. Scale items were written based onthese four categories and other relevant scale items in the literature were notused at this stage. Validity-reliability studies, exploratory factor analysis,27% upper and lower group comparisons, item-total correlation andCronbach's Alpha values were calculated by applying the scale itemsobtained from this process to the pre-service teachers. The results of thestudy reveal a two-factor scale with a high validity and reliability.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Eğitim, Özel Psikoloji

İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmen Adayları İçin Matematiğin Doğasına Yönelik İnanç Ölçeği (MDYİÖ): Bir Keşfedici Karma Desen Çalışması

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiğin doğasına yönelik inançlarını belirlemek için geçerlik ve güvenirlik düzeyi yüksek bir ölçek geliştirmektir. Çalışma, keşfedici karma desen kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın nitel araştırma deseni tekli durum çalışması, nicel araştırma deseni ise tarama çalışması ile yürütülmüştür. Çalışmanın nitel kısmının katılımcıları, kolay ulaşılabilir örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenmiş olan 53 son sınıf ilköğretim matematik öğretmen adayıdır. Nicel çalışmanın katılımcıları ise kolay ulaşılabilir örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenen 499 ilköğretim matematik öğretmen adayıdır. Çalışmanın nitel kısmındaki veriler iki açık uçlu sorudan oluşan bir görüş formu yoluyla toplanmıştır. Nitel verilerin analizi, anlamsal içerik analizi kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın nitel verilerinin sonuçları, öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel inançlarının, araç-odaklı, amaç-odaklı, ilerlemeodaklı ve işlev-odaklı matematiksel inançlar olmak üzere dört kategoride toplandığını ortaya koymuştur. Bu dört kategoriye dayalı ölçek maddeleri yazılmış ve bu aşamada literatürdeki diğer ilgili ölçek maddeleri kullanılmamıştır. Bu süreç sonunda elde edilen ölçek maddelerinin öğretmen adaylarına uygulanmasıyla elde edilen verilere geçerlik-güvenirlik çalışmaları, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, %27’lik alt-üst grup karşılaştırmaları, madde-toplam korelasyonu ve Cronbach’s Alpha değerleri hesaplanarak yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, iki faktörlü geçerlik ve güvenirlik düzeyi yüksek bir ölçeği ortaya çıkarmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları Eğitim, Özel Psikoloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abelson, R. (1979). Differences between belief systems and knowledge systems. Cognitive Sciences, 3, 355-366.
  • Anderson, J. (1997). Teachers’ reported use of problem solving teaching strategies in primary mathematics classrooms. In F. Biddulph & K. Carr (Eds.), People in mathematics education. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 50–57). Rotorua, NZ: MERGA.
  • Aydın, S., & Çelik, D. (2017). Matematiğin Doğası Hakkında İnançlar Ölçeğinin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanması. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 13(4), 715-733.
  • Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making subject-matter knowledge part of the equation. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching Vol. 2. Teacher's knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice. A research annual (pp. 1-48). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
  • Baydar, C. S. (2000). Beliefs of preservice mathematics teachers at the Middle East Technical University and the Gazi University about the nature of mathematics and the teaching of mathematics. Middle East Technical University. Ankara.
  • Baydar, S. C. ve Bulut, S. (2002). Öğretmenlerin matematiğin doğası ve öğretimi ile ilgili inançların matematik eğitimindeki önemi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 62- 66.
  • Beswick, K. (2005). The beliefs/practice connection in broadly defined contexts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 39-68.
  • Birgin, O. (2016). Matematik öğrenmeye ilişkin inanç ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Proceedings of 1st INES Academic Research Congress (ss. 663-3670). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Brantlinger, E. (1996). Influence of preservice teachers' beliefs about pupil achievement on attitudes toward inclusion. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 19(1), 17-33.
  • Charalambous, C., Philippou, G., & Kyriakides, L. (2002). Towards understanding teachers' philosophical beliefs about mathematics.
  • Cobb, P. (1986). Contexts, goals, beliefs, and learning mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(2), 2-9.
  • Committee of College and University Examiners. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives (Vol. 1). New York: David McKay.
  • Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2014). Karma yöntem araştırmaları tasarımı ve yürütülmesi (Y. Dede & S. B. Demir, Çev. Edt.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. (Orijinal çalışmanın yayınlanması 2011).
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni (M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Çev. Edt.). Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi. (Orijinal çalışmanın yayınlanması 2013).
  • Çelik, D., Özmen, Z. M., Aydın, S., Güler, M., Birgin, O., Açıkyıldız, G., Gürsoy, K., Arabacı, D., Güneş, G., & Gürbüz, R. (2018). İlköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematik hakkındaki inançlarının ulusal düzeyde karşılaştırılması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 43(193).
  • De Corte, E., Op't Eynde, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Knowing what to believe: The relevance of students' mathematical beliefs for mathematics education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • DeBellis V. A. & Goldin, G. A. (1997). The affective domain in mathematical problemsolving. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.). Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 2, (pp. 209-216). Lahti, Finland.
  • DeBellis, V. A. & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131-147.
  • Dede, Y. & Karakuş, F. (2014). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematiğe yönelik inançları üzerinde öğretmen eğitimi programlarının etkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(2), 1-23.
  • Dede, Y. (2012). Students’ attitudes towards geometry: a cross-sectional study. Jornal Internacional de Estudos em Educação Matemática, 5(1).
  • Demirsoy, N. H. (2008). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenlerinin matematik hakkındaki inançları, uygulamaları ve arasındaki ilişki. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Bolu.
  • Dionne, J. (1984). The perception of mathematics among elementary school teachers. In J. Moser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME). Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin, pp. 223-228.
  • Duatepe Paksu, A. (2008). Öğretmenlerin matematik hakkındaki inançlarının branş ve cinsiyet bakımından karşılaştırılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35, 87-97.
  • Duru, A., & Göl, R. (2016). Öğretmen Adaylarının Matematik, Matematik Öğretimi ve Matematik Öğrenmeye İlişkin İnançları. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 255-282.
  • Ekeblad, E, & Bond, C. (1994) The nature of a conception: questions of context, in R. Ballantyne & C. Bruce (Eds) Phenomenography: philosophy and practice (Brisbane, Queensland University of Technology, Centre for Applied Environmental and Social Education Research), 343-353.
  • Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13-33.
  • Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. New York: Falmer Press.
  • Felbrich, A., Kaiser, G. ve Schmotz, C. (2014). The cultural dimension of beliefs: An investigation of future primary teachers’ epistemological beliefs concerning the nature of mathematics in 15 countries. S. Blömeke, F. J. Hsieh, G. Kaiser ve W. H. Schmidt (Ed.), in International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn TEDS-M Results (s. 209-229). Springer.
  • Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistic using SPSS for Windows. Londra: Sage Publication.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
  • Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of belief. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39- 58). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Golafshani, N. (2005). Secondary teachers’ professed beliefs about mathematics, mathematics teaching, and mathematics learning: Iranian perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, Canada.
  • Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59 -72), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber Mathematik bei Mathematiklehrern (Mathematics teachers’ epistemological beliefs about the nature of mathematics). Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik (Journal of Mathematics Education), 19, 3–45.
  • Grootenboer, P. J., & Hemmings, B. (2007). Mathematics performance and the role played by affective and background factors. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(3), 3-20.
  • Grootenboer, P., Lomas, G. & Ingram, N. (2008). The affective domain and mathematics education. In H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast et al (eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2004- 2007 (pp. 255-269). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Güven, B., Karataş, İ., Öztürk, Y., Arslan, S. & Gürsoy, K. (2013). A study of scale development on determination of pre-service and in-service teachers’ beliefs about pre-school mathematics education. Elementary Education Online, 12(4), 969-980.
  • Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2012). Matematik inanç ölçeğinin Türkçe'ye uyarlama çalışması. Journal of the Cukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, 21(3), 175- 184.
  • Hannula, M. S. (2001, June). Students’ needs and goals and their beliefs. I. In Current state of research on mathematical beliefs X Proceedings of the MAVI10 European Workshop (pp. 25-32).
  • Hart, L. E. (1989). Describing the affective domain: Saying what we mean. In Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving (pp. 37-45). Springer New York.
  • Haser, Ç., & Doğan, O. (2012). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ belief systems. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(3), 261-274.
  • Işıkoğlu, N. (2008). The effects of a teaching methods course on early childhood preservice teachers' beliefs. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 29(3), 190-203.
  • Kandemir, M. A., & Gür, H. (2011). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin matematik hakkındaki inançlarını belirlemeye yönelik matematik inanç ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Education Sciences, 6(2), 1490-1511.
  • Kayan, R., Haser, Ç., & Işıksal Bostan, M. (2013). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematiğin doğası, öğretimi ve öğrenimi hakkındaki inanışları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(167).
  • Koballa, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 75–102). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lester, F. K., & Garofalo, J. (1987). The influence of affects, beliefs, and metacognition on problem solving behavior: Some tentative speculations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C.
  • Liljedahl, P., Rolka, K. & Rösken, B. (2007). Affecting affect: The re-education of preservice teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning and teaching. G. W. Martin, M. E. Strutchens, and P. C. Elliott (Eds), in 69th NCTM year book (s. 319-330). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • Markic, S., Eilks, I., & Valanides, N. (2008). Developing a tool to evaluate differences in beliefs about science teaching and learning among freshman student teachers from different science teaching domains: a case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2, 109-120.
  • McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). Challenging prospective teachers' beliefs during early field experience: A quixotic undertaking? Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 12-20.
  • McLeod, D. B. (1988). Affective issues in mathematical problem solving: Some theoretical considerations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 134-141.
  • McLeod, D. B. (1989). Beliefs, attitudes, and emotions: New views of affect in mathematics education. In Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 245- 258). Springer, New York, NY.
  • McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 575-596.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2017). Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). Ankara.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2018). Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). Ankara.
  • Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.
  • Op't Eynde, P., & De Corte, E. (2003). Students' Mathematics-Related Belief Systems: Design and Analysis of a Questionnaire.
  • Op't Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2001). What to learn from what we feel? The role of students' emotions in the mathematics classroom.
  • Özden, Y. (2002). Eğitimde yeni değerler: Eğitimde dönüşüm. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Özden, Y. (2003). Öğrenme ve öğretme. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-322.
  • Pehkonen, E. (1997). Teachers conceptions on mathematics teaching. 5. Proceedings of the MAVI-5 Workshop on the Current State of the Research on Mathematical Beliefs, University of Helsinki, Finland.
  • Pehkonen, E. (2004). State-of-art in mathematical beliefs research. In M. Niss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 1-14). Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University.
  • Pratt, D. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching, Adult Education Quarterly, 42(4), 203- 220.
  • Purnomo, Y. W. (2017). A Scale for Measuring Teachers' Mathematics-Related Beliefs: A Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 23-38.
  • Rajaratnam, N., Cronbach, L. S., & Gleser, G. C. (1965). Generalizability of stratifiedparallel tests. Psychometrika, 30, 39–56.
  • Raymond, A. M. (1993). Unraveling the relationships between beginning elementary teachers’ mathematics beliefs and teaching practices. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Monterey, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 390694.)
  • Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher's mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550-576.
  • Raymond, A., Santos, V., & Masingila, J. (1991). The Influence of Innovative Instructional Processes on Mathematical Belief Systems. Paper presented in Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED390703.pdf
  • Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers’ beliefs. In J. Rath & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Advances in teacher education series, (pp. 1-22). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Sanalan, V. A., Bekdemir, M., Okur, M., Kanbolat, O., Baş, F. &Sağırlı, M. Ö. (2013). Öğretmen adayların matematiğin doğasına ilişkin düşünceleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(33), 155-168.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariglietti, G. and Bajaj, A. (1997). The Development of Epistemological Beliefs Among Secondary School Student: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 37-40.
  • Sigel, I. E. (1985). A conceptual analysis of beliefs. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Parental belief systems: The psychological consequences for children (pp. 345-371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Silver, E. A. (1985). Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Steinbring, H. (1998). Elements of epistemological knowledge for mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(2), 157-189.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. Harper Collins. New York.
  • Tattoo, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S., Ingvarson, L., Peck, R., & Rowley, G. (2008). Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Conceptual framework. East Lansing: Teacher Education and Development International Study Center, College of Education, Michigan State University.
  • Tavşancıl, E. ve Aslan, A. E. (2001). Sözel, yazılı ve diğer materyaller için içerik analizi ve uygulama örnekleri. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınları.
  • Thompson, A. G. (1982). Teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching: Three case studies. Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.
  • Thompson, A. G. (1984). The relationship of teachers' conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 105-127.
  • Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (s. 127-146), New York: Macmillian.
  • Toluk Uçar, Z., & Demirsoy, N. H. (2010). Eski-yeni ikilemi: matematik öğretmenlerinin matematiksel inançları ve uygulamaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(39), 321-332.
  • Törner, G., & Grigutsch, S. (1994). Mathematische Weltbilder bei studienanfängern— eine erhebung. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 15(3-4), 211-251.
  • Underhill, R. (1988). Focus on research into practice in diagnostic and prescriptive mathematics: mathematics learners' beliefs: a review. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 10(1), 55-69.
APA AKYILDIZ P, DEDE Y (2019). A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. , 69 - 98.
Chicago AKYILDIZ Pınar,DEDE Yüksel A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. (2019): 69 - 98.
MLA AKYILDIZ Pınar,DEDE Yüksel A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. , 2019, ss.69 - 98.
AMA AKYILDIZ P,DEDE Y A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. . 2019; 69 - 98.
Vancouver AKYILDIZ P,DEDE Y A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. . 2019; 69 - 98.
IEEE AKYILDIZ P,DEDE Y "A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study." , ss.69 - 98, 2019.
ISNAD AKYILDIZ, Pınar - DEDE, Yüksel. "A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study". (2019), 69-98.
APA AKYILDIZ P, DEDE Y (2019). A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 69 - 98.
Chicago AKYILDIZ Pınar,DEDE Yüksel A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 9, no.1 (2019): 69 - 98.
MLA AKYILDIZ Pınar,DEDE Yüksel A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.9, no.1, 2019, ss.69 - 98.
AMA AKYILDIZ P,DEDE Y A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019; 9(1): 69 - 98.
Vancouver AKYILDIZ P,DEDE Y A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019; 9(1): 69 - 98.
IEEE AKYILDIZ P,DEDE Y "A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study." Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9, ss.69 - 98, 2019.
ISNAD AKYILDIZ, Pınar - DEDE, Yüksel. "A Belief Questionnaire about the Nature of Mathematics for Turkish Preservice Mathematics Teachers: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study". Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 9/1 (2019), 69-98.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 9:34

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları