“Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 17 Sayfa Aralığı: 38 - 55 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 22-10-2019
“Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art
Öz: The article investigates what I conceptualize as the “magnetic voice” in reference to Voiceof My Father (2012) by Zeynel Doğan and Orhan Eskiköy as well as the audio-visual artworks bySarkis, Kutluğ Ataman and Dilek Winchester. The “magnetic voice” is considered as an excess,as a “surplus sign” in the horizon of the visible and at the edge of the audible. Concerned withthe aesthetic, performative, and political significance of the voice as sound-beyond-language,the discussion is centered on the agency of the silenced voice as an attempt to pin down the disciplined/disciplining voice and to hear repressed and silenced voices.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
“Mıknatıs Ses”: Rezonans ve Sanatın Politikası
Öz: Makale, önerdiğim “mıknatıs ses” kavramıyla Zeynel Doğan ve Orhan Eskiköy’ın Babamın Sesi (2012) filmi ile Sarkis, Kutluğ Ataman ve Dilek Winchester’ın görsel-işitsel sanat çalışmalarını incelemektedir. “Mıknatıs ses” kavramı yoluyla ses görünür olanın ufkunda, işitilebilir olanın sınırında beliren bir fazlalık olarak, bir “artık bir gösterge” olarak ele alınır. İnsan sesinin dilin ötesinde bir ses olarak estetik, “performatif ve politik gücüne odaklanıldığı tartışmada temel izlek terbiye eden/terbiye edilmiş sesi saptamak ve bastırılmış, sessizleştirilmiş sesleri dinlemektir.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities. London and New York: Verso.
- Appelbaum, D. (1990). Voice. New York: State University of New York Press.
- Barthes, R. (1977). The Grain of the Voice. In S. Heath (ed.), Image, Music, Text (pp. 179-189). London: Fontana Press.
- Badiou, A. (2009). Logics of Worlds: Being and Event II. London: Continuum.
- Çankara, M. (2012). As If. In Dilek Winchester. (exhibition catalogue) (pp. 66-67). Athens, Greece: EMET.
- Chambers, I. (1994). Migrancy, Culture, Identity. London and New York: Routledge. Connor, S. (2000). Dumbstruck: A Cultural History of Ventriloquism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
- Demos, T.J. (2010). Kutluğ Ataman: The Art of Storytelling. In Kutluğ Ataman: The Enemy Inside Me (exhibition catalogue) (pp. 30-36). Istanbul: Istanbul Modern.
- Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1986). Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
- Derrida, J. (1988). The Ear of the Other: Texts and Discussions with Jacques Derrida. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
- Dolar, M. (2006). A Voice and Nothing More. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The MIT Press.
- Dolar, M. (2010). What’s in a Voice. In Amber’07: Body Process Arts Festival (pp.93-119). Istanbul: BISS, Body-Process Art Association.
- Foucault, M. (2000). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
- Foucault, M. (1977). Theatrum Philosophicum. In D.F. Bouchard (ed.), Language, Counter Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews (pp.165-196). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Hendy, D. (2014). A Human History of Sound & Listening. London: Profile Books.
- Ihde, D. (2007). Listening and Voice: Phenomenologies of Sound. New York: State University of New York Press.
- LaBelle, B. (2010). Background Noise: Perspectives on Sound Art. New York and London: Continuum.
- Maharaj, S. (2001). Modernity and Difference: A Conversation between Stuart Hall and Sarat Maharaj. In S. Campbell and G. Tawadros (eds.), Stuart Hall and Sarat Maharaj: Modernity and Difference (36-56). London: INIVA.
- Mignon, L. (2009). Ana Metne Taşınan Dipnotlar. Istanbul: Iletişim Yayınları.
- Ong, W.J. (1988). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London and New York: Routledge.
- Rogoff, I. (2007). ‘What is a Theorist?’. Toplumbilim: Special Issue on Visual Culture, 22, 57-63.
- Zabunyan, E. (2010). From Him to Us. Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
- Žižek, S. (1996). ‘I Hear You with My Eyes’; or, the Invisible Master. In R. Salecl and S. Žižek (eds.) Gaze and Voice as Love Objects (pp. 90-126). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
| APA | SAYBAŞILI N (2018). “Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art. , 38 - 55. |
| Chicago | SAYBAŞILI NERMİN “Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art. (2018): 38 - 55. |
| MLA | SAYBAŞILI NERMİN “Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art. , 2018, ss.38 - 55. |
| AMA | SAYBAŞILI N “Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art. . 2018; 38 - 55. |
| Vancouver | SAYBAŞILI N “Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art. . 2018; 38 - 55. |
| IEEE | SAYBAŞILI N "“Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art." , ss.38 - 55, 2018. |
| ISNAD | SAYBAŞILI, NERMİN. "“Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art". (2018), 38-55. |
| APA | SAYBAŞILI N (2018). “Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(17), 38 - 55. |
| Chicago | SAYBAŞILI NERMİN “Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2, no.17 (2018): 38 - 55. |
| MLA | SAYBAŞILI NERMİN “Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.2, no.17, 2018, ss.38 - 55. |
| AMA | SAYBAŞILI N “Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2018; 2(17): 38 - 55. |
| Vancouver | SAYBAŞILI N “Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art. MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2018; 2(17): 38 - 55. |
| IEEE | SAYBAŞILI N "“Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art." MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2, ss.38 - 55, 2018. |
| ISNAD | SAYBAŞILI, NERMİN. "“Magnetic Voice”: Resonance and the Politics of Art". MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2/17 (2018), 38-55. |
