Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting

Gurleyen, Tugce

Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting

Tuğçe GÜRLEYEN (İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)

A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi

5 2

Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 125 - 135 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 11-11-2019

Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting

Öz:

Geographical conditions affect behaviors, habits, relationship, mental andemotional orientations of people. The subject that forms the platform for the liv-ing memory creates the details of the urban space in the process of experiencingthrough evoking of the recollection of the memory as it forms the urban spaces.Besides, the role of layering is determinative in relation to memory with spatialorganization. This study draws attention to urban places that allow their selvesfor the possibilities of forming associations and multiple-reading of the memo-ry, and representative interfaces. It will be discussed how the past lived, gainedcontinuity and formed the sense of time in the practices of the present. Whilethe coexisting is emphasized on holistic memory, the effects that layers and poreshave on subjects will be addressed through representations. Within this scope, ithas been envisaged to combine memory layers, separated from different contextswith porosity and montage metaphors. The concept of porosity is defined not onlyas spatial and temporal but also as the mobility of social codes, and transitivitybetween past and future. The montage in the layered unity of the space also relatesto the issue of how two or more different parts form a whole with each other. Inthis context, the issues of how the relationships between different parts will occurduring memory montage, which subjects or acts will define and increase the in-terval of space-time relationship will only be solved by taking the parameters ofmemory’s spatial and temporal contexts into consideration.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Mimarlık Çevre Çalışmaları Kentsel Çalışmalar

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Al, M. (2011). Kentte Bellek Yıkımı ve Kimlik İnşası-Palimpsest: Ankara Atatürk Bulvarı Bağlamında Bir İnceleme. İdeal Kent Araştırmaları, (4), Ankara.
Amin, A., Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the Urban. Malden: Black- well Publishers.
Assman, J. (2015). Kültürel Bellek. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Press.
Auge, M. (1999). Unutma Biçimleri. İstanbul: Om Press.
Bachelard, G. (2014). Mekânın Poetikası. İstanbul: İthaki Press.
Basa, İ. (2015). Kentsel Hafızanın Sürdürülebilirliği: Bir Mimarlık Stüdyosu Deneyimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 1(15), 32-40.
Benjamin, W. (1985). Naples in One Way Street and Other Writings. London: Verso.
Bergson, H. (2007). Madde ve Bellek. Ankara: Dost Press.
Boyer, M. (1994). The City of Collective Memory. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.
Boym, S. (2009). Nostaljinin Geleceği. İstanbul: Metis Press.
Bruno, G. (2007). Atlas of Emotion: Journeys in Art. Architecture and Film. New York: Verso.
Casey, E. S. (1987). Remembering: A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Connerton, P. (2009). Modernite Nasıl Unutturur. İstanbul: Sel Press.
Crysler, C. G. (2012). Introduction: Time’s Arrows: Space of the Past. The Handbook of Architectural Theory, London.
Doyduk, S., Can, C. (2012). Nesne Merkezli Koruma Bilgisine Farklı Yaklaşımlar: Kentsel Arkeolojik Bir Araştırma, Sigma, (4), 12-21.
Doyran, Y. (2011). Gerçekliğin Maskelenmesi ve Simülasyon. ARTAM Global Art Sanat, (14), 102-107.
Ercan, N. (2012). Kentsel Hareketler: Protesto, Karşı Hafıza ve Yarat- mama Olasılığı, İdeal Kent Araştırmaları, (10), Ankara.
Goodwin, R. (2007). Porosity, the Revision of Public Space in the City Using Public Art to Test the Functional Boundaries of Built form. Architectur- al Design Research, RMIT University Press.
Graham, B. (2002). Heritage as Knowledge: Capital or Culture. Urban Studies, (39).
Huyysen, A. (1995). Alacakaran- lık Anıları: Bellek Yitimi Kültüründe Zamanı Belirlemek. İstanbul: Metis Press.
Lefebvre, H., Regulier, C. (2004). Rhythmanalysis- Space, Time and Ev- eryday Life. London: Continuum.
Lefebvre, H. (2012). The Production of Space. Malden: Blackwell.
Nora, P. (2006). Hafıza Mekânları. Ankara: Dost Press.
Owen, J. (1856). The Grammar of Ornament: A Visual Reference of Form and Colour in Architecture.
Pallasma, J. (2005). The Eyes of The Skin: Architecture and the Senses. UK: Wiley Academy.
Pösteki, N. (2012). Sinema Salolarının Dönüşümünde Bellek ve Mekân İlişkisi. New Communication Technol- ogies, Kocaeli University, İstanbul.
Rossi, A. (2006). Şehrin Mimarisi. İstanbul:Kanat Press.
Sayın, Ş. (2002). Anımsama, Bellek, Zaman ve Yaratım Süreci Üzerine. Kitaplık, (51), 120-131, İstanbul.
Sarlo, B. (2007). Bellek Kültürü ve Özneye Dönüş Üzerine Bir Tartışma. İstanbul: Metis Press.
Serim, I. B. (2012). Mimarlık Ve Sinema İttifakının Soykütüğü Üzerine. Aktör Mekânlar.
Stavrides, S. (2006). Urban Porosity and the Right to the City. World Con- gress of the International Sociological Association.
Stavrides, S. (2007). in Loose Space: Diversity and Possibility in Urban Life. Heterotopias and the Experience of Po- rous Urban Space. London:Routledge.
Tanpınar, A. H. (2015). Saatleri Ayarlama Enstitüsü. İstanbul: Dergah Press.
Terdiman, R. (1993). Present Past: Modernity and Memory Crisis. Lon- don:Cornell University Press.
Thompson, P. (1999). Geçmişin Sesi. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfi Press.
Uslu, A. (2016). Hafıza Ve Geçmişin Talebi Olarak Tarih Arasındaki Ayrım. Vira Verita, (1).

APA	Gurleyen T (2018). Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting. , 125 - 135.
Chicago	Gurleyen Tugce Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting. (2018): 125 - 135.
MLA	Gurleyen Tugce Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting. , 2018, ss.125 - 135.
AMA	Gurleyen T Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting. . 2018; 125 - 135.
Vancouver	Gurleyen T Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting. . 2018; 125 - 135.
IEEE	Gurleyen T "Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting." , ss.125 - 135, 2018.
ISNAD	Gurleyen, Tugce. "Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting". (2018), 125-135.

APA	Gurleyen T (2018). Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting. A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 125 - 135.
Chicago	Gurleyen Tugce Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting. A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 15, no.2 (2018): 125 - 135.
MLA	Gurleyen Tugce Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting. A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.15, no.2, 2018, ss.125 - 135.
AMA	Gurleyen T Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting. A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; 15(2): 125 - 135.
Vancouver	Gurleyen T Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting. A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; 15(2): 125 - 135.
IEEE	Gurleyen T "Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting." A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, ss.125 - 135, 2018.
ISNAD	Gurleyen, Tugce. "Memory layers, porosity and montage as representative interfaces of anamnesis and forgetting". A\|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 15/2 (2018), 125-135.