HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM

Yurt, Engin

HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM

Engin YURT (Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Felsefe Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Felsefi Düşün - Akademik Felsefe Dergisi

0 0

Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 10 Sayfa Aralığı: 337 - 363 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 13-11-2019

HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM

Öz:

Bu makale en temelde kutsal olan üzerine bir inceleme yapmayı amaçlar. Teoloji tarafından bir şeyin kutsal atfedilmesinin felsefe içinde nasıl bir anlama sahip olabileceği araştırılmıştır. Makalenin araştırma alanı olarak Hıristiyanlığı daha sonraları Katolik ve Ortodoks Kilisesi olarak ikiye ayırmış olan görüş ve uygulama farklılıkları seçilmiştir. Bu iki kilisenin ‘Ve Oğuldan’ tartışması, ‘Eşitler Arasında Birinci’ (primas inter pares) fikri, ‘Töz Değişimi’ ritüeli gibi başlıklar altında birbirinden ayrılması aynı zamanda onların kutsal olanı nasıl algıladığı ve düşündüğünü de şekillendirmiştir. Bu görüş ayrılıkları incelenerek bunların kutsal olanın anlamlandırılması konusunda ne denli bir payı olduğu ortaya koyulmaya çalışılmıştır. Aynı semavi geleneğe ait olan bu iki Kilise’nin görüş ayrılıklarının kutsal olanın teolojik olarak geçirdiği metamorfoz ve paradigma kaymasındaki rolü açık kılınmasına uğraşılmıştır. Son olarak da Kilise Babaları’nın meseleyle ilgili görülen ifadeleri ve görüşleri üzerinden fikir ayrılıklarının ötesine geçip ortak paydada buluşmanın bir olanağı olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Felsefe

THE DIVERGENCE ABOUT THE NATURE OF THE HOLY IN CHRISTIANITY AND A POSSIBLE SOLUTION TO THIS IN CHURCH FATHERS

Öz:

This article mainly aims to make an examination over the holy. It has been inquired into how something being ascribed holy can have a meaning in philosophy. As the article’s research area, the differences in both opinion and execution which have later divided Christianity into two as Catholic and Orthodox Churches have been selected. The separation of these two churches under the subject titles such as ‘Filioque’ controversy, the idea of ‘First Among Equals’ (primas inter pares), ritual of ‘Transubstantiation’ have also shaped how they perceived and thought the holy. With these divergences being investigated, it has been tried to present how much of a share these had in giving meaning for the holy. It has been labored to manifest the role of these two Churches’ -which belong to and come from the same celestial tradition- divergences in the metamorphosis and paradigm shift that the holy underwent. For the last, through the Church Fathers’ opinions and views which have been seen related to subject matter, with moving beyond the divergences, it has been searched if there is a possibility of meeting on the common ground or not.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Felsefe

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

A Selected Library of Niecene and Post- Nicene Fathers. Hazırlayan Philip Schaff – Henry Wace. 1. ve 2. Seri. Toplam 28 Cilt. Massachusetts: Hendrickson Pub. 2004.
Ante-Nicene Fathers: The Writings of the Fathers down to A.D. 325. Hazırlayan Alan Menzies. 10 Cilt. Massachusetts: Hendrickson Pub. 1994.
Augustinus. Confessions. Çeviren F. J. Sheed. Hazırlayan Michael P. Foley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. 2006.
Bahnsen. Greg L. By This Standard: The Authority of God’s Law Today. Texas: Institute for Christian Economics. 1991.
Bauerschmidt. Frederick Christian. Holy Teaching: Introducing the Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas. Michigan: Brazos Press. 2005.
Bray. Gerald. “The Filioque Clause in History and Theology”. Tyndale Bulletin. Sayı 34 (1983).
Bury. J. B. The Cambridge Medieval History: The Eastern Roman Empire (717-1453). 4.
Cilt. Hazırlayan J. R. Tanner, C. W. Previté-Orton, Z. N. Brooke. Cambridge: At the University Press. 1923.
Chesnut. Roberta C. “The Two Prosopa in Nestorius’ Bazaar of Heracleides”, The Journal of Theological Studies. Sayı 29 (1978): 392-409.
Congar. Yves. After Nine Hundred Years: The Background of the Schism Between the Eastern and Western Churches. New York: Fordham University Press. 1959.
I Believe in the Holy Spirit: The River of the Water of Life (Rev 22:1) Flows in the East and in the West. 3. Cilt. Çeviren Geoffrey Chapman. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company. 2000.
Cross. Frank Leslie – Livingstone. Elizabeth Anne. “Double Procession of the Holy Spirit”. The Oxford Dictionary Of The Christian Church. Londra: Oxford University Press. 2005.
Crostini. Barbara. “Catechetical Teaching in Eleventh-Century Constantinople: The Cases of Paul of Evergetis and Parisinus Graceus 752”. Networks of Learning: Perspectives on Scholars in Byzantine East and Latin West, c. 1000-1200. Hazırlayan Sita Steckel, Niels Gaul, Michael Grünbart. Berlin: Lit Verlag. 2014.
Dale. Thomas E. A. “Sacred Space from Constantinople to Venice”. The Byzantine World. Hazırlayan Paul Stephenson. New York: Routledge. 2011.
Derrida. Jacques. “Faith and Knowledge”. Çeviren Samuel Weber. Religion. Hazırlayan Jacques Derrida, Gianni Vattimo. California: Stanford University Press. 1998.
Dillard. Peter S. Non-Metaphysical Theology After Heidegger. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2016.
Dix. Dom Gregory. The Shape of the Liturgy. New York: Continuum. 2005.
East and West: The Making of a Rift in the Church: From Apostolic Times until the Council of Florence. Hazırlayan Henry Chadwick – Owen Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003.
Elowsky. Joel C. Ancient Christian Doctrine: We Believe in the Holy Spirit. 4. Cilt. Illinois: InterVarsity Press. 2009.
Fortescue. Adrian. “Epiklesis”. The Catholic Encyclopedia. 5. Cilt. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 1909.
Hägglund. Martin. Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life. California: Stanford University Press. 2008.
Hancock. Brannon. The Scandal of Sacramentality: The Eucharist in Literary and Theological Perspectives. Cambridge: James Clark & Co. 2014.
Hastings. Stephen L. Whole-Earth Ethics for Holy Ground: The Development and Practice of “Sacramental” Creation Spirituality. Maryland: Lexington Books. 2017.
Heidegger. Martin. “Brief über den Humanismus (1946)”. Wegmarken. Gesamtausgabe Band 9. Hazırlayan Friedrich-Wilhelm von Hermann. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. 1976.
Horton. Michael S. The Christian Faith: A Systematic Theology for Pilgrims on the Way. Michigan: Zondervan. 2011.
Howe. John McDonald. Before the Gregorian Reform: The Latin Church at the Turn of the First Millennium. Londra: Cornell University Press. 2016.
Irvin. Dale T. – Sunquist. Scott. History of the World Christian Movement: Earliest Christianity to 1453. 1. Cilt. Edinburg: T & T Clark. 2001.
Jugie. Martin. “Palamite (Controverse)”. Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique içinde. 1777-1818. Hazırlayan M. Vacant. Cilt: XI / 2. Paris: Editions-Librairie Letouzey & Ané. 1932.
Karkkainen. Veli-Matti. A Constructive Christian Theology for the Pluralistic World: Trinity and Revelation. 2. Cilt. Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 2014.
Kenny. Anthony. A New History of Philosophy: Mediaeval Philosophy. 2. Cilt. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005.
Krausmüller. Dirk. “Establishing Authority in the Constantinopolitan Religious Discourse of the Eleventh Century: Inspiration and Learning in the Writings of the Monk Niketas Stethatos”. Networks of Learning: Perspectives on Scholars in Byzantine East and Latin West, c. 1000-1200. Hazırlayan Sita Steckel, Niels Gaul, Michael Grünbart. Berlin: Lit Verlag. 2014.
Kutsal Kitap: Eski ve Yeni Antlaşma (Tevrat, Zebur, İncil). Kitabı Mukaddes Şirketi. İstanbul: Yeni Yaşam Yayınları. 2014.
Livanos. Christopher. Greek Tradition and Latin Influence in the Work of George Scholarios: Alone Against All of Europe. New Jersey: Gorgias Press. 2006.
Louth. Andrew. The Church in History: Greek East and Latin West: The Church, AD 681-1071. 3. Cilt. New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press. 2007.
Metcalf. Robert. “Following the Words: Heidegger’s Account of Religion as Nachfolge”, Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory. Cilt 10. Sayı: 3 (2010): 90-103.
Meyendorff. John. St. Gregory Palamas and Orthodox Spirituality. New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press. 1974.
Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes. New York: Fordham University Press. 1979. “Leo of Ohrid”. The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Hazırlayan Alexander Kazhdan. New York: Oxford University Press. 1991.
Morerod. Charles. “The Decree on Ecumenism, Unitatis Redintegratio”. Vatican II: Renewal within Tradition içinde. 311-342. New York: Oxford University Press. 2008.
Neale. John Mason. History of Eastern Church: General Introduction. 1. Cilt. Londra: Joseph Masters. 1850.
O’Collins. Gerald – Farrugia. Edward G. A Concise Dictionary of Theology. New York: Continuum. 2004.
Olson. Roger E. The Story of Christian Theology: Twenty Centuries of Tradition and Reform. Illinois: InterVarsity Press. 1999.
Patrologia Cursus Completus, Series Latina. Hazırlayan Jacques-Paul Migne. 143. Cilt. Paris: Migne. 1844-65.
Ryrie. Charles C. Basic Theology. Colorado: ChariotVictor Publishing. 1982.
Saint Ambrose: Theological and Dogmatic Works. The Fathers of the Church. 44. Cilt.
Hazırlayan Roy Joseph Deferrari. Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press. 2002.
Schalow. Frank. Heidegger and the Quest for the Sacred: From Thought to the Sanctuary of Faith. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2001.
Schwarz. Hans. Christology. Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 1998.
Seleznyov. Nikolai N. “Nestorius of Constantinople: Condemnation, Suppression, Veneration, with special reference to the role of his name in East-Syriac Christianity”. Journal of Eastern Christian Studies. Cilt 62. Sayı 3-4 (2010): 165-190.
Shephard. Jonathan. “Byzantium and the West”. The New Cambridge Medieval History c.900-c.1024 içinde. 605-623. Hazırlayan Timothy Reuter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1999.
Siecienski. A. Edward. The Filioque: History of a Doctrinal Controversy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).
Swete. Henry Barclay. The Holy Spirit in the Ancient Church: A Study of Christian Teaching in the Age of the Fathers. Londra: Macmillan & Co. 1912.
The Quest for Unity: Orthodox and Catholics in Dialogue. Hazırlayan John Borelli, John H. Erickson. New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press. 1996.
Thiselton. Anthony C. The Holy Spirit: In Biblical Teaching, Through the Centuries, and Today. Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 2013.
Vatican II: The Essential Texts. Hazırlayan Norman Tanner. New York: Random House, Inc. 2012.
Vedder. Ben – van der Heiden. Gert-Jan. “On Faith and the Holy in Heidegger and Derrida”. A Companion to Derrida içinde. 430-446. Hazırlayan Zeynep Direk, Leonard Lawlor. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell. 2014.
Will. Cornelius. Acta et Scripta Quae de Controversiis Ecclesiae Graecae et Latinae Saeculo Undecimo Composita Extant. Leipzig: N. G. Elwert. 1861.
Williams. John. Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Religion. Canadian Corporation for Studies in Religion. Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. 1977.
https://media1.britannica.com/eb-media/38/196138-004-982D2CE5.jpg Çevrimiçi 24.03. 2018.

APA	Yurt E (2018). HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM. , 337 - 363.
Chicago	Yurt Engin HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM. (2018): 337 - 363.
MLA	Yurt Engin HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM. , 2018, ss.337 - 363.
AMA	Yurt E HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM. . 2018; 337 - 363.
Vancouver	Yurt E HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM. . 2018; 337 - 363.
IEEE	Yurt E "HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM." , ss.337 - 363, 2018.
ISNAD	Yurt, Engin. "HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM". (2018), 337-363.

APA	Yurt E (2018). HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM. Felsefi Düşün - Akademik Felsefe Dergisi, 0(10), 337 - 363.
Chicago	Yurt Engin HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM. Felsefi Düşün - Akademik Felsefe Dergisi 0, no.10 (2018): 337 - 363.
MLA	Yurt Engin HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM. Felsefi Düşün - Akademik Felsefe Dergisi, vol.0, no.10, 2018, ss.337 - 363.
AMA	Yurt E HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM. Felsefi Düşün - Akademik Felsefe Dergisi. 2018; 0(10): 337 - 363.
Vancouver	Yurt E HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM. Felsefi Düşün - Akademik Felsefe Dergisi. 2018; 0(10): 337 - 363.
IEEE	Yurt E "HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM." Felsefi Düşün - Akademik Felsefe Dergisi, 0, ss.337 - 363, 2018.
ISNAD	Yurt, Engin. "HIRİSTİYANLIKTA KUTSALIN DOĞASINA DAİR FİKİR AYRILIĞI VE BUNA KİLİSE BABALARI’NDA OLASI BİR ÇÖZÜM". Felsefi Düşün - Akademik Felsefe Dergisi 10 (2018), 337-363.