Selda YILDIRIM
(Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi)
Yıl: 2019Cilt: 44Sayı: 198ISSN: 1300-1337 / 1300-1337Sayfa Aralığı: 99 - 113Türkçe

61 0
Matematik Başarısını Yordama: Sosyoekonomik Statü, Ebeveyn Katılımı ve Öz-Güvenin Rolü
Bu çalışma, sosyoekonomik statünün (SES), öğrencilerin matematik öğrenmeleri üzerindeki doğrudan ve ebeveyn katılımı ve öz-güven aracılığı ile de dolaylı etkilerini incelemiştir. Uluslararası Matematik ve Fen Eğilimleri Araştırması (TIMSS 2011) Türkiye verisi kullanılarak, çok düzeyli analizler yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar, iki SES bileşeninin-evdeki eğitim kaynakları ve okul yapısının- öğrencilerin matematik başarısını pozitif yordadığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca, sonuçlar ebeveynin evdeki katılımı ve ebeveynin okul etkinliklerine katılımının sırasıyla, evdeki eğitim kaynakları ve okul yapısı ile matematik başarısı arasında aracı rolü olduğunu göstermiştir. Hem evdeki eğitim kaynaklarının hem de ebeveynin evdeki katılımının matematik başarısı üzerindeki etkisine aracılık eden öz-güvenin matematik başarısının en güçlü yordayıcısı olduğu görülmüştür. Elde edilen, bulgular, SES ve öğrenci matematik başarısı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık etmede ebeveyn katılımının rolünü incelerken çok düzeyli analizlerin önemini vurgulamaktadır.
Fen > Temel Bilimler > Matematik
Sosyal > Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., van der Werf, G. ve Kuyper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 39, 36-46.
  • Akyüz, G. (2014). The effects of student and school factors on mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2011. Education and Science, 39(172), 150-162.
  • Alvarez-Valdiva, I. M., Chavez, K. L., Schneider, B. H., Roberts, J. S., Becalli-Puerta, L. E., Perez-Lujan, D. ve Sanz-Martinez, Y. A. (2012). Parental involvement and the academic achievement and social functioning of Cuban school children. School Psychology International, 34, 313-329.
  • Alves, A. F., Gomes, C. M. A., Martins, A. ve Almeida, L. da S. (2017). Cognitive performance and academic achievement: How do family and school converge?. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 10, 49-56.
  • Bellibaş, M. S. ve Gümüş, S. (2013). The Impact of socio-economic status on parental involvement in Turkish primary schools: Perspective of teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 9(3), 178-193.
  • Boonk, L., Gijselaers, H. J. M., Ritzen, H. ve Brand-Gruwel, S. (2018). A review of the relationship between parental involvement indicators and academic achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 10-30.
  • Bradley, R. H. ve Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-399.
  • Brunner, M., Keller, U., Wenger, M., Fischbach, A. ve Lüdtke, O. (2017). Between-school variation in students' achievement, motivation, affect, and learning strategies: Results from 81 countries for planning group-randomized trials in education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11(3), 452-478.
  • Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E. ve Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33-46.
  • Chowa, G. A. N., Masa, R. D. ve Tucker, J. (2013). The effects of parental involvement on academic performance of Ghanaian youth: Testing measurement and relationships using structural equation modeling. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 2020-2030.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl), 95-120.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Çiftçi, Ş. K. ve Cin, F. M. (2017). The effect of socioeconomic status on students’ achievement. E. Karadağ (Ed.), The Factors Affecting Student Achievement içinde (s. 171-181). Switzerland: Springer.
  • Dinkelmann, I. ve Buff, A. (2016). Children's and parents' perceptions of parental support and their effects on children's achievement motivation and achievement in mathematics. A longitudinal predictive mediation model. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 122-132.
  • DiStefano, C., Zhu, M. ve Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(20). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=14&n=2 adresinden erişildi.
  • Dumont, H., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Neumann, M., Niggli, A. ve Schnyder, I. (2012). Does parental homework involvement mediate the relationship between family background and educational outcomes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 55-69.
  • Fajoju, S. A., Aluede, O. ve Ojugo, A. I. (2016). Parental involvement as a correlate of academic achievement of primary school pupils in Edo State, Nigeria. Research in Education, 95, 33-43.
  • Fan, W. ve Williams, C. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic selfefficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30, 53-74.
  • Fan, X. T. ve Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A metaanalysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1-22.
  • Filippin, A. ve Paccagnella, M. (2012). Family background, self-confidence and economic outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 31, 824-834.
  • Fleischmann, F. ve Haas, A. de. (2016). Explaining parents' school involvement: The role of ethnicity and gender in the Netherlands. The Journal of Educational Research, 109, 554-565.
  • Foy, P., Arora, A. ve Stanco, G. M. (2013). TIMSS 2011 user guide for the international database. Chesnut Hill, MA : TIMSS ve PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
  • Galindo, C. ve Sonnenschein, S. (2015). Decreasing the SES math achievement gap: Initial math proficiency and home learning environments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 25-38.
  • Gustafsson, J. E., Nilsen, T. ve Hansen, K. Y. (2018). School characteristics moderating the relation between student socio-economic status and mathematics achievement in grade 8. Evidence from 50 countries in TIMSS 2011. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 57, 16-30.
  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800 + meta-analyses relating to achievement. UK: Routledge.
  • Hill, N. E. ve Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: a meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45, 740-763.
  • Hong, S., Yoo, S. K., You, S. ve Wu, C. C. (2010). The reciprocal relationship between parental involvement and mathematics achievement: autoregressive cross-lagged modeling. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 419-439.
  • IEA (2017). Help Manual for the IEA IDB Analyzer (Version 4.0). Hamburg, Germany. http://www.iea.nl/data.html adresinden erişildi.
  • Jafarov, J. (2015). Factors affecting parental involvement in education: The analysis of literature. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 18, 35-44.
  • Jhang, F. H. ve Lee, Y. T. (2018). The role of parental involvement in academic achievement trajectories of elementary school children with Southeast Asian and Taiwanese mothers. International Journal of Educational Research, 89, 68-79.
  • Krull, J. L. ve Mackinnon, D. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 36, 249-277.
  • Kung, H. Y. (2016). The relationships among parents’ socioeconomic status, parental Involvement and academic achievement in Taiwanese middle school students. Journal of Education and Human Development, 5(4), 177-186.
  • Kvedere, L. (2014). Mathematics self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety among 9th grade students in Latvia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2687-2690.
  • Lee, J. S. ve Bowen, N. K. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 193-218.
  • Leth-Steensen, C. ve Gallitto, E. (2016). Testing mediation in structural equation modeling: The effectiveness of the test of joint significance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(2), 339- 351.
  • Long, H. ve Pang, W. (2016). Family socioeconomic status, parental expectations, and adolescents’ academic achievements: a case of China. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22, 283-304.
  • Lv, B., Zhou, H., Liu, C., Guo, X., Caiyun, Z., Liu, Z. ve Luo, L. (2018). The relationship between mother– child discrepancies in educational aspirations and children's academic achievement: The mediating role of children's academic self-efficacy. Children and Youth Services Review, 86, 296-301.
  • McConney, A. ve Perry, L. B. (2010). Socioeconomic status, self-efficacy, and mathematics achievement in Australia: a secondary analysis. Educational Research Policy and Practice, 9, 77-91.
  • McNeal, R. B. Jr. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces, 78(1), 117-144.
  • Mullis, I.V., Martin, M.O., Foy, P. ve Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chesnut Hill, MA: TIMSS ve PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y. ve Preuschoff, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 assessment frameworks. Chesnut Hill, MA: TIMSS ve PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • OECD. (2009). Education at a Glance 2009: OECD indicators. Paris, France: Author.
  • Özcan, B.N. (2016). Ebeveynlerin çocuklarının matematik öğrenme süreçlerindeki inanç ve katılımının incelenmesi. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(8), 105-117.
  • Öztürk, M. A. ve Singh, K. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic status and previous mathematics achievement on high school advanced mathematics course taking. The Mathematics Educator, 16(2), 25-24.
  • Paredes, M. C. (2011). Parent involvement as an instructional strategy: No more waiting for superman. Teachers college record. http://www.tcrecord.org adresinden erişildi.
  • Park, S., Stone, S. I. ve Holloway, S. D. (2017). School-based parental involvement as a predictor of achievement and school learning environment: An elementary school-level analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 82, 195-206.
  • Pitsia, V., Biggart, A. ve Karakolidis, A. (2017). The role of students' self-beliefs, motivation and attitudes in predicting mathematics achievement: A multilevel analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment data. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 163-173.
  • Raudenbush, S. W. ve Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2. bs.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Riding, R.J. (2001). Self-perception in context: toward a model of individual differences in school performance. R. J. Riding ve S. G. Rayner (Ed.), International perspectives on individual differences içinde (Vol. 2-Self Perception, s. 77-100). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
  • Rodríguez, S., Piñeiro, I., Gómez-Taibo, L., Regueiro, B., Estévez, I. ve Valle, A. (2017). An explanatory model of maths achievement: Perceived parental involvement and academic motivation. Psicothema, 29(2), 184-190. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2017.32
  • Roth, T. (2013). The role of social capital in the explanation of educational success and educational inequalities. Irish Educational Studies, 32(3), 335-354.
  • Shute, V. J., Hansen, E. G., Underwood, J. S. ve Razzouk, R. (2011). A review of the relationship between parental involvement and secondary school students’ academic achievement. Education Research International, 2011, 1-10.
  • Stankov, L. ve Lee, J. (2017). Self-beliefs: strong correlates of mathematics achievement and intelligence. Intelligence, 61, 11-16.
  • Sui-Chu, E. H. ve Willms, J. D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement in eight-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69, 128-141.
  • Şirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417-453.
  • Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5. bs.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Taylor, A. B., MacKinnon, D. P. ve Tein, J. Y. (2008). Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 241-269.
  • Tazouti, Y. ve Jarlégan, A. (2016). The mediating effects of parental self-efficacy and parental involvement on the link between family socioeconomic status and children’s academic achievement. Journal of Family Studies. doi: 10.1080/13229400.2016.1241185
  • Topor, D. R., Keane, S. P., Shelton, T. L. ve Calkins, S. D. (2010). Parent involvement and student academic performance: A multiple mediational analysis. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 38, 183-197.
  • Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., ve Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111-133.
  • Wei, D. (2012). Parental influence on Chinese students' achievement: a social capital perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32, 153-166.
  • Yıldırım, H. H., Yıldırım, S. ve Ceylan, E. (2017). Türkiye perspektifinden TIMSS 2015 sonuçları (TEDMEM Analiz Dizisi 4). Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği Yayınları.
  • Yıldırım, H. H., Yıldırım, S., Ceylan, E. ve Yetişir, M. İ. (2013). Türkiye perspektifinden TIMSS 2011 sonuçları (TEDMEM Analiz Dizisi I). Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği Yayınları.
  • Yıldırım, H. H., Yıldırım, S., Yetişir, M. İ. ve Ceylan, E. (2013). PISA 2012 ulusal ön raporu. Ankara: MEB Yenilik ve Eğitim Teknolojileri Genel Müdürlüğü.
  • Yıldırım, S. (2012). Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement: a multilevel mediation model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80, 150-172.
  • Zhang, Z., Zyphur M. J. ve Preacher, K.J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 695-719.
  • Zhao, X., Lynch Jr. J.G. ve Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197-206.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.