SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM

Güldane GÜNDÜZÖZ (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi)
DİNİ ARAŞTIRMALAR
2 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 55 Sayfa Aralığı: 9 - 26 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.15745/da.552017 İndeks Tarihi: 19-02-2020

SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM

Öz:
Historically Fāṭima the daughter of Muhammad b. ‘Abd Allāh, theProphet of Islam, by his first wife, Khadīja b. Khuwaylid has an ontologicaland eschatological meaning in Shī‘ī thought. It is important to reveal the natureof this situation and to analyze the analogy with the Sacred Mary. Figure ofFāṭima is very different in the Shī‘ī thought system. There is a system ofthinking that transcends historical data. An image of the Sacred Fāṭima, whichhas an active role in both existential and eternal dimension, is envisaged in thisthought. This conception played a role in the institutionalization of the ImāmīShī‘ī theory within the Shī‘ī tradition. Fāṭima’s charisma was organized in asimilar way to the Saint Mary’s. This charisma has aspects of the hereaftersuch as intercession and mediation. This charisma also has worldly indicatorsof healing. Sacred Fāṭima and Mary are evaluated in a similar “ordeal” event.This analogy shows itself in various nomenclature, virginity, fertility, chastity,intercession, healing and fertility, becoming a celestial being, coming to theworld as a divine being subjects. Finally on one hand Fāṭima figure is shapedas a spiritual source in a historical structure, on the other hand, as in the notionof Virgin Mary, it took an iconographic form in the Shī‘ī thought. Thus Fāṭimais conceived as an intercessor of wisdom, close to the mediatory concept in Christianity in the Shī‘ī thought system. Sacred Fāṭima was accepted as asource of healing and fertility. Especially this figure is impressed by SacredMary as much as she is influenced by “The Umayiyesi-Umay Ana Figure”in the Altaic area. As a result of this icon appeared in the form of “Hamsa:Hand of Fāṭima” in Shī‘ī public. This paper examines how the importantand respected Fāṭima is judged to be a reference point for certain beliefs andacceptances in historical and religious perspectives. This paper also examineshow Fāṭima has been transformed into a cult entity in Shī‘ī thought. As aresult of this transformation, Fāṭima’s image is used as a reference in the Shī‘īliterature in formation of upper concepts such as Imāmī Shī‘ī sm, custody andintercession.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Tarih Din Bilimi Beşeri Bilimler Mantık
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Alexandre, Monique (2005). “İlk Hıristiyan Kadınlar”. Kadınların Tarihi. Trans. Ahmet Fethi, İstanbul: İş Bankası Publishing, vol. 1.
  • Āmulī, Abdullah Cevādī (2015). Fâtıma İnsanlık Örneği. Trans. Muaz Pazarbaşı, İstanbul: Önsöz Publishing.
  • And, M. (1998). Minyatürlerle Osmanlı- İslam Mitologyası. İstanbul: YKY.
  • Ay, Mahmut (2011). “İşarî Tefsirlerde Hz. Meryem”. Istanbul University Faculty of Theology Journal, vol. 25.
  • Bayat, F. (2016). Türk Mitolojik Sistemi 2, İstanbul: Ötüken Publish.
  • Borin, F. (2005). “Tasvirlerle Yargıya Varmak”. Kadınların Tarihi. Trans. Ahmet Fethi, İstanbul: İş Bank Publishing, vol. 3.
  • Boss, S. J. (2010). Mary. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Clohessy, C. P. (2009). Fatima, Daughter of Muḥammad. New Jersey: Gorgias Press.
  • Çoruhlu, Y. (2015). Türk Mitolojisinin Ana Hatları. İstanbul: Kabalcı Publish.
  • Dalarun, J. (2005). “Ruhban Bakış”. Kadınların Tarihi. Trans. Ahmet Fethi, İstanbul: İş Bankası Publishing, vol. 2.
  • Dıykanbayeva, M. (2009). “Kırgız Atalar Kültü ve Kırgız Atalar Kültünün Yaşayan Kültüre Etkileri”. Ankara University of Gazi, Institute of Social Sciences, Unpublished PhD Thesis.
  • Esin, E. (1978). İslamiyetten Önceki Türk Kültür Tarihi ve İslam’a Giriş. İstanbul: Faculty of Literature Press.
  • İnan, A. (2012). “Umay İlahesi Hakkında”. Alevilik Bektaşilik Araştırmaları Dergisi. Vol. 6.
  • Kalafat, Y. (2015). Anadolu Halk Kültürü Monografisinde Mitolojik Şifreler-I. Ankara: Berikan Publish.
  • Kaşgarlı Mahmut (1985). Dīvanü lügāti’t-Türk. Trans. Besim Atalay, Ankara: TDK Publish.
  • Kulaynī, Abū Ḏ j a‘far Muḥammad b. Ya‘ḳūb b. Isḥāḳ al-Rāzī (1968). al-Qāfīfī ‘ilm al-din. Tahran: Dārü’l-Kütübi’l-İslāmiyye, 1968, 1/6.
  • Meclisī, Muḥammad Bāqır (1924-1935). Bihār al-anvār. Tehran: Dārü’l-Kütübi’l-İslāmiyye.
  • Nīshāpūrī, Alī Muḥammad al-Fattāl (2000). Ravza al-vāizīn ve tabsira al-mutta‘izīn. Qum: Computer Research Center of Islamic Sciences.
  • Penāh, Y. (2016). al-‘Irfānal-nazarī mebādiuhū ve usūluhū. Trans. Alī Abbās al-Mūsevī, Beyrut: Merkezü’l-Hadāre li’t-Tenmiyeti’l-Fikri’l-İslāmī.
  • Qummī, Abu’l-Ḳāsimb. Kuleveyh (no date). Kāmilu’z-ziyārāt. Qum: Müessesetü’n-Neşr, vol. 10.
  • Qurṭubī, Abū ‘Abd Allāh Muḥammadb. Aḥmad (1967). al-Jāmi‘ li-aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Kahire: Dārü’l-Kütübi’l-Mısriyye, vol. 4.
  • Roded, R. (1994). Women in Islamic Biographical Collections: From Ibn Sa‘d to “Who’s Who”. London: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
  • Sābit ‘Alī, Seyyid ‘Alī Sābit al-Ma‘rifī al-Rifā‘ī (no date). Risāla kisve-i Ma‘rifī. Ankara: Milli Kütüphane, Manuscripts no: 06MilYzA 961.
  • Sagalayev, A. M. (2017). Ural-Altay Mitolojisinde Arketipler ve Semboller. Trans. Ali Toraman, İstanbul: Bilge Kültür Sanat Press.
  • Schleifer, A. (2003). İslām’ın Kutsal Meryem’i. Trans. İbrahim Kapaklıkaya, İstanbul: Gelenek Press.
  • Seyyid ‘Alīzāde, Hasan b. Müslim (2007). Hızırnāme. Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Press.
  • Shaykh al-Ṣadūq, Muḥammad b. ‘Alīb. Bābeveyh al-Qūmī (1956). al-Emālī. Tehran: İntişārāt-ı Kitapçi.
  • Shaykh al-Ṣadūq, Muḥammad b. ‘Alī b. Bābeveyh al-Qūmī (1966). İlel al-şerāi‘ve al-ahqām. Qum: Mektebe al-Dāverī.
  • Shaykh al-Ṣadūq, Muḥammad b. ‘Alī b. Bābeveyh al-Qūmī (1989). Sevāb al-a‘māl ve ‘iqāb al-a‘māl. Prep. Ḥusayn al-A‘lemī, Beyrut: Müessesetü’l-A‘lemī.
  • Shaykh al-Ṣadūq, Muḥammad b. ‘Alī b. Bābeveyh al-Qūmī (2000). Uyūn al-ahbār al-Riḍā. Qum: Computer Research Center of Islamic Sciences, 2:31-174.
  • Sumar, A. (2015). “Fātıma, Daughter of Muḥammad by Christopher Paul Clohessy”. Journal of Shi‘a Islamic Studies. 8/1.
  • Thurlkill, M. F. (2008). Chosen Among Women-Mary and Fatima in Medieval Christianity and Shi’ite Islam. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Ṭūsī, Shaykh Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan b. ‘Alī Abū Ḏ j a‘far (2000). al-Amālī fī al-ḥadīth. Qum: Computer Research Center of Islamic Sciences.
  • Tümer, G. (1996). Hıristiyanlıkta ve İslam’da Hz. Meryem. Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Publishing.
  • Üçer, M. (1981). “Türk Folklorunda ‘Fadime Ana’ (II)”. Türk Folkloru Araştırmaları, Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Milli Folklor Araştırma Dairesi, vol. 1.
  • Watt, W. M. (2000). Müslüman-Hıristiyan Diyaloğu. Trans. Fuat Aydın, İstanbul: Birey Press.
  • Yaḥyā Āgāhb. Ṣāliḥ Efendi (no date). Majmū‘a al-zarāif sandūqa al-ma‘ārif. İstanbul: Süleymaniye Kütüphanesi, Nuri Arlasez, Mikrofilm no: 4359/2492/101.
  • Zerrinqub, ‘Abd al-Ḥusayn(2014). Tarihsel Perspektifiyle İran Tasavvufu. İstanbul: Önsöz Publishing.
APA Gündüzöz G (2019). SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM. , 9 - 26. 10.15745/da.552017
Chicago Gündüzöz Güldane SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM. (2019): 9 - 26. 10.15745/da.552017
MLA Gündüzöz Güldane SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM. , 2019, ss.9 - 26. 10.15745/da.552017
AMA Gündüzöz G SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM. . 2019; 9 - 26. 10.15745/da.552017
Vancouver Gündüzöz G SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM. . 2019; 9 - 26. 10.15745/da.552017
IEEE Gündüzöz G "SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM." , ss.9 - 26, 2019. 10.15745/da.552017
ISNAD Gündüzöz, Güldane. "SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM". (2019), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.15745/da.552017
APA Gündüzöz G (2019). SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM. DİNİ ARAŞTIRMALAR, 22(55), 9 - 26. 10.15745/da.552017
Chicago Gündüzöz Güldane SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM. DİNİ ARAŞTIRMALAR 22, no.55 (2019): 9 - 26. 10.15745/da.552017
MLA Gündüzöz Güldane SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM. DİNİ ARAŞTIRMALAR, vol.22, no.55, 2019, ss.9 - 26. 10.15745/da.552017
AMA Gündüzöz G SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM. DİNİ ARAŞTIRMALAR. 2019; 22(55): 9 - 26. 10.15745/da.552017
Vancouver Gündüzöz G SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM. DİNİ ARAŞTIRMALAR. 2019; 22(55): 9 - 26. 10.15745/da.552017
IEEE Gündüzöz G "SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM." DİNİ ARAŞTIRMALAR, 22, ss.9 - 26, 2019. 10.15745/da.552017
ISNAD Gündüzöz, Güldane. "SOME IDEAS ON THE REFERENCES OF LEGENDARY TYPOLOGY OF THE HOLY FĀṬİMAIN SHĪ‘Ī THOUGHT SYSTEM". DİNİ ARAŞTIRMALAR 22/55 (2019), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.15745/da.552017
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 10:24

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları