Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 58 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 88 - 92 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 İndeks Tarihi: 26-02-2020
Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women
Öz: Introduction: Women experience a decline in physical function after menopause. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationshipbetween hand function, grip strength, and bone status in premenopausal versus postmenopausal women.Methods: Eighty-one premenopausal and 81 postmenopausal women aged 35–65 years who did not have metabolic, endocrine,and neuromuscular problems were evaluated. Grip strength (of dominant hand) was measured using Jamar handhelddynamometer. Grip ability test (GAT) was used to evaluate the hand function. Radius bone mineral density and speedof sound (SOS) were measured using quantitative ultrasonography (Sunlight Omnisense 7000S/8000S).Results: Postmenopausal women had significantly lower radius T-scores and SOS values, weaker grip strength, and higherGAT scores than premenopausal women. There was a weak negative correlation between GAT scores, radius T-scores, andSOS values and a moderate negative correlation between GAT scores and grip strength in both premenopausal and postmenopausalwomen. There was a weak positive correlation between grip strength, radius T- and Z-scores, and SOS values inboth premenopausal and postmenopausal women (p<0.05).Discussion and Conclusion: Premenopausal women had a better hand function and higher grip strength, radius T- and Zscores,and SOS values than postmenopausal women.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Kurina LM, Gulati M, Everson-Rose SA, Chung PJ, Karavolos K, Cohen NJ, et al. The effect of menopause on grip and pinch strength: results from the Chicago, Illinois, site of the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160:484–91. [CrossRef ]
- 2. Ikegami S, Uchiyama S, Nakamura Y, Mukaiyama K, Hirabayashi H, Kamimura M, et al. Factors that characterize bone health with aging in healthy postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Metab 2015;33:440–7. [CrossRef ]
- 3. Cooper R, Mishra G, Clennell S, Guralnik J, Kuh D. Menopausal status and physical performance in midlife: findings from a British birth cohort study. Menopause 2008;15:1079–85. [CrossRef]
- 4. El Khoudary SR, McClure CK, VoPham T, Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Sternfeld B, Cauley JA, et al. Longitudinal assessment of the menopausal transition, endogenous sex hormones, and perception of physical functioning: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69:1011–7. [CrossRef ]
- 5. da Câmara SM, Zunzunegui MV, Pirkle C, Moreira MA, Maciel ÁC. Menopausal status and physical performance in middle aged women: a cross-sectional community-based study in Northeast Brazil. PLoS One 2015;10:e0119480. [CrossRef ]
- 6. Maltais ML, Desroches J, Dionne IJ. Changes in muscle mass and strength after menopause. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2009;9:186–97.
- 7. Phillips SK, Woledge RC. A comparison of isometric force, maximum power and isometric heat rate as a function of sarcomere length in mouse skeletal muscle. Pflugers Arch 1992;420:578–83. [CrossRef ]
- 8. Cipriani C, Romagnoli E, Carnevale V, Raso I, Scarpiello A, Angelozzi M, et al. Muscle strength and bone in healthy women: effect of age and gonadal status. Hormones (Athens) 2012;11:325–32. [CrossRef ]
- 9. Di Monaco M, Di Monaco R, Manca M, Cavanna A. Handgrip strength is an independent predictor of distal radius bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Clin Rheumatol 2000;19:473–6. [CrossRef ]
- 10. Frank AW, Lorbergs AL, Chilibeck PD, Farthing JP, Kontulainen SA. Muscle cross sectional area and grip torque contraction types are similarly related to pQCT derived bone strength indices in the radii of older healthy adults. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2010;10:136–41.
- 11. Bassey EJ, Mockett SP, Fentem PH. Lack of variation in muscle strength with menstrual status in healthy women aged 45-54 years: data from a national survey. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1996;73:382–6. [CrossRef ]
- 12. Harlow SD, Gass M, Hall JE, Lobo R, Maki P, Rebar RW, et al. Executive summary of the Stages of Reproductive Aging Workshop + 10: addressing the unfinished agenda of staging reproductive aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:1159–68.
- 13. Dellhag B, Bjelle A. A Grip Ability Test for use in rheumatology practice. J Rheumatol 1995;22:1559–65. 14.Poole JL. Measures of adult hand function: Arthritis Hand Function Test (AHFT), Grip Ability Test (GAT), Jebsen Test of Hand Function, and The Rheumatoid Hand Functional Disability Scale (The Duruöz Hand Index [DHI]). Arthritis & Rheumatism 2003;S59–66. [CrossRef ]
- 15.Fess EE, Moran CA. Clinical assessment recommendations. American Society of Hand Therapists: 1992.
- 16. Mathiowetz V, Rennells C, Donahoe L. Effect of elbow position on grip and key pinch strength. J Hand Surg Am 1985;10:694– 7. [CrossRef ]
- 17. Njeh CF, Saeed I, Grigorian M, Kendler DL, Fan B, Shepherd J, et al. Assessment of bone status using speed of sound at multiple anatomical sites. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001;27:1337–45.
- 18. Barkmann R, Kantorovich E, Singal C, Hans D, Genant HK, Heller M, et al. A new method for quantitative ultrasound measurements at multiple skeletal sites: first results of precision and fracture discrimination. J Clin Densitom 2000;3:1–7.
- 19. Dixon WG, Lunt M, Pye SR, Reeve J, Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, et al; European Prospective Osteoporosis Study Group. Low grip strength is associated with bone mineral density and vertebral fracture in women. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:642– 6. [CrossRef ]
- 20. Sirola J, Tuppurainen M, Honkanen R, Jurvelin JS, Kröger H. Associations between grip strength change and axial postmenopausal bone loss-a 10-year population-based follow-up study. Osteoporos Int 2005;16:1841–8. [CrossRef ]
- 21. Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Sahgal V, Yue GH. Effects of aging on hand function. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:1478–84.
- 22. Sirola J, Kröger H, Honkanen R, Jurvelin JS, Sandini L, Tuppurainen MT, et al; OSTPRE Study Group. Factors affecting bone loss around menopause in women without HRT: a prospective study. Maturitas 2003;45:159–67. [CrossRef ]
- 23. Samson MM, Meeuwsen IB, Crowe A, Dessens JA, Duursma SA, Verhaar HJ. Relationships between physical performance measures, age, height and body weight in healthy adults. Age Ageing 2000;29:235–42. [CrossRef ]
- 24. Horstman AM, Dillon EL, Urban RJ, Sheffield-Moore M. The role of androgens and estrogens on healthy aging and longevity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012;67:1140–52. [CrossRef ]
- 25. Sowers M, Pope S, Welch G, Sternfeld B, Albrecht G. The association of menopause and physical functioning in women at midlife. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:1485–92. [CrossRef ]
- 26. Cheng MH, Wang SJ, Yang FY, Wang PH, Fuh JL. Menopause and physical performance-a community-based cross-sectional study. Menopause 2009;16:892–6. [CrossRef ]
| APA | akpinar p, İÇAĞASIOĞLU A, KAĞNICIOĞLU E, BAKLACIOĞLU H (2018). Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women. , 88 - 92. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| Chicago | akpinar pinar,İÇAĞASIOĞLU Afitap,KAĞNICIOĞLU Esra,BAKLACIOĞLU Hatice Şule Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women. (2018): 88 - 92. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| MLA | akpinar pinar,İÇAĞASIOĞLU Afitap,KAĞNICIOĞLU Esra,BAKLACIOĞLU Hatice Şule Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women. , 2018, ss.88 - 92. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| AMA | akpinar p,İÇAĞASIOĞLU A,KAĞNICIOĞLU E,BAKLACIOĞLU H Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women. . 2018; 88 - 92. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| Vancouver | akpinar p,İÇAĞASIOĞLU A,KAĞNICIOĞLU E,BAKLACIOĞLU H Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women. . 2018; 88 - 92. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| IEEE | akpinar p,İÇAĞASIOĞLU A,KAĞNICIOĞLU E,BAKLACIOĞLU H "Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women." , ss.88 - 92, 2018. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| ISNAD | akpinar, pinar vd. "Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women". (2018), 88-92. https://doi.org/10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| APA | akpinar p, İÇAĞASIOĞLU A, KAĞNICIOĞLU E, BAKLACIOĞLU H (2018). Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, 58(2), 88 - 92. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| Chicago | akpinar pinar,İÇAĞASIOĞLU Afitap,KAĞNICIOĞLU Esra,BAKLACIOĞLU Hatice Şule Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal 58, no.2 (2018): 88 - 92. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| MLA | akpinar pinar,İÇAĞASIOĞLU Afitap,KAĞNICIOĞLU Esra,BAKLACIOĞLU Hatice Şule Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, vol.58, no.2, 2018, ss.88 - 92. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| AMA | akpinar p,İÇAĞASIOĞLU A,KAĞNICIOĞLU E,BAKLACIOĞLU H Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal. 2018; 58(2): 88 - 92. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| Vancouver | akpinar p,İÇAĞASIOĞLU A,KAĞNICIOĞLU E,BAKLACIOĞLU H Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal. 2018; 58(2): 88 - 92. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| IEEE | akpinar p,İÇAĞASIOĞLU A,KAĞNICIOĞLU E,BAKLACIOĞLU H "Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women." Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, 58, ss.88 - 92, 2018. 10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
| ISNAD | akpinar, pinar vd. "Evaluation of Hand Function and Bone Status in Premenopausal Versus Postmenopausal Women". Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal 58/2 (2018), 88-92. https://doi.org/10.14744/hnhj.2017.28247 |
