COŞKUN SAĞLAM
(Selçuk Üniversitesi)
SERPİL ÖNDER
(Selçuk Üniversitesi)
Yıl: 2018Cilt: 6Sayı: 12ISSN: 2148-127X / 2148-127XSayfa Aralığı: 1718 - 1726İngilizce

115 1
The Use of Native Halophytes in Landscape Design in The Central Anatolia, Turkey
In this study, the usability of some herbaceous halophytes grown naturally in salt marshes that dry most of the year in Central Anatolia Region were investigated in landscape design. Within the scope of the research, in the years of 2016 and 2017, seasonal field studies were carried out in saline habitats in the vicinity of Konya, Ankara, Aksaray and Nevşehir, and taken photographs and herbarium samples of halophytic plant species. The general botanical and ecological characteristics of the selected species are given and the values used in landscape design have been determined considering the aesthetic and functional properties. As a result of the field studies carried out during the vegetation periods, 59 halophytic plant species, belonging to 38 genera and 19 families that could be used in landscape design were identified. The most representative family was the Asteraceae with 11 species, followed by Plumbaginaceae (9 species) and Chenopodiaceae (8 species). The genus Limonium from Plumbaginaceae family is well represented with 8 species for landscape use. The endemism rate of halophytes used in landscape design is 42% (25 species) in the research area. The most common uses in landscape design are determined in roof gardens by 49 species, followed in ground conservation and erosion prevention by 31 species. Since these halophytic species, which are mostly succulent and endemic, are well adapted into both wet and dry areas. Their use in landscape design is of great importance for restoration of arid and barren land, which may increase as a result of global climate change, conservation of biodiversity as well as sustainable agricultural practices.
Fen > Ziraat > Ziraat Mühendisliği
Fen > Mühendislik > Gıda Bilimi ve Teknolojisi
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Akbaş F, Güvensen A. 2001. “Ege bölgesinin halofit vejetasyonunun Ekolojisi”, Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü APK Dairesi Başkanlığı Toprak ve Su Kaynakları Araştırma Şube Müdürlüğü, Toprak ve Su Kaynakları Araştırma Yıllığı, Ankara, 117: 297-310.
  • Abd El-Ghani MM. 2000. Vegetation composition of Egyptian inland saltmarshes. Bot Bull Acad Sinica, 41: 305-314.
  • Albaho MS, Green J. 2000. Suaeda salsa, a desalinating companion plant for greenhouse tomato. Horticultural Science, 35: 620-623.
  • Anonymous. 1992. Konya İli Arazi Varlığı. Tarım ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Müdürlüğü Yayını, İl Rapor No:42, Ankara.
  • Aschenbach TA. 2006. Variation in growth rates under saline conditions of Pascopyrum smithii (Western Wheatgrass) and Distichlis spicata (Inland Saltgras) from different source populations in Kansas and Nebraska: Implications for the restoration of salt-affected plant communities. Restoration Ecology, 14: 21-27.
  • Breckle SW. 1983. Studies on halophytes from Iran and Afghanistan. II Ecology of Halophytes Along Salt Gradients, Royal Society of Edinburg, Proceedings Sec. B: Biological 89 B, 203-215.
  • Cassaniti C, Romano D. 2011. The use of halophytes for Mediterranean landscaping. The European Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 5: 58-63.
  • Clark JR, Matheny NP. 1998. A model of urban forest sustainability: application to cities in the United States. Journal of Arboriculture, 24: 112-120.
  • Chapman VJ. 1974. Salt marshes and salt deserts of the world. – In: Reimold, R.J. & Queen, W.H. (eds), Ecology of Halophytes, pp. 3-19. Acad. Press Inc., New York & London. A Subsidiary of Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.
  • Choukr-Allah R. 1991. The use of halophytes for the agricultural development of the southern part of Morocco. Plant Salinity Research New Challenges, IAV Hassan II, Agadir, Morocco: pp. 377-386.
  • Çakır YB, Özbucak T, Kutbay HG, Kılıç D, Bilgin A, Huseyinova R. 2010. Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption in a salt marsh in northern Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, 34: 311-322. doi:10.3906/bot-0906-64
  • Davis PH (ed.). 1965-1985. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vols. 1-9. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
  • Deliboran A, Savran Ş. 2015. Toprak Tuzluluğu ve Tuzluluğa Bitkilerin Dayanım Mekanizmaları. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, 8 (1): 57-61.
  • Deniz B, Şirin U. 2005. Samson Dağı dogal Bitki örtüsünün otsu karakterdeki bazı örneklerinden peyzaj mimarlıgı uygulamalarında yararlanma olanaklarının irdelenmesi. ADÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2): 5-12.
  • Eroğlu E, Acar C, Demirel A. 2013. Yol şevlerindeki doğal yerörtücü bitkilerin peyzaj mimarlığında değerlendirilebilme olanakları: Sultanmurat–Uzungöl yol güzergahı örneği. V. Süs Bitkileri Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. 2: 126-134. 06–09 May 2013, Yalova.
  • Eyüpoğlu F. 1999. Türkiye Topraklarının verimlilik Durumu. Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, Genel Yayın No: 220, Teknik Yayınlar No: T. 67, Ankara
  • Flowers TJ, Colmer TD. 2008. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist, 179: 945–963.
  • Flowers TJ, Troke PF, Yeo AR. 1977. Mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 28: 89-121.
  • Furtana GB. 2010. The ecophysiology of some endemic halophyte plants around the salt lake. Gazi University, Institute of Science and Technology. Ph. D. Thesis.
  • Güner A, AsIan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT (edlr.). 2012. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını. istanbul.
  • Hamzaoğlu E, Aksoy A. 2009. Phytosociological studies on the halophytic communities of Central Anatolia. Ekoloji, 18(71): 1-14.
  • Hansen G, Alvarez E. 2010. Landscape design: Aesthetic characteristics of plants. ENH1172, IFAS Extension. University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. (Accessed: 12.02.2018).
  • Huiskes AHL. 1995. Saline crops: A contribution to the diversification of the production of vegetable crops by research on the cultivation methods and selection of halophytes. Annual Report, 303p.
  • Jackson GB. 1914. Selecting Landscape Plants. Extension Service of Mississippi State University, cooperating with U.S. Department of Agriculture, Publication Number: P0666. http://extension.msstate.edu/sites/default/files/publications/p ublications/P0666.pdf (Accessed: 26.02.2018).
  • Koç N, Güneş G, 1998. Çatı Bahçelerinde Bitkisel Düzenleme Esasları, Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 4 (1-2): 625-633.
  • Korkut A, Kiper T, Topal TÜ. 2017. Kentsel peyzaj tasarımda ekolojik yaklaşımlar. Artium, 5(1): 14-26.
  • Martin T. 1986. "Finding a use for plants that Like Salt". Garden. Sept./Oct., 24-26.
  • Menemen Y, Hamzaoglu E. 2000. A new species of Dianthus (Caryophyllaceae) from Salt Lake, Central Anatolia, Turkey. Annales Botanici Fennici, 37: 285-287.
  • Morales MA, Torrecillas A, Rodríguez P, Alarcón JJ, Sánchez- Blanco MJ. 2001. Effects of salinity on growth and leaf water relations of two genotypes of Limonium sp. Acta Horticulturae, 559: 419-423.
  • O'leary JW. 1994. The Agricultural use of native plants on problem soils. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 21: 127-143.
  • Ellenberg H, Mueller-Dombois D. 1967. A key to Raunkiaer plant life forms with revised subdivisions. Berichte des Geobotanischen Institutes der E.T.H. Stiftung Rübel - Zürich 37: 56-73.
  • Robert FB, Richard LH, Susan JM. 2007. Landscape Architects' use of native plants in the Southeastern United States. HortTechnology, 17(1): 78-81.
  • Rogel JA, Ariza FA, Silla RO. 2000. Soil salinity and moisture gradients and plant zonation in Mediterranean salt marshes of Southeast Spain. Wetlands, 20: 357-372.
  • Sánchez-Blanco MJ, Rodríguez P, Morales MA, Ortuño MF, Torrecillas A. 2002. Comparative growth and water relations of Cistus albidus and Cistus monspeliensis plants during water deficit conditions and recovery. Plant Science, 162: 107-113.
  • Sözeri S, Tıpırdamaz R. 2001. Seyfe gölü (Kırşehir) çevresinin doğal mera alanlarındaki halofit (tuzcul) bitkileri ve bunlardan yararlanma olanakları. Türk Herboloji Dergisi, 4(2): 11-35.
  • Tanay Y, Güney MA, Türel HS, Kılıçaslan Ç. 2006. Bitkisel Tasarım. Ders Kitabı. ISBN:9944-5419-0-7. İzmir.
  • Thomas GS. 2004. The Rock Garden and It‟s Plants, Sagapress Inc., Timber Press Inc., Portland, Oregon.
  • Tugay O, Bağcı Y, Uysal T. 2010. Linum ertugrulii (Linaceae), a new species from Central Anatolia, Turkey. Annales Botanici Fennici, 47(2): 135-138.
  • Tuğ GN. 2006. “Determination of the factors effective on zonation of halophytic vegetation of salt lake, inner Anatolia, Turkey. Ankara University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Biology. Ph. D. Thesis.
  • Tuğ GN, Yaprak AE, Ketenoğlu O. 2008. Soil determinants for distribution of Halocnemum strobilaceum Bieb. (Chenopodiaceae) around Lake Tuz, Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11(4): 565-570.
  • Ungar IA, Benner DK, McGraw DC. 1979. The distribution and growth of Salicornia europaea on an inland salt pan. Ecology 60: 329-336
  • Vural M, Duman H, Aytaç Z, Adıgüzel N. 2012. A new genus and three new species from Central Anatolia, Turkey Turkish Journal of Botany, 36: 427-433. doi:10.3906/bot- 1105-16
  • Yaprak AE, Tug GN. 2006. Halophytic endemics of Turkey. Plant, fungal and habitat diversity investigation and conservation. Proceedings of IV BBC – Sofia.
  • Zahran M. 1982. Vegetation types of Saudi Arabia. Jeddah: King Abdel Aziz University Press
  • Zia S, Egan TP, Khan MA. 2008. Growth and selective ion transport of Limonium stocksii Plumbaginacea under saline conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40: 697-709.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.