Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis

Ebru HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA (İzmir Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü)
Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi
1 0
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 63 - 72 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 02-02-2020

Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis

Öz:
Energy is recognized as a crucial element in a country development process. Geothermal resources are a green energy source thatcan make a considerable contribution in some countries. Also efficient use of resources is important due to availability, economicand environmental issues and comprises the essence of this work. The exergy analysis is a powerful tool for the design, analysis andclassification of thermal systems. Using exergy for resource classification benefits their comparison, according to their ability to dowork. Specific exergy index (SExI) was calculated to show for classification and capability of some geothermal area. Actual system dataare used to assess the district heating system and power plant performance, energy and exergy efficiencies. In this study, specific exergyindex for examined field was calculated between 0.026 and 0.947 and sustainability index (SI) was found between 1.250 and 2.782.
Anahtar Kelime:

Exergy Analizi Açısından Jeotermal Enerji Kaynaklarının Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Enerji ülkelerin gelişiminde çok önemli bir unsur olarak tanınmaktadır. Jeotermal kaynaklar, bazı ülkeler için kayda değer katkı yapan yeşil enerji kaynağı olarak nitelendirilir. Aynı zamanda, kaynakların etkin kullanımı, bulunabilirliği, ekonomikliği ve çevresel konulara bağlı olarak önemlidir ve işin aslını kapsamaktadır. Ekserji analizi, tasarım, analiz ve termal sistemlerin sınıflandırılması için güçlü bir araçtır. Kaynak sınıflandırması için kullanılan ekserji, yapılacak işin niteliğine göre kaynakların verimli kullanılmasının karşılaştırılmasında da kullanılmaktadır. Spesifik ekserji indeksi (SExI), kaynakların sınıflandırılması ve bazı jeotermal alanların kapasitesinin belirlenmesi için hesaplanmaktadır. Bölgesel ısıtma sistemleri ve jeotermal santrallerin performanslarını, enerji ve ekserji verimliliklerini değerlendirmek için gerçek sistem verileri kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmada, incelenen alanlar için spesifik ekserji indeksi 0.026 ve 0.947 arasında hesaplanmış ve sürdürülebilirlik indeksi (SI) ise 1.250 ve 2.782 arasında bulunmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adiprana, R., Purnomo, DS., Lubis, IE. 2015. Kamojang Geothermal Power Plant Unit 1-2-3 Evaluation and Optimization Based on Exergy Analysis. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Arslan, O. 2010. Exergoeconomic evaluation of electricity generation by the medium temperature geothermal resources, using a Kalina cycle: Simav case study. Int. J. Therm. Sci., 49:1866-1873.
  • Arslan, O., Ozgur, MA., Kose, R., Tugcu, A. 2009. Exergoeconomic evaluation on the optimum heating circuit system of Simav geothermal district heating system. Energ. Buildings, 41:1325–1333.
  • Bejan, A. 1982. Entropy Generation through Heat and Fluid Flow, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
  • Bertani, R. 2015. Geothermal Power Generation in the World 2010-2014 Update Report. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Bettagli, N., Bidini, G. 1996. Larderello-Farinello-Valle Secolo Geothermal Area: Exergy Analysis of the Transportation Network and Of the Electric Power Plants. Geothermics, 25:3- 16.
  • Cengel, Y., Boles, MA. 1996. Thermodynamics: an engineering approach, McGraw-Hill Book Co. International Edition, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Cornelissen, RL. 1997. Thermodynamics and sustainable development: the use of exergy analysis and the reduction of irreversibility. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands.
  • Coskun, C., Oktay, Z., Dincer, I. 2011. Modified exergoeconomic modeling of geothermal power plants. Energy, 36:6358-6366.
  • Dagdas, A., Ozturk, R., Bekdemir, S. 2005. Thermodynamic evaluation of Denizli Kızıldere geothermal power plant and its performance improvement. Energ. Convers. Manage., 46:245– 256.
  • Demirbas, A. 2005. Potential applications of renewable energy sources, biomass combustion problems in boiler power system and combustion related environmental issues. Prog. Energ. Combust., 31:171-192.
  • Dincer, I. 2002. The role of exergy in energy policy making. Energ. Policy, 30:137-49.
  • DiPippo, R. 2004. Second Law assessment of binary plants generating power from low-temperature geothermal fluids, Geothermics, 33:565-86.
  • Durmuş, T. 2006. Salavatli jeotermal santralinin ekserji analizi. MSc Thesis, Istanbul Technic University, Energy Institute, Turkey.
  • European Commission (EC). 2018a. Renewable energy. http:// ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/renewable-energy.
  • European Commission (EC). 2018b. Progress made on 2020 energy efficiency target. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/news/ progress-made-2020-energy-efficiency-target.
  • Ganjehsarabi, H., Gungor, A., Dincer, I. 2012. Exergetic performance analysis of Dora II geothermal power plant in Turkey. Energy, 46:101-108.
  • Gungor, A., Erbay, Z., Hepbasli, A. 2011. Exergetic analysis and evaluation of a new application of gas engine heat pumps (GEHPs) for food drying processes. Appl. Energ., 88:882-891.
  • International Energy Agency (IEA). 2016. Key world statistics 2008, http://iklim.cob.gov.tr/iklim/Files/eKutuphane/ Key%20world%20Energy%20Statistics.pdf
  • Jalilinasrabady, S., Itoi, R., Gotoh, H., Kamenosono, H. 2010. Energy and Exergy Analysis of Takigami Geothermal Power Plant, Oita, Japan. GRC Transactions, 34:1057-1062.
  • Jalilinasrabadya, S., Itoi, R., Valdimarssonb, P., Saevarsdottirc, G., Fujii, H. 2012. Flash cycle optimization of Sabalan geothermal power plant employing exergy. Geothermics, 43:75– 82.
  • Keçebas, A. 2011. Performance and thermo-economic assessments of geothermal district heating system: A case study in Afyon, Turkey. Renew. Energ., 36:77-83.
  • Kose, R. 2007. Geothermal energy potential for power generation in Turkey: A case study in Simav, Kutahya. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 11:497–511.
  • Kuzgunkaya, EH., Hepbasli, A. 2007a. Exergetic evaluation of drying of laurel leaves in a vertical ground-source heat pump drying cabinet. Int. J. Energ. Res., 31:245–258.
  • Kuzgunkaya, EH., Hepbasli, A. 2007b. Exergetic performance assessment of a ground-source heat pump drying system. Int. J. Energ. Res., 31:760–777.
  • Kuzgunkaya, EH. 2015. Evaluation of Turkey’s Geothermal Energy Resources in terms of Exergy Analysis. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Kwambai, CB. 2005. Exergy analysis of Olkaria I power plant, Kenia. The United Nations University, Geothermal Training Program, Reports 2005, Number 5, Orkustofnun, Grensasvegur 9, Is-108, Reykjavik, Iceland, 37 pp.
  • Lee, KC. 2001. Classification of geothermal resources by exergy, Geothermics, 30:431-442.
  • Lund, JW., Boyd, TL. 2015. Direct Utilization of Geothermal Energy 2015 Worldwide Review. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Nalan, CB., Murat, Ö., Nuri, Ö. 2009. Renewable energy market conditions and barriers in Turkey. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 13:1428-1436.
  • Oktay, Z., Coskun, C., Dincer, I. 2008. Energetic and exergetic performance investigation of the Bigadic Geothermal District Heating System in Turkey. Energ. Buildings, 40:702–709.
  • Ozgener, L., Hepbasli, A., Dincer, I. 2005. Energy and exergy analysis of the Gonen geothermal district heating system, Turkey. Geothermics, 34:632–645.
  • Ozgener, L., Hepbasli, A., Dincer, I. 2006. Effect of reference state on the performance of energy and exergy evaluation of geothermal district heating systems: Balcova example. Buil. Environ., 41:699–709.
  • Ozgener, L., Hepbasli, A., Dincer, I., Rosen, MA. 2007. Exergoeconomic analysis of geothermal district heating systems: A case study. Appl. Therm. Eng., 27:1303–1310.
  • Ozgur, MA. 2008. Review of Turkey’s renewable energy potential. Renew. Energ. 33:2345–2356.
  • Pambudi, NA., Ryuichi Itoi, R., Jalilinasrabady, S., Jaelani, K. 2014. Exergy analysis and optimization of Dieng single-flash geothermal power plant. Energ. Convers. Manage., 78:405-411.
  • Rosen, MA., Dincer, I., Kanoglu, M. 2008. Role of exergy in increasing efficiency and sustainability and reducing environmental impact. Energ. Policy, 36:128–37.
  • Saidur, R., Masjukia, HH., Jamaluddin, MY. 2007a. An application of energy and exergy analysis in residential sector of Malaysia. Energ. Policy, 35:1050–1063.
  • Saidur, R., Sattar, MA., Masjuki, HH., Ahmed, S., Hashim U. 2007. An estimation of the energy and exergy efficiencies for the energy resources consumption in the transportation sector in Malaysia. Energ. Policy, 35:4018–26.
  • Shortall, R., Davidsdottir, B., Axelsson, G. 2015. Geothermal energy for sustainable development: A review of sustainability impacts and assessment frameworks. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 44:391-406.
  • Suryadarma, Azimuddin, T., Dwikorianto, T., Fauzi, A. 2005. The Kamojang Geothermal Field: 25 Years Operation. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2005, Antalya, Turkey.
APA HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA E (2018). Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis. , 63 - 72.
Chicago HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA Ebru Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis. (2018): 63 - 72.
MLA HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA Ebru Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis. , 2018, ss.63 - 72.
AMA HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA E Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis. . 2018; 63 - 72.
Vancouver HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA E Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis. . 2018; 63 - 72.
IEEE HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA E "Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis." , ss.63 - 72, 2018.
ISNAD HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA, Ebru. "Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis". (2018), 63-72.
APA HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA E (2018). Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 8(1), 63 - 72.
Chicago HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA Ebru Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi 8, no.1 (2018): 63 - 72.
MLA HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA Ebru Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, vol.8, no.1, 2018, ss.63 - 72.
AMA HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA E Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi. 2018; 8(1): 63 - 72.
Vancouver HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA E Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis. Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi. 2018; 8(1): 63 - 72.
IEEE HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA E "Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis." Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 8, ss.63 - 72, 2018.
ISNAD HANCIOĞLU KUZGUNKAYA, Ebru. "Evaluation of Geothermal Energy Resources in Terms of Exergy Analysis". Karaelmas Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi 8/1 (2018), 63-72.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 13:4

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları