Dilan ÇİFTÇİ
(Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi, İletişim Fakültesi, Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti)
Yıl: 2020Cilt: 9Sayı: 1ISSN: 1694-7215 / 1694-7215Sayfa Aralığı: 248 - 260İngilizce

82 0
The Reconstruction of the Mediated Public Sphere on Media Reporting of Migration: The Case of the Global Migration Film Festival
The aim of the current study is to explore the four models of public spheres in modern democracies and the conceptual development of mediated public spheres with an emphasis on the migration issues in general and special focus on the three important Global Migration Film Festival. This study provides an overview for the literature review on the migration media coverage around the world in order to map the negativity in migrant perceptions by using already existed studies on the global migration phenomena. The present data suggests that mediated public spheres in general, and more precisely cinema have a positive impact on helping communities to have an ability to perceive migration issues positively. In findings it is indicated that The Global Migration Film Festival with the help of the differentiated films and screening in different countries and places demonstrated not only higher awareness on the behind scenarios on migration, but also higher empathy in the perceptions on global migration.
Sosyal > İş
Sosyal > İşletme Finans
Sosyal > İktisat
Sosyal > Coğrafya
Sosyal > Tarih
Sosyal > Edebiyat
Sosyal > İşletme
Sosyal > Felsefe
Sosyal > Psikoloji
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Abid, R. Z., Manan, S. A., & Rahman, Z. A. (2017). A flood of Syrians has slowed to a trickle: The use of metaphors in the representation of Syrian refugees in the online media news reports of host and non-host countries. Discourse & Communication, 11(2), 121-140.
  • Anderson, B. (2013). Us and them? The dangerous politics of immigration control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Banda, F., & Mawadza, A. (2015). Foreigners are stealing our birth right: moral panics and the discursive construction of Zimbabwean immigrants in South African media. Discourse & Communication, 9(1), 47-64.
  • Blinder, S., & Allen, W. (2016).Constructing immigrants: Portrayals of migrant groups in British National Newspapers, 2010-2012.International Migration Review, 50(1), 3-40.
  • Boomgaarden, H. G., & Vliegenthart, R. (2009). How news content influences anti-immigration attitudes: Germany, 1993–2005. European Journal of Political Research, 48(4), 516-542.
  • Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it... and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7-23.
  • Carey, J. W. (1987). The press and the public discourse. Center Magazine, 20(2), 4-16.
  • Caviedes, A. (2015). An emerging ‘European’ news portrayal of immigration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(6), 897-917.
  • Chavez, L. (2013). The Latino Threat: Constructing Immigrants, Citizens, and the Nation. Redwood City, California: Stanford University Press.
  • Cherry, J. F., & Leppard, T. P. (2015). Experimental archaeology and the earliest seagoing: The limitations of inference. World Archaeology, 47(5), 740-755.
  • Ciftci, D. (2019). The application of solutions journalism: Strategic communications and public affairs group in Somalia. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 9(3), 1-14.
  • Çiftçi, D. (2018). Bloody sunday film analysis for international ethical concerns. ICONASH Proceedings Book. pp. 96- 100.
  • Çiftçi, D. (2017). Kamusal alan ve modernleşme sürecinde Kıbrıs Türk kadın derneği: Varlık kulübü. Milli Folklor, 29(116), 189-200.
  • Çiftçi, H. (2018). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti vatandaşlarının Suriyeli sığınmacılara yönelik tutum, algı ve empatik eğilimlerinin analizi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(3), 2232-2256.
  • Clayman, S. E. (2004). Arenas of interaction in the mediated public sphere. Poetics, 32(1), 29-49.
  • Esser, F. (1999). Tabloidization of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291-324.
  • Esses, V. M., Medianu, S., & Lawson, A. S. (2013).Uncertainty, threat, and the role of the media in promoting the dehumanization of immigrants and refugees. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 518-536.
  • Ferree, M. M., Gamson, W., Gerhard, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31(3), 289-324.
  • Freedom House (2016). Freedom of the Press 2016: The Battle for the Dominant Message. Available from https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_FTOP_2016Report_Final_04232016.pdf.
  • Freedom House (2017). Freedom of the Press 2017: Press Freedom's Dark Horizon. Available from https://freedomhouse.org/ sites/default/files/FOTP_2017_booklet_FINAL_April28.pd.
  • Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding. A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996-2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5-38.
  • Greenslade, R. (2005). Seeking scapegoats: The coverage of asylum in the UK press. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
  • Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2014). Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 225-249.
  • Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2016).Fleeing the Centre: The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis. West European Politics, 39(5), 971–991.
  • Igartua, J. J., Cheng, L., & Muñiz, C. (2005).Framing Latin America in the Spanish press: A cooled down friendship between two fraternal lands. Communications, 30(3), 359-372.
  • Khondker, H. H. (2011). Role of the new media in the Arab spring. Globalizations, 8(5), 675-679.
  • Lan, S. (2016). The shifting meanings of race in china: a case study of the African diaspora communities in Guangzhou. City & Society, 28(3), 298-318.
  • Luo, Y. (2014). The internet and agenda setting in China: The influence of online public opinion on media coverage and government policy. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1289-1312.
  • McAuliffe, M., Weeks, W., & Koser, K. (2015).Media and Migration: Comparative Analysis of Print and Online Media Reporting on Migrants and Migration in Selected Countries (Phase II). Occasional Paper Series, Belconnen: ACT: Department of Immigration and Border Protection. Available from www.border.gov.au/ReportsandPublications/Documents/research/ mcauliffe-weeks-koser.pdf.
  • Patler, C., & Gonzales, R. G. (2015). Framing citizenship: Media coverage of anti-deportation cases led by undocumented immigrant youth organizations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(9), 1453-1474.
  • Philo, G., Briant, E., & Donald, P. (2013).Bad news for refugees. London: Pluto Press.
  • Pickering, S. (2000). The hard press of asylum. Forced Migration Review, 8, 32-33.
  • Santa Ana, O. (1999). Like an animal I was treated: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 191-224.
  • Schulz, W. (1997).Changes of mass media and the public sphere. Javnost – The Public, 4(2), 57-69.
  • Sciortino, G., & Colombo, A. (2004). The flows and the flood: The public discourse on immigration in Italy, 1969- 2001. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 9(1), 94-113.
  • Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341-362.
  • Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2005). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public administration, 83(3), 573-596.
  • Spoonley, P., & Butcher, A. (2009).Reporting superdiversity. The mass media and immigration in New Zealand.Journal of Intercultural Studies, 30(4), 355-372.
  • Sullivan, J., & Renz, B. (2010). Chinese migration: Still the major focus of Russian far East/Chinese north east relations? The Pacific Review, 23(2), 261-285.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Suro, R. (2011). Writing immigration: Scholars and journalists in dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Örnebring, H., & Jönnsson, A. M. (2004). Tabloid journalism and the public sphere: A historical perspective on tabloid journalism. Journalism Studies, 5, 283-295.
  • Ulas, S., & Vural, Z. B. (2019). Social media usage practices of luxury brands: A case of luxury automobile brands’ corporate social media applications. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 9(1), e201904.
  • Uribe, R., & Gunter, B. (2004). Research note: The tabloidization of British tabloids. European Journal of Communication, 19(3), 387-402.
  • vanKlingeren, M., Boomgaarden, H. G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). Real world is not enough: The media as an additional source of negative attitudes toward immigration, comparing Denmark and the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 31(3), 268-283.
  • Wessler, H. (2008). Investigating deliberativeness comparatively. Political Communication, 25(1), 1-22.
  • Wessler, H., & Rinke, E. M. (2014).deliberative performance of television news in three types of democracy: insights from the United States, Germany, and Russia. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 827-851.
  • Wiggen, M. (2012). Rethinking anti-immigration rhetoric after the Oslo and Utøya terror attacks. New Political Science, 34(4), 585-604.
  • Wodak, R., Khosravi Nik, M., & Mral, B. (eds) (2013). Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Zielonka, J. (ed.) (2015). Media and politics in new democracies: Europe in a comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.