Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi

Nurcan ALKIŞ, (Başkent Üniversitesi)
Duygu FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY (Atatürk Üniversitesi)
Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
6 2
Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 571 - 589 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.17556/erziefd.440974 İndeks Tarihi: 04-02-2020

Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi

Öz:
Eğitim faaliyetlerinin mobil cihazlar ve uygulamalar ile desteklenmeye başlanması ile mobilöğrenme (m-öğrenme) kavramı ortaya çıkmış ve eğitim bağlamında yeni bir araştırma alanıolarak yerini almıştır. m-Öğrenmenin avantajlarından faydalanabilmek için, bu öğrenmeyönteminin son kullanıcılar tarafından benimsenmesi ve kabulü önemlidir. Literatürde,kullanıcıların m-öğrenme kabulünü etkileyen faktörleri inceleyen birçok çalışma mevcuttur. Buçalışma, m-öğrenme kabulünü etkileyen faktörleri belirleyebilmek için literatürdeki m-öğrenmekabulü çalışmalarının sistematik bir şekilde incelenmesini amaçlamıştır. Ayrıca bu çalışmanın birdiğer amacı m-öğrenme kabulünü tahmin etmek için kullanılan teorilerin belirlenmesidir.Literatürdeki çalışmalara ulaşmak için sistematik inceleme prosedürü tasarlanmış veuygulanmıştır. Sistematik inceleme prosedürü ile elde edinilen 51 çalışma, örneklem grupları,çalışmaların dayandığı teoriler ve m-öğrenmenin kabulünü etkileyen faktörler ve aralarındakiilişkiler kapsamında incelenmiştir. Yürütülen çalışmalarda toplam 106 faktör belirlenmiş ve bufaktörler m-öğrenmenin kabulü ve benimsenmesi bağlamında 12 boyut altında gruplandırılmıştır.Ayrıca bu faktörler arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiş ve toplam 222 anlamlı ilişki bulunmuştur. Builişkilerden, Algılanan Fayda-Davranışsal Niyet, Algılanan Kullanım Kolaylığı-Algılanan Fayda veAlgılanan Kullanım Kolaylığı-Davranışsal Niyet ilişkilerinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı sonuçveren ve en çok araştırılan ilk üç ilişki olduğu gözlenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Mobile Learning Acceptance: A Systematic Literature Review

Öz:
As mobile devices and applications started to support educational activities, mobile learning (m- learning) has emerged and become a new research field in education domain. Adoption and acceptance of m-learning by the end users are important in terms of exploiting its several advantages. There are many studies focusing on the factors affecting acceptance of m-learning in the literature. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the m-learning acceptance studies in the literature to identify the factors that affect acceptance of m-learning. This study also aims to identify the effective theories in predicting acceptance of m-learning. A systematic review procedure was designed and executed to identify and review the relevant studies. 51 studies obtained with the systematic review procedure were investigated in terms of their sample groups, theoretical background, the factors affecting m-learning acceptance and the relations between these factors. In total, 106 different factors were identified within the context of conducted researches and which were grouped under 12 dimension of m-learning acceptance and adoption. Also the relations between these factors were reviewed and total 222 validated relations were identified. The relations between perceived usefulness and behavioral intention, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and behavioral intention has the most statistically sound results and they are the three most studied ones among these relations.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS quarterly, 665-694.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  • Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education. 125, 389-412
  • Alrasheedi, M., & Capretz, L. F. (2015). Determination of critical success factors affecting mobile learning: a meta-analysis approach. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 41-51.
  • Arpaci, I. (2016). Understanding and predicting students' intention to use mobile cloud storage services. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 150-157.
  • Bakhsh, M., Mahmood, A., & Sangi, N. A. (2017). Examination of factors influencing students and faculty behavior towards m-learning acceptance: An empirical study. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(3), 166-188.
  • Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of systems and software, 80(4), 571-583.
  • Briz-Ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., & García -Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Learning with mobile technologies–Students’ behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 612-620.
  • Chaka, J. G., & Govender, I. (2017). Students' perceptions and readiness towards mobile learning in colleges of education: a Nigerian perspective. South African Journal of Education, 37(1), 1-12.
  • Chen, J., Park, Y., & Putzer, G. J. (2010). An examination of the components that increase acceptance of smartphones among healthcare professionals. Electronic journal of health informatics, 5(2), 16.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
  • Fishbein, M. (1979). A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications.
  • Han, S., Mustonen, P., Seppanen, M., & Kallio, M. (2006). Physicians' acceptance of mobile communication technology: an exploratory study. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 4(2), 210-230.
  • Hardless, C., Lundin, J., & Nuldén, U. (2001). Mobile competence development for nomads. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2001. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on.
  • Hashim, K. F., Tan, F. B., & Rashid, A. (2015). Adult learners' intention to adopt mobile learning: A motivational perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 381-390.
  • Hsia, J.-W. (2016). The effects of locus of control on university students’ mobile learning adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(1), 1-17.
  • Hung, J.-L., & Zhang, K. (2012). Examining mobile learning trends 2003–2008: A categorical meta-trend analysis using text mining techniques. Journal of Computing in Higher education, 24(1), 1-17.
  • Joo, Y. J., Kim, N., & Kim, N. H. (2016). Factors predicting online university students’ use of a mobile learning management system (m-LMS). Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 611-630.
  • Joo, Y. J., Lee, H. W., & Ham, Y. (2014). Integrating user interface and personal innovativeness into the TAM for mobile learning in Cyber University. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 143-158.
  • Jung, H.-J. (2015). Fostering an English Teaching Environment: Factors Influencing English as a Foreign Language Teachers' Adoption of Mobile Learning. Informatics in Education, 14(2), 219.
  • Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3‐learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175-185.
  • Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26.
  • Lee, Y.-K., Park, J.-H., Chung, N., & Blakeney, A. (2012). A unified perspective on the factors influencing usage intention toward mobile financial services. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1590-1599.
  • Liaw, S.-S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H.-M. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54(2), 446-454.
  • Mac Callum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2013). The influence of students' ICT skills and their adoption of mobile learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3).
  • Mohammadi, H. (2015). Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in Iran. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 191-207.
  • Navarro, C. X., Molina, A. I., & Redondo, M. A. (2016). Factors influencing students' acceptance in m-learning: A literature review and proposal of a taxonomy. Paper presented at the Computers in Education (SIIE), 2016 International Symposium on.
  • Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017a). Mobile-Based Assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83-95.
  • Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017b). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56-73.
  • Roschelle, J. (2003). Keynote paper: Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of computer assisted learning, 19(3), 260-272.
  • Sarrab, M., Al-Shih, H., & Rehman, O. M. H. (2013). Exploring major challenges and benefits of m-learning adoption. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 3(4), 826.
  • Shroff, R. H., & Keyes, C. J. (2017). A proposed framework to understand the intrinsic motivation factors on university students’ behavioral intention to use a mobile application for learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 143-168.
  • Tan, G. W.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Sim, J.-J., & Phusavat, K. (2012). Determinants of mobile learning adoption: An empirical analysis. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(3), 82-91.
  • Vate-U-Lan, P. (2008). Mobile learning: Major challenges for engineering education. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008. FIE 2008. 38th Annual.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
  • Wang, T.-S. (2013). Design and assessment of joyful mobile navigation systems based on TAM and integrating learning models applied on ecological teaching activity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(2), 201-212.
  • Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British journal of educational technology, 40(1), 92-118.
  • Wu, L., Li, J.-Y., & Fu, C.-Y. (2011). The adoption of mobile healthcare by hospital's professionals: An integrative perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(3), 587-596.
  • Yeap, J. A., Ramayah, T., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2016). Factors propelling the adoption of m-learning among students in higher education. Electronic Markets, 26(4), 323-338.
APA Alkış N, FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY D (2018). Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi. , 571 - 589. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
Chicago Alkış Nurcan,FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY Duygu Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi. (2018): 571 - 589. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
MLA Alkış Nurcan,FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY Duygu Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi. , 2018, ss.571 - 589. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
AMA Alkış N,FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY D Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi. . 2018; 571 - 589. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
Vancouver Alkış N,FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY D Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi. . 2018; 571 - 589. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
IEEE Alkış N,FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY D "Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi." , ss.571 - 589, 2018. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
ISNAD Alkış, Nurcan - FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY, Duygu. "Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi". (2018), 571-589. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.440974
APA Alkış N, FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY D (2018). Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 571 - 589. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
Chicago Alkış Nurcan,FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY Duygu Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 20, no.2 (2018): 571 - 589. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
MLA Alkış Nurcan,FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY Duygu Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.20, no.2, 2018, ss.571 - 589. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
AMA Alkış N,FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY D Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; 20(2): 571 - 589. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
Vancouver Alkış N,FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY D Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018; 20(2): 571 - 589. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
IEEE Alkış N,FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY D "Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi." Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, ss.571 - 589, 2018. 10.17556/erziefd.440974
ISNAD Alkış, Nurcan - FINDIK COŞKUNÇAY, Duygu. "Mobil Öğrenmenin Kabulü: Sistematik Literatür İncelemesi". Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 20/2 (2018), 571-589. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.440974
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 10:5

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları