Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 254 - 263 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.30897/ijegeo.641434 İndeks Tarihi: 18-05-2020

Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning

Öz:
World Economy has been globalizing faster than ever as a result of the technological evolution. Increase of global trade brings theneed of higher transportation capacity as bigger ships and port facilities. Port construction and expansion investments can be said tobe supply to meet demand. Maritime safety is one of the factors affecting the zoning plan approval process in the port constructionand extension investments. These factors mostly caused by the ship maneuver. One of the most widely used models is theEnvironmental Stress (ES) Model in risk assessment of navigation and ship manoeuvre.ES Model measures the risk occurring around the ship during the berthing / unberthing manoeuvres performed in the simulationenvironment with the ports and ships that are modeled similar to the port project. But, it is not certain which parameter of the portproject will be revised such as ship tonnage and length of the ship, port form and size etc. The main benefit of this study is takingprecaution with measuring risk by specifying the risk factors and their weights using both ES Model and fuzzy logic method. Thus,the development plan and project evaluation process, which is under the duty and responsibility of the Turkish Ministry of Transport,will be carried out in terms of safety with the method proposed in this study. Another important contribution of this study is itsoriginality in terms of clarification of raw outputs of ES model reports by using fuzzy logic method in scientific literature.So, the revised port project will be realized by providing maritime safety. While port projects are approved by the Ministry ofTransport within the scope of the legislation that determines the port planning process in question, the evaluation of ModelingReports with fuzzy logic method will contribute to both fast and safe project design process.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Biyoloji Arkeoloji Su Kaynakları Jeokimya ve Jeofizik Çevre Bilimleri Ekoloji Jeoloji Meteoroloji ve Atmosferik Bilimler Biyoloji Çeşitliliğinin Korunması Oşinografi
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aydın, D., Solmaz, DS. (2019). Modelling of the Oil Spill in M/V LADY TUNA Accident and the Evaluation of the Response Operation in Simulated Condition with PISCES II, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), Vol. 6(2), 213-224.
  • Başbuğ, A. (1994). “Fuzzy Technology”, Byte, February, 147-152.
  • Fışkın, R., Nas, S. (2013). A Content Analysis of the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation from 2007 to 2012.Trans. Nav. Journal, 7(1), 145-149.
  • Ford, D. Sterman, J. D. (1998). Expert knowledge elicitation to improve mental and formal models. System Dynamics Review, 14(4), 309-340
  • Friis-Hansen, P. (2008) Basic Modelling Principles For Prediction of Collision and Grounding Frequencies Working Document
  • Gucma, L., Pietrzykowski, Z. (2006). Ship Manoeuvring in Restricted Areas: An Attempt to Quantify Dangerous Situations Using a Probabilistic-Fuzzy Method. Journal of Navigation, 59(2), 251-262.
  • Hsu, H. M. Chen, T. C. (1994). Aggregation of fuzzy opinion under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79(3), 279, 285
  • Hu, S., Fang, Q., Xia, H., Xi, Y. (2007). Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 92. 369-377. Yücel & Yurören / IJEGEO (6)3: 254-263 (2019)
  • Inoue, K., Masuda, K., Sera, W. (1998). Guidelines to Assess the Safety of Marine Traffic-I : Evaluation of Shiphandling Difficulty based on the Environmental Stress Model. The Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation. 98. 225-234. 10.9749/jin.98.225.
  • Kim, KI., Jeong JS., Park GK. (2012). A Study on the Quantitative Risk Assessment of Mokpo Entrance Waterway by IWRAP, Proceedings of 2012 KOSOMES Spring Conference, pp. 253-256.
  • Korta, JP., Lee, MP., Einsberg, N., Dewispelare, A. (1996). Branch technical position on the use of expert elicitation in the high-level radioactive waste program. 1st Ed. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission.
  • Mersin, K., Bayırhan, İ., Gazioğlu, C. (2019). Review of CO2 Emission and Reducing Methods in Maritime Transportation, Thermal Sci. 1-8.
  • Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (2011), Notification Regarding Planning and Implementation Process in Coastal Structures and Facilities, Ankara, Turkey
  • Ministry of Transport (2005), Transportation Master Plan Strategy Project, Ankara, Turkey
  • Ministry of Transport (2010), Coastal Structures Master Plan, Ankara, Turkey
  • Nas, S. (2006). Gemi operasyonlarının yönetiminde kaptanın bireysel karar verme süreci analizi ve bütünleşik bir model uygulaması (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
  • Nas, S. (2015). The definitions of safety and security, Journal of ETA Maritime Science, Vol. 3(2), 53-54.
  • Nas, S., Altuğ Ş. K., Yılmazel M. (2006). A Study on the Enhancement of Safety Culture in Harbour Pilotage and Towage Organizations. 18. Congress of the International Maritime Pilots Association (IMPA) 20th-24th November 2006. Havana, Cuba.
  • Park, Y.S., Jae-Yong, J., Inoue K. (2002). A Study on Assessment of Vessel Traffic Safety Management by Marine Traffic Flow Simulation. Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation. 11.
  • Şenol Y.E.(2014), Fault Tree Analysis of Chemical Cargo Contamination By Fuzzy Approach (MSc thesis), Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Sii, H., Wang, J., Ruxton, T. (2001). A Fuzzy-Logic- Based Approach to Subjective Safety Modelling for Maritime Products. Safety and Reliability, 21(2), pp.65-78.
  • Son, N.S., Kim, S.Y., Gong, I.Y. (2009). Study on the Estimation of Collision Risk of Ship in Ship Handling Simulator using Fuzzy Algorithm and Environmental Stress Model. Journal of Korean navigation and port research.
  • Terzi, H., Gazioğlu, C. (2014). Finding Solutions before Accidents Happen, XVIII. IALA AISM 2014.
  • Terzi, H., Gazioğlu, C. (2014). Pozitif Emniyet Kültürü Temel Öğelerini Esas Alan Kazasay Olayları (Near Miss) Raporlama Sistemi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 23-58.
  • Terzi, H., Gazioğlu, C. (2016). New Era In Maritime Safety: Safety Culture, 13th International IALA VTS Symposium, International framework for VTS and national regulatory provisions.
  • URL 1 (2019). Formal Safety Assessment. http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/SafetyTopic s/Pages/FormalSafetyAssessment.aspx (Acces. Oct. 2019).
  • URL 2 (2019). Ports and Waterways Safety Assessment. https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=pawsaMai n (Acces. Oct. 2019).
  • URL 3 (2019). Ports and Waterways Safety Assessment (PAWSA) https://www.dco.uscg.mil/PAWSA/ (Acces. Oct. 2019)
  • Wang, J.(2001).Current status of future aspects of formal safety assessment of ships. Safety Science, 38, 19–30.
  • Wang, Z., Zoghi, M., Hutter, F., Matheson, D., N. de Freitas. (2013) Bayesian Optimization in a Billion Dimensions via Random Embeddings. ArXiv e-prints, January
  • Yüce H., Gazioğlu C. (2006). "Maritime Security Challenges Ahead in the Black Sea", Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, Vol.12 (3): 233-250.
  • Yurtören C., Duru O., Satir T. (2008). The Environmental Effects of Projected Container Terminal to the Safely Manoeuvring International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation Vol. 2 No. 1
  • Zadeh, LA. (1965) “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, 338–353,
  • Zhao, R. Govind, R. (1991). Defuzzification of fuzzy intervals. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 43(1), 45-55.
APA YÜCEL M, YURTÖREN C (2019). Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning. , 254 - 263. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
Chicago YÜCEL Mehmet Ersin,YURTÖREN Cemil Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning. (2019): 254 - 263. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
MLA YÜCEL Mehmet Ersin,YURTÖREN Cemil Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning. , 2019, ss.254 - 263. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
AMA YÜCEL M,YURTÖREN C Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning. . 2019; 254 - 263. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
Vancouver YÜCEL M,YURTÖREN C Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning. . 2019; 254 - 263. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
IEEE YÜCEL M,YURTÖREN C "Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning." , ss.254 - 263, 2019. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
ISNAD YÜCEL, Mehmet Ersin - YURTÖREN, Cemil. "Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning". (2019), 254-263. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.641434
APA YÜCEL M, YURTÖREN C (2019). Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 6(3), 254 - 263. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
Chicago YÜCEL Mehmet Ersin,YURTÖREN Cemil Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 6, no.3 (2019): 254 - 263. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
MLA YÜCEL Mehmet Ersin,YURTÖREN Cemil Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, vol.6, no.3, 2019, ss.254 - 263. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
AMA YÜCEL M,YURTÖREN C Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics. 2019; 6(3): 254 - 263. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
Vancouver YÜCEL M,YURTÖREN C Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics. 2019; 6(3): 254 - 263. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
IEEE YÜCEL M,YURTÖREN C "Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning." International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 6, ss.254 - 263, 2019. 10.30897/ijegeo.641434
ISNAD YÜCEL, Mehmet Ersin - YURTÖREN, Cemil. "Determination of Risk Factors Caused by Ships in Port Planning". International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 6/3 (2019), 254-263. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.641434