Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 156 - 165 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/nci.2018.01069 İndeks Tarihi: 21-05-2020

Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients

Öz:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk impairment scale (TIS), used in theevaluation of somatic, motor, and coordination disturbances in stroke patients, and provide a culturally adapted version foruse in the Turkish population.METHODS: A total of 80 patients who were either hospitalized at our facility and rehabilitated for stroke or admitted at ouroutpatient clinics were included in this study. Reliability was evaluated by the internal consistency (Cronbach α) and testreproducibility [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICCC)] methods, and validity was evaluated by the correlation betweensubgroups and the total scores of the TIS and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Brunnstrom phases, Barthel index (BI), Rivermeadmobility index (RMI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores.RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63.00±12.1 years. Out of a total of 80 subjects, 34 were female and 46 weremale. The reliability of the scale was evaluated by the internal consistency, inter- and intra-observer reliability, and test reproducibility. The findings showed that the Turkish form of the scale was reliable at a good level. The test values were as follows;Cronbach α: >0.70, ICCC: 0.969–1, subgroups and total score comparison: 0. The correlation between TIS and BBS wasconsiderably high in the validity analysis (p<0.001). Further, significant associations among the BI, RMI, KF-36, Brunnstrom,and TIS scores were found (p<0.001), which indicate the structural validity of this scale.CONCLUSION: TIS is a scale used in measuring the motor derangement that develops after a stroke. It has sufficient reliability, internal consistency, and validity for use in clinical practice and stroke investigations. Our study has shown that TISused for the evaluation of body balance is valid and reliable for the Turkish population.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Genel ve Dahili Tıp
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Hewer RL. Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983;64:24–8.
  • 2. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke 1990;21:78–81. [CrossRef ]
  • 3. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Van de Winckel A, De Weerdt W. Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2007;21:387–94. [CrossRef ]
  • 4. Verheyden G, Willems AM, Ooms L, Nieuwboer A. Validity of the trunk impairment scale as a measure of trunk performance in people with Parkinson’s disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1304–8.
  • 5. Verheyden G, Nuyens G, Nieuwboer A, Van Asch P, Ketelaer P, De Weerdt W. Reliability and validity of trunk assessment for people with multiple sclerosis. Phys Ther 2006;86:66–76. [CrossRef ]
  • 6. Pham HP, Eidem A, Hansen G, Nyquist A, Vik T, Sæther R. Validity and Responsiveness of the Trunk Impairment Scale and Trunk ControlMeasurement Scale in Young Individuals with Cerebral Palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2016;36:440–52. [CrossRef ]
  • 7. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98. [CrossRef ]
  • 8. Güngen C, Ertan T, Eker E, Yaşar R, Engin F. Standardize Mini Mental Test’in Türk Toplumunda Hafif Demans Tanısında Geçerlik ve Güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Derg 2002;13:273–81.
  • 9. Küçükdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Tennant A, Süldür N, Sonel B, Arasil T. Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitationin Turkey. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000;32:87–92.
  • 10. Ware JE. SF-36 Health Survey Update. In: Maruish ME, editor. The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment. 3rd ed. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2004. p. 693– 718.
  • 11. Demirsoy C. The MOS-SF 36 health survey: A validation studt with a Turkish sample. [Master Thesis]. İstanbul: Boğaziçi University; 1999.
  • 12. Ohene-Frempong K, Weiner SJ, Sleeper LA, Miller ST, Embury S, Moohr JW, et al. Cerebrovascular accidents in sickle cell disease: rates and risk factors. Blood 1998;91:288–94.
  • 13. Wade DT. Personal physical disability. In: Wade DT, editör. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford University Pres; 1992. p. 71–82.
  • 14. Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991;13:50–4. [CrossRef ]
  • 15. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health 1992;83 Suppl 2:S7–11.
  • 16. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995;27:27–36.
  • 17. Şahin F, Büyükavcı R, Sağ S, Doğu B, Kuran B. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Berg Balance Scale in Patients With Stroke. Turk Phys Med and Rehab 2013;59:170–5.
  • 18. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3186–91. [CrossRef ]
  • 19. Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol 1995;24:61–3. [CrossRef ]
  • 20. Petersen MA, Groenvold M, Bjorner JB, Aaronson N, Conroy T, Cull A, et al; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group. Use of differential item functioning analysis to assess the equivalence of translations of a questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2003;12:373–85. [CrossRef ]
  • 21. Küçükdeveci AA. Osteoartritte işlevsel değerlendirme ölçütleri. Turk J Geriatrics 2011;14:37–44. 22. Aboderin I, Venables G. Stroke management in Europe. Pan European Consensus Meeting on StrokeManagement. J Intern Med 1996;240:173–80. [CrossRef ]
  • 23. Bohannon RW. Lateral trunk flexion strength: impairment, measurement reliability and implications following unilateral brain lesion. Int J Rehabil Res 1992;15:249–51. [CrossRef ]
  • 24. Brinkman J, Kuypers HG. Splitbrain monkeys: cerebral control of ipsilateral and contralateral arm, hand, and finger movements. Science 1972;176:536–9. [CrossRef ]
  • 25. Taoka M, Toda T, Iwamura Y. Representation of the midline trunk, bilateral arms, and shoulders in the monkey postcentral somatosensory cortex. Exp Brain Res 1998;123:315–22. [CrossRef ]
  • 26. Côté R, Hachinski VC, Shurvell BL, Norris JW, Wolfson C. The Canadian Neurological Scale: a preliminary study in acute stroke. Stroke 1986;17:731–7. [CrossRef ]
  • 27. Kottke FJ. Neurophysiologic therapy for stroke. In: Licht S, editor. Stroke and Its Rehabilitation. Baltimore: Waverly Press; 1975 p. 256– 324.
  • 28. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Feys H, Thijs V, Vaes K, De Weerdt W. Discriminant ability of the Trunk Impairment Scale: A comparison between stroke patients and healthy individuals. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1023–8. [CrossRef ]
  • 29. Verheyden G, Vereeck L, Truijen S, Troch M, Lafosse C, Saeys W, et al. Additional exercises improve trunk performance after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:281–6. [CrossRef ]
  • 30. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, De Weerdt W. The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:326–34. [CrossRef ]
  • 31. Verheyden G, Hughes J, Jelsma J, Nieuwboer A, De Weerdt W. Assesing motor impairment of the trunk in patients with traumatic brain injury: reliability and validity of the trunk impairment scale. S Afr J Physiother 2006;62:23–8. [CrossRef ]
  • 32. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, Feys H, Schuback B, Baert I, et al. Trunk performance after stroke: an eye catching predictor of functional outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:694–8. [CrossRef ]
APA Sağ S, Büyükavcı R, SAHIN F, SAĞ M, DOĞU B, KURAN K (2019). Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. , 156 - 165. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
Chicago Sağ Sinem,Büyükavcı Raikan,SAHIN FÜSUN,SAĞ Mustafa Serdar,DOĞU BERİL,KURAN KADRİYE BANU Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. (2019): 156 - 165. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
MLA Sağ Sinem,Büyükavcı Raikan,SAHIN FÜSUN,SAĞ Mustafa Serdar,DOĞU BERİL,KURAN KADRİYE BANU Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. , 2019, ss.156 - 165. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
AMA Sağ S,Büyükavcı R,SAHIN F,SAĞ M,DOĞU B,KURAN K Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. . 2019; 156 - 165. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
Vancouver Sağ S,Büyükavcı R,SAHIN F,SAĞ M,DOĞU B,KURAN K Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. . 2019; 156 - 165. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
IEEE Sağ S,Büyükavcı R,SAHIN F,SAĞ M,DOĞU B,KURAN K "Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients." , ss.156 - 165, 2019. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
ISNAD Sağ, Sinem vd. "Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients". (2019), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2018.01069
APA Sağ S, Büyükavcı R, SAHIN F, SAĞ M, DOĞU B, KURAN K (2019). Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, 6(2), 156 - 165. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
Chicago Sağ Sinem,Büyükavcı Raikan,SAHIN FÜSUN,SAĞ Mustafa Serdar,DOĞU BERİL,KURAN KADRİYE BANU Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri 6, no.2 (2019): 156 - 165. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
MLA Sağ Sinem,Büyükavcı Raikan,SAHIN FÜSUN,SAĞ Mustafa Serdar,DOĞU BERİL,KURAN KADRİYE BANU Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, vol.6, no.2, 2019, ss.156 - 165. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
AMA Sağ S,Büyükavcı R,SAHIN F,SAĞ M,DOĞU B,KURAN K Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri. 2019; 6(2): 156 - 165. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
Vancouver Sağ S,Büyükavcı R,SAHIN F,SAĞ M,DOĞU B,KURAN K Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri. 2019; 6(2): 156 - 165. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
IEEE Sağ S,Büyükavcı R,SAHIN F,SAĞ M,DOĞU B,KURAN K "Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients." İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, 6, ss.156 - 165, 2019. 10.14744/nci.2018.01069
ISNAD Sağ, Sinem vd. "Assessing the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Trunk Impairment Scale in stroke patients". İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri 6/2 (2019), 156-165. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2018.01069