Objective: Dental ceramics have superior characteristics for fixed restorations.However, crack propagation and chipping are also common problems. Repair availability of arestoration would be advantagous for both clinician and patient.The aim of this study was tocompare different repair techniques and materials. Material and Methods: Fifty specimens werefabricated from feldspathic ceramic. The specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=10) for different repair techniques. For the direct repair, a repair set was used and composite resin was applied using a silicone matrix. For indirect repair, the composite resin and ceramic repaircomponents were prepared. All ceramic surfaces were etched with 40% phosphoric acid. For cementation of the repair ceramic and repair composite resin, a dual polymerized composite resinor a commercial cyanoacrylate (CA) was used. After cementation/CA application, all specimeswere thermocycled. The shear test was performed with 5-mm/min crosshead speed. The shearbond strength values were recorded in Newton and converted into megapascal (MPa). Data (MPa)were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test, and for the multiple comparisons, theDunn test was used with Benforrini corrections (α=.05). Results: The higher mean shear bondstrength values were observed with the direct composite resin repair technique (20.73MPa), composite resin applied with CA (14.77 MPa), and ceramic cemented with dual-polymerized composite resin (14.98 MPa), The lowest shear bond strength value was observed with theceramic-to-ceramic bonding with CA (8.59 MPa). Conclusion: Direct repair technique showedthe best shear bond strength values while other techniques can be used for interim solutions.