Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 229 - 232 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196 İndeks Tarihi: 02-05-2020

Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?

Öz:
Objective: To determine whether the type of informed consent (verbal or written and verbal) influenced the awareness of patients about the risks of lumbarpuncture (LP).Materials and Methods: An “informed consent form” was given to the patients in group 1 24 h before the procedure, and the patients were requested toread and sign the form. The informed consent form was given to patients in group 2, and then, a neurologist verbally explained the complications mentioned inthe form to the patients. After the procedure, patients in both groups were asked whether they were aware of the complications mentioned in the consent form.Results: We included 43 patients (group 1, n=23 and group 2, n=20) in the study; 14% (n=6) of the patients were university graduates, 18% (n=8) hadcompleted high-school education, and 67% (n=29) had completed primary education. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in termsof age, sex, and education level. The mean value of the number of complications that the patients were aware of was 1.17±1.02 and 7.35±1.26 in groups 1 and 2,respectively. We observed a significant difference in the number of complications that the patients were aware of between both groups (p<0.001).Conclusion: The responsibilities of physicians are not solely limited to giving the informed consent form to the patients before LP. Physicians should explainthe contents of the form verbally to the patients.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Nörolojik Bilimler

Tanısal ve Terapötik Lomber Ponksiyonda Bilgilendirilmiş Onam: Hastalar Risklerin Farkında mı?

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmada, bilgilendirilmiş onam tipinin (yazılı veya yazılı ve sözlü), hastaların lomber ponksiyon (LP) işleminin riskleri konusundaki farkındalığı üzerine olan etkilerini araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Grup 1’e işlemden 24 saat önce, “bilgilendirilmiş onam formu” verildi ve okuyup imzalamaları istendi. Grup 2’ye bilgilendirilmiş onam formu verildikten sonra, formda belirtilen komplikasyonlar bir nörolog tarafından sözlü olarak da ayrıca açıklandı. İşlem sonrası her iki gruba da onam formunda belirtilen komplikasyonlardan haberdar olup olmadıkları soruldu. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 43 hasta (grup 1, n=23 ve grup 2, n=20) dahil edildi; hastaların %14’ü (n=6) üniversite mezunu, %18’i (n=8) lise mezunu, %67’si (n=29) ilköğretim mezunu idi. Her iki grup arasında yaş, cinsiyet ve eğitim düzeyi açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Hastaların farkında olduğu komplikasyon sayısının ortalama değeri grup 1 ve 2’de sırasıyla 1,17±1,02 ve 7,35±1,26 idi. Her iki grupta da hastaların farkında oldukları komplikasyon sayısında anlamlı bir fark gözlendi (p<0,001). Sonuç: Hekimlerin sorumlulukları LP öncesi hastalara yalnızca bilgilendirilmiş onam formu vermekle sınırlı değildir. Doktorlar, formun içeriğini hastalara sözlü olarak da açıklamalıdır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Nörolojik Bilimler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Ormerod V. Improving patient safety of acute care lumbar punctures. BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2014;3:u203415.
  • 2. Bhattacharjee S, Kaur G. A study on the standard of documentation of lumbar puncture in neurology department of a major Irish Teaching Hospital in Ireland. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2013;16:627-630.
  • 3. Wang YF, Fuh JL, Lirng JF, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage and headache after lumbar puncture: a prospective non-invasive imaging study. Brain 2015;138:1492-1498.
  • 4. Pandian J, Sarada C, Radhakrishnan V, Kishore A. Iatrogenic meningitis after lumbar puncture-a preventable health hazard. J Hosp Infect 2004;56:119- 124.
  • 5. Duits FH, Martinez-Lage P, Paquet C, et al. Performance and complications of lumbar puncture in memory clinics: results of the multicenter lumbar puncture feasibility study. Alzheimers Dement 2016;12:154-163.
  • 6. Evans RW. Complications of lumbar puncture. Neurol Clin 1998;16:83-105.
  • 7. Patel PB, Anderson HE, Keenly LD, Vinson DR. Informed consent documentation for lumbar puncture in the emergency department. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15:318.
  • 8. Grady C. Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent. N Engl J Med 2015;372:855-862.
  • 9. Patel PB, Gilchrist A, Cronan KM, Selbst SM. Adequacy of informed consent for lumbar puncture in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2010;26:739-741.
  • 10. Stuart J. Consent for treatment and the withholding of consent. In: Showalter J, editor. The Law of Healthcare Administration. 4 ed. Chicago: Ill: Health Administration Press; 2004. p. 309-50.
  • 11. Choi YH. Informed Consent for Intravenous Contrast Administration in the Emergency Department: Understanding and satisfaction among patients using the video-assisted vs. traditional methods. SIGNA VITAE 2017;13:28- 31.
  • 12. Gocmen E. The Supreme Court ruled that coronary angiography informed consent was inadequate and that the physician was defective Turkey [cited 2015 15th December]. Available from: https://www.medikalakademi.com. tr/yargitay-koroner-anjiografi-onamini-yetersiz-buldu-ve-hekimi-kusurlusaydi/
APA ögün m, ÖNERLİ M, YILDIZ S (2019). Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?. , 229 - 232. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
Chicago ögün muhammed nur,ÖNERLİ Merve,YILDIZ SERPIL Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?. (2019): 229 - 232. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
MLA ögün muhammed nur,ÖNERLİ Merve,YILDIZ SERPIL Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?. , 2019, ss.229 - 232. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
AMA ögün m,ÖNERLİ M,YILDIZ S Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?. . 2019; 229 - 232. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
Vancouver ögün m,ÖNERLİ M,YILDIZ S Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?. . 2019; 229 - 232. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
IEEE ögün m,ÖNERLİ M,YILDIZ S "Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?." , ss.229 - 232, 2019. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
ISNAD ögün, muhammed nur vd. "Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?". (2019), 229-232. https://doi.org/10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
APA ögün m, ÖNERLİ M, YILDIZ S (2019). Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?. Türk Nöroloji Dergisi, 25(4), 229 - 232. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
Chicago ögün muhammed nur,ÖNERLİ Merve,YILDIZ SERPIL Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?. Türk Nöroloji Dergisi 25, no.4 (2019): 229 - 232. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
MLA ögün muhammed nur,ÖNERLİ Merve,YILDIZ SERPIL Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?. Türk Nöroloji Dergisi, vol.25, no.4, 2019, ss.229 - 232. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
AMA ögün m,ÖNERLİ M,YILDIZ S Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?. Türk Nöroloji Dergisi. 2019; 25(4): 229 - 232. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
Vancouver ögün m,ÖNERLİ M,YILDIZ S Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?. Türk Nöroloji Dergisi. 2019; 25(4): 229 - 232. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
IEEE ögün m,ÖNERLİ M,YILDIZ S "Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?." Türk Nöroloji Dergisi, 25, ss.229 - 232, 2019. 10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196
ISNAD ögün, muhammed nur vd. "Informed Consent in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture: Are Patients Aware of the Risks?". Türk Nöroloji Dergisi 25/4 (2019), 229-232. https://doi.org/10.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.41196