Meme Elastografisi

Emetullah CINDIL, (Gazi Üniversitesi)
Serap GÜLTEKİN (Gazi Üniversitesi)
Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri
3 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 50 - 62 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.5152/trs.2019.712 İndeks Tarihi: 03-05-2020

Meme Elastografisi

Öz:
-
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Radyoloji, Nükleer Tıp, Tıbbi Görüntüleme
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1]. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Ultrasound. 1st ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
  • [2]. Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM, Chikarmane S, Harston CW. Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 551-63. [CrossRef]
  • [3]. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239: 341-50. [CrossRef]
  • [4]. Cho N, Moon WK, Kim HY, Chang JM, Park SH, Lyou CY. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2010; 29: 1-7. [CrossRef]
  • [5]. Cho N, Jang M, Lyou CY, Park JS, Choi HY, Moon WK. Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: combined US elastography and color doppler US-influence on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 2012; 262: 80-90. [CrossRef]
  • [6]. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 1998; 20: 260-74. [CrossRef]
  • [7]. Ueno E, Umemoto T, Bando H, Tohno E, Waki K, Matsumura T. New Quantitative Method in Breast Elastography: Fat Lesion Ratio (FLR). Radiological Society of North America 2007 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL. 2007.
  • [8]. Barr RG, Nakashima K, Amy D, Cosgrove D, Farrokh A, Schafer F, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography, part 2: breast. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 1148-60. [CrossRef]
  • [9]. Zhi H, Xiao XY, Ou B, Zhong WJ, Zhao ZZ, Zhao XB, et al. Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (</=2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification? Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3216-21. [CrossRef]
  • [10]. Gong X, Xu Q, Xu Z, Xiong P, Yan W, Chen Y. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 130: 11-8. [CrossRef]
  • [11]. Barr RG, Silvestri AD, Scotti V, Manzoni F, Rebuffi C, Capittini C, et al. Diagnostic Performance and Accuracy of the 3 Interpreting Methods of Breast Strain Elastography A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 9999: 1-8. [CrossRef]
  • [12]. Ginat DT, Destounis SV, Barr RG, Castaneda B, Strang JG, Rubens DJ. US elastography of breast and prostate lesions. Radiographics 2009; 29: 200716. [CrossRef]
  • [13]. Insana MF, Pellot-Barakat C, Sridhar M, Lindfors KK. Viscoelastic imaging of breast tumor microenvironment with ultrasound. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2004; 9: 393-404. [CrossRef]
  • [14]. Barr RG. Real-time ultrasound elasticity of the breast: initial clinical results. Ultrasound Q 2010; 26: 61-6. [CrossRef]
  • [15]. Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey 2nd LB, Svensson WE, Balleyguier C, Smith C. Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 281-7. [CrossRef]
  • [16]. Barr RG. Shear wave imaging of the breast: still on the learning curve. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 347-50. [CrossRef]
  • [17]. Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R, Murphy P, Seifert P, Somerville P, et al. Clinical experience with elasticity imaging in a community-based breast center. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 297-302. [CrossRef]
  • [18]. Ricci P, Maggini E, Mancuso E, Lodise P, Cantisani V, Catalano C. Clinical application of breast elastography: State of the art. Eur J J Radiol 2014; 83: 42937. [CrossRef]
  • [19]. Thomas A, Degenhardt F, Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Slowinski T, Fischer T. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions:calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. Acad Radiol 2010; 17 558-63. [CrossRef]
  • [20]. Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, Wen YL, Ou B, Luo BM, et al. Semi-quantitating stiffness of breast solid lesions in ultrasonic elastography. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 1347-53. [CrossRef]
  • [21]. Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F. Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. Ultraschall Med 2011; 32: 400-5. [CrossRef]
  • [22]. Alhabshi SM, Rahmat K, Abdul Halim N, Aziz S, Radhika S, Gan GC, et al. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39: 568-78. [CrossRef]
  • [23]. Yerli H, Yilmaz T, Kaskatı T, Gulay H. Qualitative and semiquantitative evaluations of solid breast lesions by sonoelastography. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 179-86. [CrossRef]
  • [24]. Ikeda K, Ogawa Y, Takii M, Sugano K, Ikeya T, Tokunaga S, et al. A role for elastography in tjhe diagnosis of breast lesions by measuring the maximum fat lesion ratio (max-FLR) by tissue Doppler imaging. Breast Cancer 2012; 19: 71-6. [CrossRef]
  • [25]. Gong X, Wang Y, Xu P. Application of real-time ultrasound elastography for differential diagnosis of breast tumors. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32: 2171-6. [CrossRef]
  • [26]. Kumm TR, Szabunio MM. Elastography for the characterization of breast lesions: initial clinical experience. Cancer Control 2010; 17: 156-61. [CrossRef]
  • [27]. Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Dwamena BA. Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 134: 923-31. [CrossRef]
  • [28]. Yang WT, Parikh JR, Stavros AT, Otto P, Maislin G. Exploring the negative likelihood ratio and how it can be used to minimize false-positives in breast imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210: 301-6. [CrossRef]
  • [29]. Grajo JR, Barr RG. Strain elastography in the prediction of breast cancer tumor grade. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 129-34.[CrossRef]
  • [30]. Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ, Morton MJ, Nordland MR, Meixner DD, et al. Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology 2006; 238: 425-37. [CrossRef]
  • [31]. Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, Hesley GK, Sisney GA, Svensson WE, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 2007; 245: 401-10. [CrossRef]
  • [32]. Cho N, Moon WK, Chang JM, Kim SJ, Lyou CY, Choi HY. Aliasing artifact depicted on ultrasound (US)-elastography for breast cystic lesions mimicking solid masses. Acta Radiol 2011; 52: 3-7. [CrossRef]
  • [33]. Barr RG, Lackey AE. The utility of the"bull's-eye"artifacton breast elasticity imaging in reducing breast lesion biopsyrate. Ultrasound Q 2011; 27: 151-5. [CrossRef]
  • [34]. Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Han KH, Kim JA. Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 2695-704. [CrossRef]
  • [35]. Lee SH, Chang JM, Kim WH, Bae MS, Cho N, Yi A, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 1015-26. [CrossRef]
  • [36]. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, Bojunga J, Correas JM, Gilja OH, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 238-53. [CrossRef]
  • [37]. Chen L, He J, Liu G, Shao K, Zhou M, Li B, et al. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography for identification of malignant breast lesions: a metaanalysis. Jpn J Radiol 2014; 32: 592-9. [CrossRef]
  • [38]. Feldmann A, Langlois C, Dewailly M, Martinez EF, Boulanger L, Kerdraon O, et al. Shear Wave Elastography (SWE): An Analysis of Breast Lesion Characterization in 83 Breast Lesions. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 2594-604. [CrossRef]
  • [39]. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, McLean D, Brauer K, Purdie C, et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res 2010; 12: R104. [CrossRef]
  • [40]. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, Siqal-Zafrani B, Bercoff J, Deffieux T, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging-preliminary results. Radiology 2010; 256: 297303. [CrossRef]
  • [41]. Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ, Schafer FK, Svensson WE, Hooley RJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 2012; 262: 435-49. [CrossRef]
  • [42]. Yoon JH, Ko KH, Jung HK, Lee JT. Qualitative pattern classification of shear wave elastography for breast masses: how it correlates to quantitative measurements. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 2199-204. [CrossRef]
  • [43]. Kim H, Youk JH, Gweon HM, Kim JA, Son EJ. Diagnostic per-formance of qualitative shear-wave elastography according to different color map opacities for breast masses. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: e326-e31. [CrossRef]
  • [44]. Lee SH, Cho N, Chang JM, Koo HR, Kim JY, Kim WH, et al. Two-view versus single-view shear-wave elastography: comparison of observer performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. Radiology 2013 Oct 28:130561. [Epub ahead of print] [CrossRef]
  • [45]. Youk JH, Son EJ, Gweon HM, Kim H, Park YJ, Kim JA. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014; 40: 2336-44. [CrossRef]
  • [46]. Liu B, Zheng Y, Huang G, Lin M, Shan Q, Lu Y, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative diagnosis using ultrasound shear wave elastography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016; 42: 835-47. [CrossRef]
  • [47]. Tanter M, Bercoff J, Athanasiou A, Deffieux T, Gennisson JL, Montaldo G, et al. Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 1373-86. [CrossRef]
  • [48]. Cosgrove DO, Berg WA, Doré CJ, Skyba DM, Henry JP, Gay J, et al. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1023-32. [CrossRef]
  • [49]. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, McLean D, Brauer K, Purdie C, et al. Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology 2012; 263: 673-7. [CrossRef]
  • [50]. Youk JH, Gweon HM, Son EJ, Kim JA, Jeong J. Shear-wave elastography of invasive breast cancer: correlation between quantitative mean elasticity value and immunohistochemical profile. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 138: 119-26. [CrossRef]
  • [51]. Choi WJ, Kim HH, Cha JH, Shin HJ, Kim H, Chae EY, et al. Predicting prognostic factors of breast cancer using shear wave elastography. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014; 40: 269-74. [CrossRef]
  • [52]. Chang JM, Park IA, Lee SH, Kim WH, Bae MS, Koo HR, et al. Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 2450-8. [CrossRef]
  • [53]. Tourasse C, Denier JF, Awada A, Gratadour AC, Nessah-Bousquet K, Gay J. Elastography in the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes prior to dissection. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3154-9. [CrossRef]
  • [54]. Kilic F, Velidedeoglu M, Ozturk T, Kandemirli SG, Dikici AS, Er ME, et al. Ex vivo assessment of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer using shear wave elastography. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35: 271-7. [CrossRef]
  • [55]. Evans A, Armstrong S, Whelehan P, Thomson K, Rauchhaus P, Purdie C, et al. Can shear-wave elastography predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with invasive breast cancer? Br J Cancer 2013; 109: 2798-802. [CrossRef]
  • [56]. Ma Y, Zhang S, Li J, Li J, Kang Y, Ren W. Comparison of strain and shear-wave ultrasounic elastography in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 2282-91. [CrossRef]
  • [57]. Jing H, Cheng W, Li ZY, Ying L, Wang QC, Wu T, et al. Early evaluation of relative changes in tumor stiffness by shear wave elastography predicts the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35: 1619-27. [CrossRef]
  • [58]. Athanasiou A, Latorre-Ossa H, Criton A, Tardivon A, Gennisson JL, Tanter M. Feasibility of imaging and treatment monitoring of breast lesions with three-dimensional shear wave elastography. Ultraschall Med 2017; 38: 51-9. [CrossRef]
  • [59]. Lee SH, Moon WK, Cho N, Chang JM, Moon HG, Han W, et al. Shear-wave elastographic features of breast cancers: comparison with mechanical elasticity and histopathologic characteristics. Invest Radiol 2014; 49: 147-55. [CrossRef]
  • [60]. Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Cha JH, Jang M, Seong MH. Nonpalpable breast masses: evaluation by US elastography. Korean J Radiol 2008; 9: 111-8. [CrossRef]
  • [61]. Yi A, Cho N, Chang JM, Koo HR, La Yun B, Moon WK. Sonoelasto-graphy for 1,786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1033-40. [CrossRef]
  • [62]. Barr RG, Zhang Z, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Berg WA. Probably benign lesions at screening breast us in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial. Radiology 2013; 269: 701-12. [CrossRef]
  • [63]. Schafer FK, Hooley RJ, Ohlinger R, Hahne U, Madjar H, Svensson WE, et al. ShearWave™ Elastography BE1 multinational breast study: additional SWE™ features support potential to downgrade BI-RADS®-3 lesions. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 254-9. [CrossRef]
  • [64]. Lim J, Cho N, Yi A, Chang JM, Moon WK. Can US-elastography help reduce the number of short term follow-ups for BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected on supplemental screening breast US? In: Radiological Society of North America 98th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; 2012 Nov 25-30; Chicago, IL.
  • [65]. Lee SH, Chang JM, Cho N, Koo HR, Yi A, Kim SJ, et al. Practice guideline for the performance of breast ultrasound elastography. Ultrasonography 2014; 33: 3-10. [CrossRef]
  • [66]. Faruk T, Islam MK, Arefin S, Haq MZ. The Journey of Elastography: Background, Current Status, and Future Possibilities in Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Clin Breast Cancer 2015; 15: 313-24. [CrossRef]
APA CINDIL E, GÜLTEKİN S (2019). Meme Elastografisi. , 50 - 62. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
Chicago CINDIL Emetullah,GÜLTEKİN Serap Meme Elastografisi. (2019): 50 - 62. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
MLA CINDIL Emetullah,GÜLTEKİN Serap Meme Elastografisi. , 2019, ss.50 - 62. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
AMA CINDIL E,GÜLTEKİN S Meme Elastografisi. . 2019; 50 - 62. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
Vancouver CINDIL E,GÜLTEKİN S Meme Elastografisi. . 2019; 50 - 62. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
IEEE CINDIL E,GÜLTEKİN S "Meme Elastografisi." , ss.50 - 62, 2019. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
ISNAD CINDIL, Emetullah - GÜLTEKİN, Serap. "Meme Elastografisi". (2019), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.5152/trs.2019.712
APA CINDIL E, GÜLTEKİN S (2019). Meme Elastografisi. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, 7(1), 50 - 62. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
Chicago CINDIL Emetullah,GÜLTEKİN Serap Meme Elastografisi. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri 7, no.1 (2019): 50 - 62. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
MLA CINDIL Emetullah,GÜLTEKİN Serap Meme Elastografisi. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, vol.7, no.1, 2019, ss.50 - 62. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
AMA CINDIL E,GÜLTEKİN S Meme Elastografisi. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri. 2019; 7(1): 50 - 62. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
Vancouver CINDIL E,GÜLTEKİN S Meme Elastografisi. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri. 2019; 7(1): 50 - 62. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
IEEE CINDIL E,GÜLTEKİN S "Meme Elastografisi." Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, 7, ss.50 - 62, 2019. 10.5152/trs.2019.712
ISNAD CINDIL, Emetullah - GÜLTEKİN, Serap. "Meme Elastografisi". Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri 7/1 (2019), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.5152/trs.2019.712
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 14:11

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları